Midrasch zu Rut 4:23

(Fol. 7b) R. Nachman said: "Huna b. Nathan related to me the following Baraitha: Whence do we learn that the nuptial benedictions ought to be pronounced in the presence of ten? It is said (Ruth 4, 2) And he took ten men." R. Abahu said: "From here (Ps. 68, 27) In assemblies bless ye God, praise the Lord, ye sprung from Israel's fountain." But what interpretation does R. Nachman give to the latter passage? He needs it for the [interpretation of the] following Baraitha. R. Maier was accustomed to say: "Whence do we learn that even the embryos in the bowels of their mother proclaimed the song at the Red Sea? It is said: In assemblies bless ye, God [praise] the Lord, ye sprung from Israel's fountain."

...And in Jonah it is written, "I would rather die than live." Jonah was the son of the woman of Zarfat. He had already died once, and knew that he would have rest, and Elijah did not die. And so he said, "am I not better than my ancestors?"

The disciples of R. Jose questioned him: "How did David marry two sisters while they were both living?" He answered them: "He married Michal after the death of Merab." And R. Jose said so in accordance with his own theory, for we are taught in a Baraitha: R. Jose used to lecture about the following two confused passages: It is written (II Sam. 21, 8) And the king took the two sons of Rizpah, the daughters of Ayah, whom she had born unto Saul, Armoni and Mephibosheth; and the five sons of Michal, the daughler of Saul, whom she had borne to Adriel, the son of Barzillai the Mehollathite. But was Michal given to Adriel? Was she not given to Palti b. Layish? as it is written (Ib. 25, 44) But Saul had given Michal his daughter, David's wife, to Palti, the son of Layish. Hence the Scriptures equalize the betrothing of Merab to Adriel to the betrothing of Michal to Palti b. Layish. Just as the betrothing of Michal to Palti was a sin because she was already the wife of David, so also was the betrothing of Herab to Adriel a sin because she was already David's wife. But what would R. Joshua b. Karcha say to the passage which reads: The five sons of Michal, the daughter of Saul? Did then, Michal hear them? Was it not Merab who bore them? R. Joshua will answer that Merab bore them and Michal merely brought them up, and therefore they bore the name of Michal. This is to teach you that the one who brings up an orphan is considered by Scriptures as if he bore the child. R. Chanina says: "This is inferred from (Ruth 4, 17) There hath been a son born unto Naomi, etc. Did, then, Naomi bear him? Was it not, in fact, Ruth who bore him? Therefore we must say that, though Ruth bore him, he was nevertheless brought up by Naomi, and therefore is he called after her." R. Jochanan said: "From the following (I Chr. 4, 18) And his wife the Jewess bore Jered the father of Gedor, and Heber the father, etc., and these are the sons of Bithiah, the daughter of Pharaoh, whom Mered had taken [for wife]. Mered refers to Caleb, and why was he called Mered (rebel)? Because he rebelled against the accusation of the spies. And was he then born of Bithiah? Behold he was born of Jochcbed? We must therefore say that, though he was born of Jochebed, he was nevertheless raised by Bithiah, and therefore he is called after her name." R. Eliezer said: From the following (Ps. 77, 16) Thou hast with Thine arm redeemed Thy people, the sons of Jacob and Joseph. Selah, Were they, then, born to Joseph, and not to Jacob? They were born to Jacob, but Joseph fed them, and therefore they were named after him.

(Lev. 25:25:) ”When your relative becomes poor and sells some of his property, then his redeemer shall come.” Who is his redeemer? I am He, as stated (in Jer. 50:33-34), “The Children of Israel […] are oppressed […]. Their Redeemer is mighty, His name is the Lord of hosts […].” Seven names are given to the poor.¹⁴Cf. Lev. R. 34:6, which lists eight names. And they are the following: crushed (dakh), poor ('ani), lowly (makh), dispossessed (rash), oppressed (tekhakhim),¹⁵Cf. Lev. R. 34:6, followed by Yalqut Shim‘oni, Lev. 665, which reads dal (“impoverished”) here. wretched (misken), and pauper (evyon). [(Lev. 25:25:) “When your relative becomes poor.”] This text is related (to Ps. 106:43), “Many times He delivered them, but they rebelled; so they became poor through their iniquity.” You find that in the days that the Judges judged, Israel served idols; so they were enslaved in the hands of the peoples of the world, as stated (in Jud. 3:7-8), “Then the Children of Israel did evil in the sight of the Lord…. So the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel, and he delivered them into the hands of Cushan.” What did they do (according to vs. 9)? “The Children of Israel cried unto the Lord, and the Lord raised up a savior for the Children of Israel [to save them, i.e.,] Othniel ben Kenaz.” They immediately repented and were redeemed. So [it happened] another time, as stated (in Jud. 3:12), “Then the Children of Israel again did evil….” They immediately repented; so the Lord raised up a redeemer for them, Ehud ben Gera the Binyaminite; and they were redeemed at his hands. Then they served idols again and were sold into the hands of Sisera, as stated (in Jud. 4:3), “and he oppressed the Children of Israel with might twenty years.” What is the meaning of “with might?” With blasphemies and with curses, just as you say (in Mal. 3:13), “Your words have been mighty against me.” When they repented, He raised up Barak and Deborah as redeemers for them; and they were redeemed at their hands. Ergo (in Ps. 106:43), “Many times He delivered them…; so they became poor through their iniquity.” What is the meaning of “so they became poor through their iniquity?” That they became impoverished in the midst of the nations, as stated (in Jud. 6:6), “And Israel became very impoverished….” What is the meaning of “and Israel became impoverished?” R. Isaac and R. Levi differed. One said, “They were impoverished (rt.: dll) from good works”; and the other said, “They did not have [enough] to bring even a poor person's (rt.: dll) offering, as stated (in Lev. 14:21), ‘If, however, he is poor (rt.: dll) and does not have the means.’” Ergo (in Ps. 106:43), “so they became poor through their iniquity,” as they had become impoverished (rt.: dll). Another interpretation (of Ps. 106:43), “Many times He delivered them”: [These words] speak about people. When trouble comes to one [of them] and he repents, the Holy One, blessed be He, delivers him. So it is the first time and the second. [If he repents, that is preferable; but if not, the Holy One, blessed be He, brings trouble upon him. And you yourself know that the Holy One, blessed be He, tests Israel to know if they will repent. First, He brings punishments against the [other] nations, as stated (Zeph. 3:6-7) “I wiped out nations: Their corner towers are desolate… I thought that she would fear Me, would learn a lesson.” [If] they repented, that is preferable; but if not, He destroys their money, as stated (Hos 7:9), “Strangers have consumed his strength….” [If they] repented, that is preferable; but if not, the Holy One blessed be He, brings evil upon one of the cities of Israel, as stated (Is. 42:25), “it blazed upon them all about… it burned among them.” [If] they repented, that is preferable; but if not, what is written (in Numbers 14:35)? “In this desert they will end, and there will they die.” And a person should not say, “The evil is not coming on my account.” He should know that he [too] will die, as stated (Amos 9:10), “All the sinners of My people shall perish [by the sword], who boast, ‘Never shall the evil overtake us or come near us.’” Come and see how difficult it is for the Holy One, blessed be He, to raise His hand against a human being. So what does He do to him? When he sins, He begins by raising His hand against his assets. From whom have you learned it? From Naomi, her sons, and Elimelech her husband, who was the head of [his] generation. When famine came, what did he do? He left the Land of Israel and went to the Land of Moab. Now the Holy One, blessed be He, was angry with him because he was prince (nasi) of [his] generation. The Holy One, blessed be He, said to him, “These have abandoned My children and left the Land of Israel a wilderness.” What is written there (in Ruth 1:3)? “Then Naomi's husband Elimelech died,” but his sons were unable to learn from their father to return to the Land of Israel. And what did they do? (According to vs. 4) They also “took Moabite wives for themselves,” whom they neither immersed nor converted.¹⁶Ruth R. 2:9. (Ibid., cont.:) “The name of the one was Orpah ('rph) and the name of the second was Ruth”: Orpah ('rph), because she turned her back ('rp) on her mother-in-law; Ruth, because she esteemed (r'th) the words of her mother-in-law. (ibid., cont.:) “And they lived there about ten years.” All those ten years (in Moab) the Holy One, blessed be He, had been warning them, that they might repent and return to the Land of Israel. When He saw that they did not repent, he began to raise His hand against their camels and against their cattle.¹⁷Lev. R. 17:4; Ruth R. 2:10; PRK 7:10; PR 17:6. When He saw that they did not repent (literally, return in repentance), immediately (in vs. 5), “Both of them, Mahlon and Chilion, also died.” Thus [you may infer] that it is difficult for the Holy One, blessed be He, to raise His hand against [a human being]. So what does He do to them? He deprives them of their assets, and they sell them. When someone sins, what does the Holy One, blessed be He, do to him first? He brings poverty upon him, so that he sells his field. If he repents, then fine; but if not he sells his house. If he repents, then fine; but if not he sells himself. How is this shown? So is it written (in Lev. 25:25), “When your relative becomes poor.” If he repents, then fine; but if not, see what is written in the second section; (in Lev. 25:29), “And when someone sells a dwelling house.” If he repents, then fine; but if not, (in Lev. 25:39), “When your relative becomes poor and he is sold to you.” Why all this? Because they became poor through [their] iniquities. (Lev. 25:25:) “Then his redeemer shall come.” R. Simeon ben Johay said, “Elimelech, Salmon, So-and-So,¹⁸Peloni Almoni. According to Ruth 4:1, this was the “name” of Ruth’s most closely related redeemer. and Naomi's father were all descendants of Nahshon ben Amminadab;¹⁹BB 91a. See Ruth 4:20–21; also Exod. 6:23, according to which Nahshon ben Amminadab was Aaron’s brother-in-law. and Elimelech, Mahlon, and Chilion were leaders²⁰Rt.: PRNS. Cf. the Gk.: pronoos (“prudent”). of the generation.” So for what reason were they punished? Because they went abroad from the Land of Israel. Thus it is stated (in Ruth 1:19), “the whole city was excited over them, [and the women said, ‘Is this Naomi?’]” What is the meaning of, “Is this (Hazot) Naomi?” You saw (hazitem) Naomi when she went abroad from the Land of Israel. What has happened to her? (Lev. 25:25:) “Then his redeemer shall come, the one most closely related (qarov).” This is Boaz. When? When Naomi sold the field, as stated (in Ruth 4:3), “the parcel of land which belonged to our relative, [Elimelech].” (Lev. 25:25:) “Then his redeemer shall come, the one most closely related to him.” This is Boaz, since it is stated (in Ruth 2:20), “The man is our relative (qarov), [he is one of our redeeming kin (go'el)].” At that time Ruth went to Boaz. Her mother-in-law said to her (in Ruth 3:2), “see, he is winnowing barley on the threshing floor tonight.” [If] he was a prince (nasi), would he have been winnowing on a threshing floor? It is simply because his generation was dissolute in matters of theft, and [so] he went out to guard his threshing floor. She said to her (in vs. 3), “You are to wash and anoint yourself.” Then after that (ibid), “and go down to the threshing floor.” "And I shall go down" is the actual written text (ketiv)]. What is the meaning of "and I shall go down?" She said to her, “My merit will go down with you.” Hence it is written, "And I shall go down."²¹Ruth R. 5:12. But she did not do as her mother-in-law had told her. What did Ruth do? [Only] after she went down to the threshing floor, she did what she was told, as stated (in vs. 6), “She went down to the threshing floor and did just as her mother-in-law had commanded her.”²²In other words, since she only obeyed Naomi after she had arrived at the threshing floor, she must have neglected to wash and anoint herself before then. Why? It is simply that she said, “The generation was dissolute in sexual matters. What if they see me made up and say, ‘Perhaps she is a harlot?’” Therefore, “She went down to the threshing floor and” afterwards “she did just as her mother-in-law had commanded her.” (Vs. 7:) Then, when Boaz had eaten and drunk, and his heart was merry.” What is the meaning of “and his heart was merry?” That he was occupied with words of the Torah.²³Ruth R. 5:15. Thus it is stated (Prov. 4:2), “As a good teaching…,” and it is [also] written (about wisdom in Prov. 9:5), “Come and eat of my bread.” (Ruth 3:7, cont.:) “And when he came to lie down beside the grain pile, then she came in secret.” What is the meaning of, “in secret (lt; rt.: lwt)?” [It is] just as you say (in I Sam. 21:10), “here it is wrapped (rt.: lwt) in a mantle.” (Ruth 3:8:) “Now it came to pass in the middle of the night that the man was startled. So he turned aside, [and here was a woman lying at his feet].” What is the meaning of, “turned aside (rt.: lpt)?” [It is] just as you say (in Jud. 16:29), “And Samson embraced (rt.: lpt) the two middle pillars.” That righteous man began to yell. [Fear] embraced him. (Ruth 3:9:) Then he said, “Who are you?” And she said, “I am your handmaid Ruth.” He said to her, “What have you come here to do?” She said to him, “To fulfill the Torah (in Lev. 25:25), ‘When your relative becomes poor [… then his redeemer shall come].’ Arise and fulfill the Torah.” He said to her, “Since you have come to fulfill the Torah, (Ruth 3:13:) ‘Spend the night; then it shall come to pass in the morning that, if he will redeem you, good (tov)’”; for he had a relative older than he, whose name was Tov. R. Hanina said, “She said to him, ‘And are you dismissing me with words?’” He said to her (ibid., cont.), “’As the Lord lives,’ I am not dismissing you with words.” (Ruth 4:1:) “Then Boaz went up to the gate and sat down there, and behold, the redeemer of whom Boaz had spoken was passing by.” He said to him, “Sit down, and we shall look into the Torah; what is written there? Is it not written (in Lev. 25:25), ‘When your relative becomes poor and sells some of his property, [then his redeemer shall come, the one most closely related to him, and redeem…]’” Boaz said to Tov (in Ruth 4:3–4), “’Naomi is selling the parcel of land which belonged to our relative Elimelech […]. And I thought I should disclose it to you, saying, ‘Buy it,’” since you are a senior redeemer than I [and have the right] to redeem it. [Hence] (as in vs. 4, cont.,) “If you will redeem it, redeem it.” (Vs. 6:) “Then the redeemer said, ‘Acquire it for yourself.’” At that time Boaz redeemed what Naomi had sold. Now from where did Boaz learn [what to do]? From this section (in Lev. 25:25), “When your relative becomes poor and sells [some of his property, then his redeemer shall come, the one most closely related to him, and redeem…].” And who else was [like] this? Jeremiah was [like] this. At the time that the Holy One, blessed be He, said (in Jeremiah 32:7), “Behold Hanamel the son of Shalum your uncle is coming to you…,” [Jeremiah said] (in Jeremiah 32:8), “And just as the Lord had said, my cousin Hanamel came to me in the prison compound.” Immediately, Jeremiah fulfilled this section [of the Torah], as stated (in Jeremiah 32:9), “And I bought the field.” Now from where did he learn [what to do]? From this section (in Lev. 25:25), “When your relative becomes poor and sells some of his property, [then his redeemer shall come, the one most closely related to him, and redeem…].”

(Lev. 25:25:) ”When your relative becomes poor and sells some of his property, then his redeemer shall come.” Who is his redeemer? I am He, as stated (in Jer. 50:33-34), “The Children of Israel […] are oppressed […]. Their Redeemer is mighty, His name is the Lord of hosts […].” Seven names are given to the poor.¹⁴Cf. Lev. R. 34:6, which lists eight names. And they are the following: crushed (dakh), poor ('ani), lowly (makh), dispossessed (rash), oppressed (tekhakhim),¹⁵Cf. Lev. R. 34:6, followed by Yalqut Shim‘oni, Lev. 665, which reads dal (“impoverished”) here. wretched (misken), and pauper (evyon). [(Lev. 25:25:) “When your relative becomes poor.”] This text is related (to Ps. 106:43), “Many times He delivered them, but they rebelled; so they became poor through their iniquity.” You find that in the days that the Judges judged, Israel served idols; so they were enslaved in the hands of the peoples of the world, as stated (in Jud. 3:7-8), “Then the Children of Israel did evil in the sight of the Lord…. So the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel, and he delivered them into the hands of Cushan.” What did they do (according to vs. 9)? “The Children of Israel cried unto the Lord, and the Lord raised up a savior for the Children of Israel [to save them, i.e.,] Othniel ben Kenaz.” They immediately repented and were redeemed. So [it happened] another time, as stated (in Jud. 3:12), “Then the Children of Israel again did evil….” They immediately repented; so the Lord raised up a redeemer for them, Ehud ben Gera the Binyaminite; and they were redeemed at his hands. Then they served idols again and were sold into the hands of Sisera, as stated (in Jud. 4:3), “and he oppressed the Children of Israel with might twenty years.” What is the meaning of “with might?” With blasphemies and with curses, just as you say (in Mal. 3:13), “Your words have been mighty against me.” When they repented, He raised up Barak and Deborah as redeemers for them; and they were redeemed at their hands. Ergo (in Ps. 106:43), “Many times He delivered them…; so they became poor through their iniquity.” What is the meaning of “so they became poor through their iniquity?” That they became impoverished in the midst of the nations, as stated (in Jud. 6:6), “And Israel became very impoverished….” What is the meaning of “and Israel became impoverished?” R. Isaac and R. Levi differed. One said, “They were impoverished (rt.: dll) from good works”; and the other said, “They did not have [enough] to bring even a poor person's (rt.: dll) offering, as stated (in Lev. 14:21), ‘If, however, he is poor (rt.: dll) and does not have the means.’” Ergo (in Ps. 106:43), “so they became poor through their iniquity,” as they had become impoverished (rt.: dll). Another interpretation (of Ps. 106:43), “Many times He delivered them”: [These words] speak about people. When trouble comes to one [of them] and he repents, the Holy One, blessed be He, delivers him. So it is the first time and the second. [If he repents, that is preferable; but if not, the Holy One, blessed be He, brings trouble upon him. And you yourself know that the Holy One, blessed be He, tests Israel to know if they will repent. First, He brings punishments against the [other] nations, as stated (Zeph. 3:6-7) “I wiped out nations: Their corner towers are desolate… I thought that she would fear Me, would learn a lesson.” [If] they repented, that is preferable; but if not, He destroys their money, as stated (Hos 7:9), “Strangers have consumed his strength….” [If they] repented, that is preferable; but if not, the Holy One blessed be He, brings evil upon one of the cities of Israel, as stated (Is. 42:25), “it blazed upon them all about… it burned among them.” [If] they repented, that is preferable; but if not, what is written (in Numbers 14:35)? “In this desert they will end, and there will they die.” And a person should not say, “The evil is not coming on my account.” He should know that he [too] will die, as stated (Amos 9:10), “All the sinners of My people shall perish [by the sword], who boast, ‘Never shall the evil overtake us or come near us.’” Come and see how difficult it is for the Holy One, blessed be He, to raise His hand against a human being. So what does He do to him? When he sins, He begins by raising His hand against his assets. From whom have you learned it? From Naomi, her sons, and Elimelech her husband, who was the head of [his] generation. When famine came, what did he do? He left the Land of Israel and went to the Land of Moab. Now the Holy One, blessed be He, was angry with him because he was prince (nasi) of [his] generation. The Holy One, blessed be He, said to him, “These have abandoned My children and left the Land of Israel a wilderness.” What is written there (in Ruth 1:3)? “Then Naomi's husband Elimelech died,” but his sons were unable to learn from their father to return to the Land of Israel. And what did they do? (According to vs. 4) They also “took Moabite wives for themselves,” whom they neither immersed nor converted.¹⁶Ruth R. 2:9. (Ibid., cont.:) “The name of the one was Orpah ('rph) and the name of the second was Ruth”: Orpah ('rph), because she turned her back ('rp) on her mother-in-law; Ruth, because she esteemed (r'th) the words of her mother-in-law. (ibid., cont.:) “And they lived there about ten years.” All those ten years (in Moab) the Holy One, blessed be He, had been warning them, that they might repent and return to the Land of Israel. When He saw that they did not repent, he began to raise His hand against their camels and against their cattle.¹⁷Lev. R. 17:4; Ruth R. 2:10; PRK 7:10; PR 17:6. When He saw that they did not repent (literally, return in repentance), immediately (in vs. 5), “Both of them, Mahlon and Chilion, also died.” Thus [you may infer] that it is difficult for the Holy One, blessed be He, to raise His hand against [a human being]. So what does He do to them? He deprives them of their assets, and they sell them. When someone sins, what does the Holy One, blessed be He, do to him first? He brings poverty upon him, so that he sells his field. If he repents, then fine; but if not he sells his house. If he repents, then fine; but if not he sells himself. How is this shown? So is it written (in Lev. 25:25), “When your relative becomes poor.” If he repents, then fine; but if not, see what is written in the second section; (in Lev. 25:29), “And when someone sells a dwelling house.” If he repents, then fine; but if not, (in Lev. 25:39), “When your relative becomes poor and he is sold to you.” Why all this? Because they became poor through [their] iniquities. (Lev. 25:25:) “Then his redeemer shall come.” R. Simeon ben Johay said, “Elimelech, Salmon, So-and-So,¹⁸Peloni Almoni. According to Ruth 4:1, this was the “name” of Ruth’s most closely related redeemer. and Naomi's father were all descendants of Nahshon ben Amminadab;¹⁹BB 91a. See Ruth 4:20–21; also Exod. 6:23, according to which Nahshon ben Amminadab was Aaron’s brother-in-law. and Elimelech, Mahlon, and Chilion were leaders²⁰Rt.: PRNS. Cf. the Gk.: pronoos (“prudent”). of the generation.” So for what reason were they punished? Because they went abroad from the Land of Israel. Thus it is stated (in Ruth 1:19), “the whole city was excited over them, [and the women said, ‘Is this Naomi?’]” What is the meaning of, “Is this (Hazot) Naomi?” You saw (hazitem) Naomi when she went abroad from the Land of Israel. What has happened to her? (Lev. 25:25:) “Then his redeemer shall come, the one most closely related (qarov).” This is Boaz. When? When Naomi sold the field, as stated (in Ruth 4:3), “the parcel of land which belonged to our relative, [Elimelech].” (Lev. 25:25:) “Then his redeemer shall come, the one most closely related to him.” This is Boaz, since it is stated (in Ruth 2:20), “The man is our relative (qarov), [he is one of our redeeming kin (go'el)].” At that time Ruth went to Boaz. Her mother-in-law said to her (in Ruth 3:2), “see, he is winnowing barley on the threshing floor tonight.” [If] he was a prince (nasi), would he have been winnowing on a threshing floor? It is simply because his generation was dissolute in matters of theft, and [so] he went out to guard his threshing floor. She said to her (in vs. 3), “You are to wash and anoint yourself.” Then after that (ibid), “and go down to the threshing floor.” "And I shall go down" is the actual written text (ketiv)]. What is the meaning of "and I shall go down?" She said to her, “My merit will go down with you.” Hence it is written, "And I shall go down."²¹Ruth R. 5:12. But she did not do as her mother-in-law had told her. What did Ruth do? [Only] after she went down to the threshing floor, she did what she was told, as stated (in vs. 6), “She went down to the threshing floor and did just as her mother-in-law had commanded her.”²²In other words, since she only obeyed Naomi after she had arrived at the threshing floor, she must have neglected to wash and anoint herself before then. Why? It is simply that she said, “The generation was dissolute in sexual matters. What if they see me made up and say, ‘Perhaps she is a harlot?’” Therefore, “She went down to the threshing floor and” afterwards “she did just as her mother-in-law had commanded her.” (Vs. 7:) Then, when Boaz had eaten and drunk, and his heart was merry.” What is the meaning of “and his heart was merry?” That he was occupied with words of the Torah.²³Ruth R. 5:15. Thus it is stated (Prov. 4:2), “As a good teaching…,” and it is [also] written (about wisdom in Prov. 9:5), “Come and eat of my bread.” (Ruth 3:7, cont.:) “And when he came to lie down beside the grain pile, then she came in secret.” What is the meaning of, “in secret (lt; rt.: lwt)?” [It is] just as you say (in I Sam. 21:10), “here it is wrapped (rt.: lwt) in a mantle.” (Ruth 3:8:) “Now it came to pass in the middle of the night that the man was startled. So he turned aside, [and here was a woman lying at his feet].” What is the meaning of, “turned aside (rt.: lpt)?” [It is] just as you say (in Jud. 16:29), “And Samson embraced (rt.: lpt) the two middle pillars.” That righteous man began to yell. [Fear] embraced him. (Ruth 3:9:) Then he said, “Who are you?” And she said, “I am your handmaid Ruth.” He said to her, “What have you come here to do?” She said to him, “To fulfill the Torah (in Lev. 25:25), ‘When your relative becomes poor [… then his redeemer shall come].’ Arise and fulfill the Torah.” He said to her, “Since you have come to fulfill the Torah, (Ruth 3:13:) ‘Spend the night; then it shall come to pass in the morning that, if he will redeem you, good (tov)’”; for he had a relative older than he, whose name was Tov. R. Hanina said, “She said to him, ‘And are you dismissing me with words?’” He said to her (ibid., cont.), “’As the Lord lives,’ I am not dismissing you with words.” (Ruth 4:1:) “Then Boaz went up to the gate and sat down there, and behold, the redeemer of whom Boaz had spoken was passing by.” He said to him, “Sit down, and we shall look into the Torah; what is written there? Is it not written (in Lev. 25:25), ‘When your relative becomes poor and sells some of his property, [then his redeemer shall come, the one most closely related to him, and redeem…]’” Boaz said to Tov (in Ruth 4:3–4), “’Naomi is selling the parcel of land which belonged to our relative Elimelech […]. And I thought I should disclose it to you, saying, ‘Buy it,’” since you are a senior redeemer than I [and have the right] to redeem it. [Hence] (as in vs. 4, cont.,) “If you will redeem it, redeem it.” (Vs. 6:) “Then the redeemer said, ‘Acquire it for yourself.’” At that time Boaz redeemed what Naomi had sold. Now from where did Boaz learn [what to do]? From this section (in Lev. 25:25), “When your relative becomes poor and sells [some of his property, then his redeemer shall come, the one most closely related to him, and redeem…].” And who else was [like] this? Jeremiah was [like] this. At the time that the Holy One, blessed be He, said (in Jeremiah 32:7), “Behold Hanamel the son of Shalum your uncle is coming to you…,” [Jeremiah said] (in Jeremiah 32:8), “And just as the Lord had said, my cousin Hanamel came to me in the prison compound.” Immediately, Jeremiah fulfilled this section [of the Torah], as stated (in Jeremiah 32:9), “And I bought the field.” Now from where did he learn [what to do]? From this section (in Lev. 25:25), “When your relative becomes poor and sells some of his property, [then his redeemer shall come, the one most closely related to him, and redeem…].”

(Lev. 25:25:) ”When your relative becomes poor and sells some of his property, then his redeemer shall come.” Who is his redeemer? I am He, as stated (in Jer. 50:33-34), “The Children of Israel […] are oppressed […]. Their Redeemer is mighty, His name is the Lord of hosts […].” Seven names are given to the poor.¹⁴Cf. Lev. R. 34:6, which lists eight names. And they are the following: crushed (dakh), poor ('ani), lowly (makh), dispossessed (rash), oppressed (tekhakhim),¹⁵Cf. Lev. R. 34:6, followed by Yalqut Shim‘oni, Lev. 665, which reads dal (“impoverished”) here. wretched (misken), and pauper (evyon). [(Lev. 25:25:) “When your relative becomes poor.”] This text is related (to Ps. 106:43), “Many times He delivered them, but they rebelled; so they became poor through their iniquity.” You find that in the days that the Judges judged, Israel served idols; so they were enslaved in the hands of the peoples of the world, as stated (in Jud. 3:7-8), “Then the Children of Israel did evil in the sight of the Lord…. So the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel, and he delivered them into the hands of Cushan.” What did they do (according to vs. 9)? “The Children of Israel cried unto the Lord, and the Lord raised up a savior for the Children of Israel [to save them, i.e.,] Othniel ben Kenaz.” They immediately repented and were redeemed. So [it happened] another time, as stated (in Jud. 3:12), “Then the Children of Israel again did evil….” They immediately repented; so the Lord raised up a redeemer for them, Ehud ben Gera the Binyaminite; and they were redeemed at his hands. Then they served idols again and were sold into the hands of Sisera, as stated (in Jud. 4:3), “and he oppressed the Children of Israel with might twenty years.” What is the meaning of “with might?” With blasphemies and with curses, just as you say (in Mal. 3:13), “Your words have been mighty against me.” When they repented, He raised up Barak and Deborah as redeemers for them; and they were redeemed at their hands. Ergo (in Ps. 106:43), “Many times He delivered them…; so they became poor through their iniquity.” What is the meaning of “so they became poor through their iniquity?” That they became impoverished in the midst of the nations, as stated (in Jud. 6:6), “And Israel became very impoverished….” What is the meaning of “and Israel became impoverished?” R. Isaac and R. Levi differed. One said, “They were impoverished (rt.: dll) from good works”; and the other said, “They did not have [enough] to bring even a poor person's (rt.: dll) offering, as stated (in Lev. 14:21), ‘If, however, he is poor (rt.: dll) and does not have the means.’” Ergo (in Ps. 106:43), “so they became poor through their iniquity,” as they had become impoverished (rt.: dll). Another interpretation (of Ps. 106:43), “Many times He delivered them”: [These words] speak about people. When trouble comes to one [of them] and he repents, the Holy One, blessed be He, delivers him. So it is the first time and the second. [If he repents, that is preferable; but if not, the Holy One, blessed be He, brings trouble upon him. And you yourself know that the Holy One, blessed be He, tests Israel to know if they will repent. First, He brings punishments against the [other] nations, as stated (Zeph. 3:6-7) “I wiped out nations: Their corner towers are desolate… I thought that she would fear Me, would learn a lesson.” [If] they repented, that is preferable; but if not, He destroys their money, as stated (Hos 7:9), “Strangers have consumed his strength….” [If they] repented, that is preferable; but if not, the Holy One blessed be He, brings evil upon one of the cities of Israel, as stated (Is. 42:25), “it blazed upon them all about… it burned among them.” [If] they repented, that is preferable; but if not, what is written (in Numbers 14:35)? “In this desert they will end, and there will they die.” And a person should not say, “The evil is not coming on my account.” He should know that he [too] will die, as stated (Amos 9:10), “All the sinners of My people shall perish [by the sword], who boast, ‘Never shall the evil overtake us or come near us.’” Come and see how difficult it is for the Holy One, blessed be He, to raise His hand against a human being. So what does He do to him? When he sins, He begins by raising His hand against his assets. From whom have you learned it? From Naomi, her sons, and Elimelech her husband, who was the head of [his] generation. When famine came, what did he do? He left the Land of Israel and went to the Land of Moab. Now the Holy One, blessed be He, was angry with him because he was prince (nasi) of [his] generation. The Holy One, blessed be He, said to him, “These have abandoned My children and left the Land of Israel a wilderness.” What is written there (in Ruth 1:3)? “Then Naomi's husband Elimelech died,” but his sons were unable to learn from their father to return to the Land of Israel. And what did they do? (According to vs. 4) They also “took Moabite wives for themselves,” whom they neither immersed nor converted.¹⁶Ruth R. 2:9. (Ibid., cont.:) “The name of the one was Orpah ('rph) and the name of the second was Ruth”: Orpah ('rph), because she turned her back ('rp) on her mother-in-law; Ruth, because she esteemed (r'th) the words of her mother-in-law. (ibid., cont.:) “And they lived there about ten years.” All those ten years (in Moab) the Holy One, blessed be He, had been warning them, that they might repent and return to the Land of Israel. When He saw that they did not repent, he began to raise His hand against their camels and against their cattle.¹⁷Lev. R. 17:4; Ruth R. 2:10; PRK 7:10; PR 17:6. When He saw that they did not repent (literally, return in repentance), immediately (in vs. 5), “Both of them, Mahlon and Chilion, also died.” Thus [you may infer] that it is difficult for the Holy One, blessed be He, to raise His hand against [a human being]. So what does He do to them? He deprives them of their assets, and they sell them. When someone sins, what does the Holy One, blessed be He, do to him first? He brings poverty upon him, so that he sells his field. If he repents, then fine; but if not he sells his house. If he repents, then fine; but if not he sells himself. How is this shown? So is it written (in Lev. 25:25), “When your relative becomes poor.” If he repents, then fine; but if not, see what is written in the second section; (in Lev. 25:29), “And when someone sells a dwelling house.” If he repents, then fine; but if not, (in Lev. 25:39), “When your relative becomes poor and he is sold to you.” Why all this? Because they became poor through [their] iniquities. (Lev. 25:25:) “Then his redeemer shall come.” R. Simeon ben Johay said, “Elimelech, Salmon, So-and-So,¹⁸Peloni Almoni. According to Ruth 4:1, this was the “name” of Ruth’s most closely related redeemer. and Naomi's father were all descendants of Nahshon ben Amminadab;¹⁹BB 91a. See Ruth 4:20–21; also Exod. 6:23, according to which Nahshon ben Amminadab was Aaron’s brother-in-law. and Elimelech, Mahlon, and Chilion were leaders²⁰Rt.: PRNS. Cf. the Gk.: pronoos (“prudent”). of the generation.” So for what reason were they punished? Because they went abroad from the Land of Israel. Thus it is stated (in Ruth 1:19), “the whole city was excited over them, [and the women said, ‘Is this Naomi?’]” What is the meaning of, “Is this (Hazot) Naomi?” You saw (hazitem) Naomi when she went abroad from the Land of Israel. What has happened to her? (Lev. 25:25:) “Then his redeemer shall come, the one most closely related (qarov).” This is Boaz. When? When Naomi sold the field, as stated (in Ruth 4:3), “the parcel of land which belonged to our relative, [Elimelech].” (Lev. 25:25:) “Then his redeemer shall come, the one most closely related to him.” This is Boaz, since it is stated (in Ruth 2:20), “The man is our relative (qarov), [he is one of our redeeming kin (go'el)].” At that time Ruth went to Boaz. Her mother-in-law said to her (in Ruth 3:2), “see, he is winnowing barley on the threshing floor tonight.” [If] he was a prince (nasi), would he have been winnowing on a threshing floor? It is simply because his generation was dissolute in matters of theft, and [so] he went out to guard his threshing floor. She said to her (in vs. 3), “You are to wash and anoint yourself.” Then after that (ibid), “and go down to the threshing floor.” "And I shall go down" is the actual written text (ketiv)]. What is the meaning of "and I shall go down?" She said to her, “My merit will go down with you.” Hence it is written, "And I shall go down."²¹Ruth R. 5:12. But she did not do as her mother-in-law had told her. What did Ruth do? [Only] after she went down to the threshing floor, she did what she was told, as stated (in vs. 6), “She went down to the threshing floor and did just as her mother-in-law had commanded her.”²²In other words, since she only obeyed Naomi after she had arrived at the threshing floor, she must have neglected to wash and anoint herself before then. Why? It is simply that she said, “The generation was dissolute in sexual matters. What if they see me made up and say, ‘Perhaps she is a harlot?’” Therefore, “She went down to the threshing floor and” afterwards “she did just as her mother-in-law had commanded her.” (Vs. 7:) Then, when Boaz had eaten and drunk, and his heart was merry.” What is the meaning of “and his heart was merry?” That he was occupied with words of the Torah.²³Ruth R. 5:15. Thus it is stated (Prov. 4:2), “As a good teaching…,” and it is [also] written (about wisdom in Prov. 9:5), “Come and eat of my bread.” (Ruth 3:7, cont.:) “And when he came to lie down beside the grain pile, then she came in secret.” What is the meaning of, “in secret (lt; rt.: lwt)?” [It is] just as you say (in I Sam. 21:10), “here it is wrapped (rt.: lwt) in a mantle.” (Ruth 3:8:) “Now it came to pass in the middle of the night that the man was startled. So he turned aside, [and here was a woman lying at his feet].” What is the meaning of, “turned aside (rt.: lpt)?” [It is] just as you say (in Jud. 16:29), “And Samson embraced (rt.: lpt) the two middle pillars.” That righteous man began to yell. [Fear] embraced him. (Ruth 3:9:) Then he said, “Who are you?” And she said, “I am your handmaid Ruth.” He said to her, “What have you come here to do?” She said to him, “To fulfill the Torah (in Lev. 25:25), ‘When your relative becomes poor [… then his redeemer shall come].’ Arise and fulfill the Torah.” He said to her, “Since you have come to fulfill the Torah, (Ruth 3:13:) ‘Spend the night; then it shall come to pass in the morning that, if he will redeem you, good (tov)’”; for he had a relative older than he, whose name was Tov. R. Hanina said, “She said to him, ‘And are you dismissing me with words?’” He said to her (ibid., cont.), “’As the Lord lives,’ I am not dismissing you with words.” (Ruth 4:1:) “Then Boaz went up to the gate and sat down there, and behold, the redeemer of whom Boaz had spoken was passing by.” He said to him, “Sit down, and we shall look into the Torah; what is written there? Is it not written (in Lev. 25:25), ‘When your relative becomes poor and sells some of his property, [then his redeemer shall come, the one most closely related to him, and redeem…]’” Boaz said to Tov (in Ruth 4:3–4), “’Naomi is selling the parcel of land which belonged to our relative Elimelech […]. And I thought I should disclose it to you, saying, ‘Buy it,’” since you are a senior redeemer than I [and have the right] to redeem it. [Hence] (as in vs. 4, cont.,) “If you will redeem it, redeem it.” (Vs. 6:) “Then the redeemer said, ‘Acquire it for yourself.’” At that time Boaz redeemed what Naomi had sold. Now from where did Boaz learn [what to do]? From this section (in Lev. 25:25), “When your relative becomes poor and sells [some of his property, then his redeemer shall come, the one most closely related to him, and redeem…].” And who else was [like] this? Jeremiah was [like] this. At the time that the Holy One, blessed be He, said (in Jeremiah 32:7), “Behold Hanamel the son of Shalum your uncle is coming to you…,” [Jeremiah said] (in Jeremiah 32:8), “And just as the Lord had said, my cousin Hanamel came to me in the prison compound.” Immediately, Jeremiah fulfilled this section [of the Torah], as stated (in Jeremiah 32:9), “And I bought the field.” Now from where did he learn [what to do]? From this section (in Lev. 25:25), “When your relative becomes poor and sells some of his property, [then his redeemer shall come, the one most closely related to him, and redeem…].”

