Tafsiran yang Mengutip untuk Ulangan 14:4

וזבחת פסח לה' אלוקיך, צאן ובקר, “you are to slaughter the Pessach offering for the Lord your G’d consisting of the flock and the cattle;” Nachmanides writes that from the plain text, as compared with 14,4, the meaning of such words as צאן, בקר is illustrated as respectively שור and שה, oxen and sheep. This would lead us to believe that Moses includes an ox or calf as a possible candidate for the Pessach offering. Seeing that elsewhere (Exodus 12,3-4) the Torah had restricted the animals fit to serve as the Pessach offering to being a male sheep or goat both below the age of I year, the term בקר, cattle used by Moses here must refer to the unspecified offering called חגיגה, festival offering, which may consist of any of the domestic mammals normally offered on the altar as a שלמים, peace-offering. Each individual will bring the type of animal he can afford to discharge the commandment not to appear before the Lord empty handed. (Verse 16) The fact that the formula used by Moses here, i.e. וזבחת פסח...צאן ובקר is similar though not identical with such formulas elsewhere where it says מן הצאן ומן הבקר תקריבו את קרבנכם, (Leviticus 1,2) makes it clear that what is discussed here is not the Paschal lamb but the accompanying chagigah offerings.

AND THOU SHALT SACRIFICE THE PASSOVER-OFFERING UNTO THE ETERNAL THY G-D THE FLOCK AND THE HERD. Its purport³¹⁸The difficulty in the verse is the fact that the Passover-offering is not brought from the herd. Ramban therefore proceeds to explain it in accordance with the law. by way of the plain meaning of Scripture is similar to the expressions: the ox, the sheep, and the goats³¹⁹Above, 14:4. [which means: “the ox, ‘and’ the sheep … “]; Reuben, Simeon, Levi³²⁰Exodus 1:2. [which means: “Reuben, ‘and’ Simeon, ‘and’ Levi”], And here it means: “and thou shalt sacrifice the Passover-offering unto the Eternal thy G-d, ‘and’ the flock and the herd [thou shalt bring for the Festal-offering,” as will be explained]. Therefore, [because the flock and the herd are not used for the Passover-offering], he does not say “and thou shalt sacrifice the Passover-offering unto the Eternal thy G-d, ‘of’ the flock and ‘of’ the herd,” as He says in all places: ye shall bring your offering ‘of’ the cattle, ‘of’ the herd, or ‘of’ the flock;³²¹Leviticus 1:2. and if his offering be ‘of’ the flock;³²²Ibid., Verse 10. if he offer ‘of’ the herd.³²³Ibid., 3:1. But here he commands concerning the Passover-offering, which is the sheep as He has previously mentioned;³²⁴Exodus 12:5. and sheep and herd, rams and goats and calves, to celebrate the Festal-offering on that day, just as he commanded concerning the Festivals of Weeks and Tabernacles, saying, And thou shalt keep the Festival of Weeks unto the Eternal thy G-d after the measure of the freewill offering of thy hand,³²⁵Further, Verse 10. meaning that he shall bring herd and sheep as peace-offerings in accordance with his means. So also he said with reference to Tabernacles, Seven days shalt thou keep a feast unto the Eternal thy G-d etc.,³²⁶Ibid., Verse 15. and at the end he included all three [festivals] together.³²⁷Ibid., Verse 16. Similar to this [where the connecting letter vav — “and” is missing] is the verse: In the first month, in the fourteenth day of the month, ye shall have the Passover; a feast of seven days, unleavened bread shall be eaten,³²⁸Ezekiel 45:21. which means “‘and’ a feast of seven days.” We find this also in the Passover celebrated by King Josiah where it says, of the flock, lambs, and kids, all of them for the Passover-offerings … and three thousand bullocks,³²⁹II Chronicles 35:7. and afterwards it says, And they roasted the Passover [-offering] with fire according to the ordinance, and the holy offerings they boiled in pots, and in cauldrons, and in pans, and carried them quickly to all the children of the people.³³⁰Ibid., Verse 13. Thus Scripture explained there that the lambs and kids were all for the Passover-offerings, not the goats themselves [that were older than a year] nor the herd, as it is written, Your lamb shall be without blemish, a male of the first year; ye shall take it from the sheep or from the goats.³³¹Exodus 12:5. And Scripture explains that the herd that he mentioned were three thousand, and they were holy offerings which were boiled in pots to be carried quickly to the people to eat their fill,³³²Isaiah 23:18. as our Rabbis have received by tradition concerning the Festal-offering.³³³Pesachim 70a. And Onkelos connected here [in the verse before us] the word flock with the Passover-offering [for he translated as follows: “and thou shalt sacrifice the Passover-offering from the young lambs, and holy offerings from the herd”]. But in that case the vav in the word u’bakar (“and” the herd) does not connect itself well [with the word tzon — “flock,” since the connecting letter, vav, indicates that the herd and the flock were used for the same offerings, while Onkelos says that the flock was for the Passover-offering and the herd was for other types of offerings.]³³⁴But according to Ramban, both the flock and the herd are intended for the Festal-offerings, hence the connecting vav in the word u’bakar (‘and’ the herd). Moreover, the flock is not valid for the Passover-offering, [but only males less than a year old, so it is not correct to explain as Onkelos did that the flock was used for the Passover-offering]. The correct explanation is what we have said.
Now he explained here many things. Thus he mentioned concerning the unleavened bread that it be bread of affliction,³³⁵Verse 3. teaching that he commanded to remember that they left [Egypt] in haste,³³⁵Verse 3. and this [bread of] affliction is a remembrance that they were living in Egypt with sparing bread and scant water.³³⁶Isaiah 30:20. Thus he alludes to two things [that they eat unleavened bread in order to remember that they went out in haste and there was no time for their dough to rise, and that they remember that they ate there “bread of affliction”]. And thus the Rabbis also said [in the Passover Hagadah]: “This is the bread of affliction that our fathers ate in the land of Egypt.” Or it may be that he is saying that the unleavened bread be made like bread of poverty [flour and water] and not like rich bread [kneaded with wine, oil or honey] as our Rabbis stated.³³⁷Pesachim 36a. And he also explained in the commandment pertaining to leaven that it shall not ‘be seen’ with thee in ‘all thy borders’ [seven days],³³⁸Verse 4. for at first He said, [seven days] shall there be no leaven “‘found’ in your houses. ”³³⁹Exodus 12:19. See ibid., 13:7 where it already states, Neither shall there be leaven seen with thee in all thy borders! But Ramban’s point is that here it adds seven days to the earlier prohibition of leaven not being “seen” in all “the borders,” thus making it parallel to the prohibition of leaven not being “found” in “the houses” where, in Exodus, it states seven days. See my Hebrew commentary p. 415.

