Mga Sanggunian sa Talmud para sa Deuteronomio 26:6: Jerusalem Talmud Nazir

HALAKHAH: “One is guilty for wine separately, for grapes separately,” etc. It is written¹¹⁰Num. 6:3.: “Also grapes, fresh or dried, he shall not eat.” One understands, since it said “grapes”, do we not know that they are fresh¹¹¹Since raisins are called צִמּוּקִים.? Why does the verse say, “grapes, fresh or dried”? To declare guilty for either one separately. This parallels what Ḥizqiah stated: Since at a place where He did not treat the waste of fruits like fruits¹¹²The biblical rules of ‘orlah, the prohibition of fruits for the first three years of a fruit tree, do not extend to branches, leaves, or flowers (Mishnah ‘Orlah 1:7)., He treated fresh and dried equally, here, where He treated the waste of fruits like fruits, would it not be logical that we treat fresh and dried equally? The verse said, “fresh or dried”, to declare guilty for either one separately. This parallels what Rebbi Hila said: “One may not impound the movable and the fixed part of a flour-mill.¹¹³Deut. 24:6. “One understands, since it said “the fixed part”, do we not know that the entire mill is understood? Why does the verse say, “the movable and the fixed part”? To declare guilty for either part separately¹¹⁴In Sifry Deut. 272, the conclusion arrived at here is taken as the obvious meaning of the verse..