Midrash su Levitico 15:2

1) (Vayikra 15:2) ("Speak to the children of Israel, etc.") The children of Israel become tamei with zivah (a type of genital discharge); gentiles do not become tamei with zivah (by edict of the Torah). But even though they do not become tamei with zivah, they confer tumah as zavim (by Rabbinical enactment). And terumah is burned because of them (by their touching it), and there is no liability because of them for entering the sanctuary (i.e., If a gentile zav touched a Jew and he entered the sanctuary unwittingly, he is not liable to bring an offering.) If "the children of Israel," this tells me only of (native) Israelites. Whence do I derive for inclusion proselytes and bondsmen? From "and you shall say to them." "a man": This tells me only of a man. Whence do I derive a minor for inclusion? From "a man, a man." These are the words of R. Yehudah. R. Shimon b. R. Yochanan b. B'rokah says: It is written (Vayikra 15:22) "and of one who flows his flux for male or for female." "for male": anyone (even a minor) who is a male. "or for female": whether grown or a minor.

2) "if there be a flux (zov) from his flesh": from the command on. (Why is a verse necessary for this?) Does it not follow (inductively)? viz.: There is plague-spot tumah and there is zav tumah. Just as plague-spot tumah does not obtain before the command, so zav tumah does not obtain before the command. (And, furthermore, it follows) a fortiori, viz.: If plague-spot tumah, where tumah obtains (even) through external causes, does not obtain before the command, then zav tumah, which does not obtain through external causes (viz. Vayikra 15:7 below) — how much more so should it not obtain before the command! — No, this may be so with plague-spots, whose tumah and taharah obtains only by (declaration of) a Cohein, as opposed to zavim, whose tumah and taharah obtains through (ascertainment of ) any man. This being the case, I would think that it obtains (even) before the command. It must, therefore, be written "if there be a flux" — from the command on.

3) "if there be a flux": I might think even if it flows from any place (i.e., from his nose or from his mouth), he becomes tamei. But it follows (that this is not so, for) there is tumah with a zav (a male) and tumah with a zavah (a female). Just as with a zavah, the place (the uterus) from which she becomes tamei with lesser tumah, (that of niddah, which does not require seven clean days or an offering), she becomes tamei with stringent tumah, (that of zivuth, which requires seven clean days and an offering) — so, with a zav, the place (the penis) from which he becomes tamei with lesser tumah (that of keri [an accidental seminal discharge]), he becomes tamei with stringent tumah (that of zivuth).