(Fol. 91) R. Simon b. Jochai used to say that Elimelech, Machlon and Kilyon were the great men and the leaders of their generation, and they were punished only because they emigrated from Palestine, as it is said (Ruth 1, 19) All the city was in commotion about them, and people said, "Is this Naomi?" What did they mean by their question, Is this Naomi? R. Isaac said: "They wanted to see what had become of Naomi, who emigrated from the land of Israel?" R. Isaac said again: "The same day on which Ruth reached the land of Israel, the wife of Boaz died. This is why people say that before the deceased depart, the substitute for managing the house is already prepared." Rabba b. R. Huna, in the name of Rab, said: "Boaz is identical with Abzan." For what purpose does he inform us? To inform the other thing, which he (Rab b. R. Huna) said, viz: "One hundred and twenty banquets Boaz prepared for his children, as it is said (Jud. 12, 9) And he had thirty sons, and thirty daughters he sent abroad, and thirty daughters he brought in for his sons from abroad, etc. And at each marriage two banquets were given — one in the father's and one in the father-in-law's house — and not to one of them did he invite Manoah, saying: 'What return can I expect of this childless man?' " And we are taught in a Baraitha that all his children died during his (Boaz's) lifetime. And this is meant by the popular saying: "By thy life, the sixty (weaklings) thou begottest, what didst thou beget them for? Marry again and beget one as strong as sixty." R. Chanan b. Raba said again, in the name of Rab: "Elimelech, Shalam, the kinsman [referred to in Ruth 4, 1] and the father of Naomi all were the descendants of Nachshon ben Aminadab." For what purpose was this said? To teach that even a man who has distinguished ancestors to rely upon is not saved when he emigrates from Palestine.

... Another explanation. “And all the work that king Solomon had wrought in the house of the Lord was finished.” (Melachim I 7:51) What does ‘all the work’ mean? It was built by itself, rising and floating up – thus it does not say when the house was built, but rather “And the house, when it was in building…” (Melachim I 6:7) “…was built of stone finished at the quarry (masa)…” (ibid.) What does ‘finished at the quarry’ (masa nivne) mean? R’ Brechia said: the stone picked itself up (nosah atzma), rose up and was built by itself. This is what Shlomo said in his song “I have surely built You a house to dwell in…” (Melachim I 8:13) He says ‘I have surely built’, meaning ‘I built a building and the stones rose up and flew into place themselves’. If you are shocked that the Holy One would do such a thing for a single righteous person, “And a stone was brought and placed on the mouth of the pit…” (Daniel 6:18) And where did they get a rock in Bavel? Our Rabbis said that it rolled all the way from the land of Israel and came in an instant. So if the Holy One did such a thing for flesh and blood, are you surprised that He would do so for the building of a house to the Holy One?

These are the generations (Toledot) of the heaven and the earth when they were created (Gen. 2:4). R. Berechiah and R. Helbo said in the name of R. Samuel the son of Nahmani: The word toledot in Scripture lacks the letter vav in all but two verses. These verses are: These are the generations of Perez (Ruth 4:18) and the (verse quoted) above. (The full spelling of the word toledot, with the vav, is found only in these two instances.)

“He said: ‘Blessed are you of the Lord, my daughter; you have shown more kindness [at the end than at the beginning]...” Rabbi Yoḥanan, Reish Lakish, and the Rabbis – Rabbi Yoḥanan said: A person should never refrain from going to an elder to be blessed, as Boaz was eighty years old and he had not been remembered,²¹²God had not given him a son. but when that righteous woman prayed for him, he was immediately remembered, as it is stated: “Naomi said…: Blessed be he by the Lord…” (Ruth 2:20). Reish Lakish said: Ruth was forty years old, and had not been remembered when she was married to Maḥlon. When that righteous one [Boaz] prayed for her, she was remembered, as it is stated: “He said: Blessed are you of the Lord, my daughter.” The Rabbis say: The two of them were remembered only due to the blessing of the righteous, as it is stated: “All the people who were at the gate, and the elders, said: May the Lord render the woman…[like Rachel and like Leah…]” (Ruth 4:11). “You have shown more kindness at the end than at the beginning” – Rabbi Shmuel bar Rav Yitzḥak said: A woman prefers a poor young man to an elderly rich man.

“Now, my daughter, do not fear, I will do for you everything that you say, as all the men at the gate of my people know that you are a virtuous woman. Now, although I am a redeemer, there is also a redeemer nearer than I” (Ruth 3:11–12).
“Now, my daughter, do not fear…. Now, although I am a redeemer, there is also a redeemer nearer than I.” The Rabbis and Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi – the Rabbis hold: Tov, Elimelekh, and Boaz were brothers. Rabbi Yehoshua said: Salmon, Elimelekh, and Tov were brothers. They raised an objection to him: But is it not written: “That belonged to our brother, to Elimelekh” (Ruth 4:3)? He said to them: A person does not refrain from calling his uncle, brother.

(Numb. 27:1:) “Then came forward the daughters of Zelophehad.” In that generation the women were fencing¹¹On raising a fence about the Law, see Avot 1:1. that which the men were breaching.¹²Numb. R. 21:10. Accordingly you find that Aaron said to them (i.e., the men in Exod. 32:2), “Take off the gold rings [that are in the ears of your wives…]”; but the women were unwilling and protested against their husbands. Thus it is stated (in vs. 3), “So all the people took off the gold rings that were in their¹³Since “their” is masculine here, there is an implication that the men only took their own earrings. ears.” Thus the women did not take part in making the [golden] calf. So also in the case of the spies who had spread slander (according to Numb. 14:36), “when they returned, they made [the whole congregation] murmur against him.” A decree was issued against them, because they had said (in Numb. 13:31), “We are unable to go up [against this people for they are stronger than us].” The women, however, were not with them in their counsel. What is written above the matter (in Numb. 26:65)? “Because the Lord had said to them, ‘They shall surely die in the wilderness,’ not a man of them remained.” [Note that Scripture speaks of] “a man,” and not of "a woman.” Because they (i.e., the men) did not want to enter the land, but the women came forward to ask for an inheritance [in the land]; (Numb. 27:1) “Then came forward the daughters of Zelophehad.” Therefore the parashah [about the death of that generation] was written next to this parashah, because what the men broke down the women fenced in. Another interpretation (of Numb. 27:1), “Then came forward [the daughters of Zelophehad ben Hepher ben Gilead ben Machir ben Manasseh, of the families of Manasseh ben Joseph”: [Their action was] an honor to them. [It was also] an honor to their father, an honor to Machir, an honor to Manasseh and an honor to Joseph that such righteous and wise women had issued from him.¹⁴Numb. R. 21:11. But what was their wisdom? They [only] spoke up at the proper time, when Moses was busy with the parashah about inheritance (in accordance with Numb. 26:53), “To these shall you apportion the land [for an inheritance].” [So what was their wisdom? That] they said to him, “If we are like a son, let us inherit; but if not, let our mother perform levirate marriage (marry her husband's brother).”¹⁵His duty would be to rear children in the name of the deceased father. On levirate marriage generally, see Deut. 25:5-6: also Gen. 38:8-9; Ruth 4:5. Immediately (in Numb. 27:5), “Moses brought their cause before the Lord.” They were righteous, In that they had never been married to someone unworthy of them. Then why did they meet with Moses now? So that he would not [put on airs] over having abstained from his wife for forty years.¹⁶Since Moses regularly stood in the Divine Presence, he needed to preserve an unbroken state of purity. The Holy One, blessed be He, informed him through these [women], saying, “Here are women who without being commanded [remained unmarried] for forty years, until they were married to someone worthy of them.”

“Boaz went up to the gate and sat there and, behold, the redeemer of whom Boaz had spoken was passing; he said: Turn aside, sit here so-and-so. He turned aside and sat” (Ruth 4:1).
“Boaz went up to the gate and sat there and, behold, the redeemer of whom Boaz had spoken…” – what, was he standing behind the gate? Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman said: Even if he was at the ends of the earth, the Holy One blessed be He would have flown him and brought him there, so that righteous one would not be sitting in distress waiting for the matter to be settled. Rabbi Berekhya said: This is what two world greats, Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Yehoshua, expounded: Boaz did his, Ruth did hers, and Naomi did hers; the Holy One blessed be He said: ‘I, too, will do mine.’
“He said: Turn aside, sit here so-and-so [peloni almoni].” Rabbi Yehoshua says: Peloni Almoni was his name. Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman said: He was mute [ilem] from matters of Torah. He [Peloni Almoni] said: ‘The first ones died only because they took them,²³²Maḥlon and Kilyon died because they married Orpa and Ruth. and I will take her? Heaven forbid that I take her, I do not want to taint my children, I do not want to mix dross with my children.’ But he did not know that the halakha had already been introduced: “An Ammonite,” but not an Ammonite woman, “a Moavite,” but not a Moavite woman.²³³The prohibition against marrying an Ammonite or Moavite convert applies only to a man from those nations, not a woman; see Rut Rabba 4:1.

“He took ten men of the elders of the city, and said: Sit here, and they sat” (Ruth 4:2).
“He took ten men of the elders of the city.” Rabbi Alexandri said: From here [it may be derived] that lesser people are not permitted to sit unless the greater person grants him permission. Rabbi Pinḥas said: From here [it may be derived] that the court appoints elders to [attend] their wedding feasts.²³⁴The court appoints elders to attend wedding feasts so that the celebration will remain appropriate. Boaz invited the elders to sit because he intended to marry Ruth at that very gathering. Rabbi Elazar ben Rabbi Yosei said: From here [it may be derived] that the blessing of the groom is with ten.²³⁵The seven blessings recited at the wedding ceremony require a quorum of ten men. Rabbi Yudan ben Pazi said: Not only when a bachelor [marries] a virgin, but even when a widower [marries] a widow [these blessings are recited, but] only if there are ten.

“He took ten men of the elders of the city, and said: Sit here, and they sat” (Ruth 4:2).
“He took ten men of the elders of the city.” Rabbi Alexandri said: From here [it may be derived] that lesser people are not permitted to sit unless the greater person grants him permission. Rabbi Pinḥas said: From here [it may be derived] that the court appoints elders to [attend] their wedding feasts.²³⁴The court appoints elders to attend wedding feasts so that the celebration will remain appropriate. Boaz invited the elders to sit because he intended to marry Ruth at that very gathering. Rabbi Elazar ben Rabbi Yosei said: From here [it may be derived] that the blessing of the groom is with ten.²³⁵The seven blessings recited at the wedding ceremony require a quorum of ten men. Rabbi Yudan ben Pazi said: Not only when a bachelor [marries] a virgin, but even when a widower [marries] a widow [these blessings are recited, but] only if there are ten.

“He said to the redeemer: The parcel of land that was our brother Elimelekh’s, Naomi, who returned from the field of Moav, is selling. I said to disclose it to you, saying: Purchase it before those who are sitting here, and before the elders of my people. If you will redeem it, redeem it; but if he will not redeem it, tell me, and I will know, as there is no one to redeem it beside you, and I am after you. He said: I will redeem it” (Ruth 4:3–4).
“He said to the redeemer: The parcel of land that was our brother Elimelekh’s…I said to disclose it to you, saying…if you will redeem it, redeem it,” – he said to the redeemer. “But if he will not redeem it,” – he said to the court. “Tell me, and I will know [ve’ede’a].”²³⁶The heh found at the end of the word indicates “I will know her” (instead of instead of ve’eda, “I will know.” Boaz is saying that his intent is to marry Ruth and have children with her. Do not say: I have a wife and I have children, I will take her into my house with the intention of not having relations with her. When the redeemer heard this, he said: ‘Certainly any notion of marrying Ruth is gone.’

“He said to the redeemer: The parcel of land that was our brother Elimelekh’s, Naomi, who returned from the field of Moav, is selling. I said to disclose it to you, saying: Purchase it before those who are sitting here, and before the elders of my people. If you will redeem it, redeem it; but if he will not redeem it, tell me, and I will know, as there is no one to redeem it beside you, and I am after you. He said: I will redeem it” (Ruth 4:3–4).
“He said to the redeemer: The parcel of land that was our brother Elimelekh’s…I said to disclose it to you, saying…if you will redeem it, redeem it,” – he said to the redeemer. “But if he will not redeem it,” – he said to the court. “Tell me, and I will know [ve’ede’a].”²³⁶The heh found at the end of the word indicates “I will know her” (instead of instead of ve’eda, “I will know.” Boaz is saying that his intent is to marry Ruth and have children with her. Do not say: I have a wife and I have children, I will take her into my house with the intention of not having relations with her. When the redeemer heard this, he said: ‘Certainly any notion of marrying Ruth is gone.’

“Boaz said: On the day that you purchase the field from the hand of Naomi and from Ruth the Moavite, the wife of the dead you have purchased, to establish the name of the dead upon his inheritance” (Ruth 4:5).
“Boaz said: On the day that you purchase the field from the hand of Naomi and from Ruth the Moavite, the wife of the dead you have purchased [kanita].” “I have purchased [kaniti]” is written. This supports that which Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman said: He was mute from matters of Torah. He said: ‘The first ones died only because they took them. Heaven forbid that I take her, I do not want to taint my children, I do not want to mix dross with my children.’ But he did not know that the halakha had already been introduced: “An Ammonite,” but not an Ammonite woman, “a Moavite,” but not a Moavite woman.

“This was the tradition in Israel regarding redemption and regarding exchange; to validate any matter, a man would remove his shoe and give it to another, this was the testament in Israel” (Ruth 4:7).
“This was the tradition in Israel regarding redemption and regarding exchange; to validate any matter.” Rabbi Ḥanina interpreted the verse regarding Israel, regarding the nature of Israel. In the past they would laud regarding redemption, as it is stated: “This is my God and I will glorify Him” (Exodus 15:2), but now, regarding exchange, as it is stated: “They exchanged their glory for the form of an ox eating grass” (Psalms 106:20).²³⁷This is a reference to the sin of the Golden Calf. There is nothing more despicable, abominable, and strange than an ox when it is eating grass.²³⁸Due to the saliva that drips from its mouth.
Initially, they would acquire with a shoe and a sandal, as it is stated: “A man would remove his shoe.” They then resorted to acquiring with ketzatza. What is this ketzatza? Rabbi Yosei bar Avin said: Anyone who would sell a field to a gentile, his relatives would bring barrels filled with roasted grain and nuts and would break them before the children. The children would gather them and say: ‘So-and-so was severed [niktzatz] from his ancestral property.’ When he recovered it, they would say: ‘So-and-so returned to his ancestral property.’ Likewise, anyone who would marry a woman who was not suited for him, his relatives would bring barrels filled with roasted grain and nuts and would break them before the children. The children would gather them and say: ‘So-and-so is lost to his family.’ When he would divorce her, they would say: ‘So-and-so returned to his family.’ They then returned to acquiring with a shoe and a sandal, “a man removed his shoe and gave it to another.” They then began acquiring with money, with a document, or by taking possession. The three of them are written in one verse: “They will purchase fields for money” (Jeremiah 32:44) – this is money; “and write the deeds and seal them” (Jeremiah 32:44) – these are the witnesses on a document; “and attest witnesses” (Jeremiah 32:44) – these are the witnesses of possession.
Rabbi Yosei in the name of Rabbi Yoḥanan: Money does not effect transaction if it is less than the equivalent of one peruta. The statement of Rabbi Ḥanina disagrees, as Rabbi Ḥanina said: All the shekels that are written in the Torah are sela’im;²³⁹A sela is 19.2 grams of silver. This is 768 times the value of a peruta. in the Prophets, litrin;²⁴⁰A litra is the equivalent of a maneh, twenty-five sela’im, or 480 grams of silver. and in the Writings, kanterin.²⁴¹A kanter is the equivalent of a talent, one hundred sela’im, or 1.92 kilograms of silver. Rabbi Yudan ben Pazi said: With the exception of the shekels of Ephron, which were kanterin. But it is not comparable; here, money is written,²⁴²In the verse in Jeremiah it says money without specifying a coin. The reference is to the lowest denomination of money, a peruta. and what Rabbi Ḥanina said [was regarding where the first says] shekalim.
This is not like the opinion of Rabbi Eliezer,²⁴³Rabbi Eliezer disagrees with the statement that one can acquire a field by “taking possession,” which implies that one performs an action that displays ownership, such as building something or changing something about the property. as Rabbi Eliezer would say: Walking acquires, as it is taught: If one walked in the field, whether by its length or by its width, he purchased up to the place that he went, in accordance with the statement of Rabbi Eliezer. But the Rabbis say: He does not acquire until he takes possession.²⁴⁴He performs an action that displays ownership. However, this applies only if one is acquiring ownerless property. But everyone agrees, in a case where one sells a field to another, when he walks, he acquires it.

“The redeemer said to Boaz: Buy it for yourself. He removed his shoe” (Ruth 4:8).
“The redeemer said to Boaz: Buy it for yourself. He removed his shoe.” Whose shoe? Rav and Levi, one said: Boaz’s shoe, and the other said: The redeemer’s shoe. The matters appear to be in accordance with the one who said: Boaz’s shoe, as it is the way of the purchaser to give a down payment.
Likewise, “Aḥiya grabbed the new garment [that was on him, and rent it into twelve pieces]” (I Kings 11:30). Whose garment? Rav and Levi, one said: Yerovam’s garment, and the other said: Aḥiya’s garment. Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman said: It stands to reason, in accordance with the one who said: Aḥiya’s garment, as it is the way of the righteous to rend his garments when there is a schism in the royal House of David.
Likewise, “Samuel turned to go; he seized the edge of his robe, and it ripped” (I Samuel 15:27). Whose robe? Rav and Levi, one said: Saul’s robe, and the other said: Samuel’s robe. It stands to reason, in accordance with the one who said: Samuel’s garment, as it is the way of the righteous to rend their garments when their plantings are not successful.²⁴⁵Samuel had originally anointed Saul as king, and had informed Saul immediately before the verse cited here that his kingship would be torn from him.
Likewise, “Yerovam did not again recover strength [in the days of Aviya, and the Lord afflicted him and he died]” (II Chronicles 13:20).²⁴⁶It is not clear whether it was Yerovam or Aviya who was afflicted and died. Rabbi Shmuel said: Do you think that it was Yerovam who was afflicted? It was only Aviya who was afflicted. Why was Aviya afflicted? It is because he disfigured the faces of Israel, as it is stated: “The show of their countenance speaks against them” (Isaiah 3:9). Rabbi Aḥa said: It is because he stationed guards over them for three days so their form would be altered, as it is taught: One may testify that a man died only if he can testify about seeing the countenance of the face with the nose (Yevamot 120a).²⁴⁷Thus, Aviya’s army saw to it that the soldiers of Yerovam’s army who had been killed would not be able to be positively identified in such a way that their wives could remarry.
Rabbi Yoḥanan and Reish Lakish, Rabbi Yoḥanan said: It is because he publicly humiliated them, as it is stated: “With you are the golden calves [that Yerovam made for you as gods]” (II Chronicles 13:8). Reish Lakish said: It is because he demeaned the honor of Aḥiya the Shilonite, as it is stated: “Vain and wicked men gathered around him” (II Chronicles 13:7) – he called Aḥiya the Shilonite wicked.²⁴⁸It was Aḥiya the Shilonite, a prophet, who had appointed Yerovam king over the ten tribes and declared that they would break away from the kingdom of Judah. Aviya characterized Yerovam’s rise to power as supported only by vain and wicked men. The Rabbis say: It is because idol worship came under his authority and he did not eliminate it. That is what is written: “Aviya pursued Yerovam [and captured cities from him: Beit El and its environs…]” (II Chronicles 13:19), and it is written: “He positioned one in Beit El” (I Kings 12:29).²⁴⁹Yerovam had positioned a golden calf in Beit El as a place of worship, in place of the Temple in Jerusalem. When Aviya captured Beit El he did not destroy it. Consequently, it is clear that when Aviya derided Yerovam and the kingdom of Israel for its golden calves, he did so only to demean them. These matters can be deduces a fortiori: If, [regarding] a king who demeans a king, the verse states that he was afflicted, a commoner who demeans a commoner all the more so.²⁵⁰The Holy One blessed be He takes pity on the downtrodden.

“All the people who were in the gate, and the elders, said: We are witnesses. May the Lord render the woman who is coming into your house like Rachel and like Leah, the two of whom built the house of Israel; prosper in Efrat, and proclaim a name in Bethlehem” (Ruth 4:11).
“All the people who were in the gate…” Most of those participating in the feast were from Leah; therefore they accorded priority to Rachel.²⁵¹Most of those present were from the tribe of Judah, a son of Leah. Therefore, they mentioned Rachel before Leah so that it would not appear that they were according honor to themselves. Rabbi Abba bar Kahana said: Rachel was his primary wife, as it is stated: “Rachel was barren [akara]” (Genesis 29:31), [alluding to the fact that she was] primary [ikar]. Rabbi Shimon bar Yoḥai taught: Because they said things against Rachel,²⁵²Her enemies would attribute her barrenness to her character flaws. therefore [all the tribes of Israel] are called her children, as it is written: “Rachel is weeping over her children” (Jeremiah 31:15).²⁵³The verse is referring to the entire nation of Israel, not just the tribes who descended from Rachel. The same is true of the verses in Amos and Jeremiah cited below. They are not only attributed to her; they are even attributed to her son: “Perhaps the Lord, God of hosts, will be gracious to the remnant of Joseph” (Amos 5:15). They are not only attributed to her son; they are even attributed to her grandson, as it is stated: “Is Ephraim My favorite son, a delightful child?” (Jeremiah 31:20).

“May your house be like the house of Peretz whom Tamar bore to Judah, from the descendants that the Lord will give you from this young woman” (Ruth 4:12).
“May your house be like the house of Peretz…[from the descendants that the Lord will give you from this young woman].” They said: ‘May all the children the Holy One blessed be He gives you be from this woman.’ Likewise, “Isaac entreated the Lord on behalf of his wife, because she was barren” (Genesis 25:21) – Isaac was prostrated here and Rebecca was prostrated there, and he was saying: ‘Master of the universe, may all the children that You are destined to give me be from this righteous woman.’ Likewise, “Eli would bless Elkana and his wife [and say: May the Lord grant you offspring from this woman]” (I Samuel 2:20). He said: ‘May the sons that the Holy One blessed be He is destined to give you be from this righteous woman.’
“Boaz took Ruth, and she became his wife, and he had relations with her, and the Lord granted her pregnancy, and she bore a son” (Ruth 4:13).
“Boaz took Ruth, and she became his wife.” Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish said: She did not have a womb at all and the Holy One blessed be He carved her a womb.²⁵⁴This is derived from the phrase “she became his wife,” which is interpreted to mean that after Boaz took her she became capable of having children. Alternatively, the exposition is derived from the unusual phrase: “The Lord granted her pregnancy” (Etz Yosef).

“May your house be like the house of Peretz whom Tamar bore to Judah, from the descendants that the Lord will give you from this young woman” (Ruth 4:12).
“May your house be like the house of Peretz…[from the descendants that the Lord will give you from this young woman].” They said: ‘May all the children the Holy One blessed be He gives you be from this woman.’ Likewise, “Isaac entreated the Lord on behalf of his wife, because she was barren” (Genesis 25:21) – Isaac was prostrated here and Rebecca was prostrated there, and he was saying: ‘Master of the universe, may all the children that You are destined to give me be from this righteous woman.’ Likewise, “Eli would bless Elkana and his wife [and say: May the Lord grant you offspring from this woman]” (I Samuel 2:20). He said: ‘May the sons that the Holy One blessed be He is destined to give you be from this righteous woman.’
“Boaz took Ruth, and she became his wife, and he had relations with her, and the Lord granted her pregnancy, and she bore a son” (Ruth 4:13).
“Boaz took Ruth, and she became his wife.” Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish said: She did not have a womb at all and the Holy One blessed be He carved her a womb.²⁵⁴This is derived from the phrase “she became his wife,” which is interpreted to mean that after Boaz took her she became capable of having children. Alternatively, the exposition is derived from the unusual phrase: “The Lord granted her pregnancy” (Etz Yosef).

“The women said to Naomi: Blessed is the Lord, who has not left you without a redeemer today, and may his name be proclaimed in Israel” (Ruth 4:14).
“The women said to Naomi: Blessed is the Lord, who has not left you without a redeemer today.” Just as the day rules over the heavens, so, it will be with your descendants; they will dominate and rule over Israel forever. Rabbi Ḥunya said: It was due to the women’s blessing that the line of David was not cut off during the days of Atalyahu.²⁵⁵Atalyahu killed all of David’s male descendants with the exception of one small child who was successfully hidden away, the future King Yehoash (II Kings chapter 11). Rabbi Tanḥuma said, in the name of Rabbi Shmuel: There it is written: “We will give life to offspring from our father” (Genesis 19:32). Son is not written here, but rather, offspring – that offspring that will come from elsewhere, and who is this? It is the messianic king.²⁵⁶The verse cited is that which describes Lot’s daughters seeking to become pregnant by Lot. What they wanted was a son, yet the verse states the more general term offspring. This is an allusion to a descendant who would eventually come to be from their actions, namely the messianic king, who descends from Ruth, who herself was from Moav—the son produced by Lot and his younger daughter. The term redeemer mentioned in Ruth 4:14 is an allusion to the messianic king (Midrash Hamevoar).

“He will be for you a restorer of life, and nourisher of your old age, as your daughter-in-law, who loves you, who is better to you than seven sons, has borne him” (Ruth 4:15).
“He will be for you a restorer of life, and nourisher of your old age...[who is better to you than seven sons].” Rabbi Yehuda and Rabbi Neḥemya, Rabbi Yehuda says: Than the seven patrilineal heads mentioned later: “Otzem the sixth, David the seventh” (I Chronicles 2:15).²⁵⁷The reference is to the seven sons of Yishai. Rabbi Neḥemya said: Than the seven who are specified here: Peretz, Ḥetzron, Ram, Aminadav, Naḥshon, Salmon, Boaz.

Rabbi Abba bar Kahana began: “Tremble [rigzu] and do not sin…” (Psalms 4:5). David said before the Holy One, blessed be He: ‘How long will they be provoking [mitragzim] me, and saying: Does he not have flawed lineage? Does he not descend from Ruth the Moavite?’ ‘“…Say in your heart, on your bed…” (Psalms 4:5) – you also, do you not descend from two sisters?²⁵⁸You also have lineage that could be considered questionable, as Jacob married two sisters, Leah and Rachel. This would later be prohibited by the Torah. This is stated by David as a response to the elders of Judah, who had been taunting him due to his lineage. You, see what are your roots! “…and be silent, Sela” (Psalms 4:5). Tamar, too, whom Judah your grandfather took as a wife, is that not flawed lineage?²⁵⁹Judah married Tamar, who had previously been his daughter-in-law. This relationship too would later be prohibited by the Torah. And she was the daughter of Shem ben Noah.²⁶⁰The Sages identify him with Malkitzedek king of Shalem, who was a priest, and the Torah severely punishes the daughter of a priest who engages in licentiousness. Consequently, the lineage of her children Peretz and Zeraḥ were compromised by her act of having relations with Judah. What, do you have pedigree?’
Rabbi Yaakov bar Aviya said: Confront [argiz] your evil inclination and you will not sin. The Rabbis said: Anger your evil inclination and you will not sin.
“These are the generations of Peretz: Peretz begot Ḥetzron” (Ruth 4:18).
“These [eleh] are the generations of Peretz.” Rabbi Abba said: Anywhere that eleh is stated, it rejects what preceded it; ve’eleh, it adds to what preceded it. Bereshit Rabba 12 until “informed him that Ishmael repented,” end of quote>.
“Ḥetzron begot Ram and Ram begot Aminadav” (Ruth 4:19).
“Ḥetzron begot Ram.” But wasn’t Yeraḥme’el a previous son, [as it is stated:] “the sons of Ḥetzron who were born to him: Yeraḥme’el, Ram, and Keluvi” (I Chronicles 2:9)? Rather, he married a Canaanite woman in order to exalt himself [lehitater] through her, as it is written: “Yeraḥme’el had another wife, and her name was Atara” (I Chronicles 2:26).²⁶¹Since Yeraḥme’el married a Canaanite woman, the line of kingship did not come through him.
“Aminadav begot Naḥshon and Naḥshon begot Salma. Salmon begot Boaz and Boaz begot Oved” (Ruth 4:20–21).
“Ram begot Aminadav…and [Naḥshon begot…] Salmon.” To this point, they were the ladder for the princes;²⁶²Of the tribes. from this point on they were ladders to kings.²⁶³The name Salma, or Salmon, is similar to sulam, ladder. It appears in two different forms in these verses to allude to the change in status of the family: To this point, its members were tribal princes; from Boaz, Salmon’s son, the family was moving toward establishing the Israelite monarchy (Midrash HaMevoar). Rabbi Yitzḥak began: “Then [az] I said, behold, I have entered” (Psalms 40:8). I should have sung a song when I came.²⁶⁴When I was accepted into the congregation. Az means nothing other than song, as it is stated: “Then [az] Moses sang” (Exodus 15:1). I was included in “shall not enter,” and [yet] I entered.²⁶⁵David is cited as saying that he was assumed to be included within the prohibition against a Moavite convert entering the congregation, as he was a descendant of Ruth, but he was able to enter the congregation because of the acceptance of the halakha that this prohibition applies only to male converts.
“Oved begot Yishai and Yishai begot David” (Ruth 4:22).
“In the scroll of a book it is written about me” (Psalms 40:8). “In the scroll” – “whom You commanded that they should not enter into Your congregation” (Lamentations 1:10). “Of a book” – “An Ammonite and a Moavite shall not enter [into the assembly of the Lord]” (Deuteronomy 23:4). Not only did I enter, but in a scroll and a book it is written about me. In the scroll: Peretz, Ḥetzron, Ram, Aminadav, Naḥshon, Oved, Yishai, David.²⁶⁶The reference is to the verses in Ruth 4:18–22. In a book – “the Lord said: Arise, anoint him; for this is he” (I Samuel 16:12). Rabbi Huna says: It is written: “The Lord has provided me another [aḥer] offspring” (Genesis 4:25), an offspring that comes from another [aḥer] place, and who is this? It is the messianic king.²⁶⁷The messianic king is a descendant of David, and thus David is alluded to in the Torah itself.
Rabbi Berekhya and Rabbi Simon [said]: This is analogous to a king who would pass from place to place and a pearl fell from [the crown] on his head. The king and his entire entourage stopped there, and passersby would say: ‘What is the nature [of the stay] of the king and his entourage here?’ They saw and said: ‘A pearl fell from upon his head.’ What did he do? He piled up the dirt, and brought sifters, and sifted one pile but did not find it; the second, but did not find it; and the third, and he found it. They said: ‘The king found his pearl.’ So too, the Holy One blessed be He said to Abraham: “Go for yourself [lekha]” (Genesis 12:1) – It was you [lekha] that I was anticipating. What need was there to delineate the lineage: “Shem, Arpakhshad, Shelaḥ, Ever, Peleg… Naḥor, Teraḥ” (I Chronicles 1:24–26)? It was only for you. “Abram is [hu] Abraham” (I Chronicles 1:27)²⁶⁸It was he [hu] that God was anticipating, and for whom all the previous generations were listed. – “and You found his heart faithful before You” (Nehemiah 9:8). So too, the Holy One blessed be He said to David: ‘What need was there for Me to delineate the lineage: Peretz, Ḥetzron, Ram, Aminadav, Naḥshon, Oved, Yishai? Was it not for you?’ – “I have found David My servant” (Psalms 89:21).

Rabbi Abba bar Kahana began: “Tremble [rigzu] and do not sin…” (Psalms 4:5). David said before the Holy One, blessed be He: ‘How long will they be provoking [mitragzim] me, and saying: Does he not have flawed lineage? Does he not descend from Ruth the Moavite?’ ‘“…Say in your heart, on your bed…” (Psalms 4:5) – you also, do you not descend from two sisters?²⁵⁸You also have lineage that could be considered questionable, as Jacob married two sisters, Leah and Rachel. This would later be prohibited by the Torah. This is stated by David as a response to the elders of Judah, who had been taunting him due to his lineage. You, see what are your roots! “…and be silent, Sela” (Psalms 4:5). Tamar, too, whom Judah your grandfather took as a wife, is that not flawed lineage?²⁵⁹Judah married Tamar, who had previously been his daughter-in-law. This relationship too would later be prohibited by the Torah. And she was the daughter of Shem ben Noah.²⁶⁰The Sages identify him with Malkitzedek king of Shalem, who was a priest, and the Torah severely punishes the daughter of a priest who engages in licentiousness. Consequently, the lineage of her children Peretz and Zeraḥ were compromised by her act of having relations with Judah. What, do you have pedigree?’
Rabbi Yaakov bar Aviya said: Confront [argiz] your evil inclination and you will not sin. The Rabbis said: Anger your evil inclination and you will not sin.
“These are the generations of Peretz: Peretz begot Ḥetzron” (Ruth 4:18).
“These [eleh] are the generations of Peretz.” Rabbi Abba said: Anywhere that eleh is stated, it rejects what preceded it; ve’eleh, it adds to what preceded it. Bereshit Rabba 12 until “informed him that Ishmael repented,” end of quote>.
“Ḥetzron begot Ram and Ram begot Aminadav” (Ruth 4:19).
“Ḥetzron begot Ram.” But wasn’t Yeraḥme’el a previous son, [as it is stated:] “the sons of Ḥetzron who were born to him: Yeraḥme’el, Ram, and Keluvi” (I Chronicles 2:9)? Rather, he married a Canaanite woman in order to exalt himself [lehitater] through her, as it is written: “Yeraḥme’el had another wife, and her name was Atara” (I Chronicles 2:26).²⁶¹Since Yeraḥme’el married a Canaanite woman, the line of kingship did not come through him.
“Aminadav begot Naḥshon and Naḥshon begot Salma. Salmon begot Boaz and Boaz begot Oved” (Ruth 4:20–21).
“Ram begot Aminadav…and [Naḥshon begot…] Salmon.” To this point, they were the ladder for the princes;²⁶²Of the tribes. from this point on they were ladders to kings.²⁶³The name Salma, or Salmon, is similar to sulam, ladder. It appears in two different forms in these verses to allude to the change in status of the family: To this point, its members were tribal princes; from Boaz, Salmon’s son, the family was moving toward establishing the Israelite monarchy (Midrash HaMevoar). Rabbi Yitzḥak began: “Then [az] I said, behold, I have entered” (Psalms 40:8). I should have sung a song when I came.²⁶⁴When I was accepted into the congregation. Az means nothing other than song, as it is stated: “Then [az] Moses sang” (Exodus 15:1). I was included in “shall not enter,” and [yet] I entered.²⁶⁵David is cited as saying that he was assumed to be included within the prohibition against a Moavite convert entering the congregation, as he was a descendant of Ruth, but he was able to enter the congregation because of the acceptance of the halakha that this prohibition applies only to male converts.
“Oved begot Yishai and Yishai begot David” (Ruth 4:22).
“In the scroll of a book it is written about me” (Psalms 40:8). “In the scroll” – “whom You commanded that they should not enter into Your congregation” (Lamentations 1:10). “Of a book” – “An Ammonite and a Moavite shall not enter [into the assembly of the Lord]” (Deuteronomy 23:4). Not only did I enter, but in a scroll and a book it is written about me. In the scroll: Peretz, Ḥetzron, Ram, Aminadav, Naḥshon, Oved, Yishai, David.²⁶⁶The reference is to the verses in Ruth 4:18–22. In a book – “the Lord said: Arise, anoint him; for this is he” (I Samuel 16:12). Rabbi Huna says: It is written: “The Lord has provided me another [aḥer] offspring” (Genesis 4:25), an offspring that comes from another [aḥer] place, and who is this? It is the messianic king.²⁶⁷The messianic king is a descendant of David, and thus David is alluded to in the Torah itself.
Rabbi Berekhya and Rabbi Simon [said]: This is analogous to a king who would pass from place to place and a pearl fell from [the crown] on his head. The king and his entire entourage stopped there, and passersby would say: ‘What is the nature [of the stay] of the king and his entourage here?’ They saw and said: ‘A pearl fell from upon his head.’ What did he do? He piled up the dirt, and brought sifters, and sifted one pile but did not find it; the second, but did not find it; and the third, and he found it. They said: ‘The king found his pearl.’ So too, the Holy One blessed be He said to Abraham: “Go for yourself [lekha]” (Genesis 12:1) – It was you [lekha] that I was anticipating. What need was there to delineate the lineage: “Shem, Arpakhshad, Shelaḥ, Ever, Peleg… Naḥor, Teraḥ” (I Chronicles 1:24–26)? It was only for you. “Abram is [hu] Abraham” (I Chronicles 1:27)²⁶⁸It was he [hu] that God was anticipating, and for whom all the previous generations were listed. – “and You found his heart faithful before You” (Nehemiah 9:8). So too, the Holy One blessed be He said to David: ‘What need was there for Me to delineate the lineage: Peretz, Ḥetzron, Ram, Aminadav, Naḥshon, Oved, Yishai? Was it not for you?’ – “I have found David My servant” (Psalms 89:21).

Rabbi Abba bar Kahana began: “Tremble [rigzu] and do not sin…” (Psalms 4:5). David said before the Holy One, blessed be He: ‘How long will they be provoking [mitragzim] me, and saying: Does he not have flawed lineage? Does he not descend from Ruth the Moavite?’ ‘“…Say in your heart, on your bed…” (Psalms 4:5) – you also, do you not descend from two sisters?²⁵⁸You also have lineage that could be considered questionable, as Jacob married two sisters, Leah and Rachel. This would later be prohibited by the Torah. This is stated by David as a response to the elders of Judah, who had been taunting him due to his lineage. You, see what are your roots! “…and be silent, Sela” (Psalms 4:5). Tamar, too, whom Judah your grandfather took as a wife, is that not flawed lineage?²⁵⁹Judah married Tamar, who had previously been his daughter-in-law. This relationship too would later be prohibited by the Torah. And she was the daughter of Shem ben Noah.²⁶⁰The Sages identify him with Malkitzedek king of Shalem, who was a priest, and the Torah severely punishes the daughter of a priest who engages in licentiousness. Consequently, the lineage of her children Peretz and Zeraḥ were compromised by her act of having relations with Judah. What, do you have pedigree?’
Rabbi Yaakov bar Aviya said: Confront [argiz] your evil inclination and you will not sin. The Rabbis said: Anger your evil inclination and you will not sin.
“These are the generations of Peretz: Peretz begot Ḥetzron” (Ruth 4:18).
“These [eleh] are the generations of Peretz.” Rabbi Abba said: Anywhere that eleh is stated, it rejects what preceded it; ve’eleh, it adds to what preceded it. Bereshit Rabba 12 until “informed him that Ishmael repented,” end of quote>.
“Ḥetzron begot Ram and Ram begot Aminadav” (Ruth 4:19).
“Ḥetzron begot Ram.” But wasn’t Yeraḥme’el a previous son, [as it is stated:] “the sons of Ḥetzron who were born to him: Yeraḥme’el, Ram, and Keluvi” (I Chronicles 2:9)? Rather, he married a Canaanite woman in order to exalt himself [lehitater] through her, as it is written: “Yeraḥme’el had another wife, and her name was Atara” (I Chronicles 2:26).²⁶¹Since Yeraḥme’el married a Canaanite woman, the line of kingship did not come through him.
“Aminadav begot Naḥshon and Naḥshon begot Salma. Salmon begot Boaz and Boaz begot Oved” (Ruth 4:20–21).
“Ram begot Aminadav…and [Naḥshon begot…] Salmon.” To this point, they were the ladder for the princes;²⁶²Of the tribes. from this point on they were ladders to kings.²⁶³The name Salma, or Salmon, is similar to sulam, ladder. It appears in two different forms in these verses to allude to the change in status of the family: To this point, its members were tribal princes; from Boaz, Salmon’s son, the family was moving toward establishing the Israelite monarchy (Midrash HaMevoar). Rabbi Yitzḥak began: “Then [az] I said, behold, I have entered” (Psalms 40:8). I should have sung a song when I came.²⁶⁴When I was accepted into the congregation. Az means nothing other than song, as it is stated: “Then [az] Moses sang” (Exodus 15:1). I was included in “shall not enter,” and [yet] I entered.²⁶⁵David is cited as saying that he was assumed to be included within the prohibition against a Moavite convert entering the congregation, as he was a descendant of Ruth, but he was able to enter the congregation because of the acceptance of the halakha that this prohibition applies only to male converts.
“Oved begot Yishai and Yishai begot David” (Ruth 4:22).
“In the scroll of a book it is written about me” (Psalms 40:8). “In the scroll” – “whom You commanded that they should not enter into Your congregation” (Lamentations 1:10). “Of a book” – “An Ammonite and a Moavite shall not enter [into the assembly of the Lord]” (Deuteronomy 23:4). Not only did I enter, but in a scroll and a book it is written about me. In the scroll: Peretz, Ḥetzron, Ram, Aminadav, Naḥshon, Oved, Yishai, David.²⁶⁶The reference is to the verses in Ruth 4:18–22. In a book – “the Lord said: Arise, anoint him; for this is he” (I Samuel 16:12). Rabbi Huna says: It is written: “The Lord has provided me another [aḥer] offspring” (Genesis 4:25), an offspring that comes from another [aḥer] place, and who is this? It is the messianic king.²⁶⁷The messianic king is a descendant of David, and thus David is alluded to in the Torah itself.
Rabbi Berekhya and Rabbi Simon [said]: This is analogous to a king who would pass from place to place and a pearl fell from [the crown] on his head. The king and his entire entourage stopped there, and passersby would say: ‘What is the nature [of the stay] of the king and his entourage here?’ They saw and said: ‘A pearl fell from upon his head.’ What did he do? He piled up the dirt, and brought sifters, and sifted one pile but did not find it; the second, but did not find it; and the third, and he found it. They said: ‘The king found his pearl.’ So too, the Holy One blessed be He said to Abraham: “Go for yourself [lekha]” (Genesis 12:1) – It was you [lekha] that I was anticipating. What need was there to delineate the lineage: “Shem, Arpakhshad, Shelaḥ, Ever, Peleg… Naḥor, Teraḥ” (I Chronicles 1:24–26)? It was only for you. “Abram is [hu] Abraham” (I Chronicles 1:27)²⁶⁸It was he [hu] that God was anticipating, and for whom all the previous generations were listed. – “and You found his heart faithful before You” (Nehemiah 9:8). So too, the Holy One blessed be He said to David: ‘What need was there for Me to delineate the lineage: Peretz, Ḥetzron, Ram, Aminadav, Naḥshon, Oved, Yishai? Was it not for you?’ – “I have found David My servant” (Psalms 89:21).

Rabbi Abba bar Kahana began: “Tremble [rigzu] and do not sin…” (Psalms 4:5). David said before the Holy One, blessed be He: ‘How long will they be provoking [mitragzim] me, and saying: Does he not have flawed lineage? Does he not descend from Ruth the Moavite?’ ‘“…Say in your heart, on your bed…” (Psalms 4:5) – you also, do you not descend from two sisters?²⁵⁸You also have lineage that could be considered questionable, as Jacob married two sisters, Leah and Rachel. This would later be prohibited by the Torah. This is stated by David as a response to the elders of Judah, who had been taunting him due to his lineage. You, see what are your roots! “…and be silent, Sela” (Psalms 4:5). Tamar, too, whom Judah your grandfather took as a wife, is that not flawed lineage?²⁵⁹Judah married Tamar, who had previously been his daughter-in-law. This relationship too would later be prohibited by the Torah. And she was the daughter of Shem ben Noah.²⁶⁰The Sages identify him with Malkitzedek king of Shalem, who was a priest, and the Torah severely punishes the daughter of a priest who engages in licentiousness. Consequently, the lineage of her children Peretz and Zeraḥ were compromised by her act of having relations with Judah. What, do you have pedigree?’
Rabbi Yaakov bar Aviya said: Confront [argiz] your evil inclination and you will not sin. The Rabbis said: Anger your evil inclination and you will not sin.
“These are the generations of Peretz: Peretz begot Ḥetzron” (Ruth 4:18).
“These [eleh] are the generations of Peretz.” Rabbi Abba said: Anywhere that eleh is stated, it rejects what preceded it; ve’eleh, it adds to what preceded it. Bereshit Rabba 12 until “informed him that Ishmael repented,” end of quote>.
“Ḥetzron begot Ram and Ram begot Aminadav” (Ruth 4:19).
“Ḥetzron begot Ram.” But wasn’t Yeraḥme’el a previous son, [as it is stated:] “the sons of Ḥetzron who were born to him: Yeraḥme’el, Ram, and Keluvi” (I Chronicles 2:9)? Rather, he married a Canaanite woman in order to exalt himself [lehitater] through her, as it is written: “Yeraḥme’el had another wife, and her name was Atara” (I Chronicles 2:26).²⁶¹Since Yeraḥme’el married a Canaanite woman, the line of kingship did not come through him.
“Aminadav begot Naḥshon and Naḥshon begot Salma. Salmon begot Boaz and Boaz begot Oved” (Ruth 4:20–21).
“Ram begot Aminadav…and [Naḥshon begot…] Salmon.” To this point, they were the ladder for the princes;²⁶²Of the tribes. from this point on they were ladders to kings.²⁶³The name Salma, or Salmon, is similar to sulam, ladder. It appears in two different forms in these verses to allude to the change in status of the family: To this point, its members were tribal princes; from Boaz, Salmon’s son, the family was moving toward establishing the Israelite monarchy (Midrash HaMevoar). Rabbi Yitzḥak began: “Then [az] I said, behold, I have entered” (Psalms 40:8). I should have sung a song when I came.²⁶⁴When I was accepted into the congregation. Az means nothing other than song, as it is stated: “Then [az] Moses sang” (Exodus 15:1). I was included in “shall not enter,” and [yet] I entered.²⁶⁵David is cited as saying that he was assumed to be included within the prohibition against a Moavite convert entering the congregation, as he was a descendant of Ruth, but he was able to enter the congregation because of the acceptance of the halakha that this prohibition applies only to male converts.
“Oved begot Yishai and Yishai begot David” (Ruth 4:22).
“In the scroll of a book it is written about me” (Psalms 40:8). “In the scroll” – “whom You commanded that they should not enter into Your congregation” (Lamentations 1:10). “Of a book” – “An Ammonite and a Moavite shall not enter [into the assembly of the Lord]” (Deuteronomy 23:4). Not only did I enter, but in a scroll and a book it is written about me. In the scroll: Peretz, Ḥetzron, Ram, Aminadav, Naḥshon, Oved, Yishai, David.²⁶⁶The reference is to the verses in Ruth 4:18–22. In a book – “the Lord said: Arise, anoint him; for this is he” (I Samuel 16:12). Rabbi Huna says: It is written: “The Lord has provided me another [aḥer] offspring” (Genesis 4:25), an offspring that comes from another [aḥer] place, and who is this? It is the messianic king.²⁶⁷The messianic king is a descendant of David, and thus David is alluded to in the Torah itself.
Rabbi Berekhya and Rabbi Simon [said]: This is analogous to a king who would pass from place to place and a pearl fell from [the crown] on his head. The king and his entire entourage stopped there, and passersby would say: ‘What is the nature [of the stay] of the king and his entourage here?’ They saw and said: ‘A pearl fell from upon his head.’ What did he do? He piled up the dirt, and brought sifters, and sifted one pile but did not find it; the second, but did not find it; and the third, and he found it. They said: ‘The king found his pearl.’ So too, the Holy One blessed be He said to Abraham: “Go for yourself [lekha]” (Genesis 12:1) – It was you [lekha] that I was anticipating. What need was there to delineate the lineage: “Shem, Arpakhshad, Shelaḥ, Ever, Peleg… Naḥor, Teraḥ” (I Chronicles 1:24–26)? It was only for you. “Abram is [hu] Abraham” (I Chronicles 1:27)²⁶⁸It was he [hu] that God was anticipating, and for whom all the previous generations were listed. – “and You found his heart faithful before You” (Nehemiah 9:8). So too, the Holy One blessed be He said to David: ‘What need was there for Me to delineate the lineage: Peretz, Ḥetzron, Ram, Aminadav, Naḥshon, Oved, Yishai? Was it not for you?’ – “I have found David My servant” (Psalms 89:21).

Another interpretation (of Numb. 27:1): THEN CAME FORWARD <THE DAUGHTERS OF ZELOPHEHAD BEN HEPHER BEN GILEAD BEN MACHIR BEN MANASSEH, OF THE FAMILIES OF MANASSEH BEN JOSEPH. Their action was> an honor to them. <It was also> an honor to their father, an honor to Machir, and an honor to Joseph that such righteous and wise women had issued from him.³⁰Numb. R. 21:11. But what was their wisdom? They spoke up at the proper time, when Moses was busy with the parashah on inheritance (in accordance with Numb. 26:53): TO THESE SHALL THE LAND BE APPORTIONED <FOR AN INHERITANCE>. They said to him: If we are like a son, let us inherit; but if not, let our mother marry her husband's brother.³¹His duty would be to rear children in the name of the deceased father. On levirate marriage generally, see Deut. 25:5-6: also Gen. 38:8-9; Ruth 4:5. Immediately (in Numb. 27:5): MOSES BROUGHT THEIR CAUSE BEFORE THE LORD. They were righteous, in that they had not been married.³²Cf. the parallels in Tanh., Numb. 8:7 and Numb. R. 21:11: “In that they had never been married to someone unworthy of them.” Then why did they meet with Moses? So that he would not put on airs over having abstained from his wife for forty years.³³Since Moses regularly stood in the Divine Presence, he needed to preserve an unbroken state of purity. The Holy One informed him through these women, saying: Here are women who without being commanded remained <unmarried> for forty years until they were married to someone worthy of them.

(Lev. 25:25:) < WHEN YOUR RELATIVE BECOMES POOR AND SELLS SOME OF HIS PROPERTY, > THEN HIS REDEEMER SHALL COME, < THE ONE MOST CLOSELY RELATED TO HIM, AND REDEEM…. > Who was this? Boaz. When? When Naomi sold the field, as stated (in Ruth 4:3): NAOMI IS SELLING THE PARCEL OF LAND WHICH BELONGED TO OUR KINSMAN ELIMELECH. Ergo (in Lev. 25:25): AND SELLS SOME OF HIS PROPERTY. R. Simeon ben Johay said: Elimelech, Salmon, So-and-So,²⁶Peloni Almoni. According to Ruth 4:1, this was the “name” of Ruth’s most closely related redeemer. and Naomi's father were all descendants of Nahshon ben Amminadab.²⁷BB 91a. See Ruth 4:20–21; also Exod. 6:23, according to which Nahshon ben Amminadab was Aaron’s brother-in-law. Elimelech, Mahlon, and Chilion were leaders²⁸Rt.: PRNS. Cf. the Gk.: pronoos (“prudent”). of the generation. So for what reason were they punished? Because they went abroad from the land of Israel. Thus it is stated (in Ruth 1:19): < WHEN THEY CAME TO BETHLEHEM, > THE WHOLE CITY WAS EXCITED OVER THEM, AND THE WOMEN SAID: IS THIS NAOMI? What is the meaning of IS THIS NAOMI? You saw Naomi when she went abroad from the land of Israel. What has happened to her? (Lev. 25:25:) THEN HIS REDEEMER (go'el) SHALL COME, < THE ONE MOST CLOSELY RELATED (qarov) >. This is Boaz, since it is stated (in Ruth 2:20): THE MAN IS OUR RELATIVE (qarov), HE IS ONE OF OUR REDEEMING KIN (go'el). At that time Ruth went to Boaz. Her mother-in-law said to her (in Ruth 3:2): SEE, HE IS WINNOWING BARLEY ON THE THRESHING FLOOR TONIGHT. < If > he was a prince (nasi), would he have been winnowing on a threshing floor?²⁹Above, Exod. 3:16. It is simply because his generation was dissolute in sexual matters, that he went out to guard his threshing floor. She said to her (in vs. 3): YOU ARE TO WASH AND ANOINT YOURSELF. Then after that (ibid): AND GO DOWN TO THE THRESHING FLOOR. "And I shall go down" is {not written} [the actual written text (ketiv)]. She said to her: My merit will go down with you.³⁰Ruth R. 5:12. She did not do as her mother-in-law had told her. What did Ruth do? After she went down to the threshing floor, she did < what she was told >, as stated (in vs. 6): SHE WENT DOWN TO THE THRESHING FLOOR AND DID JUST AS HER MOTHER-IN-LAW HAD COMMANDED HER.³¹In other words, since she only obeyed Naomi after she had arrived at the threshing floor, she must have neglected to wash and anoint herself. Why? It is simply that she said: The generation was dissolute in sexual matters. What if they see me made up and say: Perhaps she is a harlot? (Vs. 7:) THEN, WHEN BOAZ HAD EATEN AND DRUNK, AND HIS HEART WAS MERRY. What is the meaning of AND HIS HEART WAS MERRY? That he was busy at the Torah.³²Ruth R. 5:15. Thus it is stated (by wisdom in Prov. 9:5): COME AND EAT OF MY BREAD. (Ruth 3:7, cont.:) AND WHEN HE CAME TO LIE DOWN BESIDE THE GRAIN PILE, THEN SHE CAME IN SECRET. [What is the meaning of IN SECRET (LT; rt.: LWT)? In a hiding place,] just as you say (in I Sam. 21:10 [9]): HERE IT IS WRAPPED (rt.: LWT) IN A MANTLE. (Ruth 3:8:) NOW IT CAME TO PASS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT THAT THE MAN WAS STARTLED. SO HE TURNED ASIDE, < AND HERE WAS A WOMAN LYING AT HIS FEET >. What is the meaning of TURNED ASIDE (rt.: LPT)? That he seized her head, because he thought that it was a spirit.³³See above, Exod. 3:16; Ruth R. 6:1, both of which explain further that he felt her head for hair, because demons have no hair. < It is > just as you say (in Jud. 16:29): AND SAMSON EMBRACED (rt.: LPT) THE TWO MIDDLE PILLARS. (Ruth 3:9:) THEN HE SAID: WHO ARE YOU? AND SHE SAID: I AM YOUR HANDMAID RUTH. He said to her: what have you come here to do? She said to him: To fulfill the Torah (in Lev. 25:25): WHEN YOUR RELATIVE BECOMES POOR…, [THEN HIS REDEEMER SHALL COME]. Arise and fulfill the Torah. He said to her: Since you have come to fulfill the Torah, (Ruth 3:13:) SPEND THE NIGHT. THEN IT SHALL COME TO PASS IN THE MORNING THAT, IF HE WILL REDEEM YOU, GOOD (tov); for he had a kinsman older than he, whose name was Tov. R. Hanina said: She said to him: Are you dismissing me with words? He said to her (Ibid., cont.): AS THE LORD LIVES, I am not dismissing you with words. (Ruth 4:1:) THEN BOAZ WENT UP TO THE GATE AND SAT DOWN THERE, < AND BEHOLD, THE REDEEMER OF WHOM BOAZ HAD SPOKEN WAS PASSING BY >. He said to him: Sit down, and we shall look into the Torah. What < is written > (in Lev. 25:25)? WHEN YOUR RELATIVE BECOMES POOR < AND SELLS SOME OF HIS PROPERTY, THEN HIS REDEEMER SHALL COME, THE ONE MOST CLOSELY RELATED TO HIM, AND REDEEM…. > Boaz said to Tov (in Ruth 4:3–4): NAOMI IS SELLING THE PARCEL OF LAND WHICH BELONGED TO OUR KINSMAN ELIMELECH < …; > AND I THOUGHT I SHOULD DISCLOSE IT TO YOU, SAYING: BUY IT, since you are an older kinsman than I < and have the right > to redeem it. (Vs. 4, cont.:) IF YOU WILL REDEEM IT, REDEEM IT. (Vs. 6:) THEN THE REDEEMER SAID {TO BOAZ}: < YOU > TAKE OVER < MY RIGHT OF REDEMPTION > FOR YOURSELF. At that time Boaz redeemed what Naomi had sold. Now from where did Boaz learn < what to do >? From this section (in Lev. 25:25): WHEN YOUR RELATIVE BECOMES POOR AND SELLS SOME OF HIS PROPERTY, < THEN HIS REDEEMER SHALL COME, THE ONE MOST CLOSELY RELATED TO HIM, AND REDEEM…. >

(Lev. 25:25:) < WHEN YOUR RELATIVE BECOMES POOR AND SELLS SOME OF HIS PROPERTY, > THEN HIS REDEEMER SHALL COME, < THE ONE MOST CLOSELY RELATED TO HIM, AND REDEEM…. > Who was this? Boaz. When? When Naomi sold the field, as stated (in Ruth 4:3): NAOMI IS SELLING THE PARCEL OF LAND WHICH BELONGED TO OUR KINSMAN ELIMELECH. Ergo (in Lev. 25:25): AND SELLS SOME OF HIS PROPERTY. R. Simeon ben Johay said: Elimelech, Salmon, So-and-So,²⁶Peloni Almoni. According to Ruth 4:1, this was the “name” of Ruth’s most closely related redeemer. and Naomi's father were all descendants of Nahshon ben Amminadab.²⁷BB 91a. See Ruth 4:20–21; also Exod. 6:23, according to which Nahshon ben Amminadab was Aaron’s brother-in-law. Elimelech, Mahlon, and Chilion were leaders²⁸Rt.: PRNS. Cf. the Gk.: pronoos (“prudent”). of the generation. So for what reason were they punished? Because they went abroad from the land of Israel. Thus it is stated (in Ruth 1:19): < WHEN THEY CAME TO BETHLEHEM, > THE WHOLE CITY WAS EXCITED OVER THEM, AND THE WOMEN SAID: IS THIS NAOMI? What is the meaning of IS THIS NAOMI? You saw Naomi when she went abroad from the land of Israel. What has happened to her? (Lev. 25:25:) THEN HIS REDEEMER (go'el) SHALL COME, < THE ONE MOST CLOSELY RELATED (qarov) >. This is Boaz, since it is stated (in Ruth 2:20): THE MAN IS OUR RELATIVE (qarov), HE IS ONE OF OUR REDEEMING KIN (go'el). At that time Ruth went to Boaz. Her mother-in-law said to her (in Ruth 3:2): SEE, HE IS WINNOWING BARLEY ON THE THRESHING FLOOR TONIGHT. < If > he was a prince (nasi), would he have been winnowing on a threshing floor?²⁹Above, Exod. 3:16. It is simply because his generation was dissolute in sexual matters, that he went out to guard his threshing floor. She said to her (in vs. 3): YOU ARE TO WASH AND ANOINT YOURSELF. Then after that (ibid): AND GO DOWN TO THE THRESHING FLOOR. "And I shall go down" is {not written} [the actual written text (ketiv)]. She said to her: My merit will go down with you.³⁰Ruth R. 5:12. She did not do as her mother-in-law had told her. What did Ruth do? After she went down to the threshing floor, she did < what she was told >, as stated (in vs. 6): SHE WENT DOWN TO THE THRESHING FLOOR AND DID JUST AS HER MOTHER-IN-LAW HAD COMMANDED HER.³¹In other words, since she only obeyed Naomi after she had arrived at the threshing floor, she must have neglected to wash and anoint herself. Why? It is simply that she said: The generation was dissolute in sexual matters. What if they see me made up and say: Perhaps she is a harlot? (Vs. 7:) THEN, WHEN BOAZ HAD EATEN AND DRUNK, AND HIS HEART WAS MERRY. What is the meaning of AND HIS HEART WAS MERRY? That he was busy at the Torah.³²Ruth R. 5:15. Thus it is stated (by wisdom in Prov. 9:5): COME AND EAT OF MY BREAD. (Ruth 3:7, cont.:) AND WHEN HE CAME TO LIE DOWN BESIDE THE GRAIN PILE, THEN SHE CAME IN SECRET. [What is the meaning of IN SECRET (LT; rt.: LWT)? In a hiding place,] just as you say (in I Sam. 21:10 [9]): HERE IT IS WRAPPED (rt.: LWT) IN A MANTLE. (Ruth 3:8:) NOW IT CAME TO PASS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT THAT THE MAN WAS STARTLED. SO HE TURNED ASIDE, < AND HERE WAS A WOMAN LYING AT HIS FEET >. What is the meaning of TURNED ASIDE (rt.: LPT)? That he seized her head, because he thought that it was a spirit.³³See above, Exod. 3:16; Ruth R. 6:1, both of which explain further that he felt her head for hair, because demons have no hair. < It is > just as you say (in Jud. 16:29): AND SAMSON EMBRACED (rt.: LPT) THE TWO MIDDLE PILLARS. (Ruth 3:9:) THEN HE SAID: WHO ARE YOU? AND SHE SAID: I AM YOUR HANDMAID RUTH. He said to her: what have you come here to do? She said to him: To fulfill the Torah (in Lev. 25:25): WHEN YOUR RELATIVE BECOMES POOR…, [THEN HIS REDEEMER SHALL COME]. Arise and fulfill the Torah. He said to her: Since you have come to fulfill the Torah, (Ruth 3:13:) SPEND THE NIGHT. THEN IT SHALL COME TO PASS IN THE MORNING THAT, IF HE WILL REDEEM YOU, GOOD (tov); for he had a kinsman older than he, whose name was Tov. R. Hanina said: She said to him: Are you dismissing me with words? He said to her (Ibid., cont.): AS THE LORD LIVES, I am not dismissing you with words. (Ruth 4:1:) THEN BOAZ WENT UP TO THE GATE AND SAT DOWN THERE, < AND BEHOLD, THE REDEEMER OF WHOM BOAZ HAD SPOKEN WAS PASSING BY >. He said to him: Sit down, and we shall look into the Torah. What < is written > (in Lev. 25:25)? WHEN YOUR RELATIVE BECOMES POOR < AND SELLS SOME OF HIS PROPERTY, THEN HIS REDEEMER SHALL COME, THE ONE MOST CLOSELY RELATED TO HIM, AND REDEEM…. > Boaz said to Tov (in Ruth 4:3–4): NAOMI IS SELLING THE PARCEL OF LAND WHICH BELONGED TO OUR KINSMAN ELIMELECH < …; > AND I THOUGHT I SHOULD DISCLOSE IT TO YOU, SAYING: BUY IT, since you are an older kinsman than I < and have the right > to redeem it. (Vs. 4, cont.:) IF YOU WILL REDEEM IT, REDEEM IT. (Vs. 6:) THEN THE REDEEMER SAID {TO BOAZ}: < YOU > TAKE OVER < MY RIGHT OF REDEMPTION > FOR YOURSELF. At that time Boaz redeemed what Naomi had sold. Now from where did Boaz learn < what to do >? From this section (in Lev. 25:25): WHEN YOUR RELATIVE BECOMES POOR AND SELLS SOME OF HIS PROPERTY, < THEN HIS REDEEMER SHALL COME, THE ONE MOST CLOSELY RELATED TO HIM, AND REDEEM…. >

