Talmud su Deuteronomio 23:26

“If he was working with his hand but not with his feet.” Rebbi La said, it is written: “If you come into your neighbor’s standing grain,” etc.²⁴Deut. 23:26. This quote is not followed up here; it refers to the discussion in Ma‘serot 2:6, Notes 122–123. With his hands, binding. With his feet, he compresses. Even with his shoulder, he carries.

¹²²Similar texts in Sifry Deut. 266, 267; Babli Baba Meẓi‘a 87b. It is written (Deut. 23:26): “If you come into your neighbor’s standing grain.” I could think that this means everybody; the verse says “do not swing a sickle over your neighbor’s standing grain,” he who has permission to swing a sickle, that means the laborer. Issy ben Aqabiah says, the verse speaks about everybody. Why does the verse say, “do not swing a sickle over your neighbor’s standing grain?” He has no right except at the time of swinging the sickle¹²³It seems that Issy ben Aqabiah’s text is corrupt. The Rome text reads: אִיסִּי בֶּן עֲקַבְיָה אוֹמֵר בִּשְׁאָר כָּל־אָדָם הַכָּתוּב מְדַבֵּר מַה פּוֹעֵל יֵשׁ לוֹ רְשׁוּת לְהָנִיף אַתְּ אָמוּר וּשְׁאָר כָּל־בְּנֵי אָדָן שֶׁאֵין לָהֶם רְשׁוּת לְהָנִיף לֹא כָּל־שֶׁכֵּן מַה תַלְמוּד לוֹמַר וְחֶרְמֵשׁ לֹא תָנִיף מִכָּאן שֶׁאֵין לוֹ רְשׁוּת לֶאֱכוֹל אֶלָּא בִּשְׁעַת הַנָּפַת מַגָּל … “Issy ben Aqabiah says, the verse speaks about everybody. Since you speak about the laborer who has the right to swing the sickle, so much more other people who have no right to swing the sickle. The verse says ‘do not swing a sickle over your neighbor’s standing grain,’ he has no right except at the time of swinging the sickle.”
In this version, Issy ben Aqabiah agrees that only the laborer has the right to eat from the farmer’s harvest and only at harvest time; this is the position of Aqabiah ben Mehalalel, Midrash Haggadol Deut., ed. S. Fish (Jerusalem 1975) p. 533 = Midrash Tannaïm, ed. Hoffmann, p. 153.. It was stated¹²⁴This baraita is not found in any other source.: Rebbi Simeon ben Ioḥai says, how far was the Torah careful about robbery that it judged between a human and his neighbor about a swing of the sickle! How great is labor, since the generation of the Flood was destroyed only because of robbery, but the laborer does his work, eats, and is free of any robbery!

Just²⁶⁷Here starts the discussion of the conditions imposed on produce that should be subject to peah. as you say for the harvest that its collection must be at one time in order to qualify for peah, should one say that the same is true for the laborer²⁶⁸The hired agricultural laborer, who is poor, may eat while harvesting or working in the field. May he eat only from fruits that qualify for peah, reserved for the poor?? Rebbi Jonah said, there is a difference since it says (Deut.23:26): “You may pluck rubbed ears,” even of something that is not stored²⁶⁹Both conditions, that certain produce is harvested at one time, and that it usually is harvested for storage (or, in the case of wine and oil, is produced for storage), are necessary conditions for peah. Since rubbed ears are not stored, the verse makes a point to extend the right of the farmhand..