창세기 1:32의 Chasidut
Kedushat Levi
Exodus 38,21. “These are the accounts of the Tabernacle of the Testimony that were rendered according to the commandment of Moses, etc.;” we have already written previously that the construction of the Tabernacle required holy spirit and the knowledge of how G’d used the aleph bet, i.e. the letters of the Torah and their respective combinations that G’d used when He created heaven and earth. (based on Yevamot 47). The subject has been elaborated on further in Bereshit Rabbah section 12,14 which quotes the school of Shammai saying that the idea to create the universe crystallized in G’d’s mind at night whereas the execution occurred by day, and that the letter ה written in smaller script in Genesis 2,4 in the word בהבראם is an allusion to the attribute א-ד-נ-י, one of G’d’s names, whereas afterwards in the same verse when the Torah writes ביום עשות ה' אלוקים ארץ ושמים, “on the day that <ihashem< i=""> made earth and heaven,” the apparent repetition is an allusion to the fact that G’d is unique and the exclusive Creator. [Our author must have had a different version of the Bereshit rabbah, as the second comment concerning the attribute א-ד-נ-י is not found in my updated version of that Midrash. Ed.]
The uniqueness of both Moses and Betzalel paralleled the description of unique attributes possessed by the Creator. Initially, the instructions given by Moses to Betzalel were similar to G’d’s formulating the thought of creating a universe, whereas the execution paralleled the words ביום עשות ה' אלוקים, G’d in His capacity as Hashem carrying out His plan to create the universe. The numerical value of the first letters of the opening words in our portion, אלה פקודי המשכן i.e. א'פ'ה' have a combined value of 86, equivalent to the letters in the name of G’d when it is spelled א-ל-ה-י-ם, i.e. His attribute of א-ד-נ-י, the word signifying the attribute of Justice. The respective last letters in the same sequence of words are ה'י'נ equaling 65, or the numerical value of the attribute א-ד-נ-י. When we examine the respective first and final letters in the second half of the introductory verse of our portion, i.e. משכן העדות, we find that the letters מ'ה correspond to the holy name of G’d consisting of 45 letters, whereas the final letters in these words, i.e. ת'נ or 450 i.e. ten times the value of the opening letters. This suggests that whereas Betzalel was indeed granted great insights, it was Moses, אשר פקד על פי משה who had the highest level of understanding how to manipulate all the letters in the names of G’d.
The uniqueness of both Moses and Betzalel paralleled the description of unique attributes possessed by the Creator. Initially, the instructions given by Moses to Betzalel were similar to G’d’s formulating the thought of creating a universe, whereas the execution paralleled the words ביום עשות ה' אלוקים, G’d in His capacity as Hashem carrying out His plan to create the universe. The numerical value of the first letters of the opening words in our portion, אלה פקודי המשכן i.e. א'פ'ה' have a combined value of 86, equivalent to the letters in the name of G’d when it is spelled א-ל-ה-י-ם, i.e. His attribute of א-ד-נ-י, the word signifying the attribute of Justice. The respective last letters in the same sequence of words are ה'י'נ equaling 65, or the numerical value of the attribute א-ד-נ-י. When we examine the respective first and final letters in the second half of the introductory verse of our portion, i.e. משכן העדות, we find that the letters מ'ה correspond to the holy name of G’d consisting of 45 letters, whereas the final letters in these words, i.e. ת'נ or 450 i.e. ten times the value of the opening letters. This suggests that whereas Betzalel was indeed granted great insights, it was Moses, אשר פקד על פי משה who had the highest level of understanding how to manipulate all the letters in the names of G’d.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
The first thing G’d embarked on when creating the material universe was to create heaven and earth.”
It is an axiom, general principle, that G’d created the entire universe, and having done so, never withdraws from the universe for even a single moment, [unlike sculptors or painters who, once they have completed a sculpture or painting, move on to something else, having “finished” with their previous “creation.” Ed.] This axiom is true both of what He created in the heavens and what He created in the material, three-dimensional part of the universe. We pay tribute to this in our daily prayers when we say יוצר אור ובורא חושך, “He creates and fashions (present tense) light, and He creates darkness.” When speaking of any accomplishments of G’d’s creatures however, we speak of them in the past tense, i.e.יצר כסא, “he shaped a chair,” or עשה מזרון, “he made a mattress.” G’d’s creative activity is never completed, as the Torah testified in Genesis 2,3 אשר ברא אלוקים לעשות, “which the Lord has created in order to complete it.” This means that G’d is part of every creature He ever created, and once man realizes that he is nothing without G’d Who has created him and Who provides him with all the strength and creative stimuli that he possesses, he will be able to relate to Hashem as an ongoing creative Force in His universe. This is reflected every morning when we get up [after having used the washroom] and we refer to G’d with the words אשר יצר את האדם בחכמה, “Who has fashioned man with חכמה,” the word חכמה meaning the opposite of אין, “nothing.” It is appropriate therefore that in that prayer we refer to the creation of man in the past tense, as opposed to the line we quoted earlier, seeing that we refer to something or somebody who already exists, i.e. יש. This explains why the Ari z’al , Rabbi Yitzchak Luria, said that when we refer to G’d as ה' מלך, usually translated as “Hashem is King,” the reference is to the אין, “nothing,” i.e. G’d at any given moment gives us life, -by not withdrawing it from us.- The implied meaning of the expression is that man is “nothing” unless he continues to exist as part of G’d’s creative activity. The so-called אין, “nothing,” in terms of metaphysical beings, rules supreme in the regions beyond those that are part of the physical universe, the one that we conveniently refer to as “nature.” This so-called אין, is not really a “nothing,” in terms of the universe, its “nothingness” is such only vis a vis the physical part of the universe; in the celestial regions this “אין” rules supreme. [as opposed to the חכמה in our part of the universe. Ed. Although יש and אין are popularly perceived as absolute opposites, not having anything in common, this perception is built on a fallacy; the linkage between יש and אין are the mitzvot, Torah commandments, performed by the Jewish people. The commandments are performed in the section of the universe known as יש, as a result of which close contact is maintained between the aforementioned two domains of the universe. Ezekiel 1:14 refers to the “mitzvot” in their capacity as providing the link between the terrestrial and the celestial part of the universe with the words והחיות רצוא ושוב, “and the chayot ran to and fro”. According to the Zohar II 288, the mitzvot and the Torah respectively, are viewed as related to one another like the “hidden” is related to the “revealed,” both being part of the same whole. Torah and mitzvot provide the link between these two domains, so that each domain is not completely divorced from the other. This concept is contained in the letters of the word מצוה when we divide it up into מצ and וה. The letters מצ when we read the alphabet backwards, starting with the letter ת are equivalent to the letters יה, symbolising the totally abstract Divinity, whereas the letters וה symbolize the hidden parts of the universe, יש. The first half of the word מצוה being read with the two letters used in reverse order of the aleph bet, alludes to the “hidden” part of the universe, the domain exclusive to Divine, abstract forces. Let us explain something about what precisely is “hidden” and what is “revealed,” when it comes to the מצוה, “Torah commandment.” When we perform a מצוה, we cause G’d to become pleased with having created man, the choicest of His creatures. When we comply with requests made to us by a fellow human being, we can immediately gauge whether he is pleased by our actions or not, either by his face indicating this, or by words of approval, something that is not the case when we comply with G’d’s requests from us. Since He is invisible, and does not speak to us as He did to Moses, “mouth to mouth”, we have no way of knowing if our efforts to please Him have been successful. When we try to perform deeds that are for our (immediate) personal benefit, we are able to determine if our efforts have succeeded. This then is the “hidden” element present whenever we perform any of G’d’s commandments, מצות. This is what the Torah had in mind when it wrote (Deuteronomy 29,28) הנסתרות לה' אלוקינו, “the hidden aspects of mitzvah performance are reserved for the Lord our G’d;” on the other hand, והנגלות לנו ולבנינו עד עולם, “the benefits which the performance of the Torah confers upon us will be revealed forever.” This is also the meaning of the words בראשית ברא אלוקים, (addressed to us) “at the beginning of G’d’s creative activity G’d created the יש, a physical domain of the universe.” Through His creating יש, i.e. ראשית, a beginning, the creation of heaven and earth came into being, for prior to that there was only the אין, the abstract universe. This is the meaning of Targum Yerushalmi who renders this verse as 'בראשית בחוכמא ברא ה', “at the beginning G’d created by means of using intelligence found in the domain of the abstract regions.” חכמה, as we pointed out earlier, is a quality inherent in the terrestrial domain.
