Halakhah zu Schemot 22:2
אִם־זָרְחָ֥ה הַשֶּׁ֛מֶשׁ עָלָ֖יו דָּמִ֣ים ל֑וֹ שַׁלֵּ֣ם יְשַׁלֵּ֔ם אִם־אֵ֣ין ל֔וֹ וְנִמְכַּ֖ר בִּגְנֵבָתֽוֹ׃
Wenn dies aber bei Tage geschehen ist, so ist Blutschuld seinetwegen, denn er hätte nur das Gestohlene [doppelt] zu bezahlen, wenn er nichts hat, werde er verkauft um seinen Diebstahl.
Contemporary Halakhic Problems, Vol III
In analyzing the "law of the pursuer": formulated in Exodus 22:2, the Gemara, Sanhedrin 72a, states, "… if the matter is clear to you as the sun that he is not at peace with you, slay him; but if not, do not slay him."8See R. Isaac Schorr, Teshuvot Koaḥ Shor, no. 20; R. Chaim Ozer Grodzinski, Teshuvot Aḥi‘ezer, I, no. 23, sec. 2; and R. Moses Feinstein, Ha-Pardes, Nisan 5728, reprinted in Sefer ha-Zikaron le-Maran ha-Gri Abramsky (Jerusalem, 5738), and in Iggerot Mosheh, Ḥoshen Mishpat, II, no. 69, sec. 2. This is true whether the putative aggressor be a Jew or a non-Jew. While the taking of the life of a non-Jew does not occasion capital punishment at the hands of a human court, Ravan, Baba Kamma 111b, and Kesef Mishneh, Hilkhot Rozeaḥ 2:11, are quite clear in ruling that taking the life of a non-Jew is encompassed in the prohibition against homicide. Explicit authority for that ruling is found in Mekhilta, Mishpatim 4:58. Indeed, there are many forms of homicide for which Jewish law does not prescribe capital punishment. The nature of the punishment administered and the absence of the severest form of punishment does not at all indicate that the act is to be condoned.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy