Talmud su Deuteronomio 23:25

HALAKHAH: “The following eat by Torah law,” etc. Rebbi La said, “if you come into your neighbor’s vineyard.²²Deut. 23:25: “If you come into your neighbor’s vineyard, you may eat grapes to satisfy yourself.” What else is there to eat in a vineyard?” Could anybody think that he would eat wood or stones? Why does the verse say “grapes”? That he may not skin figs or suck grapes²³Different, tannaïtic, arguments are in the Babli 87b; Ma‘śerot 2:7 (Notes 142–149); Sifry Deut. 266..

HALAKHAH: “If one was working on figs,” etc. Rebbi La said, it is written: “If you come into your neighbor’s vineyard, you may eat grapes to satisfy yourself.” What else is there in the vineyard to eat but grapes? To teach you that if he was working on grapes he may not eat figs³¹Deut. 23:25. E quotes the entire first part of the Mishnah which is from the text of Sifry Deut. 266 on this verse. It seems therefore that the text of L is original..

¹⁴²A different text with similar meaning in Sifry Deut. 266; a different baraita Babli Baba Meẓi‘a 87b. It is written (Deut. 23:25): “If you come into your neighbor’s vineyard¹⁴³The verse reads: If you come into your neighbor’s vineyard you may eat grapes to all your soul’s desire until you are satiated, but do not put anything into your own vessel..” I could think that this means everybody; the verse says: “Do not put into your own vessel,” but you may put into somebody else’s vessel. Who is this? This is the laborer¹⁴⁴Who harvests into the farmer’s vessel.. “You may eat grapes.” Do we not know that in a vineyard there is nothing to eat but grapes? Why does the verse say, you may eat grapes¹⁴⁵What is the practical difference between “you may eat in the vineyard” and “you may eat grapes in the vineyard”? The same argument Yerushalmi Baba Meẓi‘a 7:5.? From here [it follows] that if he works fig trees he cannot eat grapes, vines he cannot eat figs. “All your soul’s desire,” all that your inclination may be. “All your soul’s desire,” anything that is free from tithes. What you eat without obligation also the laborer may eat without obligation¹⁴⁶This and the following parallel argument refer כנפשך to the employer’s soul and desire, not the laborer’s. This interpretation is also in all parallel sources.. “All your soul’s desire,” from here that the laborer should not eat more than the value of his wages. From here did Rebbi Eleazar Ḥisma¹⁴⁷A Tanna of the third generation, student of R. Joshua in the Academy of Jabneh. His statement is in Mishnah Baba Meẓi‘a 7:4, Tosephta Baba Meẓi‘a8:8. deduce that the laborer should not eat more than the value of his wages, but the Sages permit it. From where that his wages are called his soul? Rebbi Abbahu in the name of Rebbi Yose ben Ḥanina, it says here “his soul” and it says at another place “his soul” as it is written (Deut. 24:15): “For that he carries his soul.” Just as “his soul” there means his wages, so here “his soul” means his wages. “Until you are satiated,” that he should not eat and vomit¹⁴⁸He should not induce vomiting to free his stomach for more food.. “Until you are satiated,” that he should not peel figs or suck out grapes¹⁴⁹Tosephta Baba Meẓi‘a 8:8. The laborer has to eat all that is edible..