Literatur des Zweiten Tempels zu Schemot 22:1

אִם־בַּמַּחְתֶּ֛רֶת יִמָּצֵ֥א הַגַּנָּ֖ב וְהֻכָּ֣ה וָמֵ֑ת אֵ֥ין ל֖וֹ דָּמִֽים׃

Wenn ein Dieb [des Nachts] beim Einbruch betroffen und dabei erschlagen wird, ist seinetwegen keine Blutschuld.

Allegorical Interpretation of Genesis

[32] This is the ground for Moses’ words, “If the thief be found where he has just broken through and be smitten and die, there is no blood-guiltiness for him: but if the sun have risen upon him,(then he) is liable, he shall die in requital” (Exod. 22:1 f.). For if a man cleave and break through the tenet that stands firm in its soundness and uprightness, testifying of unlimited power as belonging to God alone, and he be found where he has broken through, that is, in the pierced and cloven doctrine that is conscious of a man’s own mind at work but not of God, he is a thief abstracting what belongs to another;
Einen Rabbi fragenBookmarkShareCopy

Allegorical Interpretation of Genesis

Exod. 22:1 f. Rejection of God, that comes to nothing, far less heinous than thorough-going Self-exaltation (32–35).
Einen Rabbi fragenBookmarkShareCopy