Mga Sanggunian sa Talmud para sa Exodo 21:18: Jerusalem Talmud Pesachim, Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin, Jerusalem Talmud Shevuot & Jerusalem Talmud Nazir

וְכִֽי־יְרִיבֻ֣ן אֲנָשִׁ֔ים וְהִכָּה־אִישׁ֙ אֶת־רֵעֵ֔הוּ בְּאֶ֖בֶן א֣וֹ בְאֶגְרֹ֑ף וְלֹ֥א יָמ֖וּת וְנָפַ֥ל לְמִשְׁכָּֽב׃

At kapag nag-away ang mga lalaki, at sinaktan ng isa ang kanyang kapwa ng bato o ng kamao, at hindi ito namatay kundi naratay sa higaan,

Jerusalem Talmud Pesachim

Rebbi Jehudah came back and presented another argument: Leavened matter is forbidden as food and leftover68Sacrificial meat left over after the time allotted for its consumption, depending on the kind of sacrifice either day and night or two daytimes with the night in between. is forbidden as food. Since the latter is to be burned81Lev. 19:8., the former is to be burned. They told him, carcass meat disproves since it is forbidden as food and is not to be burned20Deut. 14:21.. He said to them, leavened matter is forbidden as food and for usufruct and leftover is forbidden as food and for usufruct; carcass meat does not disprove since it is not forbidden for usufruct. They told him, the stoned ox34The Babli 24b explains that one might use fat from the stoned ox to cover a wound.
The ox was stoned by order of the court because it killed humans (Ex. 21:28–29). Its meat is forbidden for usufruct as explained in the sequel. Cf. Mekhilta dR.Ismael Mišpaṭim10 (p. 282).
disproves which is forbidden as food and for usufruct82Since it says, its meat may not be eaten(Ex. 21:18) in the passive voice, according to everybody this implies prohibition of usufruct. and is not to be burned. He said to them, leavened matter is forbidden as food, and for usufruct, and makes liable for extirpation83Ex. 12:19., [and leftover is forbidden as food, and for usufruct, and makes liable for extirpation]84Lev. 19:8.; the stoned ox does not disprove since it does not make liable for extirpation. They told him, the fat85Lev. 7:25. of the stoned ox disproves which is forbidden as food, and for usufruct, and makes liable for extirpation, and is not to be burned. He said to them, leavened matter is forbidden as food, and for usufruct, and makes liable for extirpation, and is dependent on time, and leftover is forbidden as food, and for usufruct, and makes liable for extirpation, and is dependent on time; the fat of the stoned ox does not disprove since it does not depend on time. They told him, a suspended sacrifice86The sacrifice by a person who suspects that he inadvertently committed a deadly sin. He may not bring a purification sacrifice since that is possible only if there is proof of inadvertent sin; Lev. 5:17–19. following your opinion87In Mishnah Temurah 7:6 it is stated that Sages hold that the body of an animal dedicated as a hung sacrifice which was wrongly slaughtered has to be burned, but R. Jehudah requires that it be buried. does disprove since it is forbidden as food, and for usufruct, and makes liable for extirpation, and is dependent on time, [but is not to be burned]. Rebbi Jehudah remained silent88And practice does not follow him..
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin

MISHNAH: If somebody injures another person by a stone or with his fist28The language is from Ex. 21:18. and they expected him to die, but he got better and only afterwards deteriorated and died; he is [criminally] liable. Rebbi Neḥemiah declares him not liable since it is not unsubstantiated29For R. Nehemiah it is probable that the death was not caused by the injury; for the rabbis the opposite is true..
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Shevuot

MISHNAH: “I am putting an oath on you that you should come and testify for me that X owes me full damages or half damages75For damage caused by another’s animals to the claimant’s animals, Ex. 21:35–36., double restitution or quadruple and quintuple restitution76The punishment of the thief, Ex. 22:3; 21:37., that X raped or seduced my daughter70The biblical fines for seducing a virgin (Ex. 22:16) or raping her (Deut. 22:29)., or that my son hit me77If the son hit his parents without causing a wound, they can sue him for damages; it is a monetary claim. But if he injured them it is a capital crime (Ex. 21:15)., or that my neighbor injured me78He has to pay, Ex. 21:18; Mishnah Bava qamma 8:1., or that he set fire to my grain stack on the Day of Atonement79Even though it is a deadly sin punishable by extirpation, the desecration is not a case for the earthly court and has no influence on a possible damage suit. Cf. Giṭtin 5:4 Notes 138–139.;” these are liable.
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Nazir

Para lamang sa mga Premium member

Jerusalem Talmud Bava Kamma

Para lamang sa mga Premium member

Jerusalem Talmud Nazir

Para lamang sa mga Premium member

Jerusalem Talmud Avodah Zarah

Para lamang sa mga Premium member