תּלמוד אויף שמות 30:20

Rebbi Jacob bar Aḥa said, Hilfai asked: What is the status of a fistful given on the setting of the night⁴⁷It is a biblical commandment that all leftovers from the service of a certain day have to be burned on the altar during the following night. Therefore the question has to be, what is the status of the next morning’s flour offering which was brought to the altar at dawn before the required new wood was formally brought to the altar after the removal of the previous day’s ashes.? Rebbi Jeremiah said, Hilfai asked: What is the status of the public parts on the setting of the night⁴⁸The same question as before, only referring to the parts of the sacrificial animals brought before the ritual setting of new logs in the morning. The questions remain unanswered also in the Babli. Menaḥot26b.? Is that not a baratta? Nothing precedes the daily sacrifice but incense⁴⁹Since the daily sacrifice is scheduled בבוקר “in the morning (Ex. 29:39) but the incense בבוקר בבוקר “in the early morning (Ex. 30:7); cf. Halakhah 3:5. Babli Pesaḥim59a.. The baratta as commandment, what he is asking is as impediment⁵⁰Is the service invalid if the precedences indicated by the verses are not followed?. Does the diadem cover up for impurity of the hands⁵¹Since except for the biblically ordained washing (“sanctification”) of hands and feet at the start of a priest’s period of service (Ex. 30:20,40:31–32) the rules of impurity of hands are purely rabbinical, and hands are purified by immersion in a miqweh, not by sanctification from the basin. The (unanswered) question is whether the diadem covers also non-biblical infractions of the rules.? Do hands become disqualified by leaving⁵²It is obvious that if a Cohen leaves the sacred precinct because he has finished his tour of duty, for the next tour he has to sanctify his hands and feet again. The question is whether his hands become rabbinically impure if he leaves the sacred precinct for a prescribed ritual act, such as depositing excess ashes outside the sacred domain.? Is that not a barattai If he sanctified⁵¹Since except for the biblically ordained washing (“sanctification”) of hands and feet at the start of a priest’s period of service (Ex. 30:20,40:31–32) the rules of impurity of hands are purely rabbinical, and hands are purified by immersion in a miqweh, not by sanctification from the basin. The (unanswered) question is whether the diadem covers also non-biblical infractions of the rules. his hands and feet and they became impure, he immerses them and they are pure; if he left they did not become disqualified because of leaving. This comes following the one who said, an overnight stay does not disqualify hands. What is his problem? [But here] it is following him who said, an overnight stay disqualifies hands. Do hands become impure for missing time? Is that not a baraita? If he sanctified his hands and feet today for tomorrow’s service⁵³It seems that one has to complete the sentence: the sanctification is valid..

Rebbi Jonah said, except for the first sanctification¹⁴¹This now refers to Mishnah 8, that the High Priest does not use the basin but a golden pitcher. Since the first sanctification from the basis is a biblical requirement (Ex. 30:20–21, 40:30) it cannot be waved.. Rebbi Yose said, even for the first sanctification. A baraita disagrees with Rebbi Jonah: All vessels¹⁴²All containers. Zevaḥim 21b/22a. in the Temple were qualified for sanctifying hands and legs. He explains it, except for the first sanctification. A baraita disagrees with Rebbi Yose: the basin and its base are obstructive. He explains it, their place is obstructive¹⁴³The place between the Tent of Meeting and the altar (Ex. 30:18). If the basin is not in its place, no service can be held..