It is an axiom, general principle, that G’d created the entire universe, and having done so, never withdraws from the universe for even a single moment, [unlike sculptors or painters who, once they have completed a sculpture or painting, move on to something else, having “finished” with their previous “creation.” Ed.] This axiom is true both of what He created in the heavens and what He created in the material, three-dimensional part of the universe. We pay tribute to this in our daily prayers when we say יוצר אור ובורא חושך, “He creates and fashions (present tense) light, and He creates darkness.” When speaking of any accomplishments of G’d’s creatures however, we speak of them in the past tense, i.e.יצר כסא, “he shaped a chair,” or עשה מזרון, “he made a mattress.” G’d’s creative activity is never completed, as the Torah testified in Genesis 2,3 אשר ברא אלוקים לעשות, “which the Lord has created in order to complete it.” This means that G’d is part of every creature He ever created, and once man realizes that he is nothing without G’d Who has created him and Who provides him with all the strength and creative stimuli that he possesses, he will be able to relate to Hashem as an ongoing creative Force in His universe. This is reflected every morning when we get up [after having used the washroom] and we refer to G’d with the words אשר יצר את האדם בחכמה, “Who has fashioned man with חכמה,” the word חכמה meaning the opposite of אין, “nothing.” It is appropriate therefore that in that prayer we refer to the creation of man in the past tense, as opposed to the line we quoted earlier, seeing that we refer to something or somebody who already exists, i.e. יש. This explains why the Ari z’al , Rabbi Yitzchak Luria, said that when we refer to G’d as ה' מלך, usually translated as “Hashem is King,” the reference is to the אין, “nothing,” i.e. G’d at any given moment gives us life, -by not withdrawing it from us.- The implied meaning of the expression is that man is “nothing” unless he continues to exist as part of G’d’s creative activity. The so-called אין, “nothing,” in terms of metaphysical beings, rules supreme in the regions beyond those that are part of the physical universe, the one that we conveniently refer to as “nature.” This so-called אין, is not really a “nothing,” in terms of the universe, its “nothingness” is such only vis a vis the physical part of the universe; in the celestial regions this “אין” rules supreme. [as opposed to the חכמה in our part of the universe. Ed. Although יש and אין are popularly perceived as absolute opposites, not having anything in common, this perception is built on a fallacy; the linkage between יש and אין are the mitzvot, Torah commandments, performed by the Jewish people. The commandments are performed in the section of the universe known as יש, as a result of which close contact is maintained between the aforementioned two domains of the universe. Ezekiel 1:14 refers to the “mitzvot” in their capacity as providing the link between the terrestrial and the celestial part of the universe with the words והחיות רצוא ושוב, “and the chayot ran to and fro”. According to the Zohar II 288, the mitzvot and the Torah respectively, are viewed as related to one another like the “hidden” is related to the “revealed,” both being part of the same whole. Torah and mitzvot provide the link between these two domains, so that each domain is not completely divorced from the other. This concept is contained in the letters of the word מצוה when we divide it up into מצ and וה. The letters מצ when we read the alphabet backwards, starting with the letter ת are equivalent to the letters יה, symbolising the totally abstract Divinity, whereas the letters וה symbolize the hidden parts of the universe, יש. The first half of the word מצוה being read with the two letters used in reverse order of the aleph bet, alludes to the “hidden” part of the universe, the domain exclusive to Divine, abstract forces. Let us explain something about what precisely is “hidden” and what is “revealed,” when it comes to the מצוה, “Torah commandment.” When we perform a מצוה, we cause G’d to become pleased with having created man, the choicest of His creatures. When we comply with requests made to us by a fellow human being, we can immediately gauge whether he is pleased by our actions or not, either by his face indicating this, or by words of approval, something that is not the case when we comply with G’d’s requests from us. Since He is invisible, and does not speak to us as He did to Moses, “mouth to mouth”, we have no way of knowing if our efforts to please Him have been successful. When we try to perform deeds that are for our (immediate) personal benefit, we are able to determine if our efforts have succeeded. This then is the “hidden” element present whenever we perform any of G’d’s commandments, מצות. This is what the Torah had in mind when it wrote (Deuteronomy 29,28) הנסתרות לה' אלוקינו, “the hidden aspects of mitzvah performance are reserved for the Lord our G’d;” on the other hand, והנגלות לנו ולבנינו עד עולם, “the benefits which the performance of the Torah confers upon us will be revealed forever.” This is also the meaning of the words בראשית ברא אלוקים, (addressed to us) “at the beginning of G’d’s creative activity G’d created the יש, a physical domain of the universe.” Through His creating יש, i.e. ראשית, a beginning, the creation of heaven and earth came into being, for prior to that there was only the אין, the abstract universe. This is the meaning of Targum Yerushalmi who renders this verse as 'בראשית בחוכמא ברא ה', “at the beginning G’d created by means of using intelligence found in the domain of the abstract regions.” חכמה, as we pointed out earlier, is a quality inherent in the terrestrial domain.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Me'or Einayim
This shall be the Torah concerning the one struck with skin blanch [metzora] on the day he becomes clean. He shall be brought to the priest (Lev. 14:2), and our Sages of Blessed Memory interpreted metzora as one who speaks evil [motzi ra], for afflictions come through the sin of evil speech. But the matter is according to what is written, When God began to create etc. (Gen. 1:1), and our Sages of Blessed Memory interpreted: “For the sake of Torah and for the sake of Israel” (cf. Rashi, ad. loc.); so we find that Israel is something very important to Blessed God, since for their sake all of the Worlds and all the Creations were created. And Blessed God takes pleasure from each one of Israel, even from a greatly wicked person: “Your temples [rakatekh] are like a pomegranate (Song of Songs 6:7) – even the empty ones [reykanim] among you are as full of mitzvot as a pomegranate” (Babylonian Talmud, Berakhot 57a). And when a person speaks evil about one of Israel, even if he speaks truth, he nullifies the Blessed Creator’s pleasure (if it were possible) and causes Him sadness (if it were possible) as is stated, [And the Lord …] was saddened in to His heart (Gen. 6:6), and inverts the pleasure [oneg] into affliction [nega]; therefore his “wage” is measure for measure, affliction comes upon him. And our Sages of Blessed Memory said: “Evil speech is as great as idolatry, sexual immorality, and murder” (Babylonian Talmud, Arakhin 15b). But we must be precise: what connection does idolatry have to evil speech? But the matter is according to what is written, By the word of ADONAI were the heavens made (Psalm 33:6), that all of the Worlds and all of the Creations were created through speech comprised of the 22 letters of the Torah, which is called Heavenly Sovereignty. For when the Sovereign does not speak, no one knows how to do His Will; and when he speaks His Will is revealed, and that is Heavenly Sovereignty whose Sovereignty is in all jurisdictions. And we find in Sefer Yetzirah that [the letters] are established in the mouth, that Blessed God established the 22 letters: the World of Speech, Heavenly Sovereignty, the Attribute of ADONAI-ness, ADONAI, open my lips (Psalm 51:17), were established in the human mouth.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Me'or Einayim
I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob as El-Shaddai etc. (Ex. 6:3). Rashi explained, “Alas for those who are lost and not to be found!” etc. The meaning, as is known, is that the secret of Egyptian Exile is that the True Awareness was in Exile; they could not grasp the Awareness to serve the Blessed Creator, along the lines of what is stated, Know the God of your Ancestor and serve Him (1 Chron 28:9). For in truth, Awareness is the essence that brings one to complete Reverence and Love. For once a person knows and believes that the whole earth is full of [God’s] Glory (Isaiah 6:3) and no place is void of Him, and [God] is the pleasure of all pleasures, Blessed is He and Blessed His Name, Life of Lives – if so, for any of the pleasures if you imagine, God forbid, the absence of the influence of [God’s] Blessed Light and Life-Force among the created things, Creation would return to unformed and void (Gen. 1:2). And similarly for all the Upper and Lower Worlds, if you imagine, God forbid, the absence of [God’s] Life-Force, they would be as if they never were. And if that is the case, then [Awareness of God’s presence] is the essence in all things...
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Pri HaAretz
We find in the Talmud “From where do we know that a priest with a physical defect is invalid.? As it says ‘Behold I give him my covenant of peace (/SHaLOM/)’, when is he whole/complete (/SHaLeM/) therefore and not lacking. This is problematic however for SHaloM is written, with a VaV (and therefore does not have the meaning of complete/whole). But the Vav is severed (and therefore it may be read as having the meaning complete/whole). Elsewhere the Talmud explains the verse from Psalms “Pinchas stood in reckoning (VaYiPaLeL). VaYiTPaLeL (prayer) is not written, rather VaYiPaLeL (entreaty), to teach that he made a ׳reckoning׳ )(PeLiLaH) with his Creator.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Deuteronomy 1,1. “These are the words which Moses spoke to the entire people of Israel in the desert, facing the wilderness near Suph between Paran and between Tophel and Lavan.”
It seems reasonable to see in the word ערבה, wilderness, a reference to the first time the word ערב appears in the story of Creation (Genesis 1,5) where the meaning is “evening,” a transition from day to night. At the time of the creation the evening preceded the first morning, as before the creation of light the universe had been in darkness, as we read there in verse 2, and as the Talmud points out in the beginning of tractate B’rachot, when discussing the times for reciting the keriyat sh’ma. If we take our cue from that paragraph in the Torah, the early years of our lives would be described as ערב. Having this in mind, the Torah, i.e. Moses, alludes here to the need for every human being from his earliest youth to focus all of his activities on the aspect of G’d familiar to us by the name Shechinah, “G’d’s Presence.”
The deeper meaning behind the words: בין פארן, is that this is the site on earth from which the ability for living creatures on earth to become fruitful and to multiply is derived. As to the words: ובין תפל, we follow Rashi, who quotes Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai who claims that no one has ever been able to find these two locations. He therefore concluded that these names are similes, used by Moses to rebuke the Israelites who had spoken derisively of the manna (Numbers 1,7), which was white, לבן. The word תפל, [possibly as root of: תפלה “prayer”. Ed.], according to Rashi, is another word for “speech” (presumably Israel’s accepting the Torah with the words נעשה ונשמע, “we shall do and we shall listen (to instruction).” Moses’ address teaching the Israelites to make G’d their focus at all times, and to observe these covenants meticulously, covers the period between the covenant of circumcision made with Avraham and that of the Ten Commandments made with the assembled Jewish nation at Mount Sinai.
It seems reasonable to see in the word ערבה, wilderness, a reference to the first time the word ערב appears in the story of Creation (Genesis 1,5) where the meaning is “evening,” a transition from day to night. At the time of the creation the evening preceded the first morning, as before the creation of light the universe had been in darkness, as we read there in verse 2, and as the Talmud points out in the beginning of tractate B’rachot, when discussing the times for reciting the keriyat sh’ma. If we take our cue from that paragraph in the Torah, the early years of our lives would be described as ערב. Having this in mind, the Torah, i.e. Moses, alludes here to the need for every human being from his earliest youth to focus all of his activities on the aspect of G’d familiar to us by the name Shechinah, “G’d’s Presence.”
The deeper meaning behind the words: בין פארן, is that this is the site on earth from which the ability for living creatures on earth to become fruitful and to multiply is derived. As to the words: ובין תפל, we follow Rashi, who quotes Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai who claims that no one has ever been able to find these two locations. He therefore concluded that these names are similes, used by Moses to rebuke the Israelites who had spoken derisively of the manna (Numbers 1,7), which was white, לבן. The word תפל, [possibly as root of: תפלה “prayer”. Ed.], according to Rashi, is another word for “speech” (presumably Israel’s accepting the Torah with the words נעשה ונשמע, “we shall do and we shall listen (to instruction).” Moses’ address teaching the Israelites to make G’d their focus at all times, and to observe these covenants meticulously, covers the period between the covenant of circumcision made with Avraham and that of the Ten Commandments made with the assembled Jewish nation at Mount Sinai.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Agra DeKala
An additional reason why the holy Torah starts with the letter Beis, which the numerical value is two, is to teach that there are two Torahs, there is written and oral.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Mareh Yechezkel on Torah
In the beginning (Bereshit) is a covenant/circumcision of fire (brit esh, which is made up of the same letters as bereshit, Zohar Chadash, Bereshit 276-280). This is in accordance with that which is written (Genesis 1:26), “Let Us make man,” in the plural. As it is found in the Gemara, that they asked Rabbi Yehoshua ben Channaniah, “Why was man not created circumcised?” And the reason is that for everything, there must be arousal from below by a human action; and then one merits assistance from the heavens. Hence by way of our being engaged with the commandment of circumcision, which is a major action, we give the child the merit with which to have a holy soul and a heart circumcised for Torah.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Sha'ar HaEmunah VeYesod HaChasidut
Therefore, a person must believe with perfect faith, and fix in his heart and soul the unalterable belief that all of his knowledge is a created consciousness: his intellect is a created intellect, his apprehension is a created understanding, and God runs the world at every moment, managing His creation with individual Divine providence every second of creation’s existence. It is God who gives life and existence to all of the worlds and to all of forces that are emanated, created, formed and made.246He uses four terms for creation, paralleling the kabbalistic concept of the four worlds, Atzilut, Beriyah, Yetsirah, Asiyah. This is a way of saying that God runs all of the worlds, from the most sublime spiritual realm down to the lowly physical world. Not only this, but so too does He gives life and existence in this world to man’s mind, including this very understanding. God’s desire is that we take our knowledge and power of understanding and then go on to serve Him with our free will, which we are required to exercise. This is as it is written in the Tikkunei Zohar (Tikkun 70, page 137a): “Let us make a man” (Bereshit, 1:26). Man is required to perform the mitzvot of the Torah. He must devote his efforts to the Torah in order to work at it and guard it.247Based upon Bereshit 1:15. In this way he will have a good reward, and dominance over you (the angels).248According to the Sages, when God said in the plural, “Let us make a man,” He was consulting with His angels. The Zohar adds to this rest of the verse: “and they shall rule over the fish of the sea and over the fowl of the heaven,” which includes the angels themselves. Although they aided in man’s creation, his free will ultimately enables him to rule over them as well. This is why Israel is called (Yeshayahu, 60:21), “the branch of My planting, the work of My hands in which I will be glorified.” For even though the supernal angels are great in strength and always fulfill God’s word, still, their service is not ranked as truly mighty since they are programmed to serve and obey Him. They have no evil inclination that they may conquer, and do not have a body to contend with in order to serve God. For this reason, “let us make a man,” and he will rule over you. From this understanding and from this power of the intellect comes man’s power of choice, for it is God’s desire that man serve Him with his free will.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Sha'ar HaEmunah VeYesod HaChasidut
Therefore, a person must believe with perfect faith, and fix in his heart and soul the unalterable belief that all of his knowledge is a created consciousness: his intellect is a created intellect, his apprehension is a created understanding, and God runs the world at every moment, managing His creation with individual Divine providence every second of creation’s existence. It is God who gives life and existence to all of the worlds and to all of forces that are emanated, created, formed and made.246He uses four terms for creation, paralleling the kabbalistic concept of the four worlds, Atzilut, Beriyah, Yetsirah, Asiyah. This is a way of saying that God runs all of the worlds, from the most sublime spiritual realm down to the lowly physical world. Not only this, but so too does He gives life and existence in this world to man’s mind, including this very understanding. God’s desire is that we take our knowledge and power of understanding and then go on to serve Him with our free will, which we are required to exercise. This is as it is written in the Tikkunei Zohar (Tikkun 70, page 137a): “Let us make a man” (Bereshit, 1:26). Man is required to perform the mitzvot of the Torah. He must devote his efforts to the Torah in order to work at it and guard it.247Based upon Bereshit 1:15. In this way he will have a good reward, and dominance over you (the angels).248According to the Sages, when God said in the plural, “Let us make a man,” He was consulting with His angels. The Zohar adds to this rest of the verse: “and they shall rule over the fish of the sea and over the fowl of the heaven,” which includes the angels themselves. Although they aided in man’s creation, his free will ultimately enables him to rule over them as well. This is why Israel is called (Yeshayahu, 60:21), “the branch of My planting, the work of My hands in which I will be glorified.” For even though the supernal angels are great in strength and always fulfill God’s word, still, their service is not ranked as truly mighty since they are programmed to serve and obey Him. They have no evil inclination that they may conquer, and do not have a body to contend with in order to serve God. For this reason, “let us make a man,” and he will rule over you. From this understanding and from this power of the intellect comes man’s power of choice, for it is God’s desire that man serve Him with his free will.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Mevo HaShearim
Shall it be that since, to the eyes of the corporeal human the world and human appear to be corporeal as well, these things are actually [entirely] corporeal, to the extent that we cannot use these terms to describe the upper worlds? If one has poor eyesight or is mentally unstable and a human appears to him to be an ape, but out of habit still calls this being ‘human’—would we say that this term is an inaccurate one for this being, and say that every person to whom this term is employed is thus derogatorily referred to as an ape? The dignified valence of the term remains in place, and the onus is on the ill person to be healed until he can accurately behold the human in his ‘form and image.’367Genesis 1:26. Since the Besht taught that when we gaze at the world we see God, each seeing divinity in the world according to his sanctification, why should we not call the upper worlds according to their true names, as in this world as well these distinctions and levels pertain? Is it because of dulled eyes or unstable mind which do not perceive the world as it truly is? But we know that in truth all is divinity, and these simply do not see accurately, and the onus is on them to raise their sight to truly see God’s world.368In truth, according to hasidism, the material world itself is constituted of divinity, as are the ‘upper worlds.’ As such, it is appropriate to utilize the same terminology to describe both worlds, as long as one recognizes that the significations are related yet distinct. The material ‘head’ is related to the supernal ‘head,’ mutatis mutandis.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Exodus 36,7. “for the stuff (materials contributed) they had was sufficient for all the work to make it, even too much.” [Clearly the meaning of the word מלאכה, used twice in this verse must have a different meaning each time. Ed.] The statement that the materials donated for construction of the Tabernacle first described as adequate, and, as an afterthought, as more than sufficient, poses a problem. Either it was adequate or it was overabundant.
The Or hachayim already deals with this problem, (compare this editor’s translation of that commentary on pages 906/7). Our author approaches the anomaly from a different angle.
One of the names of G’d is א-ל שדי, this name of G’d also appears to contain a contradiction within itself, seeing that the word א-ל refers to strength, power, as in Ezekiel 17,13 אילי הארץ, “the mighty ones of the land,” whereas the word שדי is a derivative of שדים (compare Genesis 49,25) a word used to describe the provision of sustenance for all living creatures. Seeing that the largesse emanating from G’d in His capacity as the Eyn Sof, will automatically keep increasing unless stopped, this term for G’d is used to describe Him as also the One Who called די, “enough,” to an ever expanding universe during the process of creation. A term comprising apparent contradictions is by itself not unique, therefore. [It might not be acceptable when applied to G’d’s creatures, but is certainly not strange when applied to the Creator, Who is the source of all phenomena in His universe. It nevertheless remains our duty to explore how the Torah could apply apparently contradictory terms to contributions made by man rather than by G’d. Ed.] The Talmud in Chagigah 12 sees in the word שדי, the attribute of G’d in His capacity of being able to call a halt to His initiatives, many of which had been assigned to His creatures such as to the oceans and the earth when they received instructions to produce living creatures in the waters and also vegetation on earth. (Compare Genesis 1,20 and 1,24 respectively) It was natural for these “agents” of G’d to use the powers entrusted to them freely, without restriction, so that G’d had to impose limits in order to prevent possible new “chaos” in the universe, one which He had set out to replace by order on the first day of creation. This is all part of the concept of צמצום, “restraint,” imposed by G’d both upon Himself and on those of His creatures not granted בחירה, free will, i.e. human beings. G’d had to impose these limits on His agents, as precisely because they were only agents, מלאכים, they had not been equipped with the ability to understand what G’d had intended in parts of the universe that were not within their parameters. When a creature is showered with too much largesse, it is not a blessing but is liable to prove destructive unless checked. (Compare Yevamot 47 where we are told that even the Israelites while living in their mortal shells on earth are not able to absorb all the goodness or punishment they deserve )
The Or hachayim already deals with this problem, (compare this editor’s translation of that commentary on pages 906/7). Our author approaches the anomaly from a different angle.
One of the names of G’d is א-ל שדי, this name of G’d also appears to contain a contradiction within itself, seeing that the word א-ל refers to strength, power, as in Ezekiel 17,13 אילי הארץ, “the mighty ones of the land,” whereas the word שדי is a derivative of שדים (compare Genesis 49,25) a word used to describe the provision of sustenance for all living creatures. Seeing that the largesse emanating from G’d in His capacity as the Eyn Sof, will automatically keep increasing unless stopped, this term for G’d is used to describe Him as also the One Who called די, “enough,” to an ever expanding universe during the process of creation. A term comprising apparent contradictions is by itself not unique, therefore. [It might not be acceptable when applied to G’d’s creatures, but is certainly not strange when applied to the Creator, Who is the source of all phenomena in His universe. It nevertheless remains our duty to explore how the Torah could apply apparently contradictory terms to contributions made by man rather than by G’d. Ed.] The Talmud in Chagigah 12 sees in the word שדי, the attribute of G’d in His capacity of being able to call a halt to His initiatives, many of which had been assigned to His creatures such as to the oceans and the earth when they received instructions to produce living creatures in the waters and also vegetation on earth. (Compare Genesis 1,20 and 1,24 respectively) It was natural for these “agents” of G’d to use the powers entrusted to them freely, without restriction, so that G’d had to impose limits in order to prevent possible new “chaos” in the universe, one which He had set out to replace by order on the first day of creation. This is all part of the concept of צמצום, “restraint,” imposed by G’d both upon Himself and on those of His creatures not granted בחירה, free will, i.e. human beings. G’d had to impose these limits on His agents, as precisely because they were only agents, מלאכים, they had not been equipped with the ability to understand what G’d had intended in parts of the universe that were not within their parameters. When a creature is showered with too much largesse, it is not a blessing but is liable to prove destructive unless checked. (Compare Yevamot 47 where we are told that even the Israelites while living in their mortal shells on earth are not able to absorb all the goodness or punishment they deserve )
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Mareh Yechezkel on Torah
And that is the meaning of that which is written, “Let Us make man.” Meaning to say, in partnership [with man], by way of the act of circumcision from below. And that is the meaning of that which was said (Yevamot 61a), “[Jews] are called Adam (a man).” Meaning to say, it is [like] the expression, “I will resemble (edameh) the Most High” (Isaiah 14:14) – for he takes the image of God upon himself. And that is the meaning of that which is written in the Midrash (Avot D'Rabbi Natan 2:5), “Adam (the first man) was born circumcised, as it is stated (Genesis 1:24), ‘And God created man (Adam) in His image.’” And that is why this commandment is hinted to at the beginning of the parasha, with the expression, “Bereshit” - bet reshit (two beginning[s]). That is that the Torah is called, the beginning; and circumcision is also [the beginning, in that] it is the first commandment of a man. “And the end of a matter is better than (tov me the beginning of it” (Ecclesiastes 7:8) – meaning to say, when he is good from (tov me) his beginning.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Numbers 21,17. “then Israel sang this song: ‘come up, well sing to it- the well which chieftains dug which the nobles of the people started, etc;’” We need to understand why the song that the people under the leadership of Moses sang after the drowning of the Egyptians in the sea, were words that we could easily understand, whereas this song is shrouded in mystical allusions none of which are easy to decipher.
The answer to this question may lie in the fact that at the sea of Reeds, Moses had seen revelations by G’d in what is known as אספקלריא המאירה, “a clear vision” (compare Yevamot 49) so that he could announce his prophecies without having to resort to allusions.
The song we read here was not composed by Moses, but the Torah wrote: “then Israel sung, etc.” In other words, the people had been divinely inspired, but being only people, not Moses, they had seen prophetic insights only through the prism of אספקלריא שאיננה מאירה, a vision which was distorted through reflections. Rashi on 21,20 already asks the question why the name of Moses is not mentioned in this paragraph. He answers that the reason is that on account of this well, or rather its having failed after Miriam’s death having caused him to be punished, it would not have been fitting to associate his name when singing the praises of this well.
Let us now proceed to explain the allusions contained in this poetic song extolling the well.
