ציטירנדיקער פּירוש אויף דניאל 10:3

לֶ֣חֶם חֲמֻד֞וֹת לֹ֣א אָכַ֗לְתִּי וּבָשָׂ֥ר וָיַ֛יִן לֹא־בָ֥א אֶל־פִּ֖י וְס֣וֹךְ לֹא־סָ֑כְתִּי עַד־מְלֹ֕את שְׁלֹ֥שֶׁת שָׁבֻעִ֖ים יָמִֽים׃ (פ)

גלוסטיקע שפּײַז האָב איך ניט געגעסן, און פֿלײש און װײַן איז ניט געקומען אין מײַן מױל, און זאַלבן האָב איך זיך ניט געזאַלבט, ביז עס זײַנען פֿול געװאָרן דרײַ װאָכן צײַט.

Ibn Ezra

If Scripture had only said in the camp , it would be permissible to slaughter animals anywhere outside of the camp. The commandment that is herein given also applies to the Temple; but there it covers only the districts close to Jerusalem (the definition of “close” is known from tradition [Qiddushin 57b]). In faraway places one may simply slaughter the animal and eat its flesh (for so it is written [Deuteronomy 12:21]). Many people have incorrectly said that, during the Exile, all flesh is forbidden. They assert that the passage “nor did meat or wine come into my mouth” [Daniel 10:3] denotes an additional abstinence from the flesh of fish. I do not wish to spend time refuting them.
פֿרעגט אַ רבֿBookmarkShareCopy

Ibn Ezra

annoint from “nor did I annoint myself at all” [Daniel 10: 3]. Scripture describes the situation that is the opposite of “oil upon your head” [Ecclesiastes 9: 8].
פֿרעגט אַ רבֿBookmarkShareCopy