Midrash su Numeri 9:13
וְהָאִישׁ֩ אֲשֶׁר־ה֨וּא טָה֜וֹר וּבְדֶ֣רֶךְ לֹא־הָיָ֗ה וְחָדַל֙ לַעֲשׂ֣וֹת הַפֶּ֔סַח וְנִכְרְתָ֛ה הַנֶּ֥פֶשׁ הַהִ֖וא מֵֽעַמֶּ֑יהָ כִּ֣י ׀ קָרְבַּ֣ן יְהוָ֗ה לֹ֤א הִקְרִיב֙ בְּמֹ֣עֲד֔וֹ חֶטְא֥וֹ יִשָּׂ֖א הָאִ֥ישׁ הַהֽוּא׃
Ma l'uomo che è pulito, e non è in viaggio, e proibisce di tenere la Pasqua, quell'anima sarà tagliata fuori dal suo popolo; poiché non ha portato l'offerta del Signore nella sua stagione stabilita, quell'uomo sopporterà il suo peccato.
Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition)
(Ib. b.) Our Rabbis were taught: The orchestra of the thanks-offering consisted of violins, fifes, trumpets on every corner as well as on every elevated stone in Jerusalem and used to play (Ps. 30, 2) I will extol Thee, O Lord, for Thou hast lifted me, etc., and also (Ib. 91). Some call this later song Pegaim (destroyers) and some call this Negaim (plagues), because of the verse (Ib. 10) in which it reads, Nor shall any plague, etc.; others call it Pegaim, because of the verse (Ib. 1) There shall fall at thy side a thousand. They used to sing this song from verse one to ten inclusive, and also the whole of the third chapter of Psalms. R. Joshua b. Levi would say all the above mentioned verses before going to bed. How could he have done so. Has not R. Joshua b. Levi said that it is prohibited to cure one's self with [quoting] verses of the Torah? Protecting is different. Since he prohibited we must assume that it was in a case of a wound, if so then there is more than a prohibitory law; for we are taught that if one cures a wound by whispering, he has no share in the future world. Said R. Jochanan: "The latter refers to one who spits and then whispers, because the Heavenly name must not be mentioned on such an occasion." We are taught: One verse says (Num. 9, 13) He hath defiled the tabernacle of the Lord, and again it says further (20) Because he hath defiled the sanctuary of the Lord, etc. (Fol. 16b) R. Elazar says: Since the verse mentions the sanctuary, why should it mention the tabernacle, and if the verse mentions the tabernacle, why mention the sanctuary? The answer is: If only the tabernacle were mentioned, it could be accounted for by the fact that its being annointed with the holy oil, which was not the case with the temple, and therefore no liability is attached to defilement of the latter; on the other hand, if only the temple were mentioned, the reason might be given that it was sanctified once and forever, therefore the command which was not the case with the tabernacle; hence, the necessity of mentioning both the tabernacle and the sanctuary."
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Sifra
6) "then he shall bear his sin": R. Yehudah said "bearing sin" is mentioned here, and elsewhere (Bamidbar 9:13). Just as there, the referent is kareth; here, too, it is kareth.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy