Midrash su Isaia 42:24
מִֽי־נָתַ֨ן למשוסה [לִמְשִׁסָּ֧ה] יַעֲקֹ֛ב וְיִשְׂרָאֵ֥ל לְבֹזְזִ֖ים הֲל֣וֹא יְהוָ֑ה ז֚וּ חָטָ֣אנוּ ל֔וֹ וְלֹֽא־אָב֤וּ בִדְרָכָיו֙ הָל֔וֹךְ וְלֹ֥א שָׁמְע֖וּ בְּתוֹרָתֽוֹ׃
Chi ha dato a Jacob un bottino e Israele ai ladri? Non è il Signore? Colui contro il quale abbiamo peccato, e nei cui modi non avrebbero camminato, né erano obbedienti alla sua legge.
Eikhah Rabbah
There was an incident involving Rabbi Yehoshua ben Ḥananya, who went to the great city of Rome. They said to him: ‘There is a certain child in prison in disgrace.’10The Romans were exploiting him, or planned to exploit him, for homosexual relations. He went there and saw a certain child with beautiful eyes, good looking, with his hair arranged, standing in disgrace. He stood at the entrance to test him, and he read this verse in his regard: “Who delivered Jacob to plunder and Israel to looters?” (Isaiah 42:24). The child answered after him: “Was it not the Lord against Whom we have sinned? They did not wish to go in His ways and did not listen to His Torah” (Isaiah 42:24). When Rabbi Yehoshua heard this, he read in his regard: “The precious sons of Zion, who were valued in gold,” and his eyes shed tears. He said: ‘I call upon the heavens and the earth as witnesses that I am certain that this [child] will issue halakhic rulings in Israel. By the Temple service, I will not move from here until I redeem him for all money that they demand for him.’ They said: He did not move from there until he redeemed him for a substantial sum of money. It was only a short time later when he issued halakhic rulings in Israel. Who was he? He was Rabbi Yishmael ben Elisha.
Another matter, in what way was their preciousness manifest? It was that not one of them would attend a feast until he knew with whom he would be dining, nor would he sign [a document] until he knew with whom he would be signing, to fulfill what is stated: “Do not extend your hand with the wicked to be a corrupt witness” (Exodus 23:1).
Another matter, in what way was their preciousness manifest? It was that not one of them would attend a feast unless he would reverse his sleeve. Why to that extent? It was so that no one else could make an unsubstantiated claim.11They would not accuse them of misappropriating food from the host and tucking it into their sleeve, the front of which had a cuff (Yefe Enayim). Alternatively, in what way was their preciousness manifest? It was that none of them would make an unsubstantiated claim. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says: This was a great custom in Jerusalem: They would spread a cloth above the entrance. As long as the cloth was spread, guests would enter. When the cloth was removed, there was permission for guests to enter only three strides.
Another matter, in what way was their preciousness manifest? They would entrust the meal to the cook. If any component of the meal would be ruined, they would punish the cook,12They would penalize him for the embarrassment that he caused the host. all calculated in accordance with the standing of the host and all calculated in accordance with the standing of the guests.13This policy ensured that the food was always of a high standard and the honor of the host and guests was preserved.
Another matter, in what way was their preciousness manifest? When one of them would make a feast, he would tie all the courses of the meal in a cloth.14He would send a bit of each item to the guests in advance. Alternatively, this may be translated to mean that he would list all the courses on a cloth. In any event the point was that guests would know what was on the menu so that they could choose to eat only what they liked. Why to that extent? It is because of the delicate people, so no one would eat something that does not agree with him. Rabbi Ḥiyya Kara said in the name of Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman: From the day that the Temple was destroyed, congealed wine15This was considered a delicacy. and white glass ceased. Why was it called white? Because it was pliant.16It was therefore similar to a white cloak, which would commonly be folded (Etz Yosef).
Another matter, in what way was their preciousness manifest? It was that not one of them would attend a feast until he knew with whom he would be dining, nor would he sign [a document] until he knew with whom he would be signing, to fulfill what is stated: “Do not extend your hand with the wicked to be a corrupt witness” (Exodus 23:1).
Another matter, in what way was their preciousness manifest? It was that not one of them would attend a feast unless he would reverse his sleeve. Why to that extent? It was so that no one else could make an unsubstantiated claim.11They would not accuse them of misappropriating food from the host and tucking it into their sleeve, the front of which had a cuff (Yefe Enayim). Alternatively, in what way was their preciousness manifest? It was that none of them would make an unsubstantiated claim. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says: This was a great custom in Jerusalem: They would spread a cloth above the entrance. As long as the cloth was spread, guests would enter. When the cloth was removed, there was permission for guests to enter only three strides.
Another matter, in what way was their preciousness manifest? They would entrust the meal to the cook. If any component of the meal would be ruined, they would punish the cook,12They would penalize him for the embarrassment that he caused the host. all calculated in accordance with the standing of the host and all calculated in accordance with the standing of the guests.13This policy ensured that the food was always of a high standard and the honor of the host and guests was preserved.
Another matter, in what way was their preciousness manifest? When one of them would make a feast, he would tie all the courses of the meal in a cloth.14He would send a bit of each item to the guests in advance. Alternatively, this may be translated to mean that he would list all the courses on a cloth. In any event the point was that guests would know what was on the menu so that they could choose to eat only what they liked. Why to that extent? It is because of the delicate people, so no one would eat something that does not agree with him. Rabbi Ḥiyya Kara said in the name of Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman: From the day that the Temple was destroyed, congealed wine15This was considered a delicacy. and white glass ceased. Why was it called white? Because it was pliant.16It was therefore similar to a white cloak, which would commonly be folded (Etz Yosef).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition)
Our Rabbis were taught: It happened once that R. Joshua b. Chanania, who went to the great city of Rome, was told that there was an infant prisoner with a fine appearance, bright eyes, and whose hair was growing in locks. He went and stationed himself at the door of the prison and said (Is. 42, 24) Who gave up Jacob for a spoil, and Israel to plunderers? Upon which the child prisoner replied (Ib., ib., ib.) Was it not the Lord? He whom, we have sinned against; for they would not walk in His way neither did they hearken unto His law. R. Joshua then remarked: "I am sure that this child will in future become a Rabbi in Israel. I swear to God that I shall not leave this place until I will succeed in liberating that prisoner with any amount of money it may be asked for him." It was related that he did not move from that place until he had liberated that child for a big sum of money. Many days did not pass before that child became a Rabbi in Israel, and this was R. Ishmael b. Illisha. R. Juda said in the name of Rab: "It happened when the daughter and son of R. Ishmael b. Illisha were captured by two different masters, that the two masters met one day in a place. One said: 'I have a slave whose beauty cannot be found equal in the world,' and the other said: 'I have a maiden slave whose beauty cannot be equalled in this world. Come, let us marry them to each other and we will divide their children.' When the slaves were informed about their proposed marriage the son, who occupied a seat in one corner of the room, said: 'I am a priest, the son of High-priests. Shall I marry a maid-servant?' And she cried: 'I am a priestess, the daughter of High-priests. Shall I be married to a slave?' And so they cried together. When dawn appeared they recognized each other. Whereupon they fell upon each other and wept until their souls departed. Concerning this it is said (Lam. 1, 16) For these things do I weep; my eye, my eye runneth down with water."
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy