Midras Imamat 19:19: Midrash Tanchuma, Midrash Tehillim, Bereshit Rabbah & Bamidbar Rabbah

And Moses said unto the children of Israel: “See, the Lord hath called by name Bezalel the son of Uri” (Exod. 35:30). May it please our masters to teach us: How far must a person go to eliminate mixed materials (shatnez)?¹A biblical injunction prohibiting the wearing of a garment made of wool and linen. The law also proscribes the planting of heterogeneous plants in the same field. R. Simeon the son of Yohai concluded from the verse Neither shall there come upon thee a garment of two kinds of stuff mingled together (Lev. 19:19) that a man is prohibited from donning an outer garment of mixed material even though he puts it on over a hundred other garments. However, if he should put it on beneath his other garments, without the mixed material touching his body, he is permitted to do so, for it is said: Neither shall there come upon thee a garment of two kinds of stuff mingled together. The words upon thee signify that it may not be worn as an outer garment but that it may be placed underneath (i.e. closer to the body). The Holy One, blessed be He, said to Israel: Keep My commandments and My statues. Why? Because the consequence of a good deed is another good deed, but the result of committing a sin is another sin. Ben Azzai stated that one good deed results in another good deed, and one sin produces another sin. R. Meir said: For every good deed a man performs, an angel is assigned to watch over him. If he does one good deed, one angel is assigned to him, and if he performs many good deeds, many angels are assigned to him, as it is said: For he will give His angels charge over thee (Ps. 91:11). Every time a man increases the number of good deeds he performs, he adds to his good name. You find that a man is known by three names: the name by which his father and mother call him, the name by which other men call him, and the one he earns for himself; the most important name is the one he earns for himself.²His good deeds are apparent to all.

Another interpretation of “Blessed is the person” (Psalms 1:1) – these are the children of Korah who didn’t walk in the counsel of their father, as it is said, “Move away from the tents of these wicked people” (Numbers 16:26); “in the way of sinners” (Psalms 1:1) [also refers to the Korah rebellion, as it is said,] “the firepans of those sinners” (Numbers 17:3); “and the company of scoffers” (Psalms 1:1) – this refers to Korah, since he scoffed over Moses and over Aaron. What did he do? He assembled all the congregation, as it is said, “Korah gathered the entire community against them” (Numbers 16:19). He began to scoff, and he said to them, “There was a widow in my neighbourhood, and she had two young orphaned daughters, and she owned a single field. She came to plough [her field], and Moses said to her, “You shall not plough with an ox and a donkey together” (Deuteronomy 22:10). She came to sow [her seeds in her field] and Moses said to her “You shall not sow two types of seed together in your field” (Leviticus 19:19). She came to harvest, and to make bundles [of her harvested crop], and he told her to leave the forgotten gleanings, forgotten sheaves, and the corners [of her field, for poor people to gather]. She came to thresh [her produce] and he said to her [that she must give] a gift [to the priest], the tithe [of a Levi to a priest], the tithe of an Israelite to a Levite, and the second tithe [to be eaten by its owner in Jerusalem during specific years of the agricultural cycle]. She made herself right with the law and gave [all of these taxes] to him. What did she do? She sold her field and bought two sheep, in order to dress herself with their shearings, and to benefit from their offspring. When they gave birth, Aaron came and said to her, “Give me the first born, because the Holy One, blessed be He, told me, “[You shall consecrate to the Lord you God] all the male firstlings that are born in your herd and in your flock” (Deuteronomy 15:19).” She made herself right with the law and gave them to him. The time for shearing came along and she sheared them. [Aaron] said to her, “Give me the first of your shearing, because the Holy One, blessed be He, told me, “The first of the shearings of your flock should be given to him” (Deuteronomy 18:4).” She said [to herself], “I don’t have the strength to withstand this person, behold, I’m going to slaughter them and eat them.” Once she had slaughtered them, he said, “Give me the foreleg, the jaw, and the stomach.” She said to him, “Even after I slaughtered them, I wasn’t saved from his hand, let [the sheep] be proscribed to me [as if to say, I altogether wash my hands of these sheep!]” He told her to give him [what remained of the sheep], for so the scripture says, “Everything that has been proscribed shall be yours” (Numbers 18:14).” He took [the remains of the sheep] and he went on his way. He left her and her two daughters weeping. Can such appropriation be according to the law?! This is wretched looting! All of this they do, and they hang it upon the Holy One, blessed be He!” From here [we can see that] he was a scoffer. “But his delight is in the Torah of God” (Psalms 1:2), this refers to his children who sang a song [of praise to God], and they said, “We are obligated to honour our father, let us apportion honour [instead] to Moses our teacher. They stood, and they established themselves [as being on the side of Moses] because of the honour [due to] Moses; “and on His Torah he meditates [day and night]” (ibid.), this refers to the children of Korah. When the congregation of Korah were swallowed up, his children were [left standing on a pillar of earth that didn’t sink down; rising from the depths] like the mast of a ship, as it is says, “and they became an example” (Numbers 26:10). [The verse is referring to those who died, serving as an example. But the Midrash re-reads the verse creatively to suggest that Korah’s righteous children were left standing like a ship’s mast, since the word for an example, in this verse, נס, can also mean a banner; like one finds on the mast of a ship – the wicked people who died were one sort of example, and the children of Korah were a different sort of example]. Rabbi [Yehuda Ha-Nassi] says all of the [earth] surrounding them was torn away, but the earth upon which [the children of Korah] was standing was not torn. Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachmani said, the three [children of Korah] were not standing in the same place. Rather, each one of them was standing in their own location, and they [were left looking] like three pillars. This accords with the teaching [that says], “Upon what does the world stand? Upon three pillars.” There are those that say [that these three pillars] are the three forefathers. There are those that say [that these three pillars] are Chananya, Mishael, and Azariya [from the book of Daniel]. And there are those that say [that these three pillars are] the three children of Korah. “Not so the wicked” (Psalms 1:4) — this refers to Korah and his congregation. “For God knows the way of the righteous” (Psalms 1:6) — this refers to the children of Korah; “but the way of the wicked is doomed” (ibid.) — this refers to Korah and his congregation.

