וְהִשְׁקָ֣הּ אֶת־הַמַּ֗יִם וְהָיְתָ֣ה אִֽם־נִטְמְאָה֮ וַתִּמְעֹ֣ל מַ֣עַל בְּאִישָׁהּ֒ וּבָ֨אוּ בָ֜הּ הַמַּ֤יִם הַמְאָֽרֲרִים֙ לְמָרִ֔ים וְצָבְתָ֣ה בִטְנָ֔הּ וְנָפְלָ֖ה יְרֵכָ֑הּ וְהָיְתָ֧ה הָאִשָּׁ֛ה לְאָלָ֖ה בְּקֶ֥רֶב עַמָּֽהּ׃
און אַז ער װעט איר געבן טרינקען דאָס װאַסער, איז, אױב זי איז פֿאַראומרײניקט געװאָרן, און האָט געפֿעלשט אַ פֿעלשונג אָן איר מאַן, װעט דאָס װאַסער װאָס מאַכט פֿאַרשאָלטן, אַרײַן אין איר פֿאַר אַ ביטערניש, און איר בױך װעט געשװאָלן װערן, און איר דיך װעט אַװעקפֿאַלן; און די פֿרױ װעט װערן פֿאַר אַ קללה צװישן איר פֿאָלק.
Rashi
והשקה את המים AND HE SHALL MAKE HER DRINK THE WATER — This statement made after Scripture has just said (v. 26) “and afterwards he shall make the woman drink the waters” (see Siphre) is intended to include the case that if she says, “I will not drink” after the scroll on which the Holy Name was written had been blotted out, they pour it into her and make her drink the water against her will — except if she adds: “I have been defiled” [when, of course, no further test is necessary] (Sotah 19b).
Siftei Chakhamim
I will not drink. Meaning that if she said “I will be divorced from him without collecting a kesubah, but I will not drink” then we do not listen to her, since the Holy Name has been erased. [We only do not give her to drink if] she says “I am defiled.” However before the Holy Name is erased, if she says “I will not drink, and I will be divorced without collecting a kesubah” then we listen to her and do not make her drink, even though she does not admit to being defiled.
Rav Hirsch
V. 27. והשקה. Diese nochmalige Wiederholung bestimmt nach Sota 19 b, daß wenn einmal die mit dem Gottesnamen geschriebene Sotaschrift im Wasser abgelöscht worden, man sie zum Trinken nötigt, wenn sie sich nicht als schuldig erklärt. Bis zum Ablöschen der Schrift stand das Trinken völlig in ihrem freien Willen. Sie brauchte nicht eben ihre Schuld zu gestehen, sie durfte bei der Behauptung ihrer Unschuld beharren. Erklärte sie, nicht trinken zu wollen, so wird die Prozedur nicht weiter fortgesetzt. Ihre Schuld bleibt zweifelhaft und hat die Auflösung der Ehe zur Folge (siehe V. 13). Ist aber das Ablöschen der Schrift vollzogen, so hat sie nur die Alternative: sich für schuldig zu erklären, oder im Bewusstsein ihrer Unschuld den Sotatrank zu trinken (Sota 20a).
Rashi
וצבתה בטנה AND HER BELLY SHALL SWELL, [AND HER THIGH SHALL WASTE] — Although when uttering the curse (v. 21) he (the priest) mentioned the thigh first, for the reason given by Rashi in his comment there, the water tested her (i.e., affected her) only according to the manner it passed into her body (i.e., it affected the belly first since it first entered that part of her body and then the thigh) (Sotah 9b).
Siftei Chakhamim
צוטריטלעך נאָר פֿאַר פּרעמיום־מיטגלידערRav Hirsch
צוטריטלעך נאָר פֿאַר פּרעמיום־מיטגלידערRashi
והיתה האשה לאלה AND THE WOMAN SHALL BE AN EXECRATION — This means, as I have already explained (v. 21), that everyone shall curse by mention of her name.
Siftei Chakhamim
צוטריטלעך נאָר פֿאַר פּרעמיום־מיטגלידערRashi
בקרב עמה [AND THE WOMAN SHALL BE AN EXECRATION] AMONG HER PEOPLE — This is stressed: "among her people” — because there is a difference between a person who is brought to disgrace in a place where he is well known and a person who is brought to disgrace in a place where he is unknown.