Midrash sobre Números 15:31

(Fol. 36b) Our Rabbis were taught: How did the High-priest confess? "I have committed iniquities, transgressed, and sinned;" and so says Scripture regarding the scapegoat (Lev. 16, 21) And confess over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel, and all their transgressions, and all their sins. And this arrangement is also used by Moses (Ex. 34, 7) Forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin; so says R. Meir. The sages, however, say. Iniquities (Avonoth) refers to intentional transgressions; and so says Scripture (Num. 15, 31) That person shall be cut off, his iniquity (Avono) is upon him; transgressions (P'sha'im) refers to rebellion, and so says Scripture (II Kings 3, 7) The King of Moab hath rebelled (Pasha) against me. There is also another passage (Ib. 8, 22) Then did Libnah revolt in that time; sin (Chata'oth) refers to unintentional wrong (done in ignorance), and so says Scripture (Lev. 4, 2) If any person sin through ignorance (Yekheta). But, according to the sages, how is it possible that after he has confessed the intentional and rebellious sins, he will confess the unintentional? Therefore we must say that he said them in this order: I have sinned, committed iniquities, and transgressed. And so says David (Ps. 106, 6) We have sinned together with our fathers, ive have committed iniquity, we have done wickedly. And so also says Solomon (I Kings 8, 47; II Chr. 6) We have sinned, we have committed iniquity, we have acted wickedly. So also says Daniel (Dan. 9, 5) We have sinned, we have committed iniquity, we have done wickedly, and we have rebelled. If so, then, why did Moses say (Ex. 34, 6) Forgiving iniquity, and transgression, and sin. Moses said thus to the Holy One, praised be He! "Sovereign of the Universe, when the children of Israel will sin before thee, and then repent, consider their conscious sins as mere inadvertant acts."

We have a Baraitha coinciding with R. Chisda's opinion: "If one is walking in filthy alleys, he should not read the Sh'm'a; moreover, even if he were in the middle of his reading and should happen to find himself in a filthy street, he should stop." If he do not stop, what then? R. Meyasha the grandson of R. Joshua b. Levi said: It is of him that the passage says (Ezek. 20, 25.) "Wherefore I gave them also statutes that were not good, and ordinances whereby they could not live. R. Assi said from this (Is. 5, 18.) Woe unto those that draw iniquity with the cord of vanity. R. Ada b. Ahaba said from this (Num. 15, 31.) Because the word of the Lord hath he despised. And if he does stop what will his reward be? R. Abuhu said: "To him may be applied the passage (Deu. 32, 47.) And through this thing ye shall prolong your days."

There is a Baraitha: R. Eliezer b. Jose said: "With this argument I demonstrated the falsification of the Samaritan's books, who used to say that there is no intimation about the resurrection in the Pentateuch. I said to them: 'You have falsified your Torah, but it does not avail you; for you say that there is no intimation of the resurrection in the Torah. Does it not read, (Num. 15, 31) That person shall be cut off, his iniquity is upon him? That person shall be cut off, from this world, his iniquity upon him, referring to the world to come'?"

And he who says that the Torah was not given by Heaven, etc. Our Rabbis were taught: Concerning the verse (Num. 15, 31) "Because the word of the Lord hath he despised and his commandment hath he broken. This refers to him who says that the Torah was not given by Heaven. According to others, the word of the Lord hath he despised, refers to an Epicurean. Still another explanation is that the word of the Lord hath he despised, refers to him who interprets the Torah in opposition to the adopted sense." His commandment hath he broken; this refers to circumcision, Hikareth Tikareth; i.e., Hikareth (shall be cut off), from this world. Tikaret, from the world to come. "Infer from this," said R. Elazar the Modite, "that he who profanes the sanctuary, who despises the festivals, he who breaks the covenant of Abraham, our father (circumcision), he who explains the Torah in opposition to the adopted sense, he who exposes his fellowman to shame in public, although he possesses wisdom and good deeds, will, nevertheless have no share in the world to come." We are taught in another Baraitha: "He hath despised the word of God, refers to him who says that the Torah was not given by Heaven, and even if he says that the entire Torah was given by Heaven, except this verse, which was not by the Holy One, praised be He! but by Moses himself, such a man is included in the verse that he hath despised. And furthermore even if he says that the whole Torah was given by Heaven except such and such an explanation, such an a fortiori conclusion, such an analogy of expression, such a man is considered, as if he hath despised the word of the Lord." We are taught in another Baraitha: R. Mair says: "To him who learned the Torah but does not teach it to others, the passage, for he hath despised, refers." R. Nathan says: "It refers to him who does not care for the Mishnah." R. Nehorai says: "It refers to him who is capable of studying the Torah, but does not." R. Ismael, however, says: "It refers to an idolater." How does he conclude this: As it was taught at the college of R. Ismael: "He hath despised the word of the lord." This refers to him who has despised the words which were said to Moses at Sinai (Ex. 20, 2) "I am the Lord, thy God, there shall not be any other god before thee." R. Joshua b. Karcha says: "He who learns the Torah and does not repeat it, is like unto one who sows but does not reap." R. Joshua says: "He who learned the Torah and causes to forget it, is likened unto a woman who bears children and buries them." R. Akiba said: "Chant every day, (Ib. b) chant every day." R. Isaac b. Abudimi said: "Where is the passage which gives a hint of this? It is said (Prov. 15, 26) The desire of the laborer laboreth for him; for his mouth imposeth it on him, i.e., he is laboring here and the Torah labors for him in another place." R. Elazar said: "Every man is created to labor," as it is said: (Job. 5, 7) "But man is born unto labor. From this, however, we do not know whether it means mental or physical labor; when the verse says (Pr. 16, 26) "For his mouth imposeth it on him, hence it refers to mental labor. But still I am not aware if it refers to labor of Torah or gossip? When the passage says: (Josh. 1, 8) "This book of the law shall not depart out of thy mouth, hence it refers to the labor of the Torah." And to this Raba referred when he said: "All human bodies are mail bags (carrying Heavenly decrees), happy are they who are found worthy to be receptacles of the Torah." (Pr. 6, 32) But whosoever committeth with a woman, lacketh sense," i.e., Resh Lakish said: "This refers to one who studies the Torah occasionally, as it is said (Ib. 22, 18) For it is a pleasant thing if thou keep them within thy bosom, if they be altogether firmly seated upon thy lips."

This is what God said to Israel: My children what do I seek from you? I seek no more than that you love one another, and honor one another, and that you have awe for one another