Sometimes G’d will perform a miracle for the Israelites in response to their cry to Him for help, and this is the manner in which He responds to their outcry. The splitting of the sea of Reeds at the time was an example of G’d’s responding by means of an impressive miracle. We have read in Exodus 14,10: ויצעקו בני ישראל וגו', “the Israelites cried out, etc,” The splitting of the sea was G’d’s response to that outcry.
On other occasions G’d performs a miracle for the people without their being in need, i.e. according to their perception. The people had not even been aware at that time that deadly danger was near them. When wondering why G’d had performed a miracle for them, they investigated what danger could have lurked near them without their having been aware of it. This was the case in the paragraph above where the people only belatedly became aware of the Canaanites that G’d had killed.
We are entitled to ask what prompted G’d to reveal these details in the Torah which Rashi describes as the Canaanites having been hidden in clefts of rock overhanging the Arnon river that were invisible to people passing underneath along its banks. In the kedushah formula according to the Sefardi nussach which begins with the word: כתר, we encounter the line הן גאלתי אתכם אחרית כראשית, “see I will redeem you in the future just as I have redeemed you in the past.” At first glance this does not seem much of a promise; we had surely hoped that the ultimate redemption will be something far superior to the partial redemptions we have experienced from time to time! In light of that why would the author of this line link the final redemption to previous redemptions? Who has ever heard of the major event being linked to the minor event?
Did not our sages (Tannah de bey Eliyahu 14) state that the meaning of the opening word of the Torah, בראשית is בשביל ראשית, “on account of the people of Israel who are called ראשית, the Lord created heaven and earth?” If all parts of the universe were created on account of the Jewish people, this surely means that there is a constant injection of additional essence of life into the earth itself, on account of the pre-eminence of the Jewish people? It would follow that the earth is therefore obligated to conform to the expressed will of the Jewish people, since its very existence hinges on the well being of the Jewish people. Keeping the universe in a condition that ensures its continued existence, i.e. תקון העולם is the earth’s self interest.
It is true that only after the final stage of the universe’s creation had been revealed, i.e. the earth and its inhabitants, had it become clear what had been in the mind of the Creator from the moment He had contemplated creating a universe. At that time all could see that the intervening stages of creation had all been leading up to the creation of the Jewish people as the crowning achievement. This is what the author of the line we quoted from the kedushah had in mind when he wrote: אתכם אחרית כראשית, “you in the end as at the beginning.” Only after the final redemption will G’d’s plan for the Jewish people become revealed as having been His plan from the earliest moment of the creative process.
As long as Jewish history on this earth has not yet come to its successful conclusion (history in the sense of development) G’d’s original intentions could not have become manifest to one and all. During the period leading up to this point in Jewish history miracles have to be performed at the request of the Jewish people. Once that period has passed successfully, miracles will be performed by nature on behalf of the Jewish people without their having to ask for them. The day (not literally) prior to the revelation at Mount Sinai, when the design of G’d that the Jewish people are the objective of His creation of the universe had become manifest, this had not yet been common knowledge. This is why we read in Exodus 14,10 when Pharaoh had caught up with the Israelites, that ויצעקו בני ישראל, “the Children of Israel cried out,” i.e. asked to be saved by means of a miracle. Now at the time of or after the giving of the Torah when G’d’s original plan that His people would be the Jewish people had become well known, there was no need for them to cry out even if the enemy had lain in ambush. At this time and subsequently, the earth, for reasons of self preservation, would not allow fatal harm to befall Israel as it would suffer the consequences itself. Calling on the source of water to arise, i.e. to become manifest, was therefore a command directed at the earth rather than to G’d.
The Israelites reminded the earth of its self-interest in providing the Jewish people with a source of water for their needs in the desert. This is what Rashi had in mind when he commented on the words ענו לה, (verse 14-15) that the mountain addressed was part of Eretz Yisrael. The song was in recognition of what the earth had done, (performed miracles) on behalf of the Jewish people without having been asked to do so.
The answer to this question may lie in the fact that at the sea of Reeds, Moses had seen revelations by G’d in what is known as אספקלריא המאירה, “a clear vision” (compare Yevamot 49) so that he could announce his prophecies without having to resort to allusions.
The song we read here was not composed by Moses, but the Torah wrote: “then Israel sung, etc.” In other words, the people had been divinely inspired, but being only people, not Moses, they had seen prophetic insights only through the prism of אספקלריא שאיננה מאירה, a vision which was distorted through reflections. Rashi on 21,20 already asks the question why the name of Moses is not mentioned in this paragraph. He answers that the reason is that on account of this well, or rather its having failed after Miriam’s death having caused him to be punished, it would not have been fitting to associate his name when singing the praises of this well.
Let us now proceed to explain the allusions contained in this poetic song extolling the well.
Sometimes G’d will perform a miracle for the Israelites in response to their cry to Him for help, and this is the manner in which He responds to their outcry. The splitting of the sea of Reeds at the time was an example of G’d’s responding by means of an impressive miracle. We have read in Exodus 14,10: ויצעקו בני ישראל וגו', “the Israelites cried out, etc,” The splitting of the sea was G’d’s response to that outcry.
On other occasions G’d performs a miracle for the people without their being in need, i.e. according to their perception. The people had not even been aware at that time that deadly danger was near them. When wondering why G’d had performed a miracle for them, they investigated what danger could have lurked near them without their having been aware of it. This was the case in the paragraph above where the people only belatedly became aware of the Canaanites that G’d had killed.
We are entitled to ask what prompted G’d to reveal these details in the Torah which Rashi describes as the Canaanites having been hidden in clefts of rock overhanging the Arnon river that were invisible to people passing underneath along its banks. In the kedushah formula according to the Sefardi nussach which begins with the word: כתר, we encounter the line הן גאלתי אתכם אחרית כראשית, “see I will redeem you in the future just as I have redeemed you in the past.” At first glance this does not seem much of a promise; we had surely hoped that the ultimate redemption will be something far superior to the partial redemptions we have experienced from time to time! In light of that why would the author of this line link the final redemption to previous redemptions? Who has ever heard of the major event being linked to the minor event?
Did not our sages (Tannah de bey Eliyahu 14) state that the meaning of the opening word of the Torah, בראשית is בשביל ראשית, “on account of the people of Israel who are called ראשית, the Lord created heaven and earth?” If all parts of the universe were created on account of the Jewish people, this surely means that there is a constant injection of additional essence of life into the earth itself, on account of the pre-eminence of the Jewish people? It would follow that the earth is therefore obligated to conform to the expressed will of the Jewish people, since its very existence hinges on the well being of the Jewish people. Keeping the universe in a condition that ensures its continued existence, i.e. תקון העולם is the earth’s self interest.
It is true that only after the final stage of the universe’s creation had been revealed, i.e. the earth and its inhabitants, had it become clear what had been in the mind of the Creator from the moment He had contemplated creating a universe. At that time all could see that the intervening stages of creation had all been leading up to the creation of the Jewish people as the crowning achievement. This is what the author of the line we quoted from the kedushah had in mind when he wrote: אתכם אחרית כראשית, “you in the end as at the beginning.” Only after the final redemption will G’d’s plan for the Jewish people become revealed as having been His plan from the earliest moment of the creative process.
As long as Jewish history on this earth has not yet come to its successful conclusion (history in the sense of development) G’d’s original intentions could not have become manifest to one and all. During the period leading up to this point in Jewish history miracles have to be performed at the request of the Jewish people. Once that period has passed successfully, miracles will be performed by nature on behalf of the Jewish people without their having to ask for them. The day (not literally) prior to the revelation at Mount Sinai, when the design of G’d that the Jewish people are the objective of His creation of the universe had become manifest, this had not yet been common knowledge. This is why we read in Exodus 14,10 when Pharaoh had caught up with the Israelites, that ויצעקו בני ישראל, “the Children of Israel cried out,” i.e. asked to be saved by means of a miracle. Now at the time of or after the giving of the Torah when G’d’s original plan that His people would be the Jewish people had become well known, there was no need for them to cry out even if the enemy had lain in ambush. At this time and subsequently, the earth, for reasons of self preservation, would not allow fatal harm to befall Israel as it would suffer the consequences itself. Calling on the source of water to arise, i.e. to become manifest, was therefore a command directed at the earth rather than to G’d.
The Israelites reminded the earth of its self-interest in providing the Jewish people with a source of water for their needs in the desert. This is what Rashi had in mind when he commented on the words ענו לה, (verse 14-15) that the mountain addressed was part of Eretz Yisrael. The song was in recognition of what the earth had done, (performed miracles) on behalf of the Jewish people without having been asked to do so.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Deuteronomy 27,8. you will inscribe on these stones all these words of the Torah, very clearly.”
A look at Rashi’s comment on the expression will reveal that he understands this as a translation of the entire Torah into 70 languages.
[According to Rabbi Eliyahu Mizrachi, foremost super commentary on Rashi, Rashi may have arrived at this interpretation when considering that the letters of the word היטב when converted into what is known as tzeyrufim, ”letter permutation,” ה, הי, היט, היטב, add up to a numerical value of 70. Ed.]
Still, we must try and understand what prompted Moses to command at this point that the Torah be made available in indelible writing (engraved on stone) in all the known languages of that time. We may find the answer in Rashi’s commentary on the very first verse in the Torah, where he said (based on Bereshit Rabbah 1,3) that the reason why the Torah commenced with the statement that G’d had created heaven and earth, was so that when an international Court of Law would declare the Israelites’ conquest and subsequent dispossession of the seven Canaanite nations illegal, we would respond that the Canaanites themselves had claimed territorial rights to an earth that belonged exclusively to G’d who had created it. Surely the owner had the right to re-allocate the earth to tenants of His choosing.
The whole idea behind G’d’s commandments to take stones from the Jordan river and (erect them near Mount Gerizim) to inscribe in them the Torah in all the known languages was that if the Israelites, at this time, prepared to take possession of the lands of the Canaanites they would do so with the owner’s permission, nay, at the Owner’s instructions. Moreover, this should remind the nations of the world that the reason they were now being dispossessed was because they had refused to accept this very Torah when they had been given the opportunity to accept it. Seeing that the Israelites were the only nation willing to accept the Torah, most of whose commandments can only be observed in the land which up to then had belonged to the Canaanites, the Canaanites were now forced to abandon it or die in the struggle to hang on to it.
A look at Rashi’s comment on the expression will reveal that he understands this as a translation of the entire Torah into 70 languages.
[According to Rabbi Eliyahu Mizrachi, foremost super commentary on Rashi, Rashi may have arrived at this interpretation when considering that the letters of the word היטב when converted into what is known as tzeyrufim, ”letter permutation,” ה, הי, היט, היטב, add up to a numerical value of 70. Ed.]
Still, we must try and understand what prompted Moses to command at this point that the Torah be made available in indelible writing (engraved on stone) in all the known languages of that time. We may find the answer in Rashi’s commentary on the very first verse in the Torah, where he said (based on Bereshit Rabbah 1,3) that the reason why the Torah commenced with the statement that G’d had created heaven and earth, was so that when an international Court of Law would declare the Israelites’ conquest and subsequent dispossession of the seven Canaanite nations illegal, we would respond that the Canaanites themselves had claimed territorial rights to an earth that belonged exclusively to G’d who had created it. Surely the owner had the right to re-allocate the earth to tenants of His choosing.
The whole idea behind G’d’s commandments to take stones from the Jordan river and (erect them near Mount Gerizim) to inscribe in them the Torah in all the known languages was that if the Israelites, at this time, prepared to take possession of the lands of the Canaanites they would do so with the owner’s permission, nay, at the Owner’s instructions. Moreover, this should remind the nations of the world that the reason they were now being dispossessed was because they had refused to accept this very Torah when they had been given the opportunity to accept it. Seeing that the Israelites were the only nation willing to accept the Torah, most of whose commandments can only be observed in the land which up to then had belonged to the Canaanites, the Canaanites were now forced to abandon it or die in the struggle to hang on to it.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Sha'ar HaEmunah VeYesod HaChasidut
It is written in the Midrash Rabbah (Bereshit, 4): “And God made the firmament in the midst of the waters” (Bereshit 1:7). This is one of the verses where Ben Zoma’s262Ben Zoma was considered to be one of the greatest interpreters of the Torah of his day (2nd century, CE). He was one of the four sages who “entered the Orchard” of mystical experience. The other three being Ben Azzai, Elisha ben Abuya, and R. Akiva. Due to the intense nature of the experience, Ben Zoma went mad, Ben Azzai died, and Elisha ben Abuya became a heretic and was subsquently known as Acher – “Other.” Only R. Akiva entered and departed in peace. explanation shook the world and perplexed the sages.263The following passage from the tractate Hagiga (15a) describes the incident: Our Rabbis taught: Once Rabbi Yehoshua ben Hananiya was standing on a step on the Temple Mount, and Ben Zoma saw him and did not stand up before him. So Rabbi Yehoshua said to him, “What are you contemplating, Ben Zoma?” He replied, “I was gazing between the upper and the lower waters, and there is only three fingerbreadths between them, for it is said (Bereshit 1:6), And the spirit of God hovered over the face of the waters - like a dove which hovers over her young without touching them.” Thereupon Rabbi Yehoshua said to his students, “Ben Zoma is still outside.” See now, when was it that ‘the spirit of God hovered over the face of the water? It was on the first day of Creation. But the division took place on the second day, for it is written: And let it divide the waters from the waters!’ And what is the size of the division? Rabbi Akha ben Yaakov said, “a hair’s breadth.” According to R. Gershon Hanokh, Ben Zoma was attributing the division between G-d and creation to the very roots of reality – to the first day of creation. However, as Rabbi Yehoshua pointed out, the division between G-d and creation only occurred on the second day, with the creation of the firmament. And even in those terms, Ben Zoma was still wrong, as he perceived a significant division between the upper and lower worlds (three fingerbreadths), whereas the division is no more than a hair; meaning to say, the division between G-d and creation is extremely slight, and exists only from the human perspective, as explained above. For further discussion of this see Living Waters: The Mei HaShiloach, (Tr. Betzalel Edwards), Parshat Emor, on the verse, “and you shall not do so in your land.” Wasn’t the creation of the firmament already included in the statement (Tehillim, 33:6), “The heavens were created with God’s word, and the spirit of His breath all their hosts”?264Verse six in the first chapter of Genesis says, “And God said, let there be a firmament.” Verse seven says, “And God made the firmament.” Yet the psalm teaches us, “The heavens were created with God’s word,” meaning, God’s word created the universe immediately. Thus, if the firmament was already created in verse six, why in verse seven does it say, “God made the firmament”? To Ben Zoma, this implied a division between G-d and His actions. Rashi explains to us that Ben Zoma perplexed the sages by saying that he gazed and saw that the distance between the upper and lower waters was three fingerbreadths. The Midrash goes on to say that it was not long after this that he died. Concerning the creation of the firmament and the division of the waters, the Ramban asked why in verse 6 the Torah says, “Let there be a firmament in the waters,” and then again in verse 7 it says, “And God made the firmament.” Wasn’t the firmament already made in verse 6?265According to Ramban, this is the exact problem that bothered Ben Zoma. It was not only on account of the word, “He made” since on the fourth, fifth, and sixth days it also says, “He made.” Rather, Ben Zoma’s problem was that on other days, immediately after God’s utterance (“let there be”), it is written, “and it was so.” This implies that it came into being immediately after the utterance. Yet on the second day, after it says, “and God said, let there be a firmament,” it goes on to say, “and He made.” (before it says, “and it was so.”) The Ramban suggests that Ben Zoma had some secret interpretation of the verse that he did not want to reveal. (See the Ramban for his own reconciliation of this problem.) Truly, both explanations are true and one. The mistake of Ben Zoma was that he posited too great a distance between the upper and the lower waters. This is the meaning of the statement, “Ben Zoma glimpsed and died.”266According to the Babylonian Talmud, Ben Zoma went mad, but Ben Azzai died. According to Palestinian Tamud, Ben Zoma died, and Ben Azzai went mad. The Mei HaShiloach gives a brief explanation of this. The Gemara (Hagiga, 15b) records Ben Zoma saying, “I was gazing between the upper and the lower waters, and there is only three fingerbreadths between them.” Upon hearing this, Rabbi Yehoshua said to his students, “Ben Zoma is still on the outside.”267Simply explained, this means after his mystical experience, Ben Zoma’s perception became damaged, and the sages of his day felt that they could no longer rely upon him. On a deeper level, R. Yehoshua may have been saying that Ben Zoma perception was outside the realm of unity. What was the actual distance between the upper and lower waters? “Rabbi Aha ben Yaakov said a hairbreadth. And the Rabbis said the space between the boards of a narrow bridge. Mar Zutra (or maybe Rav Assi) said as the space between two garments spread one over the other; and others say, the space between two cups fitted one over the other.” The subject of the space between the upper waters and the lower waters is hinted at in the matter of the firmament, which alludes to the separation between the upper and lower worlds. The creation of the firmament made a division between the upper and lower worlds, as it is written in the Zohar (Bereshit, 17a): “And God said, let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters.” (Bereshit, 1:6) This is the secret of the rectification, specifically of the separation between the upper and lower waters, in the secret of the left… A conflict that is arrayed as above,268D. Matt’s translation was partially used in this passage. which rises and does descend,269Meaning, a conflict exists in this world, similar to the conflict above – i.e. the division between heaven and earth; that is the Talmudic debate between Shammai and Hillel, which was a “makhloket l’shem shamayim” – a dispute for the sake of Heaven, and ultimately reconciled (Pirkei Avot, 5:17), just as the division between heaven and earth will ultimately be reconciled. The opposite is the conflict of Korah, which was a a “makhloket sh’lo l’shem shamayim” – not for the sake of heaven, and thus will not endure. It is similar to the false division perceived by Ben Zoma. and which exists on a straight path, is the dispute of Shammai and Hillel. There God separated between the two and reconciled them. Since this was a conflict for the sake of Heaven, the Heavens mediated the conflict, and because of this it endures.270Matt renders, “and upon this conflict the world was established,” based on another version. This is akin to the creation of the world. Korah (in his dispute with Moshe) went against the work of creation. He was in dispute with the heavens. He wanted to contradict the words of Torah. In his dispute he was certainly cleaving to hell, and hell clove to him. This secret is written in the book of Adam. The reason for the separation between the upper and lower realms is in order give man the ability to serve God. The division creates darkness and a concealment of the Divine Presence. Man can then serve God through the power of his own free choice. This is as was mentioned above in the Tikkunei Zohar (Tikkun 70) and is mentioned in the Zohar (Tetsave, 184a): Man only serves God from amidst darkness…271G-d’s worship is not complete until it arises out of man’s free will. But in order for many to have free will, he cannot be aware of G-d’s presence. A level of darkness, concealment, or “division” between the upper and lower worlds must exist. Therefore God created the “Tree of Doubt” which is the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.272The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil represents the consciousness that perceives a separation between heaven and earth. When it is used to bring man closer to G-d, it is called a “controversy (i.e. division) for the sake of heaven.” However, when the dualistic perception is taken to its most negative extreme, it posits an unbridgeable gap, which is the root of all irreconcilable controversies, that are “not for the sake of heaven.” In this way man can serve God out of this very uncertainty. This is as it is said (ibid.): Light is only that which comes out of darkness. When this side is subdued, the Holy One, blessed be He, ascends above, and His Glory is magnified.273The only true service of God is that which arises from a situation of doubt and confusion. Indeed, from the downward evolutions and concatenations of the branches of the Tree of Doubt, there eventually arises the phenomenon of the dispute which is not for the sake of Heaven, like the dispute of Korah.274The Radziner is presenting a tremendously novel concept, namely that the root of all earthly conflicts lie in the contradiction between God’s omnipresence and His concealment. Though He is everywhere, as the Torah states, “there is none else besides Him,” yet our normal human perceptions contradict this. Similarly, though God directs everything in the world, we still have free choice to do as we please. Yet, it is the concealment of the Divine that provides us with the ability to freely serve Him. When the Zohar says, “The Heavens mediated this conflict, and thus it endures,” it means that only through God’s illumination can the human mind grasp the reconciliation of these paradoxes. This is because the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil also contains separate evil. This is included in the divine utterance of creation, “Let there be a firmament,” – which is separate – and creates a division between the upper and lower realms.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Sha'ar HaEmunah VeYesod HaChasidut
It is written in the Midrash Rabbah (Bereshit, 4): “And God made the firmament in the midst of the waters” (Bereshit 1:7). This is one of the verses where Ben Zoma’s262Ben Zoma was considered to be one of the greatest interpreters of the Torah of his day (2nd century, CE). He was one of the four sages who “entered the Orchard” of mystical experience. The other three being Ben Azzai, Elisha ben Abuya, and R. Akiva. Due to the intense nature of the experience, Ben Zoma went mad, Ben Azzai died, and Elisha ben Abuya became a heretic and was subsquently known as Acher – “Other.” Only R. Akiva entered and departed in peace. explanation shook the world and perplexed the sages.263The following passage from the tractate Hagiga (15a) describes the incident: Our Rabbis taught: Once Rabbi Yehoshua ben Hananiya was standing on a step on the Temple Mount, and Ben Zoma saw him and did not stand up before him. So Rabbi Yehoshua said to him, “What are you contemplating, Ben Zoma?” He replied, “I was gazing between the upper and the lower waters, and there is only three fingerbreadths between them, for it is said (Bereshit 1:6), And the spirit of God hovered over the face of the waters - like a dove which hovers over her young without touching them.” Thereupon Rabbi Yehoshua said to his students, “Ben Zoma is still outside.” See now, when was it that ‘the spirit of God hovered over the face of the water? It was on the first day of Creation. But the division took place on the second day, for it is written: And let it divide the waters from the waters!’ And what is the size of the division? Rabbi Akha ben Yaakov said, “a hair’s breadth.” According to R. Gershon Hanokh, Ben Zoma was attributing the division between G-d and creation to the very roots of reality – to the first day of creation. However, as Rabbi Yehoshua pointed out, the division between G-d and creation only occurred on the second day, with the creation of the firmament. And even in those terms, Ben Zoma was still wrong, as he perceived a significant division between the upper and lower worlds (three fingerbreadths), whereas the division is no more than a hair; meaning to say, the division between G-d and creation is extremely slight, and exists only from the human perspective, as explained above. For further discussion of this see Living Waters: The Mei HaShiloach, (Tr. Betzalel Edwards), Parshat Emor, on the verse, “and you shall not do so in your land.” Wasn’t the creation of the firmament already included in the statement (Tehillim, 33:6), “The heavens were created with God’s word, and the spirit of His breath all their hosts”?264Verse six in the first chapter of Genesis says, “And God said, let there be a firmament.” Verse seven says, “And God made the firmament.” Yet the psalm teaches us, “The heavens were created with God’s word,” meaning, God’s word created the universe immediately. Thus, if the firmament was already created in verse six, why in verse seven does it say, “God made the firmament”? To Ben Zoma, this implied a division between G-d and His actions. Rashi explains to us that Ben Zoma perplexed the sages by saying that he gazed and saw that the distance between the upper and lower waters was three fingerbreadths. The Midrash goes on to say that it was not long after this that he died. Concerning the creation of the firmament and the division of the waters, the Ramban asked why in verse 6 the Torah says, “Let there be a firmament in the waters,” and then again in verse 7 it says, “And God made the firmament.” Wasn’t the firmament already made in verse 6?265According to Ramban, this is the exact problem that bothered Ben Zoma. It was not only on account of the word, “He made” since on the fourth, fifth, and sixth days it also says, “He made.” Rather, Ben Zoma’s problem was that on other days, immediately after God’s utterance (“let there be”), it is written, “and it was so.” This implies that it came into being immediately after the utterance. Yet on the second day, after it says, “and God said, let there be a firmament,” it goes on to say, “and He made.” (before it says, “and it was so.”) The Ramban suggests that Ben Zoma had some secret interpretation of the verse that he did not want to reveal. (See the Ramban for his own reconciliation of this problem.) Truly, both explanations are true and one. The mistake of Ben Zoma was that he posited too great a distance between the upper and the lower waters. This is the meaning of the statement, “Ben Zoma glimpsed and died.”266According to the Babylonian Talmud, Ben Zoma went mad, but Ben Azzai died. According to Palestinian Tamud, Ben Zoma died, and Ben Azzai went mad. The Mei HaShiloach gives a brief explanation of this. The Gemara (Hagiga, 15b) records Ben Zoma saying, “I was gazing between the upper and the lower waters, and there is only three fingerbreadths between them.” Upon hearing this, Rabbi Yehoshua said to his students, “Ben Zoma is still on the outside.”267Simply explained, this means after his mystical experience, Ben Zoma’s perception became damaged, and the sages of his day felt that they could no longer rely upon him. On a deeper level, R. Yehoshua may have been saying that Ben Zoma perception was outside the realm of unity. What was the actual distance between the upper and lower waters? “Rabbi Aha ben Yaakov said a hairbreadth. And the Rabbis said the space between the boards of a narrow bridge. Mar Zutra (or maybe Rav Assi) said as the space between two garments spread one over the other; and others say, the space between two cups fitted one over the other.” The subject of the space between the upper waters and the lower waters is hinted at in the matter of the firmament, which alludes to the separation between the upper and lower worlds. The creation of the firmament made a division between the upper and lower worlds, as it is written in the Zohar (Bereshit, 17a): “And God said, let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters.” (Bereshit, 1:6) This is the secret of the rectification, specifically of the separation between the upper and lower waters, in the secret of the left… A conflict that is arrayed as above,268D. Matt’s translation was partially used in this passage. which rises and does descend,269Meaning, a conflict exists in this world, similar to the conflict above – i.e. the division between heaven and earth; that is the Talmudic debate between Shammai and Hillel, which was a “makhloket l’shem shamayim” – a dispute for the sake of Heaven, and ultimately reconciled (Pirkei Avot, 5:17), just as the division between heaven and earth will ultimately be reconciled. The opposite is the conflict of Korah, which was a a “makhloket sh’lo l’shem shamayim” – not for the sake of heaven, and thus will not endure. It is similar to the false division perceived by Ben Zoma. and which exists on a straight path, is the dispute of Shammai and Hillel. There God separated between the two and reconciled them. Since this was a conflict for the sake of Heaven, the Heavens mediated the conflict, and because of this it endures.270Matt renders, “and upon this conflict the world was established,” based on another version. This is akin to the creation of the world. Korah (in his dispute with Moshe) went against the work of creation. He was in dispute with the heavens. He wanted to contradict the words of Torah. In his dispute he was certainly cleaving to hell, and hell clove to him. This secret is written in the book of Adam. The reason for the separation between the upper and lower realms is in order give man the ability to serve God. The division creates darkness and a concealment of the Divine Presence. Man can then serve God through the power of his own free choice. This is as was mentioned above in the Tikkunei Zohar (Tikkun 70) and is mentioned in the Zohar (Tetsave, 184a): Man only serves God from amidst darkness…271G-d’s worship is not complete until it arises out of man’s free will. But in order for many to have free will, he cannot be aware of G-d’s presence. A level of darkness, concealment, or “division” between the upper and lower worlds must exist. Therefore God created the “Tree of Doubt” which is the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.272The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil represents the consciousness that perceives a separation between heaven and earth. When it is used to bring man closer to G-d, it is called a “controversy (i.e. division) for the sake of heaven.” However, when the dualistic perception is taken to its most negative extreme, it posits an unbridgeable gap, which is the root of all irreconcilable controversies, that are “not for the sake of heaven.” In this way man can serve God out of this very uncertainty. This is as it is said (ibid.): Light is only that which comes out of darkness. When this side is subdued, the Holy One, blessed be He, ascends above, and His Glory is magnified.273The only true service of God is that which arises from a situation of doubt and confusion. Indeed, from the downward evolutions and concatenations of the branches of the Tree of Doubt, there eventually arises the phenomenon of the dispute which is not for the sake of Heaven, like the dispute of Korah.274The Radziner is presenting a tremendously novel concept, namely that the root of all earthly conflicts lie in the contradiction between God’s omnipresence and His concealment. Though He is everywhere, as the Torah states, “there is none else besides Him,” yet our normal human perceptions contradict this. Similarly, though God directs everything in the world, we still have free choice to do as we please. Yet, it is the concealment of the Divine that provides us with the ability to freely serve Him. When the Zohar says, “The Heavens mediated this conflict, and thus it endures,” it means that only through God’s illumination can the human mind grasp the reconciliation of these paradoxes. This is because the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil also contains separate evil. This is included in the divine utterance of creation, “Let there be a firmament,” – which is separate – and creates a division between the upper and lower realms.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Leviticus 23,15. “you shall count for yourselves from the day following the festival, (Passover) etc.;” we need to understand first of all why the festival of Passover is referred to as Hashabbat in our verse. This has been explained by our sages, (Tanna de bey Eliyahu 14) where the author interprets the word בראשית as meaning בשביל ישראל, “for the sake of Israel.” Granted that this is true, it did however, not come to the attention of the world until G’d redeemed Israel from Egypt when His love for His people manifested itself. As a result, Passover became similar to the Sabbath. The Sabbath is unique as on the Sabbath G’d abstained from His creative activity, whereas, according to the Zohar, on Passover He abstained from entertaining thoughts. When G’d “rested” on the original Sabbath His work during the preceding six days was revealed for the first time. Similarly, His love for the Jewish people was revealed for the first time on the occasion of the redemption from Egypt, i.e. the day of the Exodus. On the first day of Passover it finally became clear why G’d had bothered to create the universe altogether. In other words, Passover may be looked upon as the logical conclusion of what had been set in motion the moment G’d had first thought of the people of Israel as a project for the future. This is also the meaning of a statement of the sages in Shabbat 118 that if the Israelites were to observe two Sabbath days, i.e. the terrestrial Sabbath as well as the celestial Sabbath, they would be redeemed immediately. The scholar to whom this statement is attributed quoted Isaiah 56,4 in support, where G’d promises redemption to the eunuchs who keep His Sabbaths, following up in verse 7 with: “and I will bring them to the Mountain of My holiness etc,. etc.” The “two” Sabbaths of which the Talmud speaks are not to be understood quantitatively, i.e. 2 separate Sabbath days, but refer to the שבת תחתון and the שבט עליון, observance of the Sabbath with our body, i.e. תחתון, and at the same time observing it with our hearts and minds, i.e. שבת עליון, the Sabbath in our upper regions, our heads. The more the Israelites engage in serving the Lord, the clearer it will become that G’d only created the universe on account of the Israelites. There is an allusion to this in the letters of the words מן פסח when we reverse the order of the aleph bet, i.e. that the letter א=ת, ב-ש, ג=ר etc. [Magen Avraham on the laws of the New Moon chapter 428, subsection 3 deals with this in greater detail, i.e. that certain festivals must occur on the weekdays corresponding to other festivals preceding them during the same year. Ed.] ...
