Mga Sanggunian sa Talmud para sa Levitico 24:5: Jerusalem Talmud Shekalim, Jerusalem Talmud Shabbat, Jerusalem Talmud Yoma & Pesachim

MISHNAH: For what was the disbursement used? One buys from it daily and musaf sacrifices and their libations, the `omer<sup>1</sup>The offering of barley grain on the 16th of Nisan to permit consumption of grain from the new harvest; Lev. 23:9–14., and the Two Breads<sup>2</sup>The two leavened breads on Pentecost, Lev. 23:17., and the shew-bread<sup>3</sup>Seven breads every week, Lev. 24:5–9., and all public offerings<sup>4</sup>Including incense and public reparation offerings (Lev. 4:13–21.). The watchmen for aftergrowth in the sabbatical year<sup>5</sup>Since the `omer and the Two Breads have to be produce of the Land, and no sowing is permitted in a Sabbatical, the grains have to be harvested from spontaneous aftergrowth. Fields from which such a yield is expected have to be watched lest the plants be eaten by animals or the grains be taken by humans. In this case the watch is an essential precondition for the possibility of the offering and therefore the expenses have to be borne by the Temple. take their wages from the disbursement from the lodge. Rebbi Yose says, he also may volunteer as unpaid trustee⁶Even though the unpaid trustee acquires rights to what he is watching, R. Yose holds that private property may be donated to the Temple as public offering.. They told him, would you not also say that they only come from the public⁷The Sages deny that private property may be donated to the Temple as public offering. “They” are public offerings. Therefore the argument cannot be intended to convince R. Yose; rather it is a statement clarifying that they insist that only fully paid watchmen are acceptable.?

This implies that one item which was mentioned separately by necessity does not divide¹³⁶Since we found a reason why the item was mentioned one cannot infer that it is established as a separate rule.. If it was mentioned not by necessity it divides¹³⁷It is a general hermeneutical rule (No. 4) that two parallel items are just that, two separate items, and no additional inferences or comparisons are possible. If both are prohibitions, infractions generate separate liabilities.. If two items were mentioned separately, do they divide? Let us hear from the following: From where that he transgresses a prohibition whoever brings to the altar meat of a purification offering¹³⁸For purification and reparation offerings, blood is sprinkled on the altar and fat is burned. The meat must be eaten by the priests; it cannot be sacrificed., or meat of a reparation offering, or meat of most holy offerings¹³⁹Most holy offerings are elevation offerings which are completely burned, purification and reparation offerings already mentioned, and the public well-being offering accompanying the Two Leavened Breads on Pentecost which introduce the season of the wheat harvest. Only the last item can be meant here, where the meat also must be eaten by the priests., or meat from simply holy offerings¹⁴⁰The family sacrifices, of which only blood and fat are given to the altar, Lev. Chapter 3., or the remainder of the ˋOmer¹⁴¹The barley offering on the Festival of Unleavened Bread, of which a handful is burnt on the altar and the remainder must be eaten by the priests. Lev. 23:10. or the Two Breads¹⁴²The Two Breads to be brought on Pentecost, to be eaten by the priests with the meat of the public well-being offering (Note 139). Lev. 23:17., or the Shew Bread¹⁴³Of which the incense is burned on the altar; the bread itself has to be eaten by the priests, Lev. 24:5–9., or remainders of cereal offerings¹⁴⁴To be eaten by the priests after a handful was burned on the altar, Lev. Chapter 2., or leaven¹⁴⁵This again refers to the Two Breads, the only leavened offering., or date honey¹⁴⁶Which as an offering of first fruits is consumed by the priest after being presented to the altar but not brought onto the altar. Deut. 26:2.? The verse says¹⁴⁷Lev. 2:12., for any leaven or any date honey you may not turn into smoke as a fire gift to the Eternal. Therefore anything that had been given to the fire is under “do not turn into smoke”¹⁴⁸If any part or appendix had to be given to the fire on the altar, there is a prohibition to put any of the remainder on the altar..

HALAKHAH: ¹²²This paragraph should belong to the next Halakhah, discussion of Mishnah 5. From where that one may feed him fig cake and raisins of heave? From this: They gave him a slice of fig cake and two raisins¹²³1Sam. 30:12. Since the verse reports that the Egyptian recovered from having been without food for 72 hours, this sugary food is proven antidote to boulimy and may be given even from prohibited food.. Rebbi Ḥuna said, the twenty-four esronot which David ate, he ate in hunger¹²⁴He implies that Ahimelekh gave to David all shew breads of the Tabernacle (1Sam. 21:7) and he ate all of them. There are 12 breads, each of them 2 esronot(Lev.24:5). 24 esronot are 2.4 epha, or 7.2 seah, a volume of about 92 liter of flour. (Cf. S. Abramson, Sinai 63(1968), pp. 193–197.). This happened to Rebbi Joḥanan¹²⁵An attack of boulimy. and he ate everything which happened to be before him. They quoted about him, wisdom revives its possessor¹²⁶Eccl. 7:12.. It was stated: “One feeds him the least forbidden¹²⁷If no kosher food is available at the moment. Babli 83a, Tosephta 4:4.. Carcass meat or heave, one feeds him heave. Ṭevel and sabbatical produce¹²⁸While illegitimate use of heave oil for anointing is prohibited, it is mentioned in the framework of the farmer’s declaration in the Temple, which is a positive commandment. Overstepping the prohibition of anointing when it is forbidden legally is overstepping a positive commandment not under the scope of biblical penal law., one feeds him Šabbatical produce.” Ḥallah and ˋorlah is problematic¹²⁹Ḥallah as heave is a sanctum, forbidden to non-Cohanim. Its improper ingestion is a deadly sin. Usufruct of ˋorlah is forbidden to everybody as a simple prohibition.. Rebbi Yose said, I questioned before Rebbi Ba: Heave is a deadly sin, carcass meat a prohibition¹³⁰Eating non-kosher meat is a simple prohibition punishable by 39 lashes., and you are saying so? Following him who said, they accepted the tithes voluntarily¹³¹In this opinion, tithes, heave, and Sabbatical produce are biblical obligations only if all 12 tribes are on their ancestral lands; today all these obligations were voluntarily accepted by the returnees from Babylon and have only rabbinic status.; Ševiˋit 6:1, Notes 11–13. But non-kosher food is biblically forbidden...