Midras Mazmur 19:15: Midrash Tehillim, Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Midrash Tanchuma & Shemot Rabbah

“Who does not walk in the counsel of the wicked” (Psalms 1:1). Rabbi Shimon ben Pazi said, “And since he didn’t walk with them, where did he stand [with them]? And since he didn’t stand [with them] where did he sit [with them]? And since he didn’t sit [with them] where did he scoff [as they did]? Rather, [this comes] to teach you that if he walked [with them,] his end will be to stand [with them], and if he stood [with them,] his end will be to scoff, and if he scoffed, Scripture speaks of him [when it says]: “If you are a scoffer, your bear it alone” (Proverbs 9:12) [i.e., you may have scoffed as a result of peer-pressure, but in the end, you have to bear the responsibility on your own.] This comes to teach us that a good deed leads to another good deed, and a transgression [leads to another transgression]. And since he neither walked, nor stood, nor sat [with the wicked], you might [come to think] that he would neither do good nor bad, but [simply] put his hand upon his mouth. [Therefore, the psalm continues] to teach us, “but his delight is in the Torah of God” (Psalms 1:2). Rabbi Berechia said, “What is the verse coming to tell us [when it says], “Don’t be overly wicked” (Ecclesiastes 7:1)? That [it’s perfectly fine if we’re only] a little bit wicked?! Rather, [it means] if you’ve been wicked [already], don’t add to [what you’ve done]. Rabbi Shimon bar Yocahi says, if a person sat and didn’t transgress [any laws,] he is rewarded as if he did a good deed. Rabbi Zeira said, that this [only applies in a case where an opportunity to sin] came to him and he was saved from it [by his own resilience and will-power]. As it is said, “Depart from evil and do good” (Psalms 34:15; 37:27) — depart from evil in order to do good; and similarly, it is said, “they have never fallen into iniquity, in His ways they have walked” (Psalms 119:3) [which implies that, merely by not having fallen into iniquity, they are counted as if they have walked in God’s ways]. A sage of the academy of Rabbi Yehoshua ben Karcha says that the twenty instances of the word אשרי [meaning blessed, or happy] in the book of Psalms correspond to the twenty instances of הוי [which is an expression of dismay] in the book of Isaiah. Rabbi [Yehuda Ha-Nassi] said, “I am perplexed [by this]! How could Rabbi Yehoshua teach us that אשרי is written twenty times? And I say [that it is written] twenty-two times. Why? Corresponding to the twenty-two letters [of the alphabet]. And about them [David] said, “May the words of my mouth [and the prayer of my heart be acceptable to you, Oh Lord, my rock and my redeemer]” (Psalms 19:15). They should be made [relevant] for the generations, and written for the generations, and inscribed for the generations. And those who read them shouldn’t be like those who read [words] in a book. Rather, they should read them and take reward [for reading] them, [like the reward one receives from learning the most difficult tractates of Mishna, such as] Negaim and Oholot. “May the words of my mouth [and the prayer of my heart] be acceptable.” “Oh, that I might dwell in your tent forever, [take refuge under Your protecting wings.]” (Psalms 61:5). [This verse uses a word for “forever” that can also mean “worlds.”] But could it enter your mind that David would have requested to reside in two worlds [in heaven and on earth]? Rather, this is what David said: May they [continue] to recall me [by reading my Psalms] in houses of prayer, and in study halls, [even after I have passed on to the next world, such that it should be] as if I were alive and well in two worlds.

