Rujukan Talmud untuk Ester 9:19: Jerusalem Talmud Megillah & Megillah

Naḥman the son of Rebbi Samuel bar Naḥman: Joy and enjoyment⁷¹The entire statement is an explanation of Esth. 9:10, but the expression “joy and enjoyment” is from 8:17 instead of the correct “joy” (as in the Babli, 5b.), this implies that eulogies are forbidden. And festive dinner, this implies that fasting is forbidden. And holiday, this implies that work is forbidden⁷²The Babli notes that it is not clear from the statement whether this refers to both days of Purim or only to the day celebrated in the community.. Rebbi Ḥelbo said, many times I sat before Rebbi Samuel bar Naḥman but did not hear these things from him. He said to him, did you hear all the traditions which my father had? The action of Rebbi disagrees, for Rebbi acted demonstratively on two days in the year. He took a bath on the Seventeenth of Tammuz⁷³To emphasize that the restrictions of the 9^th of Av do not apply to the 17^th of Tammuz. and planted saplings on Purim⁷⁴To make it clear that work is not forbidden on Purim; Babli 5b.. Rebbi Ḥabiba in the names of the Rabbis of there: Any place where it is written holiday it is not written theyaccepted, and any place where it is written they accepted it is not written holiday⁷⁵In the list of Esth. 9:19 “holiday” is mentioned, but in the note 9:22 that the Jews accepted the rules of Purim, only joy and dinner are mentioned (in addition to obligations to send food to one another and gifts to the poor.). And here it is written holiday and it is written they accepted⁷⁶This can be read either as proof of R. Ḥelbo’s position (as a question), or (as a statement) by Naḥman that 9:23 asserts that the Jews accepted all that Mordocai had written to them, implicitly endorsing the holiday status.? Rebbi Simon in the name of Rebbi Samuel bar Naḥman: Family and family, these are the hamlets. City and city, these are the fortified places. Town and town, these are the small towns⁷⁷Esth. 9:28; Babli 2b..

May a village dweller free a city dweller of his obligation? Should it follow “anybody not obligated for something may not free the public from their obligation”⁵³Mishnah Roš Haššanah 3:8. By this argument, neither the village dweller on the 15^th nor the city dweller on the 14^th may read for another person’s benefit.? May a city dweller free a village dweller of his obligation? Should it follow “anybody not obligated for something may not free the public from their obligation”? Or should it follow what “Rebbi Ḥelbo said, Rebbi Ḥuna in the name of the Great Rebbi Ḥiyya: Everybody may fulfill his obligation on the Fourteenth, which is the time of its reading⁵⁴Chapter 1, Note 67. By this argument, everybody may read for other persons on the 14^th. The question is not resolved (but Tosaphot Yebamot 14a, s.v. כי read the text as following the first opinion.)”? Rebbi Yudan asked. [A village dweller who] decided to move in the night of the Fifteenth? Is that not the Mishnah, “a villager who went to a walled city”? The Mishnah if he was in the walled city. What is problematic for him, if he was in a village. But those on an ocean trip or passing through deserts read normally on the Fourteenth. Rebbi Mana said, if he intended to return to his place. Rebbi Phineas said, therefore the dispersed Jews⁵⁵Esth. 9:19., in that hour he was dispersed⁵⁶Since he could not possibly reach his home on Purim. Babli 19a..

Cities which have been walled since the days of Joshua son of Nun read on the fifteenth. From where is this ruling derived? Rava said: Because Scripture says, “Therefore do the Jews of the villages that dwell in the unwalled towns, etc.” (Esther 9:19) Since the villages [are to read] on the fourteenth, the walled towns [must read] on the fifteenth.