V. 2. זאת החיה אשר תאכלו מכל בהמה וגו׳. Wir haben bereits zu Bereschit 1, 24 u. 25 bemerkt, wie im allgemeinen בהמה und חיה zwei charakteristisch gesonderte Klassen des Reiches der Säugetiere bezeichnen, indem unter בהמה diejenigen Tiere begriffen werden, welche sich dem Menschen dienend unterordnen, die במה seiner Hoheit bilden, der Begriff חיה hingegen alle die übrigen umfaßt, die sich seiner Herrschaft entziehen und ein "selbständiges Leben" zur Erscheinung bringen. So Bereschit 7, 14: וכל החיה למינה וכל הבהמה למינה , daselbst 8, 1: ואת כל החיה ואת כל הבהמה Allein es kommt auch die Bezeichnung חיה als Gesamtbegriff des Lebendigen vor, so daselbst 8, 17 u. 19: ' כל החיה אשר אתך וגו' כל החיה כל הרמש וג . So schließt auch unser Kapitel: להבריל וגו׳ ובין החיה הנאכלת ובין החיה אשר לא תאכל und umfaßt in diesem Ausdruck alle in diesem Kapitel besprochenen Tiere. Allein es kommt auch בהמה in erweitertem Sinne vor zur Bezeichnung der ganzen dem Menschen untergeordneten Tierwelt, so Bereschit 6, 7: מאדם ועד בהמה , so auch daselbst 7, 23 und Schmot 9, 25 u.a.m. In charakteristischer Weise treten aber beide Ausdrücke nebeneinander in unserem Satze auf: מכל בהמה וגו׳ .את החיה וגו׳, eine Wahl des Ausdrucks, die eine beziehungsreiche Absicht voraussetzen läßt. Chulin 70b und 71a wird auf diese und die korrespondierende Stelle Dewarim 14, 4 u. 5 hingewiesen, wie hier, nachdem zuerst חיה als Objekt des Satzes genannt ist, in der ergänzenden Beifügung מכל בהמה וגו׳ und im folgenden Satze mit בהמה fortgefahren wird, somit בהמה בכלל חיה , unter חיה hier בהמה mitbegriffen ist, und dem hingegen dort: זאת הבהמה אשר תאכלו שור וגו׳ איל וצבי וגו׳ offenbar בהמה ,חיה בכלל בהמה auch היה mitbegreift.

מן הכבשים ומן העזים — i. e. either from these (a lamb) or from these (a goat) (i. e. the ו of ומן does not signify “and”, but “or”); for a goat, also, is called שה, as it is said, (Deuteronomy 14:4) “the שה of the goats” (שה means the young animal, either of the sheep or of the goats) (cf. Mekhilta).