R. Joshua of Sikhnin said in the name of R. Levi, “There are four things that the evil drive would refute [as irrational], and for each of them is written [the word,] huqqah (i.e., an unquestioned statute).⁸⁴Although Huqqah is normally translated simply as “statute,” the word more fully denotes a command that demands implicit and unquestioned obedience. Huqqah is therefore translated “unquestioned statute” throughout this section. Now these concern the following: (1) the nakedness of a brother's wife, (2) diverse kinds, (3) the scapegoat, and (4) the red heifer.”⁸⁵PR 14:12; Numb. R. 19:5; see Yoma 67b. In regard to the nakedness of a brother's wife, it is written (in Lev. 18:16), “You shall not uncover the nakedness of your brother's wife”; [yet if the brother] dies without children [it is written] (in Deut. 25:5), “her brother-in-law shall have sexual intercourse with her [and take her for a wife].” And it is written about the sexual prohibitions (in Lev. 18:5), “And you shall keep [all] My unquestioned statutes [...].” In regard to diverse kinds, it is written (in Deut. 22:11), “You shall not wear interwoven stuff, [wool and flax together]”; yet a linen cloak⁸⁶Gk.: sindon. with [wool] tassels is permitted.⁸⁷See Numb. 15:37-38. And for [this commandment also] it is written, [that it is] an unquestioned statute. [Thus it is written (in Lev. 19:19),] “You shall keep My unquestioned statute. You shall not mate your cattle with a different kind…, [nor shall you wear a garment with diverse kinds of interwoven stuff].” In regard to the scapegoat, it is written (in Lev. 16:26), “And the one who sets the azazel-goat free shall wash his clothes”; yet it is [the goat] itself that atones for others. And for [this commandment also] it is written (in Lev. 16:34), “And this shall be to you an unquestioned statute forever.” In regard to the red heifer, where is it shown? Since we are taught (in Parah 4:4), “All engaged with the [rite of the red] heifer from beginning to end render [their] garments unclean”; yet it is [the heifer] itself that purifies [what is] unclean. And for [this commandment also] it is written, [that it is] an unquestioned statute. Thus it is written (in Numb. 19:2), “This is an unquestioned statute of the Torah.”