Chasidut zu Bereschit 1:31
וַיַּ֤רְא אֱלֹהִים֙ אֶת־כָּל־אֲשֶׁ֣ר עָשָׂ֔ה וְהִנֵּה־ט֖וֹב מְאֹ֑ד וַֽיְהִי־עֶ֥רֶב וַֽיְהִי־בֹ֖קֶר י֥וֹם הַשִּׁשִּֽׁי׃ (פ)
Und Gott sah alles, was er gemacht hatte, und siehe, es war sehr gut; und es ward Abend, und es ward Morgen, der sechste Tag.
Flames of Faith
In the book of Genesis, after every day of God’s creation, He examined His handiwork and declared that it was good. On the sixth day He reviewed all and declared, Ve-hinneh tov me’od, “And behold it is very good” (Gen. 1:31). The Midrash287Bereishis Rabbah, Chapter 9. explains the phrase “very good” as referring to Gehinnom, death, and the evil inclination. How can the Midrash call these disasters “very good”? The answer is that deep down even the worst evils are good. A kelippah (a shell) fulfills an important function, it preserves the fruit. Kelippos in the moral sense, such as evil desires, help maintain the pleasure that is slated for man.288Innerspace pg. 71.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Mareh Yechezkel on Torah
From the Pesach Haggadah: “And God saw all that He had made and behold, it was very good” (Genesis 1:31): As on each day, it is stated, “And God saw that it was good” – that from God, may He blessed, seeing it, it was good. But afterwards (on the sixty day), God saw again (a second time) – and that was very good.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Genesis 17,13., “to be circumcised, etc.:” [what follows is not documented although the author quotes Bereshit Rabbah, 49. It is not found there, nor in Bereshit Rabbah 47, where it ought to be, if at all. The author himself appears to have had his doubts, and this is why he attributes the so-called “quote” די לעבד להיות כרבו, “it is appropriate for a servant to emulate his master,” to a statement in the Levush. The authenticity of the statement has been questioned as it implies that just as G’d is “circumcised,” so His favourite creatures must be. I will content myself with paraphrasing the thoughts of the author. We know that in order to create a physical world, G’d had to “reduce” the impact of His emanations, or to be מצמצם, “to understate the extent of His brilliance.” In order for G’d to conclude a covenant with Avraham in his capacity as the founder of the Jewish people, G’d’s “junior” partner on earth, he and the people under his authority had to perform a symbolic act on their body, i.e. the removal of their foreskin. By doing this they emulated an attribute used by their Creator. This explanation may answer the question that if G’d created everything in His universe in a perfect state, (compare Genesis 1,31) why would it be necessary at this stage for Avraham to remove a G’d given part of his body? Ed.]
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy