ציטירנדיקער פּירוש אויף במדבר 32:29

Rabbi Meir says: every stipulation which is not like that of the children of Gad and the children of Reuben is not a [valid] stipulation, as it say, “And Moses said to them, ‘If the children of Gad and the children of Reuben will pass [with you over the Jordan, then you shall give them the land of Gilead for a possession].” and it is also written, “But if they will not pass over with you armed, [then they shall have possessions among you in the land of Canaan]” (Numbers 32:29-30). Rabbi Hanina ben Gamaliel says: the matter had to be stated, for had it not been stated it would have implied that even in Canaan they should not inherit. The children of Gad and Reuven did not want to inherit on the west side of the Jordan river; they wished to remain on the east side, in a place good for their cattle. Moses responded to them that if they cross to help fight in the conquering of Canaan, then they may inherit on the east side of the Jordan. He also added that if they did not cross and fight with the rest of Israel, then they would only be able to inherit in Canaan. From the fact that Moses “doubled” his stipulation, Rabbi Meir derives that all stipulations must be doubled. Rabbi Hanina ben Gamaliel responds that Moses had to state the second half of his statement. Had he not done so, he might have implied that if they didn’t fight for Canaan they wouldn’t even get an inheritance in Canaan. Since the second half is a necessary statement, we cannot learn that stipulations that don’t need a “negative” side do not need to be doubled. The mishnah ends with Rabbi Hanina ben Gamaliel’s response to Rabbi Meir. Had Rabbi Meir responded he might have said that it is obvious that the children of Gad and Reuven would inherit in the land of Canaan, since all of the tribes inherited there irregardless of their participation in the conquest. Since the second half of his stipulation was unnecessary, we can learn that the only reason Moses added it in was because all stipulations must be thusly doubled.

A Kabbalistic approach: it is possible to view this letter as alluding to the specially small letter ה in Genesis 2,4. Perhaps Moses wrote the letter ה here large, at the end of the Torah, as opposed to when he wrote it “small” at the beginning, in order to remind us that this is the letter (last letter of the tetragram) with which the Lord created the terrestrial universe. The extra large letter ה at the end of the Torah is an allusion to the extra small letter ה near the beginning (Genesis 2,4), to show that the large letter ה at the end provided the extra power needed for the small letter ה to create the universe with. The large letter ה in our verse is symbolic of the repentance of the souls; in other words the ultimate repentance by man made the creation of the universe a wothwhile project for the Lord.
It is an accepted concept that when the Jewish people are full of merits they thereby reinforce the power of the Shechinah, whereas when they accumulate demerits, this power wanes somewhat. Moses asks the people by using the preface ה-לה', “are you going to be responsible by your deeds for reducing the power of the Shechinah, for making G’d feel that He wasted His time in creating man?” [freely translated. Ed.] The word זאת describes the attribute of G’d which would “suffer” through the iniquities committed by a people who are perverse, etc. This is why Moses added: “If only they would have drawn on the source of the attribute חכמה, they would have understood this and prevented it from coming about.” They would then have strengthened the attribute זאת instead of weakening it. The whole verse 29 refers to the fact that if the people had displayed the wisdom and intelligence generally attributed to them, they would have contributed to more knowledge all around as a result of which G’d’s image and attribute זאת would have been greatly enhanced. They would have considered the consequences of failing to do so.
The line הלא הוא אביך קנך is read by the Kabbalists as if the word קנך had been vocalised “kinecha,” your nest.” The first small letter ה in the Torah we referred to is understood to refer to G’d as the “nest” of the universe, performing a function similar to that which the birds’ nests perform for their inhabitants. It is perceived as the foundation of the existence of the birds; where there is no nest, birds cannot develop. Some of these considerations are reflected in the commandment of שלוח הקן, the sending away of the mother bird before emptying her nest of its young. The last letter ה in this verse, i.e. הוא עשך, is a parallel construction to הוא עשנו ולו אנחנו, “He has made us and we are His” (Psalms 100,3).
The word ויכוננך, “He has established you firmly,” means that G’d has constructed Israel in such a way that it may be rehabilitated.

