וּשְׂעִ֨יר עִזִּ֥ים אֶחָ֛ד לְחַטָּ֖את לַיהוָ֑ה עַל־עֹלַ֧ת הַתָּמִ֛יד יֵעָשֶׂ֖ה וְנִסְכּֽוֹ׃ (ס)
Juga seekor kambing jantan sebagai kurban penghapus dosa bagi Yang Mahakekal; kurban itu harus dipersembahkan di samping kurban bakaran tetap beserta kurban curahannya.
Rashi
ושעיר עזים וגו׳ AND ONE KID OF THE GOATS [FOR A SIN OFFERING] — All goats brought as additional offerings are intended to atone for those sins committed by causing uncleanness to the Sanctuary or its holy things, — all as is set forth in Treatise Shevuot 9a. The goat of the New Moon differs from other goats brought as additional offerings in the fact that the word לה׳ is stated of it: that it is a sin offering to the Lord. The Halachic explanation of this is: it is to teach you that it only makes atonement for uncleanness where there is no consciousness of having caused it either before or after it has been done (cf. Rashi on Leviticus 16:16 and Note thereon), so that no one is cognisant of the sin except the Holy One, blessed be He, alone. (It is a חטאת לה׳, a sin offering for a sin known only to God). And that the same applies to other goats (i. e., that they atone for uncleanness under the same conditions) we derive from the law about this goat. — But its Aggadic explanation is as follows: The Holy One, blessed be He, said, “Bring an atonement offering for My sake, because I diminished the size of the Moon" (cf. Rashi on Genesis 1:16; Shevuot 9a, Chullin 60b).
Rabbeinu Bahya
ושעיר עזים אחד לחטאת לה', “and one male goat as a sin-offering for Hashem.” According to the plain meaning of the text he word לה' means the same as in Leviticus 16,8: “one male goat as sin-offering for Hashem.” Alternatively, the word לה' may mean “in respect of a sin committed against Hashem.” This would be a normal construction in Hebrew where the prefix ל often occurs as not meaning “for” but “against.” Examples are: Genesis 39,9 וחטאתי לאלו-הים and I would commit a sin against G’d.” Or, Genesis 44,32: וחטאתי לאבי, “and I would have committed a sin against my father.”
According to Chulin 60 (one opinion) the meaning here is the reverse of the usual, G’d commanding the offering on His own behalf, “atoning” for having reduced the moon from its original size. This is one of the mysteries of the Torah.
According to Chulin 60 (one opinion) the meaning here is the reverse of the usual, G’d commanding the offering on His own behalf, “atoning” for having reduced the moon from its original size. This is one of the mysteries of the Torah.
Rabbeinu Bahya
A Midrashic approach: The words חטאת לה' refers to the kind of sin unknown to anyone except Hashem. This is the way the Talmud in Shevuot 9 understands the expression. Another explanation offered by Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish there is that G’d offered to atone for having diminished the size of the moon by means of this offering. [The important thing to remember is that nowhere else does the sin offering in a mussaf sacrifice conclude with the words לה', a peculiar expression seeing all sacrifices are לה' for Hashem and no other deity or even attribute of G’d. Ed].
In Chulin 60 we find a lengthy description of what is meant here. Rabbi Shimon ben Pazzi raised the point that the Torah appears to contradict itself when it wrote in Genesis 1,16: “G’d made the two large luminaries, the great luminary and the small luminary.” If they both were first described as “large,” how could the verse continue in the same breath describing one as “small” and one as “great?” In answer to this question a dialogue between the moon and G’d is cited. The moon said to G’d: ”how can two kings both wear the same crown?” G’d replied: “reduce yourself in size.” Thereupon the moon countered: “why should I have to reduce myself in size (importance) merely because I asked a legitimate question?” Thereupon G’d said: “O.K. so you shine by day as well as by night.” To this the moon replied: “what good is my light during the day when there is no one to appreciate it?” To this argument G’d replied: “the Jewish people are going to count their days and years according to your orbits.” The moon was not satisfied with this, saying: “they will have to count days in accordance with the seasons, i.e. by relying on solar orbits.” G’d appreciated this argument and reassured the moon by saying: “the righteous will bear names referring to you.” Thus we find Yaakov referred to as יעקב הקטן in Amos 7,2, and Samuel referred to as שמואל הקטן; David is referred to as דוד הקטן in Samuel I 17,14. In spite of all this G’d did not succeed in satisfying the moon. As a last resort, G’d told the Jewish people to offer a male goat as sin-offering on His behalf seeing He had reduced the size of the moon.
In order to understand this strange-sounding dialogue between G’d and the moon we must appreciate that the word הגדולים in Genesis 1,16 means that originally sun and moon were equal in size and power. The moon was reduced in size and this is why the Torah refers to it as the small luminary in the second half of the verse we quoted. The reason that it was reduced was that it had complained. However, we must not view the moon as displaying egotistical motives, [otherwise why would G’d feel guilty? Ed.]. When the moon referred to the inability of two kings wearing the same crown it meant that anything which appeared like power-sharing would reflect negatively on G’d. If two luminaries were to wear the same crown it would appear as if G’d were unable to create two servants each of whom had the ability to generate its own light without relying on an outside force, a companion to assist Him. The nations of the world would be encouraged to say that G’d was unable to supply original light to each of the luminaries as they had to trade “crowns” with one another. The moon’s error was the suggestion that G’d did not know what He had been doing when He created the universe as the moon had found it. One does not second-guess G’d the Creator.
As a result, the moon had to be “punished.” After the moon had been reduced in size and had felt suitably ashamed for its behavior, G’d said to it: “go and govern both by day and by night.” He added that the Jewish people would count their months according to its orbit, and that the righteous would bear names associated with the moon. G’d did all this in order to put the moon’s mind at rest, so much so that He accorded the moon honor in assigning an additional male goat to the mussaf offering commemorating this dialogue for all times. This is the real meaning of the enigmatic words by Rabbi Shimon ben Pazzi who portrayed G’d as saying: “bring an atonement on My behalf.” G’d’s major concern in all this was that none of His creatures should have complaints about the way in which He had seen fit to create the universe and to assure its proper functioning. No creature should feel disadvantaged by its creator vis-a-vis any other part of the creation.
It is also possible that the entire episode and the manner it is alluded to in the Torah serves as an encouragement to would be repentant sinners to come forward and change their life styles. They would learn from this episode in the celestial regions that once the guilty party had recognized the error of its ways G’d would go out of His way to compensate such repentant sinners for their having accepted instruction from Him. This also explains why the righteous are actually compared to the sun in Judges 5,31: “and the ones who love Him will emerge like the sun in its might,” seeing that they had to suffer various insults just as the sun had to be the victim of the moon’s complaints.
Rav Yitzchak Alfassi writes in his halachic work at the end of the first chapter of tractate Shevuot that the word עלי in Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish’s parable הביאו כפרה עלי, “bring an atonement on My behalf,” should really be understood as אלי, “to Me,” not “on My behalf.” Most commentators agree with him.
In Chulin 60 we find a lengthy description of what is meant here. Rabbi Shimon ben Pazzi raised the point that the Torah appears to contradict itself when it wrote in Genesis 1,16: “G’d made the two large luminaries, the great luminary and the small luminary.” If they both were first described as “large,” how could the verse continue in the same breath describing one as “small” and one as “great?” In answer to this question a dialogue between the moon and G’d is cited. The moon said to G’d: ”how can two kings both wear the same crown?” G’d replied: “reduce yourself in size.” Thereupon the moon countered: “why should I have to reduce myself in size (importance) merely because I asked a legitimate question?” Thereupon G’d said: “O.K. so you shine by day as well as by night.” To this the moon replied: “what good is my light during the day when there is no one to appreciate it?” To this argument G’d replied: “the Jewish people are going to count their days and years according to your orbits.” The moon was not satisfied with this, saying: “they will have to count days in accordance with the seasons, i.e. by relying on solar orbits.” G’d appreciated this argument and reassured the moon by saying: “the righteous will bear names referring to you.” Thus we find Yaakov referred to as יעקב הקטן in Amos 7,2, and Samuel referred to as שמואל הקטן; David is referred to as דוד הקטן in Samuel I 17,14. In spite of all this G’d did not succeed in satisfying the moon. As a last resort, G’d told the Jewish people to offer a male goat as sin-offering on His behalf seeing He had reduced the size of the moon.
In order to understand this strange-sounding dialogue between G’d and the moon we must appreciate that the word הגדולים in Genesis 1,16 means that originally sun and moon were equal in size and power. The moon was reduced in size and this is why the Torah refers to it as the small luminary in the second half of the verse we quoted. The reason that it was reduced was that it had complained. However, we must not view the moon as displaying egotistical motives, [otherwise why would G’d feel guilty? Ed.]. When the moon referred to the inability of two kings wearing the same crown it meant that anything which appeared like power-sharing would reflect negatively on G’d. If two luminaries were to wear the same crown it would appear as if G’d were unable to create two servants each of whom had the ability to generate its own light without relying on an outside force, a companion to assist Him. The nations of the world would be encouraged to say that G’d was unable to supply original light to each of the luminaries as they had to trade “crowns” with one another. The moon’s error was the suggestion that G’d did not know what He had been doing when He created the universe as the moon had found it. One does not second-guess G’d the Creator.
As a result, the moon had to be “punished.” After the moon had been reduced in size and had felt suitably ashamed for its behavior, G’d said to it: “go and govern both by day and by night.” He added that the Jewish people would count their months according to its orbit, and that the righteous would bear names associated with the moon. G’d did all this in order to put the moon’s mind at rest, so much so that He accorded the moon honor in assigning an additional male goat to the mussaf offering commemorating this dialogue for all times. This is the real meaning of the enigmatic words by Rabbi Shimon ben Pazzi who portrayed G’d as saying: “bring an atonement on My behalf.” G’d’s major concern in all this was that none of His creatures should have complaints about the way in which He had seen fit to create the universe and to assure its proper functioning. No creature should feel disadvantaged by its creator vis-a-vis any other part of the creation.
It is also possible that the entire episode and the manner it is alluded to in the Torah serves as an encouragement to would be repentant sinners to come forward and change their life styles. They would learn from this episode in the celestial regions that once the guilty party had recognized the error of its ways G’d would go out of His way to compensate such repentant sinners for their having accepted instruction from Him. This also explains why the righteous are actually compared to the sun in Judges 5,31: “and the ones who love Him will emerge like the sun in its might,” seeing that they had to suffer various insults just as the sun had to be the victim of the moon’s complaints.
Rav Yitzchak Alfassi writes in his halachic work at the end of the first chapter of tractate Shevuot that the word עלי in Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish’s parable הביאו כפרה עלי, “bring an atonement on My behalf,” should really be understood as אלי, “to Me,” not “on My behalf.” Most commentators agree with him.