וְדִבֶּ֨ר יְהוָ֤ה אֶל־מֹשֶׁה֙ פָּנִ֣ים אֶל־פָּנִ֔ים כַּאֲשֶׁ֛ר יְדַבֵּ֥ר אִ֖ישׁ אֶל־רֵעֵ֑הוּ וְשָׁב֙ אֶל־הַֽמַּחֲנֶ֔ה וּמְשָׁ֨רְת֜וֹ יְהוֹשֻׁ֤עַ בִּן־נוּן֙ נַ֔עַר לֹ֥א יָמִ֖ישׁ מִתּ֥וֹךְ הָאֹֽהֶל׃ (ס)
און גאָט פֿלעגט רעדן צו משהן פּנים אֶל פּנים, אַזױ װי אַ מענטש רעדט צו זײַן חבֿר. און ער פֿלעגט זיך אומקערן אין לאַגער, אָבער זײַן באַדינער יהוֹשועַ דער זון פֿון נון, אַ יונגער מאַן, פֿלעגט ניט אָפּטרעטן פֿון געצעלט.
Rashi
ודבר ה׳ אל משה פנים אל פנים AND THE LORD SPAKE UNTO MOSES FACE TO FACE — Here too (as in v. 9) in spite of the fact that the text states “face to face” the Targum is: ומתמלל עם משה.
Chizkuni
פנים אל פנים, “literally: “face to face,” an obviously incorrect translation, seeing that G-d does not possess physical attributes; Our author takes it for granted that the reader is aware of this, and does not spell it out. He does, however, indulge in presenting the reader with another insoluble problem, that of that either G-d or Moses must have changed position in order to speak to one another as if on the same level. He therefore tells us, his readers, that he does not know if the expression means that G-d had raised Moses closer to His level, or vice versa, i.e. that G-d had descended to Moses’ level. He had done so in Exodus 34,5, after the third forty days after the revelation at the Mountain had expired, i.e. on the Day of Atonement.
Ramban
AND HIS MINISTER JOSHUA, ‘BIN’ (THE SON OF) NUN, ‘NA’AR’ (A LAD). Rabbi Abraham ibn Ezra wrote: “Joshua lived a hundred and ten years,455Joshua 24:29. and the Sages say456Arakhin 13a. that it took him seven years to conquer the Land [of Israel] and seven years to apportion it amongst the tribes. If so, he was now fifty-six years old,457The forty years of the wilderness plus the fourteen years in the Land of Israel, make a total of fifty-four years. Subtract these from a hundred and ten, and you are left with fifty-six. Yet Scripture calls him na’ar (lad)! and how does Scripture call him na’ar (lad)? We must therefore say that this is the meaning thereof: and his minister Joshua the son of Nun rendered him such service as can be given only by a youthful attendant.”
In my opinion it is the way of the Sacred Language to call any attendant [regardless of age] na’ar, for the person of high office is called ish (man),458See Ramban Genesis 9:20, Vol. I, p. 141. and [with respect to him] his attendant is called na’ar. Thus: Gehazi ‘na’aro’ (his attendant);459II Kings 4:12. Let ‘ha’ne’arim’ (the attendants), I pray thee, arise and play before us.460II Samuel 2:14. Similarly, and ten ‘ne’arim’ (attendants) that bore Joab’s armor,461Ibid., 18:15. and Joab [David’s commander-in-chief] would surely only turn over his armor to valiant men who stood near him! And it is also written, And Joshua said unto the two ‘men’ that had spied out the land,462Joshua 6:22. and yet it is written there, and ‘ha’ne’arim’ the spies went in etc!463Ibid., Verse 23. [Thus we must say that the] term [ha’ne’arim] is used because they were servants of the congregation, acting for them as spies. There are many similar instances. So also, the ‘na’arei’ of the king that ministered unto him,464Esther 2:2. [the second half of the phrase being in apposition,] explaining that they were the servants who attended the king personally, and not the attendants of the court. And if so, our verse is stating: and his minister Joshua the son of Nun was always in attendance, and never departed out of the tent.
In my opinion it is the way of the Sacred Language to call any attendant [regardless of age] na’ar, for the person of high office is called ish (man),458See Ramban Genesis 9:20, Vol. I, p. 141. and [with respect to him] his attendant is called na’ar. Thus: Gehazi ‘na’aro’ (his attendant);459II Kings 4:12. Let ‘ha’ne’arim’ (the attendants), I pray thee, arise and play before us.460II Samuel 2:14. Similarly, and ten ‘ne’arim’ (attendants) that bore Joab’s armor,461Ibid., 18:15. and Joab [David’s commander-in-chief] would surely only turn over his armor to valiant men who stood near him! And it is also written, And Joshua said unto the two ‘men’ that had spied out the land,462Joshua 6:22. and yet it is written there, and ‘ha’ne’arim’ the spies went in etc!463Ibid., Verse 23. [Thus we must say that the] term [ha’ne’arim] is used because they were servants of the congregation, acting for them as spies. There are many similar instances. So also, the ‘na’arei’ of the king that ministered unto him,464Esther 2:2. [the second half of the phrase being in apposition,] explaining that they were the servants who attended the king personally, and not the attendants of the court. And if so, our verse is stating: and his minister Joshua the son of Nun was always in attendance, and never departed out of the tent.