וְעָמְד֧וּ שְׁנֵֽי־הָאֲנָשִׁ֛ים אֲשֶׁר־לָהֶ֥ם הָרִ֖יב לִפְנֵ֣י יְהוָ֑ה לִפְנֵ֤י הַכֹּֽהֲנִים֙ וְהַשֹּׁ֣פְטִ֔ים אֲשֶׁ֥ר יִהְי֖וּ בַּיָּמִ֥ים הָהֵֽם׃
maka kedua orang yang berperkara itu harus berdiri di hadapan Yang Mahakekal, di hadapan para imam dan para hakim yang ada pada masa itu.
Jerusalem Talmud Yoma
Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun, Rebbi Ḥuna in the name of Rebbi Yose. It is said here two,[by the mouth of two witnesses17Deut. 17:6.], and it is said there two, two men remained in the camp18Num. 11:27.. Since there two means men but not women nor underaged, also here two means men but not women nor underaged. Then why is it said (two) [and the two men shall stand]19If actually the same price was paid for the two he-goats used on the Day of Atonement, but if they were regularly sold in the market one of them clearly would fetch a higher price, they are not disqualified but do not fulfill the biblical requirement of equality.? Lest one of them be standing while the other be sitting; [one is silent while the other talks]11Corrector’s addition from the parallel sources., one says everything he has to say, but to the other one says, make your statement short. With one the judge is friendly, to the other he is unfriendly, lets one sit and the other stand. [They said in the name of Rebbi Ismael, one says to him, either you dress as he is dressed or pay him to be dressed as you are.]11Corrector’s addition from the parallel sources.
Jerusalem Talmud Nedarim
HALAKHAH: “The dissolution of vows may take place the entire day,” etc. It was stated77Babli 76b, 77a, Šabbat 157a.: “Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah and Rebbi Eleazar ben Rebbi Simeon say78In Sifry Num. 156 this is attributed to R. Simeon himself., the dissolution of vows may take place from time to time7924 hours from the moment the husband is informed..” What is the reason of the rabbis? “From day to day80Num. 30:15..” What is the reason of Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah? “On the day of his hearing81Num. 30:6,8,13. In the Babli, 76b, and Sifry Num. 156, the arguments are switched: “On the day of his hearing” implies that at nightfall the time has run out, “from day to day” implies 24 hours.
It is not necessary to amend the Yerushalmi since Targum Pseudo-Jonathan and Rashi explain Num. 30:15 following the rabbis: “If her husband remains silent from the day he was informed to another day”, i. e., the next night. R. Yose ben R. Jehudah will explain that “the day of his hearing” starts only with his hearing..” How do the rabbis explain Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah’s reason, “on the day of his hearing”? Explain it that she made the vow on the start of the night82In that case, the husband has 24 hours even according to the rabbis.. How does Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah explain the rabbis’ reason, “from day to day”? Explain it that she made the vow at the start of Friday night83The mention of the start of Friday night is problematic. It is a correction by the scribe himself and probably an insertion at the wrong place., he became paralyzed84After he was informed of the vow., and then his power of speech returned85Within 24 hours after he heard from his wife.. In the opinion of Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah one gives him 24 hours. In the opinion of the rabbis he has only that day86Until nightfall on Saturday, less than 24 hours.. If he became paralyzed, and later87Not on the same day. his power of speech returned, in the opinion of Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah one adds up to a total of 24 hours88The paralysis does not stop the clock. In this case, R. Yose ben R. Jehudah is more restrictive than the rabbis.. In the opinion of the rabbis he always can dissolve when his speech returns. But if it happened one hour89“One hour” means “a short time”. If the husband was informed of the vow shortly before sundown and before he could dissolve the vow was paralyzed at sundown, for the rabbis he had his day and when he regains his speech cannot undo the vow. before sundown, he can no longer dissolve.
It is not necessary to amend the Yerushalmi since Targum Pseudo-Jonathan and Rashi explain Num. 30:15 following the rabbis: “If her husband remains silent from the day he was informed to another day”, i. e., the next night. R. Yose ben R. Jehudah will explain that “the day of his hearing” starts only with his hearing..” How do the rabbis explain Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah’s reason, “on the day of his hearing”? Explain it that she made the vow on the start of the night82In that case, the husband has 24 hours even according to the rabbis.. How does Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah explain the rabbis’ reason, “from day to day”? Explain it that she made the vow at the start of Friday night83The mention of the start of Friday night is problematic. It is a correction by the scribe himself and probably an insertion at the wrong place., he became paralyzed84After he was informed of the vow., and then his power of speech returned85Within 24 hours after he heard from his wife.. In the opinion of Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah one gives him 24 hours. In the opinion of the rabbis he has only that day86Until nightfall on Saturday, less than 24 hours.. If he became paralyzed, and later87Not on the same day. his power of speech returned, in the opinion of Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah one adds up to a total of 24 hours88The paralysis does not stop the clock. In this case, R. Yose ben R. Jehudah is more restrictive than the rabbis.. In the opinion of the rabbis he always can dissolve when his speech returns. But if it happened one hour89“One hour” means “a short time”. If the husband was informed of the vow shortly before sundown and before he could dissolve the vow was paralyzed at sundown, for the rabbis he had his day and when he regains his speech cannot undo the vow. before sundown, he can no longer dissolve.