ציטירנדיקער פּירוש אויף איוב 34:10

Job had taken this to be axiomatic and had based his theses upon it; the new disputant [Bildad] acknowledged it too. However, Job had considered these matters from the viewpoint of 'individual' law,¹Those laws of Nature that pertain to individual entities, as distinct from those that pertain to the universe as a whole (universal or general law). and so had reasoned as follows:
• For God to do any injustice is prohibited by His essential quality.
• However, the governance of individuals is patently not ordered according to law and justice, for we observe that it does not distinguish between the righteous and the wicked, all things come alike to all; as is the good person so is the sinner (Ecclesiastes 9:2) subject to the accidents of time and its vagaries.
• And since it is an injustice for the righteous to suffer undeservedly, this governance cannot emanate from God, for far be it from God to do wrong, or for the Almighty to be unjust (Job 34:10).
Therefore Job had concluded that this governance emanates from a blind and undiscerning ruler—the Cosmos—which makes no distinction between the one who serves God and the one who does not.