ציטירנדיקער פּירוש אויף בראשית 3:14

And it said to the woman. Some say that Chavah understood the gesticulations of the animals. According to Rav Sadyah Gaon, however, whenever speech is ascribed to an animal it is actually an angel that is speaking on its behalf. Alternatively, it is possible that these verses are to be taken literally, since it is no more difficult for Hashem to give intelligence to a serpent than to human beings.

One might ask, since the actual exodus happened during the day, as Scripture states, “None of you shall go outside of his house until morning.” (Ex. 12:22) and, “For on that very day I brought your ranks out of the land of Egypt,” (Ex. 12:17), why do we remember the Exodus at night? The sages sought a reason from the following verse, “‘It is because of what Adonai did for me when I went free from Egypt.” (Ex 13:8) Even though the Haggadah explains, “One only says this at the time when matzah and maror are before the person,” the main event was during the day.
However, since the first part of the obligation is for a person to behave⁶⁷This text follows the version of the Haggadah of the Rambam and used by most Sephardic Jews. In other texts it says “A person is obligated to see himself/herself (lirot) as if…” בְּכָל דּוֹר וָדוֹר חַיָּב אָדָם לְהַרְאוֹת אֶת עַצְמוֹ כְּאִלּוּ הוּא בְּעַצְמוֹ יָצָא עַתָּה מִשִּׁעְבּוּד מִצְרַיִם שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר וְאוֹתָנוּ הוֹצִיא מִשָּׁם as if one personally went forth from Egypt, this is best done in the evening when one eats the Passover sacrifice.⁶⁸Even though they had not yet been liberated from Egypt on the night of the first Passover, they acted as if the liberation had already taken place. Therefore it is an obligation to go on at length before the meal and afterwards recall the miracles that were performed. Or (one might explain), the remembrance of the suffering in Egypt should happen at night, as Scripture states, “Arise, cry out in the night at the beginning of the watches,” (Lam. 2:19) and it is also stated, “Bitterly she weeps in the night,” (Lam. 1:2). Since, “the sound of which could be heard from afar.” (Ezra 3:13) it is fitting to announce the redemption at night. The redemption from Egypt hints at the future redemption and “night” arouses compassion for our redemption, and that “Merit is brought about by means of one who is meritorious.”⁶⁹BT Baba Batra 119b One might also explain that since the people engaged in much singing, praise, and rejoicing in Egypt, on the night before the Exodus, as is written, “For you, there shall be singing, as on a night when a festival is hallowed,” (Is. 30:29) they offered supplications to God, that He might have compassion on them and not listen to the one who prosecuted them, asking permission to enter their homes to cause destruction. As Scripture says, “Nor let the Destroyer enter and smite your home.” (Ex. 12:23) From this we may conclude that the Destroyer had to ask permission to enter (their homes). So, too, we also behave as if we went forth from Egypt as our ancestors did, singing, praising, and speaking of God’s wonders in order to arouse God’s compassion so that the Holy One may again do with us as He did with our ancestors.
The sages say, “The days of your life,” refers to this world; “All the days of your life,” refers to the coming of the Messiah. The sages interpreted this verse as referring to the future with a Gezera shawa,⁷⁰Gezera shawa, “equal category,” according to which an obscure passage might be illuminated by reference to another containing the same key term. (Britannica) with the verse, “And dirt shall you eat/all the days of your life.” (Gen. 3:14) Everyone admits that this also refers to the messianic period, since Scripture also states, “The wolf and the lamb shall graze together/And the lion shall eat straw like the ox/And the serpent’s food shall be earth.” (Is. 65:25) “One may heal oneself with any substance except for it…”⁷¹See Pesachim 25a, I am not certain what the connection here is to this passage to the Gezera shawa.

