ייִדישער מחשבֿה אויף דברים 33:10

יוֹר֤וּ מִשְׁפָּטֶ֙יךָ֙ לְיַעֲקֹ֔ב וְתוֹרָתְךָ֖ לְיִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל יָשִׂ֤ימוּ קְטוֹרָה֙ בְּאַפֶּ֔ךָ וְכָלִ֖יל עַֽל־מִזְבְּחֶֽךָ׃

זײ לערנען דײַנע געזעצן יעקבֿן, און דײַן תּוֹרה ישׂראלן; זײ טוען װײַרױך אין דײַן נאָז, און גאַנצאָפּפֿער אױף דײַן מזבח.

Akeidat Yitzchak

On the other hand, one could argue the reverse. As long as all performance is merely potential and has not yet been brought to fruition, it is still in the realm of imagination only, and therefore not worth a great deal at all. The concept of "the reward of a good deed is another good deed," (Avot 4,2) suggests that if an effect of a good cause exists, it in turn becomes a cause for another good effect. The Aggadah in Shabbat 119, about the two angels that accompany man on the Sabbath eve on his way home from the synagogue, and who respond to the evidence of the Sabbath preparations which either have or have not been made, by saying "Amen, may it be likewise next week," represent the same viewpoint. Once one sets out on a certain path, one builds a certain amount of momentum. Whether this momentum is positive or negative is irrelevant; the momentum has been built. There are no bad angels, but there is a yetzer hara, an urge to do evil, and it is this that the Talmud refers to when it uses the expression "bad angel." Deeds become causes. The amount of self discipline needed to accomplish certain moral objectives, diminishes in relation to the frequency of the occasions on which this self discipline needs to be exercised. If a sick person finds it an extreme effort to swallow food, after a while the strength that food has given him makes the effort to swallow further amounts of food seem progressively less strenuous. We can understand why our ancestors expressed themselves in three different ways regarding their acceptance of Torah. 1) (Exodus 19,8) "All that G-d has said, we will perform." 2) (Exodus 24,3) "All that G-d has said we will perform and hear." 3) (Deut.5,24) "All that the Lord our G-d will say to you (Moses) we will hear and perform." The first time the word na-asseh, we will perform, refers to the successful end product. They undertook to achieve the task that had been set out for them. The second time, they referred to the process which would lead to the successful achievement of what they had promised in the first verse, namely acquiring the good habits of doing the right thing through repetition, i.e. following instructions. The people had realised that achievements of Torah's purpose does not get accomplished by a single act or gesture. The sequence of study/performance is based on the manner in which angels, i.e. the Lord's messengers address themselves to a task. (compare Talmud Shabbat 88 and our commentary in chapter 44) When the people said "we will hear and perform," they referred to the manner in which the perfect assiyah performance would be assured, namely through study of the objective. As the Torat Kohanim explains (Leviticus Acharey 9) ushmartem va-assitem you will study and comply. In this instance the word "shamar," means study. Proper performance is possible only after study. From the foregoing we see that refinement of one's personality is achieved even when the deeds are deficient in quality, even though the objective is performance of a perfect deed. We have the paradox that both action and study seem superior. The solution is that evaluation of the merit of something may either be based on objective, absolute criteria, or on subjective, relative criteria. From an objective point of view, study is superior to performance since it involves man's finest part his brain, the potentially divine within him. Also, study precedes action chronologically. Man's creation itself had to be preceded by the concepts calling for his creation. Subjectively, however, performance is superior, since without it, theory, study etc. can never be put into practice. (Theory, i.e. the result of study cannot be proven correct without having been put to the practical test.) The training of wild beasts, domesticating them to become beasts of burden, proves the impact of study and habit.
פֿרעגט אַ רבֿBookmarkShareCopy

Akeidat Yitzchak

Reflecting the high standard of Israel, the opening Midrash described the disease as epilepsy, a temporary affliction, of brief duration. The remedy quoted, the kami-a, amulet, is considered spiritual in nature, not something organic, (in Talmudic and Midrashic parlance) This suggests that the aberration had been brief, subject to prompt correction by proper spiritual orientation. Angels achieve their shleymut, perfection, by means of a single expression, i.e. experience. (Daniel 4,14), whereas man requires two expressions, i.e. experiences. The first was "let Us make man in Our image," at the time man was being created. The second expression, a further stage leading to complete perfection was the revelation at Mount Sinai. Hopefully, the two experiences between them will achieve mankind's refinement, and convert our potential into the actual achievement of the finest our species is capable of.
פֿרעגט אַ רבֿBookmarkShareCopy

Derashot HaRan

And our sages understand this in another way, that Jacob assured Judah that some form of authority would never depart from his tribe, whether in their land or in exile, and he likewise assured him that Torah would never depart from his seed, as stated in Sanhedrin (5a): "'The staff shall not depart from Judah' — these are the exilarchs in Bavel, who wielded authority over the people; 'nor the sceptre [or law-giver] from between his feet' — these are the grandchildren of Hillel, who taught Torah before the multitude." Two assurances are subsumed here: the first, that a leader and commander will never be cut off from his seed even when we are in exile; the second, that his seed will always occupy themselves in Torah, as stated in Yoma (26a): "Rava said: 'You do not find a Torah disciple who renders halachic decisions that does not come either from the tribe of Levi or from the tribe of Issachar. From Levi, as it is written (Deuteronomy 33:10): "They shall teach Your judgments to Jacob." From Issachar, as it is written (I Chronicles 12:32): "And from the sons of Issachar, those who know understanding for the times."' Why not also include Judah, for it is written (Psalms 60:9): "Judah, my law-giver"? We are speaking of those who correctly derive the halachah from their learning." We see, then, that even though Judah's seed was not assured of arriving at the truth, they were assured of never ceasing from Torah study.
פֿרעגט אַ רבֿBookmarkShareCopy