(Ib. b) We are taught: The sages made a fence to their words [to protect their ordinances], lest a man coming from the field in the evening, would say: "I will go home, eat a little, drink a little, and sleep a while and then I will read Sh'm'a and pray the evening service." In the meantime he will fall asleep and sleep through the whole night without having read the Sh'm'a or prayed. But [in order to prevent this they say:] "A man coming from the field in the evening shall enter the synagogue, and if he be accustomed to read the Scripture, let him do so; or if he be able to study traditional law, let him do that. After this, he should read the Sh'm'a and pray; then he can eat his meal and recite the Aftermeal Benediction. He who transgresses the words of the wise, deserves the penalty of death." Why docs the Baraitha use the expression here that "He who transgresses the words of the wise is worthy of the penalty of death," and not use it in any other place? If you wish, you may say, because here the force of sleep puts him beyond his own control [and if he is not strongly warned against it, he may transgress the command even though he really desires to fulfill it]; and if you please, you may say, because it is the intention [of the Baraitha] to reverse the opinion of those who say that the evening service is only optional it tells us, therefore, [by its warning,] that it is obligatory. The master said [above]: "He reads the Sh'm'a and prays (the evening service)" This is in support of [the view of] R. Jochanan, who was accustomed to say: "Who is sure to have a share in the world to come? He. who, immediately after the benediction of Geula, says the prayer of the Eighteen Benedictions at the evening service." R. Joshua b. Levi said: "The Eighteen Benedictions were ordained to be said in the middle." On what do they base their difference of opinion? If you please, you may say on a Biblical passage, and if you please, you may say on common sense. As to reason, R. Joshua holds that the redemption (of Egypt) commenced on the evening (towards the fifteenth of Nisan) although the real redemption did not take place until the morning, [therefore the Ge-ula which indicates the redemption should be said immediately before the Eighteen Benedictions in the evening also]; but R. Joshua b. Levi holds that as long as the real redemption did not take place until the morning then the redemption of the evening matters little. As to the Biblical passage they differ in the interpretation of the passage. (Deu. 6, 7.) And when thou lieth down, and when thou riseth up, (referred to Sh'm'a) . R. Jochanan holds: "We compare Lying down [at evening] to arising [in the morning] for the reason that just as the reading of the Sh'm'a in the morning comes before the prayer, so, in the evening, the reading of the Sh'm'a comes first also, and then the prayer of the Eighteen Benedictions." R. Joshua holds: "We compare the reading of the Sh'm'a when lying down to the reading of the Sh'm'a when arising, for the reason that just as in the morning the Sh'm'a is read close upon rising so is the Sh'm'a of the evening read just before lying down." The following objection was raised by Mar b. Rabina: "We have learned (in a Mishnah) 'In the evening, he says two benedictions before the Sh'm'a and two after the Sh'm'a.' If the Eighteen Benedictions should be said immediately after Ge-ula, then the Benedictions of Hash-ki-benu, prevents his having the Ge-ula, (the first one after Sh'm'a) closely after the Eighteen Benedictions?" Since the Rabbis ordained that Hash-ki-benu is to be said [between Ge-ula and the Eighteen Benedictions] then it is considered as one long benediction; for if we do not say so, then in the morning how can we say the Eighteen Benedictions immediately after the Ge-ula? Has not R. Jochanan said: "He should first say, O Lord, open Thou my lips, and my mouth shall declare thy praise (Ps. 51, 17), and then proceed with the Eighteen Benedictions; and at the conclusion he should say. May the words of my mouth, and the meditation of my heart be acceptable before Thee, O Lord, my rock and my redeemer, (Ib. 19, 15)." But since the Rabbis ordained that the passage [O Lord, open my mouth, etc. ] be said, it is considered one long prayer (part of the eighteen benedictions), so in this instance also, since the Rabbis ordained that the Hash-ki-benu be said between Ge-ula and the Eighteen Benedictions, it is considered a part of Ge-ula

Let us see: The passage (Ps. 19, 15.) May the words of my mouth he acceptable, can be explained in the past tense, and it may be explained in the future tense. Why then have the Rabbis decided to say it after the Eighteen Benedictions and not before? R. Juda, the son of R. Simon b. Pazi, said: "Because David did not say this verse until after he had said eighteen chapters, therefore did the Rabbis decree [to say it] after the Eighteen Benedictions." Is it after eighteen? Behold! it is after nineteen? Aye! the first two chapters, viz., Happy is the man, and Wherefore do heathens rage, are only one chapter, for R. Juda, the son of R. Simon b. Pazi, said: "One hundred and three chapters were uttered by David, and he did not say Hallelujah until he had contemplated the downfall of the wicked; as it is said (Ps. 104, 35.) Let the sinners be taken completely out of the earth, and let the wicked be no more; Bless the Lord, O my soul. Hallelujah! Instead of one hundred and three, we ought to say, one hundred and four? but we infer this, that Blessed is the man, and Why do the heathens rage, are but one psalm. (Fol. 10a) As R. Samuel b. Nachmeini in the name of R. Jonathan said: 'Every chapter that was beloved by David, he began and concluded it with the word, Happy; It began with Happy is the man (Ps. 1, 1), and ended with Happy are all they that put treir trust in Him (Ib. 2, 10).' [This proves that the first two chapters are one]."