מדרש אויף ויקרא 21:21

כָּל־אִ֞ישׁ אֲשֶׁר־בּ֣וֹ מ֗וּם מִזֶּ֙רַע֙ אַהֲרֹ֣ן הַכֹּהֵ֔ן לֹ֣א יִגַּ֔שׁ לְהַקְרִ֖יב אֶת־אִשֵּׁ֣י יְהוָ֑ה מ֣וּם בּ֔וֹ אֵ֚ת לֶ֣חֶם אֱלֹהָ֔יו לֹ֥א יִגַּ֖שׁ לְהַקְרִֽיב׃

איטלעכער מאַן פֿון דעם זאָמען פֿון אַהרן דעם כֹּהן, װאָס אין אים איז דאָ אַ מום, זאָל ניט גענענען מקריבֿ צו זײַן די פֿײַעראָפּפֿער פֿון גאָט; אַ מום איז דאָ אין אים, טאָר ער ניט גענענען מקריבֿ צו זײַן די שפּײַז פֿון זײַן גאָט.

Sifra

1) (Vayikra 21:21) ("Every man in whom there is a blemish, of the seed of Aaron the Cohein, shall not come near to offer up the fire-offerings of the L–rd. There is a blemish in him; the bread of his G d he shall not come near to offer up.") This tells me only of these (i.e., the aforementioned blemishes). Whence are the other blemishes derived? From "in whom there is a blemish, of the seed of Aaron the Cohein." (i.e., only those who bear a normal human semblance may serve.)
פֿרעגט אַ רבֿBookmarkShareCopy

Sifra

2) Whence is derived (for inclusion) (one with the skin-coloring of) a Cushite, one who is red-spotted, one who is white-spotted, one who is pole-like in appearance (i.e., unusually long and thin), one who is dwarf-like, a deaf-mute, an imbecile, and those with (halachically) clean plague-spots? From "Every man."
פֿרעגט אַ רבֿBookmarkShareCopy

Sifra

3) (For without "every" we would say:) Does it not follow a fortiori, (that all of the aforementioned (#2) should be permitted in a Cohein), viz.: If a beast, which is unfit (for consummation) in the instances of "it and its son" (Vayikra 22:28), are treifah (organic defect) and Caesarian section, is kasher in all of the aforementioned instances,
פֿרעגט אַ רבֿBookmarkShareCopy