Mga Sanggunian sa Talmud para sa Levitico 4:15: Jerusalem Talmud Sotah, Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin & Sanhedrin

וְ֠סָמְכוּ זִקְנֵ֨י הָעֵדָ֧ה אֶת־יְדֵיהֶ֛ם עַל־רֹ֥אשׁ הַפָּ֖ר לִפְנֵ֣י יְהוָ֑ה וְשָׁחַ֥ט אֶת־הַפָּ֖ר לִפְנֵ֥י יְהוָֽה׃

At ipapatong ng matatanda ng kapisanan ang kanilang mga kamay sa ulo ng toro sa harap ng Walang-Hanggan, at kakatayin ang toro sa harap ng Walang-Hanggan.

Jerusalem Talmud Sotah

34The parallel text is in Sanhedrin1:3. There35Mishnah Sanhedrin 1:3., we have stated: The leaning of the hands of the Elders36Lev. 4:15. If the entire community (or their representative, the High Court) have erred, the purification offering requires that the Elders shall lean their hands on the head of the bull. and the breaking of the neck of the calf is done by three [judges]; Rebbi Jehudah says, by five. What is the reason of Rebbi Simeon? “The Elders shall lean37Lev. 4:15; Babli 44b. The quote of the verb is unnecessary. The plural “Elders” means “at least two Elders,”, cf. Note 5.,” two. No court has an even number of members; one adds another one, that makes three. What is the reason of Rebbi Jehudah? “They shall lean,” two; “the Elders,” two. No court has an even number of members; one adds another one, that makes five. And for the calf whose neck is broken, what is the reason of Rebbi Simeon? “Your Elders, your judges,38Deut. 21:2; Sifry Deut. 205.” two. No court has an even number of members; one adds another one, that makes three. What is the reason of Rebbi Jehudah? “Your Elders shall go out,” two, “and your judges,” two. No court has an even number of members; one adds, that makes five. Rebbi said, the words of Rebbi Simeon are reasonable for the leaning of the hands and those of Rebbi Jehudah for the breaking of the neck. The words of Rebbi Simeon are reasonable for the leaning of the hands, for he does not refer to “they shall lean”39Since the number of the verb is in general determined by the number of the subject, this number cannot be considered independent information.. And those of Rebbi Jehudah for the breaking of the neck, for he does not refer to “they shall go out.40This argument is less clear since R. Simeon likewise does not refer to the verb. The difference between R. Simeon and R. Jehudah is that for R. Jehudah “Elders, judges” represent independent plurals but for R. Simeon one is restricted to “judges who are Elders” (the Babli concurs in this, 34b).” If you would say that the words of Rebbi Jehudah are reasonable for the calf whose neck is broken because he refers to both to “they shall lean” and “they shall go out,” it turns out that you have to say “there shall go out” two, “your Elders” two, “and your judges,” two. No court has an even number of members; one adds another one, that makes seven41Since this number is never mentioned, no author considers the plural form of the verb as information.. How do the rabbis43In the Babli, “the select of your judges”, i. e., one disqualifies any judges who are not members of the High Court. explain “your Elders and your judges”? Your Elders who are your judges43In the Babli, “the select of your judges”, i. e., one disqualifies any judges who are not members of the High Court.. It was stated44Babli 45a, Sanhedrin 14b.: Rebbi Eliezer ben Jacob says “your Elders,” that is the High Court; “and your judges” these are king and High Priest45He requires the entire High Court to appear (Rashi in Babli 45a). The king (or, in a tribal society, the head of the tribe) is involved since he represents the police powers who alone can determine whether the murderer is unknown. The High Priest is involved since he has to send the priests to conduct the ceremony..
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin

MISHNAH: Whipping by three [judges]; in the name of Rebbi Ismael they said, by 23107The imposition of corporal punishment needs an official court of duly ordained judges. The Mishnah is a reconstruction of what was assumed to be the historic procedure; R. Ismael lived about 70 years after the removal of criminal jurisdiction from Jewish courts and R. Meïr, represented by the anonymous opinion, more than 100 years afterwards. But the prescription of the Mishnah certainly was followed by the autonomous Jewish courts under the Parthians.. The lengthening of a month by three [judges]108Whether a thirtieth day should be counted for the current month. Fixing the calendar was the sole privilege of a committee of the Patriarch’s court as a successor to the Synhedrion. The current computed calendar was promulgated by such a court in the middle of the Fourth Century (Eruvin 3:11 21c l. 24)., the intercalation of a year by three [judges]109In the current calendar, the addition of 30 days to the lunar year, labelled as “First Adar.”, the words of Rebbi Meïr. Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel says, one starts with three, one discusses with five, and one votes with seven110A committe of three has to decide whether the year be a candidate for intercalation; an enlarged committe of five has to do the detailed computations; a further enlarged committee of seven has to confirm the computations. Intercalated months in the lunar year are necessary to keep Passover in the “month of spring” as required by Ex. 13:4.
There is no basic disagreement between R. Meïr and Rabban Simeon, since the latter agrees that in an emergency situation, a duly empowered committee of three is competent. Since Rabban Simeon was the Patriarch of the restauration during the second half of the Second Century, his procedure was the one actually used.
. But if they voted with three, it is intercalated.
The leaning of Elders220Lev. 4:15. If the High Court realized that they had erred in a ruling and permitted something which is biblically prohibited, they have to bring a purification sacrifice and a deputation of the Court has to lean with their hands on the head of the sacrificial animal while confessing their error, as detailed in Traxtate Horaiot. and the breaking of the calf’s neck221The ritual of atonement for an unsolved murder, Deut. 21:1–9, Soţah Chapter 9. by three [judges], the words of Rebbi Simeon, but Rebbi Jehudah says, by five. Ḥalîṣah222The ceremony by which the widow of a childless man is freed from levirate marriage, which requires involvement of “the Elders”, Deut. 25:5–9. and repudiations223The repudiation of a marriage by an underage girl, married off by her mother or brothers after her father’s death and whose marriage during her minority is valid only rabbinically; cf. Yebamot Chapter 13. by three [judges], [redemption of] the growth of the fourth year224The fruits of a tree in the fourth year after planting, the first year they are permitted as food, have to be eaten in holiness by the rules of Second Tithe (Lev.19:24; Maˋaser Šeni Chapter 5). They may be redeemed under the rules of Second Tithe, the sanctity being transferred to the redemption money. and Second Tithe225Cf. Maˋaser Šeni 4:2, Note 51. Second Tithe remains the farmer’s property but must be eaten in purity at the site of the Temple. If there is any danger of spoilage in transport, the produce may be redeemed and the sanctity transferred to the redemption money, Deut. 14:22–26; cf. Introduction to Tractate Maˋaser Šeni. whose value is not known by three [appraisers], also of Temple dedications226Property donated to the Temple which will be sold by the Temple treasurer upon appraisal by a committee of three; Lev.27:11. by three. Estimations of movables227If a person makes a vow to donate the estimated value of a person to the Temple, the amount payable is specified in Lev.27:2–7 depending on age and sex. If the person wants to pay with movables in lieu of money, their value has to be determined by a committee of three. These rules are detailed in Tractate ˋArakhin. by three [appraisers], Rebbi Jehudah says that one of them must be a Cohen; of real estate228Lev. 27:14–25. In all verses speaking of redemption of property donated to the Temple, ‘the Cohen” is mentioned in the singular. nine and a Cohen. The same holds for humans229Somebody promising to pay to the Temple the value a person would fetch if sold as a slave..
Capital crimes [are judged] by 23. The participants in active or passive bestiality259Whether human or animal; the additional statement is needed only for the animal. [is judged] by 23, as it is said, you shall slay the woman and the animal260Lev. 20:16. Since woman and animal are mentioned together, the animal can be condemned only by a court empowered to judge the woman who had sex with the animal., and it says, and you shall slay the animal261Lev. 20:15, about male bestiality.. The bull to be stoned262Which had killed a human. [is judged] by 23, as it is said, the bull shall be stoned, also its owner shall die263Ex. 21:29.; like the owner’s death sentence so is the ox’s death sentence. The wolf and the lion, the bear, and the tiger, and the panther, and the snake are sentenced to death by 23264He does not need permission; it is no case for a court.. Rebbi Eliezer says, anyone quick to kill them is meritorious265End of Halakhah 1, Notes 103–106.; Rebbi Aqiba says, they are sentenced by 23.
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Sanhedrin

"'Semichat Zkeinim' (when the elders put their hands on the sacrifice to atone for a sin of the entire people) and the breaking of the calf's neck (when a body is found between jurisdictions) with three"—the words of Rabbi Shimon. Rabbi Yehudah says: "With five." 'Chalitzah' (the ceremony of giving up claim to your brother's widow) and 'Miunin' (nullification of a betrothal of a young girl) with three.
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy