Talmud su Levitico 5:16

Rebbi Yose asked, if somebody benefited from Temple property less than the value of a perutah¹⁶⁸Which therefore cannot be claimed in court and there is no coin with which to pay., is he liable for reimbursement? (He said to him.)¹⁶⁹Addition by the corrector; to be deleted. Let us hear from the following: What he appropriated from sancta he has to repay¹⁷⁰Lev. 5:16. This seems to exclude amounts smaller than the smallest coin in circulation since such an amount cannot be paid., except what is less than the value of a perutah. There are Tannaim who state, to add. (He who said except, for) [he who said “except what is less than the value of a perutah” for reimbursement¹⁷¹Sifra Ḥovah (Wayyiqra II) Parashah11(7). The argument there is based on the expression from sancta, even a minute part. and] sacrifice. He who said “to add”, for reimbursement¹⁷²While is cannot be paid for in coin, it can be restituted in kind. Everybody agrees that no sacrifice as prescribed in 5:15 is due in this case. (The scribe’s text, in parentheses, is preferable.). As you are saying there^172*Appropriating less than the value of a perutah from sancta does not trigger the obligation to pay an additional fifth since no amount less that a perutah can be invoiced., intentionally less than the value of a perutah, even though he does not pay the fifth and a reparation sacrifice he has to pay to the tribe, one says the same here. The colleagues said before Rebbi Yose, is that not a Mishnah? “Somebody who eats leavened heave on Passover, if in error pays its value and a fifth¹⁴⁶A Non-Cohen who eats sanctified heave (which either was dedicated leavened before Passover or was dedicated unleavened but became leavened by itself on Passover) has to pay restitution to the priests together with a biblically ordained surcharge; Mishnah Terumot 6:1 Note 1., if intentionally he is not liable for restitution even as value of wood¹⁴⁷Intentional desecration of heave (e. g., used as food by a Non-Cohen) is too great a sin to be forgiven for just a monetary fine (Mishnah Terumot 7:1 Note 2). Also, while the restitution money and the fine for inadvertent consumption are sancta, the restitution for intentionally consumed heave is profane (loc. cit.) and therefore has to follow the rules of civil debts. Since leavened matter on Passover is forbidden for usufruct, it has no monetary value, not even as fuel to be burned.”? He told them, there it is impossible to complete¹⁷³Since leavened matter on Passover is worthless, rules about it cannot be invoked in discussions about money’s worth., but here it is possible to complete.