תּוספֿתּא אויף ויקרא 15:15

וְעָשָׂ֤ה אֹתָם֙ הַכֹּהֵ֔ן אֶחָ֣ד חַטָּ֔את וְהָאֶחָ֖ד עֹלָ֑ה וְכִפֶּ֨ר עָלָ֧יו הַכֹּהֵ֛ן לִפְנֵ֥י יְהוָ֖ה מִזּוֹבֽוֹ׃ (ס)

און דער כֹּהן זאָל זײ מאַכן אײנע אַ זינדאָפּפֿער, און אײנע אַ בראַנדאָפּפֿער, און דער כֹּהן זאָל מכַפּר זײַן אױף אים פֿאַר גאָט פֿון װעגן זײַן פֿליסונג.

Tosefta Parah

Rebbi says, what is the verse coming to teach (Num. 8:8), "And a second (sheni) bull, a young of the herd, take for a sin-offering"? If it is to teach that there are two, behold, it already says (Lev. 15:15), "And the Kohen shall make them, one as a sin-offering and one as a burnt-offering." [Rather,] you might have thought that the sin-offering precedes the burnt-offering in every [sacrificial] act, thus the verse says, "And a second bull, a young of the herd, take for a sin-offering." Or, you might have thought that "a second bull, a young of the herd, take as a burnt-offering" comes to teach that the burnt offering precedes the sin offering in every [sacrificial] act. Thus the verse states (Num. 8:12), "and he shall designate one as a sin-offering and one as a burnt offering, to God" (i.e., switching the order). How so? The blood of the sin-offering precedes the blood of the burnt-offering, because it appeases, and the bones of the burnt-offering precede the limbs of the sin-offering, because they are entirely burnt (Zev. 10:2). Rabbi Shimon says, what does it come to teach, "and a second bull, a young of the herd, take as a sin-offering"? You might think that the sin-offering is eaten by the Levites; thus the verse states, "second," as in "second to the burnt-offering." Just as the burnt-offering is not eaten, so too the sin-offering is not eaten. Similarly, said Rabbi Yosei (Ezra 8:35), "The exiles who returned from captivity sacrificed burnt offerings to the God of Israel: twelve bulls for the sake of all Israel, ninety-nine rams*note that the received text of Ezra 8:35 has "ninety-six rams", seventy-seven lambs, and twelve he-goats as a sin-offering, all these as a burnt-offering to God." Is it possible that the sin-offerings were offered up as burnt-offerings? Rather, just as a sin-offering is not eaten, so too a burnt-offering is not eaten. And so too Rabbi Yehuda would say, is was [as atonement] for idol worship [during the exile] that they brought them.
פֿרעגט אַ רבֿBookmarkShareCopy