Talmud su Esodo 26:2

“He who weaves two rows, who hits two threads, who ties, and who unties.” ³⁹⁴This paragraph and the next are also in Chapter 15, on Mishnah 15:1 (15), What tying was in the Tabernacle? They were tying down the ropes³⁹⁵Needed to tie the gobelins which formed the lowest part of the roof to the posts. Mentioned Ex. 35:18. Babli 74b.. But was this not temporarily³⁹⁶Tying a knot or untying is a Sabbath violation if the knot is intended to be permanent. Since the ropes had to be untied when the Tabernacle was transported, tying and untying could not be Sabbath violations.? Rebbi Yose says, because they were camping and travelling by the Word³⁹⁷By Divine order. Since tying and untying was not a decision humans could make; it could as well be considered permanent. In 15 this is a declarative sentence; it is the equivalent of being permanent. Babli Eruvin 55b., was it like temporarily? Rebbi Yose [ben Rebbi Abun]³⁹⁸From G and 15, confirmed by Or zaruaˋ Šabbat 67. said, since the Holy One, praise to Him, has promised them that he will bring them into the Land, it is as if it were (temporary) [permanent]³⁹⁹The text in (parentheses) is that of the corrector of the Leiden ms. and the scribe in 15, the one in [brackets] is of the original scribe here, the corrector in 15, and G. Since the Tabernacle was finally fixed at Shilo, there the ties were permanent. The other argument notes that while the times of disassembly of the Tabernacle were not predictable, the fact of future disassembly was a certainty; these ties were not permanent.. Rebbi Phineas said, they learned it from the gobelin sewers. If [a thread] broke, he was tying it. If it broke again, it was impossible to make many knots but he would untie the first one⁴⁰⁰Therefore both tying and untying happened during the construction of the Tabernacle and are correctly mentioned in the list of Sabbath prohibitions.. Rebbi Ḥizqiah said, an expert tailor merges the two heads⁴⁰¹The previous argument is not convincing. An expert in invisible mending can connect the threads without a knot being noticeable.. And where was this said? As Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Ḥanina said, they learned it from the weavers of the gobelins. What is the reason? The length of one gobelin⁴⁰²Ex. 26:2. To form a single unit, a gobelin could not have a broken thread even temporarily., that it should be an entity⁴⁰³For reasons of chronology, the [reading] of G is to be preferred over that of the (Leiden ms.) here and in Chapter 15.. If [a thread] broke, he was tying it. When he came to the weave, he untied it and brought it in. Rebbi Tanḥuma in the name of (Rav) [Rebbi]⁴⁰⁴For the purposes of the construction of the Sanctuary everything had to be perfect; no broken threads to be repaired. The only possible explanation remains the first one. Ḥuna: Even on its warp there was neither knot nor connection⁴⁰⁵A scribal error..