(Lev. 25:25:) < WHEN YOUR RELATIVE BECOMES POOR AND SELLS SOME OF HIS PROPERTY, > THEN HIS REDEEMER SHALL COME, < THE ONE MOST CLOSELY RELATED TO HIM, AND REDEEM…. > Who was this? Boaz. When? When Naomi sold the field, as stated (in Ruth 4:3): NAOMI IS SELLING THE PARCEL OF LAND WHICH BELONGED TO OUR KINSMAN ELIMELECH. Ergo (in Lev. 25:25): AND SELLS SOME OF HIS PROPERTY. R. Simeon ben Johay said: Elimelech, Salmon, So-and-So,²⁶Peloni Almoni. According to Ruth 4:1, this was the “name” of Ruth’s most closely related redeemer. and Naomi's father were all descendants of Nahshon ben Amminadab.²⁷BB 91a. See Ruth 4:20–21; also Exod. 6:23, according to which Nahshon ben Amminadab was Aaron’s brother-in-law. Elimelech, Mahlon, and Chilion were leaders²⁸Rt.: PRNS. Cf. the Gk.: pronoos (“prudent”). of the generation. So for what reason were they punished? Because they went abroad from the land of Israel. Thus it is stated (in Ruth 1:19): < WHEN THEY CAME TO BETHLEHEM, > THE WHOLE CITY WAS EXCITED OVER THEM, AND THE WOMEN SAID: IS THIS NAOMI? What is the meaning of IS THIS NAOMI? You saw Naomi when she went abroad from the land of Israel. What has happened to her? (Lev. 25:25:) THEN HIS REDEEMER (go'el) SHALL COME, < THE ONE MOST CLOSELY RELATED (qarov) >. This is Boaz, since it is stated (in Ruth 2:20): THE MAN IS OUR RELATIVE (qarov), HE IS ONE OF OUR REDEEMING KIN (go'el). At that time Ruth went to Boaz. Her mother-in-law said to her (in Ruth 3:2): SEE, HE IS WINNOWING BARLEY ON THE THRESHING FLOOR TONIGHT. < If > he was a prince (nasi), would he have been winnowing on a threshing floor?²⁹Above, Exod. 3:16. It is simply because his generation was dissolute in sexual matters, that he went out to guard his threshing floor. She said to her (in vs. 3): YOU ARE TO WASH AND ANOINT YOURSELF. Then after that (ibid): AND GO DOWN TO THE THRESHING FLOOR. "And I shall go down" is {not written} [the actual written text (ketiv)]. She said to her: My merit will go down with you.³⁰Ruth R. 5:12. She did not do as her mother-in-law had told her. What did Ruth do? After she went down to the threshing floor, she did < what she was told >, as stated (in vs. 6): SHE WENT DOWN TO THE THRESHING FLOOR AND DID JUST AS HER MOTHER-IN-LAW HAD COMMANDED HER.³¹In other words, since she only obeyed Naomi after she had arrived at the threshing floor, she must have neglected to wash and anoint herself. Why? It is simply that she said: The generation was dissolute in sexual matters. What if they see me made up and say: Perhaps she is a harlot? (Vs. 7:) THEN, WHEN BOAZ HAD EATEN AND DRUNK, AND HIS HEART WAS MERRY. What is the meaning of AND HIS HEART WAS MERRY? That he was busy at the Torah.³²Ruth R. 5:15. Thus it is stated (by wisdom in Prov. 9:5): COME AND EAT OF MY BREAD. (Ruth 3:7, cont.:) AND WHEN HE CAME TO LIE DOWN BESIDE THE GRAIN PILE, THEN SHE CAME IN SECRET. [What is the meaning of IN SECRET (LT; rt.: LWT)? In a hiding place,] just as you say (in I Sam. 21:10 [9]): HERE IT IS WRAPPED (rt.: LWT) IN A MANTLE. (Ruth 3:8:) NOW IT CAME TO PASS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT THAT THE MAN WAS STARTLED. SO HE TURNED ASIDE, < AND HERE WAS A WOMAN LYING AT HIS FEET >. What is the meaning of TURNED ASIDE (rt.: LPT)? That he seized her head, because he thought that it was a spirit.³³See above, Exod. 3:16; Ruth R. 6:1, both of which explain further that he felt her head for hair, because demons have no hair. < It is > just as you say (in Jud. 16:29): AND SAMSON EMBRACED (rt.: LPT) THE TWO MIDDLE PILLARS. (Ruth 3:9:) THEN HE SAID: WHO ARE YOU? AND SHE SAID: I AM YOUR HANDMAID RUTH. He said to her: what have you come here to do? She said to him: To fulfill the Torah (in Lev. 25:25): WHEN YOUR RELATIVE BECOMES POOR…, [THEN HIS REDEEMER SHALL COME]. Arise and fulfill the Torah. He said to her: Since you have come to fulfill the Torah, (Ruth 3:13:) SPEND THE NIGHT. THEN IT SHALL COME TO PASS IN THE MORNING THAT, IF HE WILL REDEEM YOU, GOOD (tov); for he had a kinsman older than he, whose name was Tov. R. Hanina said: She said to him: Are you dismissing me with words? He said to her (Ibid., cont.): AS THE LORD LIVES, I am not dismissing you with words. (Ruth 4:1:) THEN BOAZ WENT UP TO THE GATE AND SAT DOWN THERE, < AND BEHOLD, THE REDEEMER OF WHOM BOAZ HAD SPOKEN WAS PASSING BY >. He said to him: Sit down, and we shall look into the Torah. What < is written > (in Lev. 25:25)? WHEN YOUR RELATIVE BECOMES POOR < AND SELLS SOME OF HIS PROPERTY, THEN HIS REDEEMER SHALL COME, THE ONE MOST CLOSELY RELATED TO HIM, AND REDEEM…. > Boaz said to Tov (in Ruth 4:3–4): NAOMI IS SELLING THE PARCEL OF LAND WHICH BELONGED TO OUR KINSMAN ELIMELECH < …; > AND I THOUGHT I SHOULD DISCLOSE IT TO YOU, SAYING: BUY IT, since you are an older kinsman than I < and have the right > to redeem it. (Vs. 4, cont.:) IF YOU WILL REDEEM IT, REDEEM IT. (Vs. 6:) THEN THE REDEEMER SAID {TO BOAZ}: < YOU > TAKE OVER < MY RIGHT OF REDEMPTION > FOR YOURSELF. At that time Boaz redeemed what Naomi had sold. Now from where did Boaz learn < what to do >? From this section (in Lev. 25:25): WHEN YOUR RELATIVE BECOMES POOR AND SELLS SOME OF HIS PROPERTY, < THEN HIS REDEEMER SHALL COME, THE ONE MOST CLOSELY RELATED TO HIM, AND REDEEM…. >

The Seers (i.e., the prophets) were the ones who said the doubled letters, mantzepakh (mem, nun, tzadi, peh, and kaf, which are the letters that have a different form when they appear at the end of a word). [The doubling of kaf that is found in Genesis 12:1,] "Lekh lekha (Go for yourself)," hints to Avraham that he will father Yitschak at one hundred years [of age] (as the numerical value of these two words is one hundred). [The doubling of mem that is found in Genesis 26:16,] "ki atsamta memenu (as you have become more powerful than us)" is a hint [to Yitschak] that hints that he and his seed will be powerful in both worlds. The doubling of nun [that is found in Genesis 32:12,] "Hatsileini na (Save me)" [is a hint to] Yaakov, [that] he will be saved in both worlds. The doubling of peh [that is found in Genesis 50:24,] "pakod yifkod (He will surely remember you)" [is a hint to] Yosef, [that] He will remember you in this world, and He will remember you in the world to come. The doubling of tzadi [that is found in Zachariah 6:12,] "hinei eesh, Tsemach shemo, ou'metachtav yitsmach (behold, a man called Branch shall branch out from the place where he is,)" is [referring to] the messiah. And so is it stated (Jermiah 23:5), "vahikimoti leDaveed tsemach tsadeek (and I will raise up a true branch of David)." ["The leader of fifty" (Isaiah 3:3)] ("Sixty were the queens" [Song of Songs 6:8]). Twenty-four books (of the Bible), and add to them eleven of the thirteen [books of the minor prophets] - besides Yonah which is by itself - and six orders of the Mishnah and nine chapters of Torat Kohanim, behold ["The leader of fifty"] ("Sixty were the queens"). "[Sixty were the queens] and eighty were the concubines" (Song of Songs 6:8). Sixty tractates and eighty study halls that were in Jerusalem corresponding to its gates. "And maidens without number" (Song of Songs 6:8). The study outside. "Behold the bed of Shlomo, sixty warriors" (Song of Songs 3:7). [This] corresponds to the [number of] letters of [the priestly blessing,) "May the Lord bless you and keep you, etc." (Numbers 6:24-26). The Satan (HaSatan) has the numerical equivalent of the count of the days of the solar year, as he rules over all the year to slander, except for Yom Kippur. Rabbi Ami bar Abba said, "Avraham was missing five organs before he was circumcised and [before he] fathered. The [letter] hay (with a numerical value of five) was added [to his name] and he became complete and fathered, and he was called Avraham [corresponding to the complete set of organs, two hundred and forty-eight], the numerical count of his letters." [Regarding] Sarai, two Amoraim (later rabbinic teachers) differed. One said, "The [letter] yod [with a numerical count of ten that was taken from her] was divided into two, [to give] a hay to Avaraham and a hay to Sarah." And [the other] said, "The yod that was taken from Sarah raised a protest until Yehshoua came and had a yod added, as it is stated (Numbers 13:16), "and Moshe called Hoshea [...], Yehoshua." And it saved him from the counsel of the [other] spies. [The significance of the letters in the name,] Yitschak [is as follows]: Yod [with a numerical count of ten] corresponds to the ten trials [of Avraham]. [The letter] tsadi [with a numerical count of ninety, as] Sarah was ninety when he was born. [The letter] chet [with a numerical count of eight, as] he was circumcised on the eighth day. And the letter kof [with a numerical count of one hundred, as] Avraham was a hundred years old when he was born. Yaakov was called according to [the significance of the letters of] his [own] name: Yod [corresponds to] the tenth of his offspring going backwards, Levi. Count from (the last son), Binaymin to Levi - there are ten sons, and Levi was the tenth. And he gave him as a tithe to the Omnipresent to fulfill [what he said] (Genesis 28:22), "all that You give to me, I will surely tithe it to You." [The letter] ayin [with a numerical count of seventy corresponds to the number of offspring he took to Egypt], "with seventy souls" (Deuteronomy 10:22). Kof corresponds to the [number of the] letters of the blessing [that he received], "And may He give you [etc.]" (Genesis 27:28). Take away the name [of God] from there, and one hundred [letters] remain. [The letter] bet [with a numerical count of two] corresponds to two angels [that he saw on the ladder in his dream] rising. Yehudah was called according to [the significance of the numerical count of the letters of] his [own] name: Thirty, corresponding to the thirty virtues of the monarchy. There were six hundred and thirteen letters on the tablets - from "I am" (Exodus 20:2) to "to your neighbor" (Exodus 20:14) - corresponding to the six hundred and thirteen commandments. And they were all given to Moshe at [Mount] Sinai; and in them are statutes and judgments, Torah and Mishnah, Talmud and aggadah. "The fear of the Lord is his treasure" (Isaiah 33:6). There is no greater characteristic than fear and humility, as it is stated (Deuteronomy 10:12), "And now Israel, what does the Lord, your God, ask of you [besides to fear Him]." "The fear of" (Yirat) has a numerical value of six hundred and eleven; along with Torah and circumcision, behold that is six hundred and thirteen. [The numerical value of] fringes (tsitsit) is six hundred. [Add] eight strings and five knots, behold that is six hundred and thirteen. "[The man (David)] raised on high" (II Samuel 23:1) - [high (al)] has a numerical value of one hundred, corresponding to one hundred blessings. As on every day, one hundred men of Israel were dying. [So] David and ordained [the daily saying of] one hundred blessings. "And now Israel, what (mah) does the Lord, your God, ask of you" - read it as one hundred (meah), these are the hundred blessings. Once he ordained it, the pestilence ceased. "This is the law of the burnt-offering (olah), it is the burnt-offering" (Leviticus 6:2), [meaning] the yoke (ulah) of Torah and the yoke of repentance. "Two anointed ones" (Zechariah 4:14). These are David and Aharon who were anointed with the anointing oil, such that their anointing was for [all] the generations. With Aharon, it is written (Numbers 25:13), "It shall be for him and his descendants after him, a pact of priesthood for all time." With David it is written (Ezekiel 37:25), "and My servant David as their prince for all time." "Forgive all guilt and take the good (tov)" (Hosea 14:3). Israel said, "Master of the world, at the time that the Temple existed, we would offer a sacrifice and be cleansed. But now all we have in our hand is prayer." The numerical value of tov is seventeen. Prayer [consists of] nineteen [blessings]. Take away from them the blessing for the malfeasers that was composed at Yavneh, and "Let the sprout of David blossom," which they ordained for the sake of "Probe me, Lord, and try me" (Psalms 26:2). Rabbi Simon says, "'Forgive all guilt and take the good (tov).' The numerical value of tov in at-bash (matching letters based on how close they are to the center of the alphabet) is [the same as] soul (nefesh). Israel said, 'Behold the fat from us, from our souls. May it be Your will that it be atonement for us and "that we pay with the words of our lips" (Hosea 14:3).'" "And the Lord gave her conception (herayon)" (Ruth 4:13). [Herayon] has a numerical value of the [number of the] days of the nine months of birthing (two hundred and seventy one). The name of the angel that is appointed for conception is night, as stated (Job 3:3), "and the night [that it was] said, 'A man was conceived." The measure of the water of a mikveh (ritual bath) is forty seah corresponding to the [forty mentions] of well, written in the Torah. And [the volume of] how many eggs is the measure of the mikveh? Five thousand seven hundred and sixty. And a seah is a hundred and forty-four eggs. Forty-three and a fifth eggs is the measure of [what is required for] hallah [tithe]. And from where [do we know] that a mikveh requires forty seah? As it is written (Isaiah 8:6), "Since this nation has rejected the waters of Shiloach that flow gently (le'at)." The numerical value of le'at is forty. Behold the measure of a seah is a tefach by a tefach with the height of [sixteen] tefach [and a fifth]. And one who separates the measure of the hallah [tithe] must separate [one part in forty three] and a fifth [from Torah writ like the numerical value of hallah]. Forty lashes (which are actually thirty-nine) is from Torah writ, as it is written (Exodus 35:1), "These (eleh) are the things which the Lord commanded." [The numerical count of] "eleh" is thirty-six; "things" (being plural) is two; "the things" [indicates an additional] one - behold, forty minus one (thirty-nine). "He shall strike him forty, he shall not add" (Deuteronomy 25:3), corresponds to the forty curses received by the snake, Chava, Adam and the ground, and the sages lessened one, because of "he shall not add." A Sanhedrin is twenty-three, so [that it is possible for] those advocating innocence to have one more (than twenty), and those advocating guilt to have two more. It is best for the two to come and push off one. The numerical value of anathmea (cherem) is two hundred and forty-eight. And Shmuel said, when it takes force it takes force on [all] two hundred and forty-eight organs, and when it leaves, it leaves from two hundred and forty-eight limbs, as it is written (Habakuk 3:2), "in anger, remember to have mercy (rachem, which is made up of the same letters as cherem)." It is written,"tirash," but we read it [as] tirosh. [If] he merits, he becomes a rosh (leader); [if] he does not merit, he becomes a rash (poor person). Our rabbis, may their memory be blessed said, "A man is recognized by three things: by his purse, by his glass and by his anger. Tavel is Ramaliah. Seshach is Bavel (Babylon) [according to] its numerical value of in at-bash. The numerical value of Gog and Magog is seventy, as they are the seventy nations [of the world].

... seven things were taken away from Adam Harishon after he ate from the tree of knowing, including among them] his brilliance, his life, and his stature / zivo v’chayyav v’qomato...

Another interpretation (continuing in Gen. 38:2): AND JUDAH SAW THERE < THE DAUGHTER OF A CERTAIN CANAANITE >. There is the one who committed fornication and profited; there is also the one who committed fornication and lost. < There is the one who killed and profited; there is also the one who killed and lost. There is the one who stole and profited; there is also the one who stole and lost. There is the one who stole and lost, i.e., Achan (of Joshua 7). There is the one who stole and profited, i.e., Rachel, of whom it is stated (in Gen. 31:19): SO RACHEL STOLE. There is the one who killed and lost (in Numb. 35:16): THE MURDERER SHALL SURELY BE PUT TO DEATH. There is the one who killed and profited, i.e., Phinehas (of Numb. 25:7-13) >.⁴⁰This section in angle brackets (< >) is taken from Codex Vaticanus Ebr. 34. The shorter Buber text, which has Phinehas stealing instead of killing, reads as follows: “There is the one who stole and profited; there is also the one who stole and lost. There is the one who stole and profited. This is Phinehas. There is the one who stole and lost. This is Achan (of Joshua 7).” There is the one who committed fornication and lost. This is Zimri (of Numb. 25:6-14). There is the one who committed fornication and profited. This is Judah, since from him arose Perez and Hezron, who were going to sire < the line of > David (according to Ruth 4:18-21) and the Messianic King, who is going to redeem Israel. Look at how many episodes the Holy One brings about before he raises up the Messianic King from Judah! That is the one about whom it is written (in Is. 11:2): AND THE SPIRIT OF THE LORD SHALL REST UPON HIM.

[Another interpretation (of Gen. 29:31): WHEN THE LORD SAW THAT LEAH WAS HATED]…. BUT RACHEL WAS BARREN (rt.: 'QR), < i.e., > she was the chief (rt.: 'QR) of the house, since Jacob would not have subjugated himself (to Laban) except for her.⁴¹Gen. R. 71:2; PRK 20:2. It is so stated (in Gen. 29:20): SO JACOB SERVED SEVEN YEARS FOR RACHEL. Where is it shown that she was house chief? Where Leah's children admit it.⁴²Ruth R. 7:13. Boaz and all his court⁴³Gk.: synhedrion. were from the tribe of Judah, < i.e., > from the sons of the sons of Leah. And what is written (in Ruth 4:11)? THEN ALL THE PEOPLE WHO WERE IN THE GATE AND THE ELDERS SAID: < WE ARE > WITNESSES. MAY THE LORD MAKE THE WOMAN WHO IS COMING INTO YOUR HOUSE LIKE RACHEL AND LEAH,⁴⁴The fact that Leah’s descendants mention Rachel before Leah, even though Leah is the elder, is seen as their admission that Rachel was favored over Leah. BOTH OF WHOM BUILT THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL. SO PROSPER IN EPHRATHAH AND BECOME RENOWNED IN BETHLEHEM. Hence Rachel is the chief (rt.: 'QR) of the house, since it is stated (in Gen. 29:31): but RACHEL WAS BARREN (rt.: 'QR). R. Berekhyah [Berabbi] the Priest said: She had no foundation (rt.: 'QR), < i.e., > metra,⁴⁵The Greek work means “womb.” since it is stated (in Gen. 29:31): BUT RACHEL WAS BARREN (rt.: 'QR)… nevertheless, she and her children are the foundation of the world, since no one maintains Israel in the world but the children of Rachel.⁴⁶Gen. R. 71:2 and PRK 20:2 add that Israel is referred to as Rachel’s children in Jer. 31:15, 20; Amos 5:15. See also Matthew 2:16-18.

(Gen. 2:4:) THESE ARE THE GENERATIONS (toledot) OF HEAVEN AND EARTH WHEN THEY WERE CREATED. R. Berekhyah and R. Helbo said in the name of R. Samuel bar Nahman:⁴⁵Sanh. 38b; Gen. R. 12:6; Exod. R. 30:3; Numb. R. 13:12; PR 46:2; Tanh., Gen. 1:6; Hasarot wlterot, fol. 37. Every toledot which is in the Torah lacks < a vowel letter > apart from two which are spelled in full. < The two are > (Ruth 4:18): THESE ARE THE GENERATIONS (toledot) OF PEREZ < and > (Gen. 1:4): THESE ARE THE GENERATIONS OF HEAVEN. Both of them are spelled in full. R. Judah bar Shallum the Levite said: Those < which lack a vowel letter number > six. R. Pinhas said in the name of R. Reuben: They correspond to the six things which < the Holy One > took away from the first Adam, and these are the following: (1) His facial luster, (2) his stature, (3) his life (i.e., his immortality), (4) the fruits of the earth, (5) the Garden of Eden, and (6) sun and moon. Where is it shown about his facial luster? Where it is stated (in Job 14:20): YOU CHANGE HIS FACE AND SEND HIM AWAY. Where is it shown about his stature?⁴⁶Hag. 12a; cf. Gen. R. 19:8; Cant. R. 3:7:5; PRK 1:1; 5:3; PR 15:3. Where it is stated (in Ps. 139:5): YOU HAVE < RE > FORMED ME BEHIND AND BEFORE. Where is it shown about his life? Where death was decreed over him (in Gen. 2:17); [for, if he had been worthy], he would have remained alive forever. Where is it shown about the fruits of the earth? Where it is stated (in Gen. 3:17): CURSED IS THE LAND BECAUSE OF YOU. Where is it shown about the Garden of Eden? Where it is stated (in Gen. 3:24): AND HE DROVE OUT THE MAN. Where is it shown about sun and moon? Where it is stated (in Is. 13:10): THE SUN SHALL BE DARK AT ITS RISING AND THE MOON SHALL NOT CAUSE ITS LIGHT TO SHINE. In the world to come, however, the Holy One will restore {to him} [them]. [Where is it shown] about facial luster? Where it is stated (in Is. 61:9): ALL WHO SEE THEM SHALL ACKNOWLEDGE THEM, < THAT THEY ARE THE SEED WHICH THE LORD HAS BLESSED >. And where is it shown about his stature? Where it is stated (in Lev. 26:13):⁴⁷Sifra, ad loc.; Sanh. 100a. AND I MADE YOU WALK WITH STATURE. R. Judah says: What is the meaning of STATURE? The time will come when each and every {upright} one [from Israel] will be a hundred cubits tall. R. Simeon ben Johay says: two hundred cubits, as stated (here): STATURE (qomemiyyut): Qom < ahmeans one stature of > a hundred; miyyut (read as me'ot, i.e., "hundreds") < implies another > hundred.⁴⁸Cf. Gen. R. 8:1). Ergo: two hundred. {And they would live forever?} [And where is it shown about his life?] Where it is stated (in Is. 65:22): AS LONG AS THE DAYS OF A TREE SHALL BE THE DAYS OF MY PEOPLE…. And where is it shown about the fruits of the earth?⁴⁹See ySheq. 6:2 (50a); yTaan. 1:2 (64a). Where it is stated (in Ezek. 47:12): AND BY THE RIVER UPON ITS BANK ON BOTH SIDES [SHALL GROW EVERY TREE FOR FOOD. THEIR LEAF SHALL NOT WITHER, NEITHER SHALL THEIR FRUIT FAIL. THEY SHALL BRING FORTH NEW FRUIT EVERY MONTH]. Where is it shown about the Garden of Eden? Where it is stated (in Hos. 14:8 [7]): THOSE WHO DWELL IN HIS SHADOW SHALL BE TRANSFORMED. THEY SHALL GROW GRAIN AND BLOSSOM LIKE A VINE. Where is it shown about sun and moon? Where it is stated (in Is. 30:26): MOREOVER, THE LIGHT OF THE MOON SHALL BE AS THE LIGHT OF THE SUN, AND THE LIGHT OF THE SUN SHALL BE SEVENFOLD, AS THE LIGHT OF THE SEVEN DAYS. R. Aha said in the name of R. Hanina: The wound from the blow to the world will heal.

Another interpretation (of Ps. 98:3): HE HAS REMEMBERED HIS LOVING-KINDNESS. The remembrance is of our mother Rachel. (Ibid., cont.:) TOWARD THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL, as stated (in Ruth 4:11) < RACHEL AND LEAH >, BOTH OF WHOM BUILT UP THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL. Ergo (in Gen. 30:22): THEN GOD REMEMBERED RACHEL.

And Moses went, and returned unto Jethro his father-in-law. Prior to this is written: And when the Lord saw that he returned to see … and He said: “Moses, Moses” (Exod. 3:4). R. Abba the son of Kahana said: Everyone whose name is repeated in immediate succession experiences life in both worlds: Noah, Noah (Gen. 6:9); Abraham, Abraham (ibid. 22:11); Jacob, Jacob (ibid. 46:2); Moses, Moses (Exod. 3:4); Samuel, Samuel (I Sam. 3:10); Perez, Perez (Ruth 4:15). However, someone retorted: Is it not also written: These are the generations of Terah, Terah (Gen. 11:27). He replied: Even he had a portion in both worlds, for our patriarch Abraham was not buried until he was assured that his father, Terah, had repented, for it is said: But thou shalt go to thy fathers in peace (ibid. 15:15). Abraham said to the Holy One, blessed be He: Master of the Universe: Shall I go to my fathers, though I have stored up good deeds in this world? The Holy One, blessed be He, answered: Be assured: Thy father hath repented. Hence his name was repeated.

21 The Seers (i.e., the prophets) were the ones who said the doubled letters, mantzepakh (mem, nun, tzadi, peh, and kaf, which are the letters that have a different form when they appear at the end of a word). [The doubling of kaf that is found in Genesis 12:1,] "Lekh lekha (Go for yourself)," hints to Avraham that he will father Yitschak at one hundred years [of age] (as the numerical value of these two words is one hundred). [The doubling of mem that is found in Genesis 26:16,] "ki atsamta memenu (as you have become more powerful than us)" is a hint [to Yitschak] that hints that he and his seed will be powerful in both worlds. The doubling of nun [that is found in Genesis 32:12,] "Hatsileini na (Save me)" [is a hint to] Yaakov, [that] he will be saved in both worlds. The doubling of peh [that is found in Exodus 3:15, is a hint to] Israel, to Moshe,"pakod pakadeti etchem (I have surely remembered you)." The doubling of tsadi [that is found in Zachariah 6:12,] "hinei eesh, Tsemach shemo, [ou'metachtav yitsmach] (behold, a man called Branch shall branch out from the place where he is,)" is [referring to] the Messiah. And so is it stated (Jermiah 23:5), "vahikimoti leDavid tsemach tsadeek [...] (and I will raise up a true branch of David [...])." "The leader of fifty" (Isaiah 3:3). Twenty-four books (of the Bible); add to them eleven of the thirteen [books of the minor prophets] - besides Yonah which is by itself - and six orders of the Mishnah and nine chapters of Torat Kohanim, behold fifty. "Sixty were the queens," (Song of Songs 6:8), sixty tractates; "and eighty were the concubines," eighty study halls that were in Jerusalem corresponding to its gates.; and maidens without number," the study outside. "Behold the bed of Shlomo, sixty warriors" (Song of Songs 3:7). [This corresponds to] the sixty letters of the priestly blessing (Numbers 6:24-26). Three hundred and eighteen [souls mentioned in Genesis 14:14 is the numerical equivalent of] Eliezer. "Inasmuch (ekev) as Avraham obeyed Me and kept My charge: My commandments, My laws, and My teachings" (Genesis 26:5) - he recognized him when he was three (the numerical equivalent of ekev, being three less than that of Avraham). The Satan (HaSatan) has the numerical equivalent of three hundred and sixty-four, the count of the days of the solar year that he rules over all of them to slander, excepting Yom Kippur. Rabbi Ami beiRabbi Abba said, "Avraham was missing five organs before he was circumcised and [before] he fathered. The [letter] hay (with a numerical value of five) was added [to his name] and he became complete and fathered [corresponding to the complete set of organs, two hundred and forty-eight], the numerical count of his letters." "A woman of valor is the crown of her husband" (Proverbs 12:4) - that is Sarah. Her name had been Sarai. Two Amoraim (later rabbinic teachers) differed. One said, "The [letter] yod (with a numerical count of ten that was taken from her) was divided into two, [to give] a hay to Avaraham and a hay to Sarah." And [the other] said, "The yod that was taken from Sarah raised a protest until Yehoshua came and Moshe added to him a yod - the Lord save you from the counsel of the [other] spies. [The significance of the letters in the name,] Yitschak [is as follows]: Yod (with a numerical count of ten) corresponds to the ten trials [of Avraham]. [The letter] tsadi (with a numerical count of ninety), [as] Sarah was ninety when he was born. [The letter] chet (with a numerical count of eight), [as] he was circumcised on the eighth day. And the letter kof (with a numerical count of one hundred), [as] Avraham was a hundred years old when he was born. Yaakov was called according to [the significance of the letters of] his [own] name: Yod [corresponds to] the tenth of his offspring going backwards. Count from (the last son), Binaymin to Levi - there are ten sons, [and Levi] was the tenth. [The letter] ayin (with a numerical count of seventy corresponds to the number of offspring he took to Egypt), "with seventy souls" (Deuteronomy 10:22). Kof corresponds to the [number of the] letters of the blessing [that he received minus the name of God, "And may He give you etc." (Genesis 27:28)]. [The letter] bet (with a numerical count of two) remains, corresponding to two angels (that he saw on the ladder in his dream) rising. There were six hundred and thirteen commandments in the tablets - corresponding to the letters from "I am" (Exodus 20:2) to "to your neighbor" (Exodus 20:14) - corresponding to the six hundred and thirteen commandments - no less and no more. And they were all given to Moshe at [Mount] Sinai; and in them are statutes and judgments, Torah and Mishnah, Talmud and aggadah. "The fear of the Lord is his treasure" (Isaiah 33:6). There is no greater characteristic than fear and humility, [as it is stated] (Deuteronomy 10:12), "And now Israel, what does the Lord, your God, ask of you besides to fear Him [...]." "The fear of" (Yirat) has a numerical value of six hundred and eleven; and Torah has a numerical value of six hundred and eleven - and Torah and fear [of God] along with them, behold that is six hundred and thirteen. [The numerical value of] fringes (tsitsit) [is six hundred] - the rabbis taught: [Add] eight [strings] and five [knots], behold that is six hundred and thirteen. The days of Avraham were one hundred and seventy-five years, [of] Yitzchak were one hundred and eighty years [and of] Yaakov were a hundred and forty-seven years. When you put them together, it is found to be five hundred and two years. And so is the distance of the the heavens to the earth, "like the the days of the heavens above the earth" (Deuteronomy 11:21). "[The man (David)] raised on high" (II Samuel 23:1) - [high (al) has a numerical value of one hundred] corresponding to one hundred blessings. As on every day, one hundred men of Israel were dying. [So] David came and ordained [the daily saying of] one hundred blessings. Once he ordained them, the pestilence ceased. High (al) [corresponds to] the yoke (ulah) of Torah and the yoke of suffering. "Forgive all guilt and take the good (tov) that we pay with the words of our lips" (Hosea 14:3). Israel said, "Master of the world, at the time that the Temple existed, we would offer a sacrifice and be cleansed. But now all we have in our hand is prayer." The numerical value of tov is seventeen. Prayer [consists of] nineteen blessings. Take away from them the blessing for the malfeasers that was composed at Yavneh, and "Let the sprout of David blossom," which they ordained after it for the sake of "Probe me, Lord, and try me" (Psalms 26:2). Rabbi Simon says, "Take tov [in at-bash (matching letters based on how close they are to the center of the alphabet), which is the same] as the numerical value of soul (nefesh). Israel said, 'At the time that the Temple existed, we would incinerate the fats and the innards and be cleansed. But now behold our fat, our blood and our souls. May it be Your will that it be atonement for us and "that we pay with the words of our lips" (Hosea 14:3).'" "And the Lord gave her conception (herayon)" (Ruth 4:13). [Herayon] has a numerical value of two hundred and seventy one (the number of the days of the nine months of birthing). The measure of the water of a mikveh (ritual bath) is forty seah [corresponding to the forty mentions] of well water, written in the Torah. And [the volume of] how many eggs is the measure of the mikveh? Five thousand seven hundred and sixty. Each seah is a hundred and forty-four eggs. Forty-three and a fifth eggs is the measure of [what is required for] challah [tithe]. And from where [do we know] that a mikveh requires forty seah? As it is written (Isaiah 8:6), "Since this nation has rejected the waters of Shiloach that flow gently (le'at)." The numerical value [of le'at] is forty. And one who separates the measure of the challah [tithe] must separate one part in forty three and a fifth from Torah writ like the [numerical] value of challah. The main categories of work [on Shabbat] are forty minus one (thirty-nine), as it is written (Exodus 35:1), "These (eleh) are the things which the Lord commanded." [The numerical count of] "eleh" is thirty-six; "things" (being plural) is two; "the things" [indicates an additional] one - behold, forty minus one. "He shall strike him forty, he shall not add" (Deuteronomy 25:3), corresponds to the forty curses that the snake, Chava, Adam and the ground were cursed - and the sages lessened one, because of "he shall not add." Those [judges] advocating innocence are more those advocating guilt. [For] it is best for the two to come and push off one. Seshach is Bavel (Babylon) [according to] its numerical value in at-bash. Tavel is Ramlah [according to] its numerical value in al-bam (another numerical scheme). "Thus (bezot) shall Aaron enter the shrine; with a bull of the herd for a sin offering and a ram for a burnt offering" (Leviticus 16:3). Bezot (which has a numerical count of four hundred and ten) is a hint to the first Temple that stood for four hundred and ten years.

"Upon a ten-stringed instrument and upon the psaltery" (Ps. 92:8). All testimonies reliable to Israel are (celebrated) with ten (males). The harp upon which David played had ten strings. The testimony for the dead is through ten (males). The testimony for the (public) benediction of (God's) Name is through ten (males). The testimony of the covenant of circumcision is through ten (males). The testimony for Chalizah is through ten (males), as it is said, "And he took ten men of the elders of the city" (Ruth 4:2).

Another interpretation (of Gen. 39:1): WHEN JOSEPH WAS TAKEN DOWN TO EGYPT…. What is written above on the matter (in Gen. 38:29)? AND IT CAME TO PASS THAT, AS HE DREW BACK HIS HAND < … > [SO HIS NAME WAS CALLED PEREZ]. Here is kingship (according to Ruth 4:18): THESE ARE THE GENERATIONS OF PEREZ.⁶⁸The biblical text continues with a genealogy from Perez to David. (Gen. 38:30:) THEN AFTERWARDS HIS BROTHER CAME OUT. Here is a priest. Then afterwards (in Gen. 39:1): WHEN JOSEPH WAS TAKEN DOWN TO EGYPT, the Holy One simply brought them the good news that, wherever they went, they would have the services of a king and a priest. How so? In Egypt < they had > a king and a priest, as stated (in Exod. 7:8): NOW THE LORD SAID UNTO MOSES AND UNTO AARON…. Also in their Exodus < they had a king and a priest > (according to Ps. 77:21 [20]): YOU LED YOUR PEOPLE LIKE A FLOCK BY THE HAND OF MOSES AND AARON.

11 Another interpretation (of Numb. 27:1): “Then came forward [the daughters of Zelophehad [ben Hepher ben Gilead ben Machir ben Manasseh, of the families of Manasseh ben Joseph]”: [Their action was] an honor to them. [It was also] an honor to their father, an honor to Machir and an honor to Joseph that such righteous and wise women had issued from him. But what was their wisdom? They [only] spoke up at the proper time, when Moses was busy with the parashah about inheritance (in accordance with Numb. 26:53), “To these shall you apportion the land [for an inheritance].” They said to him, “If we are like a son, let us inherit; but if not, let our mother perform levirate marriage (marry her husband's brother).”¹¹His duty would be to rear children in the name of the deceased father. On levirate marriage generally, see Deut. 25:5-6: also Gen. 38:8-9; Ruth 4:5. Immediately (in Numb. 27:5), “Moses brought their cause before the Lord.” They were righteous, In that they had never been married to someone unworthy of them. Then why did they meet with Moses at the end [of the forty years]? So that he would not [put on airs] over having abstained from his wife for forty years.¹²Since Moses regularly stood in the Divine Presence, he needed to preserve an unbroken state of purity. The Holy One, blessed be He, informed him through these [women], saying, “Here are women who without being commanded [remained unmarried] for forty years, until they were married to someone worthy of them.”

... “He does the will of those who fear Him…” (Tehillim 145:19) Meaning that Gd does not annul his prayers and gives him what he requests. This refers to David, of whom it is written “I am a companion to all who fear You…” (Tehillim 119:63) at the time when he was troubled over the Holy Temple, as it is written “Remember, O Lord, onto David all his affliction. That he swore to the Lord, he vowed to the Mighty One of Jacob; That I shall not come into the tent of my house, and I shall not go up on the bed that was spread for me. I shall not give sleep to my eyes nor slumber to my pupils, Until I find a place for the Lord, dwellings for the Mighty One of Jacob.” (Tehillim 132:1-5) Since the Holy One saw that he stood there, troubled over the Holy Temple, He immediately sent Gad the prophet to him and showed him the place of the Holy Temple, as it is written “And Gad came to David on that day, and said to him, ‘Go up to erect an altar to the Lord in the threshing-floor of Aravnah the Jebusite.’” (Shmuel II 24:18) David went there immediately, as it says “And David went up according to the word of Gad, as the Lord had commanded. (Shmuel II 24:19) He found there the altar where Adam, the first man, made offerings, where Noach made offerings, where Avraham made offerings. Once he found it he began to measure, saying ‘from here to here will be the Courtyard, from here to here will be the Holy of Holies’ as it says “And David said, ‘This is the House of the Lord God…” (Divre HaYamim I 22:1) And how could he declare “…and this is the altar for burnt offerings for Israel” (ibid.)? This is what is meant that the Holy One does not nullify the desire of the righteous, but rather gives them what they seek in order to fulfill “He does the will of those who fear Him…” (Tehillim 145:19)