A Midrashic approach (Tanchuma Tazria 9): Why has this paragraph not been introduced by the customary: “speak to the Children of Israel; if a person has such and such symptoms, etc.?” The absence of this introductory formula is to teach you that it is not the Lord who initiates afflictions as we know from Psalms 5,5 כי לא אל חפץ רשע אתה לא יגורך רע, ”for You are not a G’d who desires wickedness, evil cannot abide with You;” David does not belabour the obvious; he speaks about G’d having no desire to make any creature guilty of anything. We have proof of this also in Ezekiel 33,11: “as true as I am alive, says the Lord, G’d, I do not desire the death of the wicked.” On the contrary, what is it that G’d desires? He wants to find an excuse to justify His creatures’ actions as we know from Isaiah 42,21: ה’ חפץ למען צדקו יגדיל תורה ויאדיר, ”The Lord desires His creatures’ vindication, that He may magnify and glorify (His) Teaching.” If our paragraph had commenced in the normal way some people might have misunderstood and thought that G’d derives satisfaction from having to afflict people even though they were guilty of something.
Another comment by the Midrash: the words “evil does not abide with You” which we quoted from Psalms 5,5 mean that the name of G’d is not associated with events of an evil nature but only with things positive. When G’d created light and darkness, He did associate His name with the light but not with the darkness. In Genesis 1,5 the Torah writes: “G’d called the light day, and the darkness He called night.” When G’d blessed the first pair of human beings, His name was associated with the blessing for both of them, as the Torah writes (Genesis 1,28: “G’d blessed them.” On the other hand, when G’d decreed a curse on man, (Genesis 3,16) The Torah writes: “to the woman He had said, etc.,” and we find similar language in connection with the penalty decreed on Adam. The Torah writes (Genesis 3,17): “and to Adam He had said, etc.” You may ask that when G’d cursed the serpent we also find this kind of language, i.e. (Genesis 3,14) “the Lord G’d had said to the serpent, ‘because you have done this, etc.’” Our sages answered this query in Tanchuma Tazria 9 by saying that there are indeed three occasions when G’d did associate His name with something evil, such as a curse. The first instance is the case of the מסית, someone who seduces others to worship idols; the first personification of such a seducer was the serpent who seduced Chavah in Gan Eden saying to her: “G’d knows that on the day you (pl) will eat from the tree your eyes will be opened and you will become just like G’d” (Genesis 3,5). The serpent implied that just as G’d had created worlds so she and Adam would be able to create worlds; the serpent implied that G’d had forbidden eating the fruit because He was jealous of potential competition. The serpent implied that just as a skilled craftsman is anxious not to reveal the secrets of his craft, so G’d wanted to keep the secret of how He had created the universe. Seeing that the serpent had used G’d’s name in its seduction of Chavah, G’d in turn associated His name with the punishment, the curse.
The second instance of G’d’s name being associated with something evil concerns people who deliberately transgress the decrees of the sages whose authority has been given to them by G’d and has been confirmed at Mount Gerizim. The prophet Jeremiah referred to the fact that such people are guilty of death when he wrote in Jeremiah 11,3: “Thus said the Lord: cursed be the man who will not obey the terms of this covenant which I enjoined your fathers when I freed them from Egypt, etc.” The sin of these people is that they place their trust in man instead of in G’d as the prophet said in Jeremiah 17,5: “Thus said the Lord: ‘cursed is he who trusts in man, who makes a mere flesh his strength and turns his thoughts from the Lord.’” In other words, when does the curse mentioned earlier apply? When someone turns his heart away from the Lord. When Noach blessed his sons Shem and Yaphet, he used the name of G’d in his blessing, saying: ברוך ה’ אלו-הי שם, “blessed be the Lord, the G’d of Shem,” etc. When he cursed Canaan (Genesis 9,26) he simply said: ארור כנען, “cursed be Canaan;” he did not mention G’d in that context. When the prophet Elisha prayed to G’d asking for deliverance from the Arameans (enemy of the Israelites at that time, Kings II 6,17) he invoked the name of the Lord in his prayer saying: “Lord open his eyes let him see” (a reference to his attendant who was afraid). When he then turned to cursing the Arameans (verse 18 of the same chapter), Elisha only said: ”please strike these people with a blinding light.” The name of G’d was not invoked in the prayer to bring a curse upon them. Even when the Israelites were sinful, G’d referred to them with respect and honor. When G’d legislated the kind of animals which were to be offered by the Israelites, -when, where and under what circumstances,- the legislation is introduced with the words: “if one of you wishes to offer a sacrifice to the Lord, etc.” When introducing the צרעת legislation, however, the name of G’d does not appear. Clearly, even when the legislation presupposes sins by the afflicted, the Torah still does not wish to involve G’d directly, as the One who initiates the “curse.” This is why the verse starts merely with the words: “when someone develops a white spot on the skin of his flesh, etc.”
What sins cause such afflictions? In retribution for illicit sex. (Tanchuma Tazria 11) This is also what happened in Jerusalem whose inhabitants were struck by this disease because their sexual mores had deteriorated so much (Isaiah 3,16) ”because the daughters of Zion are so vain and walk with their heads thrown back, with roving eyes, and with mincing gait, making a tingling with their feet...the Lord will uncover their heads.” The word used there is שפח which is the equivalent of צרעת as we know from Leviticus 14,5.
The words אדם כי יהיה בעור בשרו שאת או ספחת, are equivalent to what we read n Chabakuk 1,7 איום ונורא ממננו ושפתו ושאתו יצא, “they are terrible and dreadful; they make their own laws and are overbearing.” The prophet speaks about Adam who was the direct creation of G’d, created in His likeness, who was composed of particles from all the corners of the globe and whose dominion before his sin therefore extended over all parts of the globe. At that time Adam was able to see with his eyes from one end of the earth to the other. Adam’s wife, Chavah was created from his very body, she who caused his mortality. Seeing that she gave Adam to eat from the fruit of the tree of knowledge she made him mortal.
Another Midrashic explanation: The words “terrible and dreadful” which we quoted from Chabakuk refer to Pharaoh who ruled over the whole earth as we know from Psalms 105,20. The words: “they make their own laws, etc.” refer to Moses who grew up in the very house of this wicked Pharaoh and eventually deprived him of his rule after bringing ten plagues upon him. Moses used to take a look at his holy staff to see which kind of plague was appropriate to smite Pharaoh with; he would then inflict this plague upon him; hence the prophet speaks about something “terrible and dreadful.”
Yet another interpretation of that verse in Chabakuk relates the adjectives in that verse to the principal characteristics of the four host nations who had control of the Jewish people in exile at different times. [The Midrash broadens its perspective of allegorical meanings; the interested reader is referred to the original text seeing that our author does not contribute to the understanding of this Midrash except quoting its text. Ed.]

וינשכו את העם AND THEY BIT THE PEOPLE — God said, as it were: Let the serpent which was punished for slanderous statements come and exact punishment from those who utter slander. — Let the serpent to which all kinds of food have one taste (that of earth; cf. Genesis 3:14 and Yoma 75a) come and exact punishment from these ingrates to whom one thing (the manna) had the taste of many different dainties (see Rashi 11:8) (Midrash Tanchuma, Chukat 19).