Rav Yehudah in Makkot 11 teaches the rule that if someone is excommunicated, even conditionally, [i.e. he has been warned he would be put in ban if he did not conform to certain rules of conduct, Ed.] the conditional ban is not considered as having been lifted unless a collegium of laymen or judges has released such a person from such a conditional excommunication. The Talmud cites Yehudah's statement "if I do not bring him back to you" as proof. We have a tradition quoted by Rabbi Shemuel bar Nachmeni in the name of Rabbi Yochanan that the reason Yehudah and Reuben are linked in Moses' blessing in Deuteronomy 33,6 "may Reuben live and not die" followed by the statement "וזאת ליהודה," is that during all the forty years the Jewish people travelled through the desert with the coffin of Yehudah, the bones in his coffin still kept turning over. If you were to say that perhaps Yehudah's fault had been that he had not spelled out what would happen if he fulfilled his guarantee as did the tribe of Gad and Reuben in Numbers 32,29-30 [something known as תנאי כפול in halachah, Ed.], the fact remains that he did deliver on his promise, so why should he be guilty of anything?

ונצלתם render it as the Targum does: and ye shall empty out Egypt. Similar are: (Exodus 12:36) “And they emptied out (וינצלו) Egypt”; (Exodus 33:6) “And the children of Israel stripped themselves (ויתנצלו) of their ornaments” The נ in it is a root-letter. Menachem ben Seruk placed it (this word ויתנצלו) in section צ (taking the root as צל not as נצל) together with, (Genesis 31:9) “And God took away (ויצל) your father’s cattle”, and with, (Genesis 31:16) “which God hath taken away (הציל) from our father”, but his view cannot be sustained. For if the נ is not a root-letter, then seeing that it (the word ונצלתם) is vowelled with Chirik, it cannot be used in the sense of “and ye shall do something” (the active voice, which is required here since את מצרים can only be the object of the verb), but in the sense of “and ye shall have something done to you” (the passive — “Niphal”), as (Deuteronomy 28:63) “And ye shall be plucked up (וְנִסַּחְתֶּם) from off your land”; (Leviticus 26:25) “and ye shall be given (וְנִתַּתֶּם) into the hand of the enemy”; (Leviticus 17) “And ye shall be smitten (וְנִגַּפְתָּם) before your enemies”; (Ezekiel 22:21) “And ye shall be melted (וְנִתַּכְתָּם) in the midst thereof”; (Jeremiah 7:10) “And ye say, נִצַּלְנוּ” — which expresses the idea “we have had something done to us” (the Niphal: we have been delivered). Then again, every נ which sometimes appears in a word and sometimes is omitted, as e. g. the נ of נוגף and נושא and נותן and נושך, when the word expresses the sense “and ye shall do something” (the Kal), it is pointed with vocal Sheva (חטף a “snatched” sound), as, for instance, (Genesis 45:19) “and ye shall bear (וּנְשָׂאתָם) your father”; (Numbers 32:29) “And ye shall give (וּנְתַתֶּם) them the land of Gilead”; (Genesis 17:11) “And ye shall circumcise (וּנְמַלְתֶּם) the flesh of your foreskin”. Consequently I am of the opinion that this letter נ which is vowelled with a Chirik is one of the root letters, and the grammatical form of the noun of the same root is נִצּוּל which is of the strong (dageshed) forms, just as דִּבּוּר and כִּפּוּר and לִמּוּד. When, in the case of verbs formed from these roots one expresses the idea of “and ye shall do something” (active voice) the נ has the vowel Chirik (i. e. it is the Piel conjugation), as (Numbers 20:8) “And ye shall speak (וְדִבַּרְתֶּם) unto the rock”; (Ezekiel 45:20) “And ye shall atone (וְכִּפַּרְתֶּם) for the house”; (Deuteronomy 11:19) “And ye shall teach (וְלִמַּדְתָּם) them unto your children”.