וַיִּקַּ֛ח יְהוָ֥ה אֱלֹהִ֖ים אֶת־הָֽאָדָ֑ם וַיַּנִּחֵ֣הוּ בְגַן־עֵ֔דֶן לְעָבְדָ֖הּ וּלְשָׁמְרָֽהּ׃
און גאָט דער האַר האָט גענומען דעם מענטשן, און האָט אים אַרײַנגעזעצט אין גאָרטן פֿון עֵדֶן, אים צו באַאַרבעטען און אים צו היטן.
The Midrash of Philo
Why did God place man whom he had created in the Paradise, but not that man who is after his own image? (Genesis 2:15).
Allegorical Interpretation of Genesis
It is somewhat startling to be told that the Man placed in the Garden in Gen. 2:15 is not the Man of Gen. 2:8, but the Man of Gen. 1:27. Only the latter can till and guard the virtues. The former sees them only to be driven from them. The one is “made,” the other is “moulded.” The Man of 2:8 has but facility in apprehending (as is signified by the words “placed in the Garden”). The Man of 2:15 has also persistence in doing (“to till it”), and tenacity in keeping (“to guard it”). (43–55.)
The Midrash of Philo
Why God placed man in the Paradise with a twofold object, namely, that he might both till it and keep it, when the Paradise was in reality in need of no cultivation, because it was perfect in everything, as having been planted by God; nor, again, did it require a keeper, for who was there to ravage it? (Genesis 2:15).