Tafsiran Keluaran 21:34: Rashi, Chizkuni, Ramban & Rashbam

בַּ֤עַל הַבּוֹר֙ יְשַׁלֵּ֔ם כֶּ֖סֶף יָשִׁ֣יב לִבְעָלָ֑יו וְהַמֵּ֖ת יִֽהְיֶה־לּֽוֹ׃ (ס)

pemilik lubang itu harus membayar ganti rugi. Ia harus membayar uang kepada pemilik hewan itu, dan hewan yang mati itu menjadi milik pemiliknya.

Rashi

בעל הבור THE OWNER OF THE PIT [SHALL PAY FOR IT] — This means the one who occasioned the damage. Although the pit was not his, — for he dug it in the public thoroughfare, — Scripture regards him as its “owner” (בעל הבור) in so far that he becomes responsible for the damage caused by it.
Tanya RabiBookmarkShareCopy

Chizkuni

בעל הבור, “the one responsible for that hole;” this cannot refer literally to the owner of the land on which the hole has been dug, but must refer to the one who created the hazard on it. The owner of the land, if not the same, is completely free from responsibility.
Tanya RabiBookmarkShareCopy

Ramban

AND THE DEAD BEAST SHALL BELONG TO HIM — “to the one who suffered the damage. We make an estimation of the value of the carcass and he takes it in part payment and the one who caused the damage, [the owner of the pit], pays him in addition as much as makes up the value of his damage.” This is Rashi’s language. But he did not explain the law sufficiently. For there is no need for Scripture to tell us concerning this carcass that the one who suffered the damage must take it in part payment, when he brings it before the court to collect his damage; for even if the one who caused the damage had other carcasses that were carrion, or flesh that was treifah189Any animal suffering from a serious organic disease, whose meat is forbidden even if ritually slaughtered. in his possession, he can give it to him in part payment, it being already established190Baba Kamma 7a. that restitution for damages need not be in money, but may “include anything of value, even bran.” Rather, the meaning of the verse is to state that the carcass belongs to the one who suffered the damage and is considered his property; therefore if its value decreased after the damage was caused, or it was stolen, the one who caused the damage, [the owner of the pit], pays only the loss in value caused by the death of the animal. Thus if the ox that was killed was worth when alive one hundred zuzim, and upon its death became worth fifty, the one who caused the damage is liable to pay only fifty zuzim, and the other attends to his carcass [removing it from the pit], and keeps it for himself.191He may use its hide for leather, and its flesh to feed the animals, or he may sell it for such uses. This law applies to all damages, and it is what the Sages call: “the loss in the carcass’ value,” and is explained in the Gemara.192Ibid., 34a. [See in my translation of Hameniach, Shulsinger Bros., New York, 5729, p. 65.]
Tanya RabiBookmarkShareCopy

Rashi

כסף ישיב לבעליו [THE OWNER OF THE PIT SHALL PAY FOR IT] AND RESTORE MONEY UNTO THE OWNER OF THEM — The word ישיב is apparently redundant; it would have sufficed to state ישלם כסף לבעליו but it is added to include as legal tender in this case even bran (i. e. the restitution need not be money so long as he actually restores something of money-value). (Bava Kamma 7a).
Tanya RabiBookmarkShareCopy