(Lev. 14:2:) “This shall be the law of the leper.” Let our master instruct us: For how many things does leprosy come? Thus have our masters taught: The affliction comes [upon one] for eleven things:²³Cf. Numb. R. 7:5; Lev. 17:3; ‘Arakh. 16a. (1) For idolatry, (2) for desecration of the name [of God], (3) for unchastity, (4) for theft, (5) for slander, (6) for false witness, (7) upon²⁴In this passage “for” and “upon” translate the same Hebrew word (‘al). the judge who perverts justice, (8) for swearing in vain, (9) upon one who enters a domain which is not his, (10) upon one who thinks false thoughts, and (11) upon one who instigates quarrels among brothers. And some also say, “for the evil eye (i.e., for being miserly).” How is it shown [that leprosy comes] for idolatry? In that, when they made the calf, they were afflicted with leprosy. Thus it is stated (in Exod. 32:25), “Now Moses saw that the people were riotous (parua')”; and it is written concerning the leper (in Lev. 13:45), “his head shall be unkempt (parua').” And how is it shown [that leprosy comes] for cursing the name? From Goliath, of whom it is stated that he said in (I Sam. 17:8), “Choose a man ('ish) for yourselves.” Now man ('ish) can only be the Holy One, blessed be He, since it is stated (in Exod. 15:3), “The Lord is a man ('ish) of war.” It is also written (in I Sam. 17:46) “This day [the Lord] will deliver (rt.: sgr) you.” Now deliverance can only imply leprosy, since it is stated (in Lev. 13:5), “the priest shall isolate (rt.: sgr) him.” And how is it shown for unchastity? Where it is written (in Is. 3:[16-]17), “[Because the daughters of Zion are haughty, and walk with extended neck and roving eyes…]. Therefore the Lord will smite with sores (sph) the scalps [of the daughters of Zion].”²⁵Vs. 17 differs here from the Masoretic Text by replacing the divine name with Adonay (LORD). Now sores (sph) can only be leprosy, as stated (in Lev. 14:56), “For a swelling and for a sore (rt.: sph) and for a bright spot.” How is it shown for theft? Where it is stated (in Zech. 5:4), “I have sent it (i.e., the curse of the flying scroll in vs. 1) forth, says the Lord of hosts; and it shall come unto the house of the thief.” Hence, for theft. How is it shown for swearing falsely? Where it is stated (in Zech. 5:4, cont.), “and unto the house of the one who swears falsely in My name; and it shall lodge within his house; and it shall consume it, [even] with its timbers and stones.” What is a thing which consumes timbers and stones? Rabbi says, “This is leprosy, since it is written (concerning a house infested with leprosy (in Lev. 14:45), ‘And he shall break down the house with its timbers and stones.’” And how is it shown for slander? From Miriam [of whom] it is written (in Numb. 12:10), “so when Aaron turned unto Miriam, there she was, stricken with leprosy.” It is written (in Lev. 14:1), “This shall be the law of the leper (hametsora'),” [i.e.] the one who puts forth evil (hamotsi ra'). And how is it shown for those who bear false witness? Where Israel testified falsely and said (in Exod. 32:4), “These are your gods, O Israel,” they were struck with leprosy, as stated, “Instruct the Israelites to remove from the camp….” It also states (Exodus 32:25), “Now Moses saw that the people were riotous (parua').”²⁶Cf. above in this section, where parua‘ in this verse is related to Lev. 13:45, according to which the leper’s HEAD SHALL BE UNKEMPT (parua‘). And [how is it shown] for the judge who perverts justice? Where it is stated (of unjust judges in Is. 5:24), “And it shall be that as a tongue of fire consumes straw, and as chaff sinks down in a flame, their root shall be like the rot, and their blossom shall rise up like the dust; for they have rejected the law of the Lord of hosts.” Their blossom (prh) can only refer to leprosy, since it is stated (in Lev. 13:12), “If the leprosy should blossom out widely (rt.: prh).” And how is it shown for one who enters a domain which is not his? From Uzziah, who entered the domain of the priesthood. It is so stated (of him in II Chron. 26:19), “then leprosy appeared on his forehead.” And how is it shown for one who instigates quarrels among brothers? From Pharaoh, as stated (in Gen. 12:17), “Then the Lord afflicted Pharaoh,” because he had taken Sarah from Abraham. And [how is it shown] for the evil eye (i.e., for being miserly)? R. Isaac said, “When someone's eye is too evil (i.e., when someone is too miserly) to lend out his possessions. When someone comes and says to him, ‘Lend me your scythe, lend me your ax, or any object,’ he says to him, ‘Cursed is the one who has a scythe, cursed is the one has an axe’ (meaning, ‘I do not have one’). What does the Holy One, blessed be He, do?²⁷Cf. Yoma 11b. He afflicts [his house] with leprosy. When he comes to the priest and says to him, ‘Something like a plague has appeared in the house belonging to me,’ he commands (according to Lev. 14:45), ‘Let him break down the house with its timbers and stones.’ Then everybody will see his implements, when they lug them and bring them outside. So they publicize²⁸Mepharsemin, from PRSM, a verb related to the Greek, parresiazesthai (“to speak freely”). his implements, and they all say, ‘Did he not say, “I do not have a scythe; I do not have an ax?” See, he does have such and such an object, but he did not want to lend it.’ So his eye is evil (i.e., he is miserly), to lend.” (Leviticus 14:37:) “And [the priest] says, ‘[The walls are] deeply colored (shkarurot).’” Do not read it [such], but rather read it as he brought down curses (shaka arurot). As he said, “Cursed,” and he brought down his house. And everyone saw his curses, as stated (in Job 20:28), “The produce of his house shall depart, poured out in the day of His wrath.” [Moreover,] there are also some who say, [leprosy] also [comes] for haughtiness. How is it shown? From Naaman, as stated (in II Kings 5:1), “Now Naaman, the commander of the army of the king of Aram […] a valiant warrior, was a leper,” because he was haughty. [Leprosy] also [comes] upon the one who says something against his colleague that is not true about him. Thus you find it so in the case of Moses our master, when he said (in Exod. 4:1), “But [surely] they shall not believe me.” The Holy One, blessed be He, said to him, “They are believers [and] children of believers”: [Believers] (in Exod. 4:31), “And the people believed”; the children of believers, as stated (in Gen. 15:6), “And he (Abram) believed in the Lord.” However, it is necessary [for you] to be afflicted, since the one who suspects the innocent is afflicted in his body. It is so stated (in Exod. 4:6), “Then [the Lord…] said, ‘Please put your hand in your bosom’; so he put his hand in his bosom, and when he withdrew it, behold, it was leprous as snow.” The Holy One, blessed be He, said to Israel, “Look at the difference between you and the peoples of the world. When they sin, I afflict them first in their bodies and after that in their houses, as stated (in Gen. 12:17), ‘Then the Lord afflicted Pharaoh with great plagues,’ and afterwards, ‘and his house.’ But if you sin, I afflict your houses first.” Where is it shown? From what they read on the matter (in Lev. 14:34), “and I put a plague of leprosy in a house of the land you possess.” (Lev. 14:34:) “And I put a plague of leprosy in a house of the land you possess.” How has the land sinned, that it should be afflicted? It is simply that the land is afflicted for human sin, as stated (in Ps. 107:[32-]34), “[He turns….] A fruitful land into a salt marsh because of the evil [of those who dwell in it].” Why? Because of the evil [of the people]. And so does it state (Isaiah 26:9), “with Your judgements upon the earth, so will those that dwell in the inhabitation learn justice.” Why do punishments come upon the world? For the creatures, so that they would look, consider, and say, “Whoever sins is afflicted, and whoever does not sin is not afflicted.” So why are the trees, the stones and the walls afflicted? So that their owners will look [at them] and repent. And so you find that when Israel sinned, the Holy One, blessed be He, intended to exile them at once before the [other] nations. But He said, “If I exile them at the start, they will become a shame and a disgrace to all the nations.” What did he do? He brought Sennacherib the wicked upon all the [other] nations and exiled them. Thus it is stated (in Is. 10:14), “My hand (the hand of Sennacherib) has found the wealth of the peoples like a nest.” It is also written (in vs. 13), “and I (Sennacherib) have removed the borders of peoples.” The Holy One, blessed be He, said, “When Israel sees that I have exiled the nations of the world, they will repent and fear My judgment.” It is so stated (in Zeph. 3:6), “I have rooted out the nations; their corner towers are desolate.” And after it is written (in vs. 7), “I said, ‘Surely you will fear Me, they will learn rebuke!’” When they did not repent, they immediately went into exile. Therefore the Holy One, blessed be He, warns them and [first] afflicts their houses, so that they will repent. Thus it is stated (in Lev. 14:34), “and I put a plague of leprosy in a house of the land you possess.” For him to repent is preferable; but if not, he is afflicted in his body, as stated (in Lev. 15:2), “When any man has a discharge issuing from his flesh….” Hence, the stones are struck first. For him to repent is preferable; but if not, his clothes are afflicted, as stated (in Lev. 13:47), “When the plague of leprosy is in a garment.” Then if he does not repent, he is afflicted in his body. Thus it is stated (in Lev. 13:40), “When someone's head becomes hairless [so that he is bald, he is clean]”; but still with a balding of the head there is a substantial doubt whether he is unclean or clean. For him to repent is preferable, but if not, he is afflicted with boils, as stated (in Lev. 13:18), “And when one has boils on the skin of his flesh and is healed.”²⁹The verses that follow explain that the boils may then become leprous. Boils is [worse] than balding of the head. For him to repent is preferable, but if not, he is afflicted with five scourges: swelling, sore, bright spot, scab, and plague spot. And why all this? Because he did not repent.³⁰Numb. R. 14:4. Scripture has said (in Prov. 19:29), “Judgments are ready for scoffers; and stripes for the back of fools.” The Holy One, blessed be He, said, “Before I created the human, I prepared all these for him.” [The situation] is comparable to an evil slave who was about to be sold. When his master went to buy him, he knew that he was a bad salve. [So] he took along chains and whips so that if he rebelled, he might subdue him with them. When he did rebel, he brought out the chains and chained him. He brought out the whips and beat him. The slave said to him, “Did you not know that I was a bad slave? Why did you buy me?” He said to him, “Because I knew that you are difficult, I prepared chains and whips for you, so that if you rebelled, I might subdue you with them.” So too the Holy One, blessed be He [and] blessed be His name forever, before He created the human one, He prepared afflictions for him, because (according to Gen. 8:21) He knows that³¹Heb.: Ki. Although in the biblical context the word must mean “for,” or its equivalent, the midrash understands the word with the alternate meaning of “that.” “the instinct of one's heart is evil from his youth.” He therefore prepared all these for him, so that if he rebelled, He would subdue him, as stated (in Prov. 19:29), “Judgments are ready for scoffers; and stripes (mahalumot) for the back of fools.” What are mahalumot? Mahah lamoot (strike to death). Warn him first; it is preferable if he repents. But if not, strike his body. How is it shown? From that which we read about the matter (in Lev. 14:34), “and I put a plague of leprosy in a house of the land you possess.”

4) — No, this may be so with a zavah, who becomes tamei only with three sightings in three days, as opposed to a zav, who becomes tamei with three sightings in one day. This being the case, (then without being apprised otherwise, we would assume that) he becomes tamei (as a zav from any place). It must, therefore, be written "from his flesh," and not from all of his flesh.

3a) Binyan av vekathuv echad (a general rule implicit in one verse), viz.: "Mishkav" (what is lain upon) is not like "moshav" (what is sat upon [see Vayikra 15]), and moshav is not like mishkav. What is common to them is that they are articles designed for man's (bodily) comfort alone, and a zav (see Vayikra 15:2, Rashi,) defiles them by (their supporting) most of his weight, to (in turn) defile a man by maga (touching) and by massa (carrying), to (in turn) defile clothing. So, (all) articles which are designed for man's (bodily) comfort alone are defiled by a zav, by (supporting) most of his weight to (in turn) defile a man by maga and massa, to (in turn) defile clothing. This excludes (from such defilement) tarkav (a measuring instrument [which was employed for mishkav or moshav]), it being designed for a different purpose (i.e., measuring, and not "man's bodily comfort." (In sum, then, anything designed for man's bodily comfort and used for mishkav is governed by the "one verse" of mishkav, and anything designed for man's bodily comfort and used for moshav is governed by the "one verse" of moshav.)

5) Now that Scripture has made this distinction, we can reason (as in 3) above): There is tumah with a zav and tumah with a zavah. Just as with a zavah, the place from which she becomes tamei with lesser tumah, she becomes tamei with stringent tumah — so with a zav, the place from which he becomes tamei with lesser tumah, he becomes tamei with stringent tumah.

6) "from his flesh": (He is not tamei) until his tumah (i.e., his discharge) comes outside of his flesh. (For if not for the verse, I would say) Does it not follow (otherwise)? viz.: If a zavah, who becomes tamei only with three sightings in three days, becomes tamei (if the flux remains) inside as well as (if it comes) outside, then a zav, who becomes tamei with three sightings in one day, how much more so should he become tamei inside as well as outside. It must, therefore, be written "from his flesh": (He is not tamei) until his tumah comes outside of his flesh.

“and the dust returns to the earth as it was; and the spirit returns to God, who provided it” (Ecclesiastes 12:7).
“And the dust returns to the earth as it was” – Rabbi Pinḥas and Rabbi Ḥilkiya [said] in the name of Rabbi Simon: When is it that “the spirit returns to God, who provided it”? It is when “the dust returns to the earth [as it was].”¹²If the body returns free of sin, as it was before the person lived his life. If not, “may He cast away the souls of your enemies…” (I Samuel 25:29).¹³God will cast away the souls of the sinners.
Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥmani [said] in the name of Rabbi Avdimi of Haifa: [This is analogous] to a priest who is scrupulous regarding matters of ritual purity who gave a loaf of teruma bread to a priest who is not scrupulous in that regard, and said to him: ‘Look, I am pure, my household is pure, my utensils are pure, and this loaf that I am giving you is pure. If you return it to me in the manner that I gave it to you, fine, but if not, I will burn it in your presence.’ So too, the Holy One blessed be He says to each person: Look, I am pure, My abode is pure, My attendants are pure, and the soul that I am placing in you is pure. If you give it to Me as I gave it to you, fine, but if not, I will burn it in your presence.¹⁴In Gehenna
All this [occurs to a person] in his old age; however, in one’s youth, if he sins he is stricken with gonorrhea and leprosy; therefore, Moses cautions Israel: “[Any] man, when there will be a discharge from his flesh” (Leviticus 15:2).¹⁵The term “from his flesh” is seemingly unnecessary and is meant to emphasize that if one sins God brings upon him bodily punishment even in his youth. God need not bring this punishment from an external source; He can bring it from within a person’s own body.
Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi interpreted the verses regarding the Temple.¹⁶Previously verses 1–7 were interpreted as warning a person to remember God before reaching old age. Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi offers an alternative interpretation of these verses. The prophet said to Israel: “Remember your Creator” (Ecclesiastes 12:1) – remember your Creator while your chosen status is still intact, while the covenant of priesthood is still intact, as it is stated: “And choose it from all the tribes of Israel [to be priests for Me]” (I Samuel 2:28); while the covenant of Levitehood is still intact, as it is stated: “As the Lord your God has chosen it from all your tribes…” (Deuteronomy 18:5); while the covenant of Jerusalem is still intact, as it is stated: “The city that I have chosen” (I Kings 11:32); while the kingdom of the House of David is still intact, as it is stated: “He chose David, His servant” (Psalms 78:70); while the Temple is still intact, as it is stated: “Now I have chosen and consecrated this house” (II Chronicles 7:16); while you are still intact, as it is stated: “The Lord your God has chosen you to be a treasured people for Him” (Deuteronomy 7:6). “Before the evil days come” (Ecclesiastes 12:1) – these are the days of the exile; that is what is written: “Who put far away the evil day” (Amos 6:3). “And the years arrive when you will say” (Ecclesiastes 12:1): The merit of the patriarchs has ceased.
“Before the sun…are darkened” (Ecclesiastes 12:2) – this is the kingdom of the House of David, as it is stated: “His throne will be like the sun before Me” (Psalms 89:37). “The light” (Ecclesiastes 12:2) – this is Torah, as it is stated: “For the commandment is a lamp and Torah is light” (Proverbs 6:23). “The moon” (Ecclesiastes 12:2) – this is the Sanhedrin,¹⁷The Sanhedrin would sit in the configuration of a semicircle, or half-moon. as it is written: “Like the moon, it will be established forever” (Psalms 89:38). “The stars” (Ecclesiastes 12:2) – these are Torah scholars.
“And the clouds return after the rain” (Ecclesiastes 12:2) – you find that all the harsh prophecies that Jeremiah prophesied in their regard did not befall them until after the destruction of the Temple.
“On the day that the guards of the house will tremble” (Ecclesiastes 12:3) – these are the priestly and Levite watches. “The men of valor will be bent” (Ecclesiastes 12:3) – these are the priests. Rabbi Abba bar Kahana said: Aaron [picked up and] waved twenty-two thousand Levites on one day, as it is stated: “Aaron waved the Levites a waving before the Lord (Numbers 8:11). Rabbi Ḥanina said: The crop [of a bird] is very light, and the priest would aim, take it in one hand, and throw it behind the ramp [of the altar, a distance of] thirty-two cubits, with a backward [motion of his] hand.¹⁸Throwing a light item accurately to a great distance takes enormous strength.
“The grinders will cease” (Ecclesiastes 12:3) – these are the great compilations [of tannaitic traditions], like the compilation of Rabbi Akiva, the compilation of Rabbi Ḥiyya and Rabbi Hoshaya, and the compilation of bar Kappara. “Because they have dwindled” (Ecclesiastes 12:3) – this is the Talmud that is intermingled with them. “It will be dark for those who gaze through the windows” (Ecclesiastes 12:3) – you find that when Israel was exiled to Babylon, there was no one able to clearly articulate his studies.
“The doors to the street will be shut” (Ecclesiastes 12:4) – these are the doors of Neḥashta of the House of Elnatan,¹⁹Neḥushta, daughter of Elnatan, was the mother of Yehoyakhin, king of Judah (see II Kings 24:8). Her door was open to all those in need, but this was no longer the case after the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple. which had been wide open. “With the fading of the sound of the mill” (Ecclesiastes 12:4) – [the destruction occurred] because they were indolent in the study of Torah. Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥmani said: Matters of Torah were likened to a mill; just as a mill is not idle by day or at night, so too, regarding matters of Torah it is stated: “You shall contemplate it day and night” (Joshua 1:8). “And one will arise to the voice of a bird” (Ecclesiastes 12:4) – Rabbi Levi said: For eighteen years, a Divine Voice would proclaim and call out to Nebuchadnezzar and say to him: Wicked slave, ascend and destroy the house of your Master, because His children are rebellious and do not obey Him. “And all the sources of music will be lowered” (Ecclesiastes 12:4) – [Nebuchadnezzar] ascended and abrogated song in the Temple; that is what is stated: “They will not drink wine with song” (Isaiah 24:9).
“They will also fear heights” (Ecclesiastes 12:5) – [Nebuchadnezzar] also feared the most elevated, the King of kings. “There will be obstacles on the way” (Ecclesiastes 12:5) – the fear of the way fell over him. Rabbi Levi said: He began delineating subdivisions along the route, as it is stated: “For the king of Babylon stood at the crossroads, [at the head of the two roads, to practice divination; he shot arrows, consulted the terafim, and examined the liver]” (Ezekiel 21:26); [he stood at] a thoroughfare that diverges, “at the head of the two roads,” [a location] that diverges to two roads. There were two roads there, one going toward the wilderness and one going toward the settlement [Jerusalem]. “To practice divination” – he began performing divination in the name of Rome, but it was not successful;²⁰He performed divination to find out if he would be successful if he waged war against Rome, but the message he received was that he would not be successful. in the name of Alexandria, but it was not successful; in the name of Jerusalem, and it was successful. “He shot arrows” in the name of Rome, but it was not successful; in the name of Alexandria, but it was not successful; in the name of Jerusalem, and it was successful.²¹He shot arrows straight up into the air and watched to see in which direction they would fall. When he shot with the intention to receive a sign about Jerusalem, the arrow sailed in the direction of Jerusalem. He kindled lamps and lanterns in the name of Rome, but they did not light; in the name of Alexandria, but they did not light; in the name of Jerusalem, and they lit. He sailed boats on the Euphrates River in the name of Rome, but they did not move; in the name of Alexandria, but they did not move; in the name of Jerusalem, and they moved. “Consulted the terafim” – this is his idol worship. “And examined the liver” – Rabbi Levi said: Like an Arab who slaughters a lamb and examines its liver.²²This is a form of divination.
“In his right hand was the divination for Jerusalem, [to place battering rams, to call for murder, to raise the voice with shouting, to place battering rams against the gates, to pour a ramp, to build a siege tower]” (Ezekiel 21:27) – the divination of Jerusalem was in his right hand.²³He was encouraged by the signs he received via divination that he would conquer Jerusalem. Alternatively, he cast lots, and the lot of Jerusalem came up in his right hand, indicating that he would conquer it. “To place battering rams [karim]” – [to appoint] government officials [kalorkhin]; “to call for murder” – [to administer] death sentences; “to raise the voice” – [to sound] trumpets of war; “to place battering rams” – he deployed a siege; “to pour a ramp” – [from which they would catapult] stones; “and to build a siege tower” – ramps [to climb over the wall]. Regarding all of these [it could have been said]: “But it will be for them like a vain divination [in their eyes, who have weeks upon weeks, and it evokes iniquity for them to be captured]” (Ezekiel 21:28). The prophet said to Israel: Had you merited, you would have read the Torah that is expounded in seven times seven ways.²⁴This is alluded to in the phrase “weeks upon weeks,” as a week has seven days. Now that you have not merited, Nebuchadnezzar will divine seven times seven divinations upon you. Why to that extent? “And it evokes iniquity for them to be captured” – this is the blood of Zekharia.²⁵See Kohelet Rabba 3:16, where the story is told of Zekharia, a prophet and priest, who was murdered in the Temple. This terrible act caused the Israelites to be punished with great bloodshed and suffering at the time of the destruction of the Temple.
“The almond tree will blossom” (Ecclesiastes 12:5) – this is the prophecy of Jeremiah, as it is stated: “I see the branch of an almond tree” (Jeremiah 1:11). Rabbi Elazar said: Just as an almond tree, from the moment that it blossoms until its fruit ripens is twenty-one days, so too, the entire decree was [carried out] only from the seventeenth of Tammuz until the ninth of Av.
“The grasshopper will be burdened” (Ecclesiastes 12:5) – this is the image of Nebuchadnezzar, as it is stated: “Nebuchadnezzar the king made an image of gold; [its height was sixty cubits, and its width was six cubits]” (Daniel 3:1).²⁶It is referred to disdainfully as a grasshopper as a way to mock its giant size. Rabbi Yoḥanan said: It emerges that you are saying that anything whose height is sixty and its width is six [is able to stand,] but [in fact] it requires a width one-third of its height. Rabbi Banai said: It was like a reed; he would place it upright and it would fall, he would place it upright and it would fall. Rabbi Ḥagai said in the name of Rabbi Yitzḥak. It was incapable of standing until he brought all the silver and gold from Jerusalem. They poured it into a solid base before it as a stand for its feet. That is what is written: “They will cast their silver in the streets” (Ezekiel 7:19).
“The caper berry [haaviyona] will fail” (Ecclesiastes 12:5) – this is the merit of the patriarchs.²⁷The word aviyona is expounded to mean father of a dove [avi yona], as the Jewish people are likened to a dove. “For the man goes to his eternal home” (Ecclesiastes 12:5) – they were from Babylon,²⁸Abraham’s origins were in Babylon. and to Babylon they returned. “And the mourners will circle in the streets” (Ecclesiastes 12:5) – this is the exile of Yekhonya. You find that at the time of the exile of Zedekiah,²⁹The exile of Zedekiah, which took place in the wake of the destruction of the Temple, was eleven years after the exile of Yekhonya. the members of the exile of Yekhonya emerged to greet them. They were covered in sackcloth³⁰This was in mourning for the destruction of the Temple. on the inside and in white garments³¹As residents of Babylon, they outwardly celebrated their king’s victory. on the outside. They would ask each other:³²Those who had been exiled previously asked those who were just coming into exile. How is [my] father doing? How is [my] mother doing? How is [my] brother doing? They said to them: They were killed. They would mourn with one hand and laud with the other hand,³³They would beat their chests or thighs in mourning, and when forced to, they would applaud the king for his victory. to fulfill what is stated: “Your splendor will be upon your heads and your shoes upon your feet; you will not lament and you will not weep” (Ezekiel 24:23).³⁴They were forced to wear celebratory clothing and could not properly mourn their loss.
“Before the silver cord is severed” (Ecclesiastes 12:6) – this is the genealogical chain;³⁵Families of impeccable lineage kept meticulous genealogical records and were careful to marry only families with similarly impeccable lineage. This ability, and certainly the records, were lost during the period of destruction and exile. “the golden skull is shattered” (Ecclesiastes 12:6) – these are matters of Torah, as it is stated: “More pleasant than gold” (Psalms 19:11).
“The pitcher is smashed at the spring” (Ecclesiastes 12:6) – two amora’im: One says: The pitcher of Barukh at the spring of Jeremiah,³⁶Barukh ben Neriya was the disciple of Jeremiah. The transmission from master to disciple was disrupted. and one says: The pitcher of Jeremiah at the spring of Barukh. That is what is written: “[Then Barukh answered them:] From his own mouth he would recite all these words to me and I would write on the scroll with the ink” (Jeremiah 36:18).³⁷In this verse, Barukh copied down what Jeremiah said. The midrash may be alluding to the fact that Jeremiah was dependent upon Barukh’s skill as a scribe, which was enhanced by Divine inspiration (Maharzu); alternatively, Jeremiah the teacher was enriched by his student’s insights and questions (Etz Yosef).
“And the wheel is shattered into the cistern” (Ecclesiastes 12:6) – they were from Babylon, and to Babylon they returned. They were from Babylon, as it is stated: “The Lord said to Abram: Go you from your land” (Genesis 12:1).³⁸Abraham’s original land was Ur Kasdim (see Genesis 11:31), which is in Babylon. “And to Babylon they returned” – [as it is stated regarding Nebuchadnezzar:] “And exiled the people to Babylon” (Ezra 5:12). Rabbi Yoḥanan said: “Who says to the depths: Be dry” (Isaiah 44:27). “The depths” – this is Babylon. Why is it called “the depths”? Because the dead of the generation of the Flood were submerged there, as it is written: “As Babylon caused the dead of Israel to fall, [so at Babylon shall fall the dead of all the land]” (Jeremiah 51:49).
Reish Lakish said: It is written: “They found a valley in the land of Shinar” (Genesis 11:2). Why is it called Shinar? Because the dead of the generation of the Flood were transported [sheninaru] there [by the water]. Alternatively: Shinar, as they died in convulsions [tashnuk], without a lamp and without a bathhouse.³⁹Because they were impoverished. Alternatively: Shinar, as they were bereft [meno’arim] of the mitzvot, without teruma and tithes.⁴⁰These mitzvot apply specifically in the Land of Israel. Shinar, as their princes die as lads [ne’arim]. Shinar, as they established an enemy [soneh] and a destroyer [va’er]; and who is that? It is Nebuchadnezzar.
“And the dust returns to the earth as it was” (Ecclesiastes 12:7) – they were from Babylon, and to Babylon they returned. “And the spirit returns to God” – this is the Divine Spirit. You find that when Jeremiah saw Jerusalem destroyed, the Temple burned, Israel exiled, and the Divine Spirit that departed, he began [to speak] about them with [the phrase] “vanity of vanities” (Ecclesiastes 12:8).

7) "from his flesh" he is tamei, and not from any external cause — whence they ruled: In seven ways they examine a zav (for possible external causes) before he is "bound" to zivah (after the first two sightings): for (excessive) eating, for drinking, for jumping, for (carrying) a burden, for sickness, for sight (of a woman), and for thought (of a woman). Once he is "bound" to zivah (after the first two sightings), he is not examined. His accident (i.e., one of the external causes) and the possibility of his having seen it (the third sighting) because of (an antecedent discharge of) his semen, render him tamei (and liable for an offering), for there is reason to suppose (that this third sighting is not caused by the other factors).

5) prat ukllal (specific-general): (Shemoth 22:9): "If a man give to his neighbor an ass or an ox or a lamb — specific; "or any beast to watch" — general: specific-general — the general adds to the specific.

8) "his flux is tamei": We are hereby taught that his flux (itself) is tamei (and not only the man). Now does this not follow (even without a verse, viz.:) If the zav, whose tumah was caused by the flux is tamei, how much more so, the flux itself! — This is refuted by the sent-away he-goat (of Yom Kippur) which causes tumah (to the sender), but which itself is tahor.

(Lev. 15:25:) “And when a woman has had a discharge of blood for many days.” Why a woman and not a man? Previously it applied to men and women. Thus it is stated (in Lev. 15:2), “When any man has a discharge issuing from his flesh.” R. Meir says, “The man's uncleanness was more serious than the woman's uncleanness. Why? Because the uncleanness of women is a sign of children; however, that of a man is [a sign] of suffering. Thus it is stated (in vs. 3), ‘And this shall be the uncleanness in his discharge,’³⁴The next verses (4-12) stress just how defiling his discharge really is. [i.e.] something which seals and closes.” Previously the men saw water, until Rachel arose and said (in Gen. 31:35), “for the period of women is upon me.” Then it was given to her. Therefore (in Exod. 15:25), “And when a woman has had a discharge of blood.” (Lev. 15:25:) “And when a woman has had a discharge of blood for many days.” Thus have our masters taught (in Shab. 2:6): Women die at the time of their childbirth for three transgressions:³⁵Tanh. (Buber), Gen. 2:1; Tanh., Gen. 2:1. Because they have not been careful in regard to menstruation, in regard to the hallah,³⁶I.e., the priest’s share of the dough. and in regard to the lighting of the lamp.³⁷I.e., the Sabbath lamp. Why at the time of their childbirth? Because the adversary (Satan) only makes accusations³⁸Gk.: kategorein. in time of danger. Now the three of them are from the Torah. [Where is it shown about] menstruation? (Lev. 15:25:) “And when a woman has had a discharge of her blood.” [Where is it shown about] the hallah? (Numb. 15:20:) “[You shall set aside] the first of your dough as a hallah offering.” [Where is it shown] in regard to the lighting of the [Sabbath] lamp? As our masters taught, “Where is it shown that a person is to be zealous and diligent in the lighting of the [Sabbath] lamp? Where it is stated (in Is. 58:13), ‘and you call the Sabbath a delight.’ This refers to the lighting of the lamp.” And why were [these commandments] transmitted to the woman?³⁹Gen. R. 17:8; yShab. 2:4 (5b). The Holy One, blessed be He, said, “She extinguished the lamp of the world….” In regard to menstruation, the Holy One, blessed be He, said, “She shed the blood of Adam, and she was sentenced to have her own blood shed, since it is stated (in Gen. 9:6), ‘Whoever sheds human blood [by a human will his blood be shed].’ She shall observe her menstrual period to atone for the blood that she shed.” Ergo (in Lev. 15:25), “And when a woman has had a discharge of blood.” Therefore, the Holy One, blessed be He, compares the uncleanness of Israel to the uncleanness of the menstrual period, when [a woman] is unclean and [then] purified. So the Holy One, blessed be He, is going to purify Israel, as stated (in Ezek. 36:25), “I will sprinkle pure water upon you, and you shall be pure.” Another interpretation: (Ezek. 36:17:) “Their way before Me was like the uncleanness of a menstruant woman”; like the uncleanness of a menstruant woman, and not like the uncleanness of a corpse. With a corpse in the house, a high priest does not enter there; but in the case of a menstruant woman, a high priest enters into the house with her and sits [with her] on the couch,⁴⁰‘YSTWW’, probably from the Gk.: histion, which means “something woven.” but on condition that it not shake (when they sit on it). So if Israel were compared to the impurity of death, the Divine Presence would never return upon them; however, they are compared to the menstruant because there is cleansing for her in a mikveh, so that the priest may be with her in the house and not be afraid. Thus the Divine Presence dwells with Israel, even though they are unclean, as stated (in Lev. 16:16), “which dwells with them in the midst of their uncleannesses.” R. Levy said, “When Israel was in Egypt, the women did not see menstrual blood, because the fear of Egypt was upon them. And also after Israel left Egypt, they did not see menstruation in the desert, because the Divine Presence was among them.” [Moreover,] the women accepted the Torah first. It is so stated (in Exod. 19:3), “Thus shall you say to the House of Jacob,” these are the women;⁴¹Exod. R. 28:2. Cf. Shab. 118b: “R. Jose said, ‘… but my wife [I called] my house.’” (ibid., cont.), “and declare to the sons of Israel,” these are the men. And so it says (in Cant. 6:10), “terrible⁴²Buber, n. 91, points out that ‘ayummah (TERRIBLE) is seen as related to ‘emah (“fear”), in that the fear of the Divine Presence was upon them. like bannered hosts.” Now about them it is stated (in Cant. 4:12), “A locked garden is my sister, my bride, a locked fountain, a sealed spring.” The Holy One, blessed be He, said to Israel, “In this world you became clean but returned to uncleanness; but in the world to come I Myself will cleanse you so that you shall not ever become unclean.” Thus it is stated (in Ezek. 36:25), “I will sprinkle pure water upon you, and you shall be pure; I will purify you from all your uncleannesses and from all your idols.”

9) Do not wonder, then, that the flux, even though it causes tumah (to the man) is itself not tamei. It must, therefore, be written that the flux is tamei.

10) I might think that blood flowing from his penis is tamei; it is, therefore, written "his flux," but not blood.

Rabbi Yehuda interpreted the verse regarding Torah scholars: “Curls, black as a raven” – these are Torah scholars, as even though they appear ugly and black in this world, in the future, “their appearance is like torches, they dash like lightning” (Nahum 2:5).
Rabbi Shmuel bar Yitzḥak interpreted the verse regarding the portions of the Torah: “Curls, black as a raven” – these are the texts of the Torah that appear too ugly and black to state them in public, and the Holy One blessed be He said: They are pleasant for Me, just as it says: “The offering of Judah [and Jerusalem] will be pleasant” (Malachi 3:4). Know that it is so, as the portion of the zav and the zava were not stated together; rather, this one in and of itself and that one in and of itself, as it is stated: “Speak to the children of Israel, and say to them: Any man, when he has a discharge from his flesh” (Leviticus 15:2), [and separately,] “And a woman, if her bloody discharge shall flow” (Leviticus 15:25).

