Talmud su Levitico 16:10
וְהַשָּׂעִ֗יר אֲשֶׁר֩ עָלָ֨ה עָלָ֤יו הַגּוֹרָל֙ לַעֲזָאזֵ֔ל יָֽעֳמַד־חַ֛י לִפְנֵ֥י יְהוָ֖ה לְכַפֵּ֣ר עָלָ֑יו לְשַׁלַּ֥ח אֹת֛וֹ לַעֲזָאזֵ֖ל הַמִּדְבָּֽרָה׃
Ma la capra, sulla quale il lotto cadde per Azazel, sarà messa in vita dinanzi al Signore, per espiare su di lui, per mandarlo via per Azazel nel deserto.
Jerusalem Talmud Yoma
141This paragraph is repeated in Halakhah 6:1 (6). If he drew lots for three pairs142Instead of one pair of he-goats there were three; for each group of sprinkling one was slaughtered while the other was alive., to give from one between the beams, from one on the gobelins, from one on the golden altar. Which of them is sent away? Rebbi Zeˋira said, to atone on him143Lev. 16:10., one with whom one atones, the companion is sent away; one with whom one does not atone, the companion is not sent away.. Rebbi Hila said, to atone on him, one with whom one completes atonement, the companion is sent away, one with whom one does not complete atonement, the companion is not sent away. In Rebbi Zeˋira’s opinion, all three are sent away. In Rebbi Hila’s opinion, only the last one is sent away.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Shevuot
237This paragraph is Yoma 6:2. However, there the sequence of topics is different. Sifra Aḥare Pereq 2(6–8).Shall be stationed alive; this teaches that it the future it is going to die238Lev. 16:10. Since the verse later only requires that the scapegoat be sent to a cliff (v. 22) in the desert (v. 21), but nothing is said what happens to the goat there, it is inferred that since it is emphasized that it must be alive as long as it is standing before the Eternal that later it will not continue to live, but will be pushed over the cliff to its death (Sifra Aḥare Pereq 2(7,8), Yoma 6:2, Babli Yoma40b,65a,71a.. How long must it live? Up to he will finish from atoning to Sanctuary239Lev. 16:20. If the scapegoat dies before the blood of the other he-goat was sprinkled on the gobelin and the incense altar in the Sanctuary, the ceremony has to be repeated. Later, no new he-goat has to be provided., the words of Rebbi Jehudah. Rebbi Simeon says, up to the moment of confession240Until after the High Priest leaves the sanctuary to put his hands on the scapegoat to confess the people’s sins (v. 21). If the he-goat dies at the moment the High Priest starts to put his hands on its head, no new he-goat is needed.. In Rebbi Jehudah’s opinion, the confession is indispensable241Since neither the blood of the bull nor that of the he-goat may be brought inside the Sanctuary without prior confession (v. 11) the scapegoat may not be sent to the desert without confession; without a scapegoat the atoning is not complete.. In Rebbi Simeon’s opinion, the confession is not indispensable242Since for him the High Priest only has to stand next to the scapegoat, the final confession itself is needed only if the scapegoat is alive at that time.
Commentators note that the Babli Yoma 40b seems to switch the positions of RR. Jehudah and Simeon in this matter, but since Sifra parallels the Yerushalmi this seems to be unlikely. Maimonides does not mention the matter in his Code.. What is the difference between them? 243This is a non sequitur. But in the Yoma text, which has to be considered as original, the scapegoat is treated first, i. e., that a scapegoat sent away without confession for R. Jehudah requires an entire new ceremony with formal confession, but not for R. Simeon. Then it is asserted that by analogy if the bull whose blood is to be brought into the Sanctuary was slaughtered without confession, for R. Jehudah the slaughter is invalid and the entire ceremony has to be repeated, but not for R. Simeon. If he slaughtered without confession. In Rebbi Jehudah’s opinion, he must bring another bull. In Rebbi Simeon’s opinion, he does not have to bring another bull. The same holds for the scapegoat. If he sent it without a confession. In Rebbi Jehudah’s opinion, he must bring another goat. In Rebbi Simeon’s opinion, he does not have to bring another goat. If he confessed, slaughtered, then the blood was spilled. Do you say, does he have to bring another bull and confess a second time or did he do his duty with the first confession244If the bull was slaughtered correctly but for some reason its blood could not be brought into the Sanctuary, does R. Jehudah require a full repetition of the ceremony including confession?? The same holds for the scapegoat; must he cast lots a second time or did he do his duty with the first confession245If the scapegoat dies before it can be sent away, one needs a replacement. May one bring a single he-goat as replacement or does one have to bring two he-goats, cast new lots, use one as scapegoat and let the other one graze until it develops a bodily defect when it can be sold and one buys other sacrifices with the money? With the Yoma text one has to read:
צָרִיךְ לְהַגְרִיל פַּעַם שְׁנִייָה אוֹ כְבָר יָצָא בְּהַגְרִילוֹ
שֶׁלָּרִאשׁוֹן.
“Must he cast lots a second time or did he do his duty with the first casting of lots?” (Babli Yoma 39b/40a.)?
Commentators note that the Babli Yoma 40b seems to switch the positions of RR. Jehudah and Simeon in this matter, but since Sifra parallels the Yerushalmi this seems to be unlikely. Maimonides does not mention the matter in his Code.. What is the difference between them? 243This is a non sequitur. But in the Yoma text, which has to be considered as original, the scapegoat is treated first, i. e., that a scapegoat sent away without confession for R. Jehudah requires an entire new ceremony with formal confession, but not for R. Simeon. Then it is asserted that by analogy if the bull whose blood is to be brought into the Sanctuary was slaughtered without confession, for R. Jehudah the slaughter is invalid and the entire ceremony has to be repeated, but not for R. Simeon. If he slaughtered without confession. In Rebbi Jehudah’s opinion, he must bring another bull. In Rebbi Simeon’s opinion, he does not have to bring another bull. The same holds for the scapegoat. If he sent it without a confession. In Rebbi Jehudah’s opinion, he must bring another goat. In Rebbi Simeon’s opinion, he does not have to bring another goat. If he confessed, slaughtered, then the blood was spilled. Do you say, does he have to bring another bull and confess a second time or did he do his duty with the first confession244If the bull was slaughtered correctly but for some reason its blood could not be brought into the Sanctuary, does R. Jehudah require a full repetition of the ceremony including confession?? The same holds for the scapegoat; must he cast lots a second time or did he do his duty with the first confession245If the scapegoat dies before it can be sent away, one needs a replacement. May one bring a single he-goat as replacement or does one have to bring two he-goats, cast new lots, use one as scapegoat and let the other one graze until it develops a bodily defect when it can be sold and one buys other sacrifices with the money? With the Yoma text one has to read:
צָרִיךְ לְהַגְרִיל פַּעַם שְׁנִייָה אוֹ כְבָר יָצָא בְּהַגְרִילוֹ
שֶׁלָּרִאשׁוֹן.
“Must he cast lots a second time or did he do his duty with the first casting of lots?” (Babli Yoma 39b/40a.)?
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy