ציטירנדיקער פּירוש אויף אסתר 10:3

הן לי לא נתת זרע, although You have said to me “I will make you into a great nation and I will make your descendants as numerous as the dust of the earth” (12,2) When Avram said all this to G’d, it did not cross his mind that G’d might have deceived him, lied to him, and that this was why the promise had not come true. He may have thought of one of two reasons being the cause why the promise had not been fulfilled. 1) that he had committed some sin after G’d had made the promise, so that the premise upon which the promise had been based was no longer valid. 2) or, he thought that the seed G’d had spoken of was a reference to some other family member, people carrying many of the same genes. The word זרע does appear in such a sense in Esther 10,3 where Mordechai is described as דובר שלום לכל זרעו, “interceding on behalf of all his seed.” If Mordechai had interceded only on behalf of personal children and grandchildren, this would hardly have been worth mentioning, certainly not worth praising him for. Basically, Avram wanted G’d to know that if G’d had meant that the definition of the word זרעך as mentioned in 12,2 was only in the most general sense, such as in Esther 10,3, then he, Avram, would not consider this reward as something special seeing G’d had not seen fit to make his wife conceive offspring from his seed.

AND WHOEVER IS NOT FOUND PLEASING BY THE PEOPLE, ETC. We need both cases to be made clear. Had the mishna only included the first section, “whoever is found pleasing, etc.”, I would have had grounds to say that there is no clear implication that “whoever is not found pleasing, etc.” For it may be that the people do not find him pleasing because he is at the extreme of piousness but G-d is pleased with him. And had the mishna only included the last section, “whoever is not found pleasing, etc.”, I would have had grounds to say that there is no clear implication that “whoever is found pleasing, etc.” For perhaps the people will find him pleasing because he will make some pretense of goodness, but “he lays his ambush inside of him,” i.e. he sins in secret.
The mishna therefore teaches us that this is a reliable test in both directions, whether positive or negative. And the reason for this is given by the verse, “and I shall place My spirit in your [Heb. plural “you”] midst” (Ezekiel 36:27)—we see that the spirit of the people is a reflection of the spirit of G-d.
Now the mishna does not say “found pleasing by all the people,” for we pay no heed to the minority, as we find that Mordechai was only able to “find favor with most of his brothers” and not all of his brothers—Midrash Shmuel.

Thus, the word “twice” denotes “double” (as it does in “there will be twice” [Exodus 16: 5]), when the word serves as a noun. On the other hand, when the same word appears in such phrases as “second to the king” [Esther 10: 3] the word functions as an adjective. It comes from the word “two”, as I have explained [comment on Esther 10: 3]. Scripture thus clarifies here that the phrase “at the seventh year he shall go out free, without paying” [Exodus 21: 2] denotes the beginning of the seventh year. Further proof could be brought from the case of the Sabbatical year, or even from the case of the Sabbath day.