(Lev. 14:34:) WHEN YOU COME INTO THE LAND < OF CANAAN…, AND WHEN I PUT A PLAGUE OF LEPROSY IN A HOUSE OF THE LAND YOU POSSESS >. How has the land sinned, that it should be afflicted?⁴⁶Tanh., Lev. 5:4. It is simply that the land is afflicted for human sin, as stated (in Ps. 107:33–34): < HE TURNS…; > A FRUITFUL LAND INTO A SALT MARSH BECAUSE OF THE EVIL OF THOSE WHO DWELL IN IT. For what reason did suffering come into the world? Because of the people, so that they would look, consider, and say: Whoever sins is afflicted, and whoever does not sin is not afflicted. So why are the trees, the stones and the walls afflicted? So that their owners will look < at them > and repent. And so you find that when Israel sinned, the Holy One intended to exile them. The Holy One said: If I exile them at the start, they will become a shame and a disgrace to all the nations. What did he do? He brought Sennacherib the Wicked upon all the < other > nations and exiled them. Thus it is stated (in Is. 10:14): MY HAND (the hand of Sennacherib) HAS FOUND THE WEALTH OF THE PEOPLES LIKE A NEST. It is also written (in vs. 13): AND I (Sennacherib) HAVE REMOVED THE BORDERS OF PEOPLES. The Holy One said: When Israel sees that I have exiled the nations of the world, they will repent and fear my judgment. It is so stated (in Zeph. 3:6–7): I HAVE ROOTED OUT THE NATIONS; THEIR CORNER TOWERS ARE DESOLATE…. AND I SAID: SURELY YOU WILL FEAR ME… ! When they did not repent, they immediately went into exile. Therefore the Holy One warns them and first afflicts their houses, so that they will repent. Thus it is stated (in Lev. 14:34): AND I PUT A PLAGUE OF LEPROSY IN A HOUSE OF THE LAND YOU POSSESS. For him to repent is preferable; but if not, one is afflicted in his body, as stated (in Lev. 15:2): WHEN ANY MAN HAS A DISCHARGE ISSUING FROM HIS FLESH…. {Therefore, the stones are afflicted at first.} For him to repent is preferable; but if not, his clothes are afflicted, as stated (in Lev. 13:47): WHEN THE PLAGUE OF LEPROSY IS IN A GARMENT. Then if he does not repent, he is afflicted in his body. Thus it is stated (in Lev. 13:40): WHEN SOMEONE'S HEAD BECOMES HAIRLESS < SO THAT HE IS BALD, HE IS CLEAN >; but still with a balding of the head there is a substantial doubt whether he is unclean or clean. For him to repent is preferable, but if not, he is afflicted with boils, as stated (in Lev. 13:18): AND WHEN ONE HAS BOILS ON THE SKIN OF HIS FLESH [AND IS HEALED].⁴⁷The verses that follow explain that the boils may then become leprous. For him to repent is preferable, but if not, he is afflicted with five scourges {i.e., blows}: Swelling, sore, bright spot, scab, and plague spot. And why all this? Because he did not repent.⁴⁸Numb. R. 14:4. {The Holy One} [Scripture] has said (in Prov. 19:29): JUDGMENTS ARE READY FOR SCOFFERS; [AND STRIPES FOR THE BACK OF FOOLS]. The Holy One said: Before I created the human, I prepared all these things for him. < The situation > is comparable to an evil slave who was sold. His < new > master went to buy him. Since he knew about him being an evil slave, he took along chains and whips so that, if he rebelled, he might subdue him with them. When he did rebel, he brought out the chains and chained him. He brought out the whips and beat him. The slave said to him: Did you not know that I was an evil slave? Why did you buy me? He said to him: Because I knew that you were an evil slave, I prepared chains and whips for you, so that if you rebelled, I might subdue you with them. Also before the Holy One, blessed be his name, created the human one, he prepared afflictions for him, because (according to Gen. 8:21) he knows THAT⁴⁹Heb.: Ki. Although in the biblical context the word must mean “for,” or its equivalent, the midrash understands the word with the alternate meaning of “that.” THE INSTINCT OF ONE'S HEART IS EVIL FROM HIS YOUTH. He therefore prepared all these things for him, as stated (in Prov. 19:29): JUDGMENTS ARE READY FOR SCOFFERS; [AND STRIPES FOR THE BACK OF FOOLS].

(Lev. 15:25:) AND WHEN A WOMAN HAS HAD A DISCHARGE OF BLOOD. Why a woman and not a man?⁵³Tanh., Lev. 5:9. Previously it applied to men and women. Thus it is stated (in Lev. 15:2): WHEN ANY MAN HAS A DISCHARGE ISSUING FROM HIS FLESH. R. Meir says: The man's uncleanness was more serious than the woman's uncleanness. Why? Because the uncleanness of women is a sign of children; however, that of a man is < a sign > of suffering. Thus it is stated (in vs. 3): AND THIS SHALL BE THE UNCLEANNESS {FROM} [IN] HIS DISCHARGE, WHETHER HIS FLESH RUNS WITH HIS DISCHARGE OR WHETHER HIS FLESH IS SEALED FROM HIS DISCHARGE,⁵⁴The next verses (4–12) stress just how contagious his discharge really is. < i.e. > something which is sealed and closed. Previously the men saw blood, until Rachel arose [and said] (in Gen. 31:35): FOR THE PERIOD OF WOMEN IS UPON ME. Then it was given to her. Therefore (in Exod. 15:25): AND WHEN A WOMAN HAS HAD A DISCHARGE OF BLOOD.

R. Ze’era said: The laws of uncleanness apply to human beings: To men: When any man hath an issue out of his flesh (Lev. 15:2), and to women: If a woman have an issue (ibid., v. 19). This is the law: When a man dieth in a tent, everything shall be unclean (Num. 19:14). Thou art fairer than the children of men (Ps. 45:3). Moses is merely called human (but his essence is of a higher level). In what way? The Holy One, blessed be He, causes death and restores to life, He casts men into the pit and brings them out again, and Moses did likewise. He cast Korah and his followers, while still alive, into the pit, as it is said: So they, and all that appertained to them, went down alive into the pit (Num. 16:32). The Holy One, blessed be He, issued a decree, but he (Moses) caused it to be revoked, as is written: Therefore He said that He would destroy them, had not Moses His chosen stood before Him in the breach (Ps. 106:23). Grace is poured upon thy lips (ibid. 45:3) indicates that he spoke in their defense, as it is said: And Moses besought the Lord (Exod. 32:11), and He did not depart until the Lord repented (ibid., v. 14).