תּלמוד אויף בראשית 4:22

וְצִלָּ֣ה גַם־הִ֗וא יָֽלְדָה֙ אֶת־תּ֣וּבַל קַ֔יִן לֹטֵ֕שׁ כָּל־חֹרֵ֥שׁ נְחֹ֖שֶׁת וּבַרְזֶ֑ל וַֽאֲח֥וֹת תּֽוּבַל־קַ֖יִן נַֽעֲמָֽה׃

און צִלָה, זי אױך האָט געבאָרן תּובַל-קַיִנען, דעם אױסשלײַפֿער פֿון אַלערלײ קופּער- און אײַזנגעצײַג; און די שװעסטער פֿון תּובַל-קַיִנען איז געװען נַעֲמָה.

Jerusalem Talmud Bava Batra

HALAKHAH: “A person should not put,” etc. It was stated: Nor a smithy. Rav Qarna stated: If he was like a metal worker34The biblical metal worker; Gen.4:22; he only spends a small part of his time as a smith; most of his time he manufactures metal vessels., or it was built originally as a smithy35A separate building. It is possible to read: If it was built as a smithy from the start, i. e., if the smithy existed before the construction of the warehouse; this is the interpretation of the Babli, 20b., it is permitted. How is it in front of his dwelling36Out in the open.? Rebbi Aḥa said, certainly not in front of his dwelling37This already was settled in Halakhah 1:7.. Rebbi Jonathan said, a person causing damage has no claim of undisturbed posession38Babli 23a. Even if the other inhabitants of the courtyard do not object, a new owner can object if an activity is classified in law as damaging.. Rebbi Joshua39Rosh (Chapter 2, §18) reads “R. Joshua ben Levi.” This reading has to be accepted. said, the rabbis object to permanent smoke. As the following: A woman was burning sand40Maybe to make glass. It is possible to read: She was burning the bird Ḥol (Phoenix, Job 19:18). For חולין Rosh reads קלא or קולין “roasts”. below [the apartment of] Rebbi Ilfay41Rosh reads: R. Eleazar.. He wanted to object to her. The case came before Rebbi Nasa who said, they said it only about continuous smoke.
פֿרעגט אַ רבֿBookmarkShareCopy