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Me'or Einayim
[Regarding] the statement in the Holy Zohar, “Come to Pharaoh (Ex. 10:1) – it should have said ‘go to Pharaoh!’” (cf. Zohar Bo, 2:34a), as well as the question posed by the commentators, which I wrote above – the miracle of the Exodus from Egypt was that the Awareness was in exile with wicked Pharaoh in Egypt; and therefore Israel was exiled there to bring the Awareness from there. And the difficulty of the servitude made it whole, as is stated in Tikkunei Zohar: “And the Egyptians made the children of Israel to serve… in mortar [be-homer] (Ex. 1:13-14), that is [the logical argument of] ‘…and certainly…’ [kal ve-homer]; and in brick [oo-vil’venim] (Ex. 1:14), that is the heating [libbun] of halakhah; and in all manner of service in the field (Ex. 1:14), that is the external sources; in all their service, wherein they made them serve with rigor [b’farekh] (Ex. 1:14), that is argumentation [pirkha]” (Tikkun 9, Supplement 147a), which is to say that all of this was in exile in Egypt. And through their servitude they took the Awareness, which is the Torah, out of the exile. When they served in mortar they brought [the logical argument of] “…and certainly…” out of the exile, and so on for all the other servitudes as we have stated. And therefore when Moses our Teacher, peace be upon him, said, Behold, the people of Israel have not listened to me [ – How then shall Pharaoh listen to me] (Ex. 6:12), and Rashi explained, “This is one of ten ‘…and certainly…’ [arguments] in the Torah,” that is to say that when [Moses] said this “…and certainly…” [argument] he brought the “…and certainly…” [argument] in the Torah out of the exile. For the all of the Torah was in the Egyptian exile, since the Awareness was in exile; and the Awareness is the Torah. Now, the Torah begins with [the letter] bet, In the beginning [God] created etc. (Gen. 1:1); but why didn’t the Torah begin with aleph, which is the first of all the letters? Because [if that were the case] the world would not be able to exist for even one hour, and would be nullified from existence because of the letter aleph’s great brightness, since it alludes to the Champion [aluf] of the World, who is Blessed God in [God’s] Glory and [God’s] Essence, as if it were possible. But because the LORD God is a sun and shield (Psalm 84:12) – which is to say just like one can not look at the sun because of its great brightness, only by way of a shade or a shield can one look at the sun’s light – so too, as if it were possible, with a thousand thousands of thousands of distinctions without end or boundary, would it be impossible to exist because of the letter aleph’s great brightness, since it is the Champion of the World. Only by way of a shade or a shield, which is the letter bet – [only] through it does it become possible to constrain the letter aleph so that it can also be in the Torah. For after the letter bet in bereshit we find several alephs, in the word bereshit and in the words bara elohim, once it was constrained by the letter bet. And that is [the meaning of] Come [בא] to Pharaoh, which is to say through the bet the aleph will be in the Torah. And since now the Torah is in exile, therefore I have hardened his heart and [the heart of his servants] (Ex. 10:1) so that Israel will serve in mortar and in brick (Ex. 1:14) to bring the Torah out of exile. And as is stated in Tikkunei Zohar, “… in mortar [be-homer] (Ex. 1:13-14), that is [the logical argument of] ‘…and certainly…’ [kal ve-homer],” as we said above – through this they brought [the argument of] “…and certainly…” out of the exile, and so on for the other servitudes. And that is [the meaning of] that I may show these signs [otot] of mine among them (Ex. 10:1), that the letters [otiot], which belong to the Torah, must be taken out of exile. And the verse concludes, that you may tell … how I have toyed (Ex. 10:2), which is to say that I made Myself small since the Awareness was in smallness. And now you may know (Ex. 10:2), as was stated above.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Sha'ar HaEmunah VeYesod HaChasidut
It is written in the Midrash Rabbah (Kohelet, Parsha 1), “‘I wounded, and I will heal.’ (Devarim, 32:39) … Rabbi Yohanan said, ‘I struck’ is not written, but rather ‘I wounded.’ I created a wound275The word for wound – mahatsti – is similar to the word mehitsah, “divider.” in that I made a division between the upper and lower realms whereby the upper realms exist forever, and the lower realms are subject to death. Yet in the time to come, there will no longer be death, as it is written (Yeshayahu, 25:8), ‘He will destroy death forever.’ Rabbi Abba said, furthermore, in the time to come I will return and heal the wound. It is precisely through the division that I bring healing.” The matter of division hints at the positive aspect of separation, which necessitates the existence of free choice, as mentioned above. The result of choosing the good, despite the concealment of God’s presence, is the revelation of the God’s glory in the world. This is as the Gemara says (Rosh Hashanah, 31a), “[What psalm did the Levites recite] on the second day of the week? ‘God is great and greatly praised,’ (Tehillim, 145:3) because He divided His works and ruled over them.” The division of God’s attributes led to the birth of the attribute of Malkhut – G-d’s Kingship – by means of human beings using their power of choice. Before the division, God could not be called, “King.”276Before the division of heaven and earth, God ruled alone. R. Gershon Hanokh uses the term moshel - – a ruler – to define G-d’s reign at that stage. This is unlike a king, who rules through the consent of the people. Thus, it was only on the second day, after the division in creation was formed and something “other” than G-d existed, could the creation willfully crown Him as its King. Thus, on the first day of the week [the Levites recited]; “The earth is God’s and the fullness thereof” (Tehillim, 24:1).277The song that the Levites sung each day of the week corresponded to the six primordial days in which G-d created the world. Since, on the first day of creation, there was not yet a division between heaven and earth, nor was there an independent creation to coronate G-d as King, so, the Levites, on Sunday, sang “The earth is God’s and the fullness thereof.” At that point, the creation belonged solely to G-d. It was then that He acquired, gave over acquisition, and ruled in His world. What does it mean that God, “ruled,” on the first day? He ruled against the will of the creation, without having His sovereignty built upon the free choice of the creation. But since concealment is a prerequisite for choice, it also leads to absence, darkness, and the need for healing. This is hinted at in the Zohar (Bo, 35a), with the secret of the great sea creature:278See Bereshit, 1:21 Then, when the light was hidden above from the gardener,279The Zohar is revealing the secrets of the mystery of creation, which begins on the first day, where God “divided between the light and the darkness.” Before this passage, the Zohar introduced the concept of the Tsaddik (Holy Man, also, alluding to the sefirah of Yesod) who is described as a gardener, who tends, cultivates, and facilitates growth. It also represents Divine providence, which “cultivates,” humankind in particular and the creation as a whole. as mentioned, the first darkness emerged, hitting [the sea creature] on the hole that had been made in its head. And a single thread emerged from between the light that had been hidden and the emerging darkness. This is as it is written, “And God divided between the light and the darkness.” This sea creature,280The sea creature is the Leviathan (see Bereshit 1), representing the highest levels of Hokhmah - Wisdom (ChaBaD of Hokhmah), which are the concealed forces in the upper waters. The Midrash teaches us that there were two Leviathans, the largest creatures of the sea, a male and a female. The female was killed after being created, and its meat was salted and preserved for the Righteous in the time to come. with the separation of the thread, was then divided into the rivers that flow within the darkness.281The thread of light that that the Zohar tells us is emerging from the darkness provides the power of choice and the ability for man in the lower world to choose the good, thereby revealing God’s glory in the world. God created the lower world purely out of His kindness. This is as it is written (Tehillim, 89:3), “For I have said, the world will be built on kindness.” God divided space into six directions.282North, south, east, west, up, down. Each direction representing one of the six lower attributes (Sefirot), and from the division of these six attributes comes the power of choice, which brings forth the seventh and final attribute of Malkhut – Kingship.283Malkhut is the ability to receive God’s light and thereby crown Him as King of the world. This is related to the statement in the Chapters of Rabbi Eliezer, that Kingship only comes about through choice and will. Now, the attributes are divided into Hesed - Lovingkindness, Gevurah - Strength, Tiferet - Beauty, etc.284The revelation of God’s sovereignty is achieved through man actively choosing through which of the six lower attributes that Sovereignty will be revealed. To reveal the aspect of Sovereignty in any one of the attributes, one must draw the light of ChaBaD into that attribute. We have mentioned above that each of the attributes on its own is not intrinsically good. Thus, when any one of the attributes is used without Da’at – Consciousness285Da’at, or Divine consciousness, originates in the intellect, or the upper three sefirot, and is ideally drawn down and infused into the lower revealed sefirot, the attributes of action. The drawing of divine consciousness allows for spiritual growth, much as water and nutrients that flows through the tree allows for the tree to grow. one could make grave blunders, such as showing mercy to cruel people.286This would be a misuse of the trait of Hesed - lovingkindness. See above, Part 2, chapter 2, for a discussion of the misuse or “unclarified” used of the attributes. However, when the six lower attributes287The six lower “revealed” Sefirot are Hesed – Lovingkindness, Gevurah – Strength, Tiferet – Beauty, Netzah –Eternity, Hod – Majesty, and Yesod – Foundation. Each of these corresponds, as well, to elements of the human personality. are illuminated with the light of HaBaD,288HaBaD is the initials of the three upper “intellectual” or “hidden” Sefirot, Hokhmah – Wisdom, Binah – Understanding, and Da’at – Consciousness. HaBaD is the spiritual root of man’s intellectual faculties. and as a result, the sum total of the attributes are used in their proper time and place, then the structure is complete. Then the attribute of Malkhut comes forth as the true completion and perfection of all the attributes, and the light of the Kingship of Heaven shines in its full completeness. Indeed, when a man reaches the point where he is drawing HaBaD into the lower attributes, which is possible only through his concerted efforts in Divine service and striving to know God, it must occur in the same way that Shabbat follows the six days of the week.289The six work days correspond to the six attributes (sefirot), from Hesed to Yesod, with Shabbat corresponding to the Sefirah of Malkhut. Just as free will needs the engagement of all six of these attributes (without which, a person would be emotionally imbalanced, and fall into idolatry, as explained above), which leads to the creation of Malkhut – the willing acceptance of G-d’s kingship – so too, does Shabbat follow the six days of the week. Similarly, with man, this is only possible through efforts at the service of God, crowning God over him as his King, and accepting upon himself the yoke of the Kingship of Heaven. In the world, this idea is hinted at in the place of the Holy Temple, which is a place of lucid Divine service, for it is at that place that God shines His light in its fullness.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Sha'ar HaEmunah VeYesod HaChasidut
Truly, one must know and understand, that from God’s point of view, it is all one, whereas the concealment of God’s presence and separation exist only from man’s point of view. God gave man the power to serve the Divine with his power of choice in order to unify all of the attributes and connect them to their source. Once this is done, he will see that they are, in reality, not even called attributes. This is how Ben Zoma shook the entire world in asserting, “Is it not written that that the Heavens were made by the word of God? And here, after God said, let there be a firmament, it is said, and God made the firmament. Thus, in this place, there is a difference between God saying, and God doing.” The conclusion in the Talmud, after reviewing this statement, was that, “Ben Zoma is still on the outside. But what is the actual distance between the upper and lower waters? Like the space between two garments spread one over the other; or as the space two cups fitted over one another.” That is to say, there is no separation whatsoever.308Likewise, there is no actual separation between God saying and doing. The separation is only an appearance in order to enable man’s ability to serve the Divine. A veil must conceal the source from its effects in the world we live in, for if the source were revealed there would be no impetus from the side of man to perform Divine service. Therefore, in Tehillim 148:4, which describes how all the elements of creation give praise to God, it does not say, “Halleluiah, all of the waters which are below the heavens,” but it says specifically, “all of the waters which are above the heavens,”309The full verses are: “Praise Him, you highest heavens and you waters above the heavens... Praise G-d from the earth, the great sea creatures and all the depths.” The “depths” are mentioned here (תהמות) but not the waters themselves. for the depth below is no more than a vessel,310The depth below refers to the world of concealment in which man lives and exercises his free choice. and not the waters. If the waters are praising the Creator, then, by definition, they are called, “upper waters,” for at such a time of proclaiming God’s praises the lower waters have ascended and are in a state of complete unity with the upper waters. God is constantly occupied with healing the veil of separation, as was mentioned above, in Chapter Seven, with the Midrash Kohellet on the verse, “I have wounded, and will heal.” This is also hinted at in the Zohar (Vayigash, 207a): “God established the heavens with understanding.” (Mishlei, 3:19) What does the word, “establish,” mean? Rather, God establishes each day, never ceasing. He does not fix the world once, but rather fixes the world each and every day. God established that from the creation’s point of view a separation exists, and all that descends from the source in the upper realms to enclothe itself in the lower world takes on the appearance separation. This is as it is written in the Zohar (Bereshit, 22b): All of Rabbi Shimon’s fellowship stood up and said, “Rabbi, Rabbi, is there a separation between Abba and Imma,311The supernal personae (partsufim) expressing the Divine conduct of Wisdom (represented by the partsuf of Abba-Father) and Understanding (representing the partsuf of Imma-Mother) for Abba is in the path of atzilut (the World of Emanation), and the side of Imma in the world of beriya (Creation)?” Rabbi Shimon answered, “My friends, my friends, it is not like this. The Adam312Meaning the partsufim (see previous note). of atzilut is male and female, from the side of Abba and Imma.313The two are cleaving together as one, equal to each other. This is as it is said, ‘Let there be light, and there was light.’ ‘Let there be light,’ comes from the side of Abba, ‘and there was light,’ from the side of Imma.314This follows the principle in the kabbalah whereby Abba represents speech and Imma represents action. This is the meaning of the teaching that Adam was initially created with two faces, one male and one female.315See Bereshit, 1:27 However, the Adam of beriya has no image (tselem) or likeness (d’mut)316See Bereshit, 1:26, “let us make a man in our image and after our likeness.” from Abba and Imma. Rather, the supernal Imma was called by the name whose numerical equivalent is Elo-him (86). This name is, ‘light and darkness.’ As a result of the darkness existing in this name, father said that Adam of beriya would sin in the future.” It is apparent from the Zohar in parshat Kedoshim (page 83a) and in the Tikkunei Zohar (Tikkun 67, page 98b) that sin cannot touch atzilut whatsoever.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Sha'ar HaEmunah VeYesod HaChasidut
Truly, one must know and understand, that from God’s point of view, it is all one, whereas the concealment of God’s presence and separation exist only from man’s point of view. God gave man the power to serve the Divine with his power of choice in order to unify all of the attributes and connect them to their source. Once this is done, he will see that they are, in reality, not even called attributes. This is how Ben Zoma shook the entire world in asserting, “Is it not written that that the Heavens were made by the word of God? And here, after God said, let there be a firmament, it is said, and God made the firmament. Thus, in this place, there is a difference between God saying, and God doing.” The conclusion in the Talmud, after reviewing this statement, was that, “Ben Zoma is still on the outside. But what is the actual distance between the upper and lower waters? Like the space between two garments spread one over the other; or as the space two cups fitted over one another.” That is to say, there is no separation whatsoever.308Likewise, there is no actual separation between God saying and doing. The separation is only an appearance in order to enable man’s ability to serve the Divine. A veil must conceal the source from its effects in the world we live in, for if the source were revealed there would be no impetus from the side of man to perform Divine service. Therefore, in Tehillim 148:4, which describes how all the elements of creation give praise to God, it does not say, “Halleluiah, all of the waters which are below the heavens,” but it says specifically, “all of the waters which are above the heavens,”309The full verses are: “Praise Him, you highest heavens and you waters above the heavens... Praise G-d from the earth, the great sea creatures and all the depths.” The “depths” are mentioned here (תהמות) but not the waters themselves. for the depth below is no more than a vessel,310The depth below refers to the world of concealment in which man lives and exercises his free choice. and not the waters. If the waters are praising the Creator, then, by definition, they are called, “upper waters,” for at such a time of proclaiming God’s praises the lower waters have ascended and are in a state of complete unity with the upper waters. God is constantly occupied with healing the veil of separation, as was mentioned above, in Chapter Seven, with the Midrash Kohellet on the verse, “I have wounded, and will heal.” This is also hinted at in the Zohar (Vayigash, 207a): “God established the heavens with understanding.” (Mishlei, 3:19) What does the word, “establish,” mean? Rather, God establishes each day, never ceasing. He does not fix the world once, but rather fixes the world each and every day. God established that from the creation’s point of view a separation exists, and all that descends from the source in the upper realms to enclothe itself in the lower world takes on the appearance separation. This is as it is written in the Zohar (Bereshit, 22b): All of Rabbi Shimon’s fellowship stood up and said, “Rabbi, Rabbi, is there a separation between Abba and Imma,311The supernal personae (partsufim) expressing the Divine conduct of Wisdom (represented by the partsuf of Abba-Father) and Understanding (representing the partsuf of Imma-Mother) for Abba is in the path of atzilut (the World of Emanation), and the side of Imma in the world of beriya (Creation)?” Rabbi Shimon answered, “My friends, my friends, it is not like this. The Adam312Meaning the partsufim (see previous note). of atzilut is male and female, from the side of Abba and Imma.313The two are cleaving together as one, equal to each other. This is as it is said, ‘Let there be light, and there was light.’ ‘Let there be light,’ comes from the side of Abba, ‘and there was light,’ from the side of Imma.314This follows the principle in the kabbalah whereby Abba represents speech and Imma represents action. This is the meaning of the teaching that Adam was initially created with two faces, one male and one female.315See Bereshit, 1:27 However, the Adam of beriya has no image (tselem) or likeness (d’mut)316See Bereshit, 1:26, “let us make a man in our image and after our likeness.” from Abba and Imma. Rather, the supernal Imma was called by the name whose numerical equivalent is Elo-him (86). This name is, ‘light and darkness.’ As a result of the darkness existing in this name, father said that Adam of beriya would sin in the future.” It is apparent from the Zohar in parshat Kedoshim (page 83a) and in the Tikkunei Zohar (Tikkun 67, page 98b) that sin cannot touch atzilut whatsoever.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bnei Yissaschar
“In the beginning” (Gen. 1:1) is translated [by the Jerusalem Targum] as “With Wisdom” meaning “With the Torah” (See Genesis Rabbah 1:1). Therefore this month is connected to the tribe of Asher, whose portion contains olive oil, which cultivates Wisdom.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Exodus 14,30. “On that day Hashem delivered Israel from the hands of the Egyptians;” The author feels that the words: “on that day,” require further analysis. Seeing that, -as he has told us repeatedly,- the various universes have been created only for the sake of the Jewish people, as Rashi already commented on the opening words of the Torah, בראשית ברא, it follows that when, G’d forbid, hard times hit the Jewish people, the “days” themselves must come to the assistance of the Jewish people and point out good deeds of this people to G’d, as, if we were G’d forbid to disappear, so would these “days,” i.e. all of the world’s history would disappear with the Jewish people. The expression ביום ההוא, “on that day” in our verse, therefore refers to the “day” on which the collective soul of the universe praised the Jewish people to forestall its defeat at the hands of the Egyptians.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
[The following is a short synopsis of a long paragraph, one that deals also with the apparent paradox of the statement in psalms 2,11 עבדו את ה' ביראה וגילו ברעדה, “serve the Lord in awe; rejoice greatly while trembling.” Ed.]
While the description of the state of the universe before man, i.e. Jews, had been charged with the task of being a nation of priests and a holy nation, is meant to make us aware of our duty to live as servants of our Creator and to ensure that His handiwork will prove to be worthwhile, we face a dilemma, portrayed in the following parable.
While the description of the state of the universe before man, i.e. Jews, had been charged with the task of being a nation of priests and a holy nation, is meant to make us aware of our duty to live as servants of our Creator and to ensure that His handiwork will prove to be worthwhile, we face a dilemma, portrayed in the following parable.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Exodus 8:4 “and this is how the lampstand (candlestick) was made, etc.” [I have not figured out, why our author suddenly quotes a verse from Numbers 8,4, instead of using a verse from our portion. Ed.]
We have a rule that there are three types of “love” in the universe, (objects of love). 1) The most common object of love are tangible phenomena. The Torah warns not to “love” certain tangible phenomena. 2) There are some tangible phenomena, which at first glance appear as permissible objects to be loved, but which on closer examination are only symbols of what is permitted to love, i.e. not the object itself but the concepts which the object represent. Therefore, the third type of love is our love for the essence behind the external symbols, the mitzvoth, in this instance, i.e. our love for Hashem.
When we love G’d in this manner, we succeed in helping the “sparks” to return to their original habitat as part of the Sh’chinah, (as explained in our translation on pages 21-23.)
It is not permissible for us to ever claim that there exist phenomena in our universe that are totally apart from their origin, from their holy roots. It is up to us to try and find behind phenomena that appear totally divorced from their holy roots, the point of contact through which such a thread, however slender, still exists. According to our author, the פנימיות, inner essence, of any phenomenon, is a reflection of this “love.” In order to serve the Lord properly, the worshipper must get hold of this “love” and use it as the vehicle with which he relates to his Creator. He considers that other מדות, attributes, virtues, must be used in a similar manner. He claims that there are a total of seven such מדות, virtues, and that the seven arms of the lampstand, or candlestick in the Tabernacle, symbolized these seven virtues. He considers Numbers 8,2 as the key phrase in the Torah referring to this concept, when the Torah writes: בהעלותך את הנרות אל מול פני המנורה יאירו שבעת הנרות, “when you elevate the lights of the lampstand they shall be focused on the center shaft so that all seven lamps will be providing light.” The “centre shaft” symbolizes the Sh’chinah, presence of G’d.
At that point the Torah continues with the words: וזה מעשה המנורה מקשה, “and this is the essential ingredient of this lampstand, it is hammered out of a single piece (of gold)”. This verse teaches that true Judaism when it is practiced with all the required virtues, will result in a completely unified, harmonious personality of the worshipper. It is our task in this multifaceted material universe, to reflect the unity of the Creator by emulating His virtues to the best of our knowledge and ability.
The Torah underlines this by adding: עד ירכה, “to its physical foundation;” this is an allusion to physically permitted love when it serves duly married couples to engage in marital intercourse for the purpose of “uniting” their input through bringing into this universe a child that combines the parents’ best qualities in a single body. [Some of these words are mine, but I trust they reflect the author’s meaning. Ed.]
When the Torah relates how G’d set about creating the first human being, (Genesis 1,26) נעשה אדם בצלמנו, “let Us make man in our image, etc.” the words בצלמנו כדמותנו, “in our image, similar to Our likeness,” are parallel to the description of the candlestick being out of one chunk of gold, עד ירכה עד פרחה, colloquially speaking “from head to toe,” i.e. all of it. Although the human being contains parts difficult to associate with sanctity and holiness, as their function is to turn excess food into excrement, for instance, in the final analysis even dung is connected and remains connected to its Creator in heaven. We are asked to relate with love to that aspect of the phenomenon even if its exterior disgusts us. The word פרחה in Numbers 8,4 whose numerical value is 288, clearly is a hidden reference to the 288 sparks of which we wrote on pages 21-23. The words מקשה היא are an allusion to the ultimate unity of the Sh’chinah, when all of these sparks have returned to its holy origin.
We have a rule that there are three types of “love” in the universe, (objects of love). 1) The most common object of love are tangible phenomena. The Torah warns not to “love” certain tangible phenomena. 2) There are some tangible phenomena, which at first glance appear as permissible objects to be loved, but which on closer examination are only symbols of what is permitted to love, i.e. not the object itself but the concepts which the object represent. Therefore, the third type of love is our love for the essence behind the external symbols, the mitzvoth, in this instance, i.e. our love for Hashem.
When we love G’d in this manner, we succeed in helping the “sparks” to return to their original habitat as part of the Sh’chinah, (as explained in our translation on pages 21-23.)
It is not permissible for us to ever claim that there exist phenomena in our universe that are totally apart from their origin, from their holy roots. It is up to us to try and find behind phenomena that appear totally divorced from their holy roots, the point of contact through which such a thread, however slender, still exists. According to our author, the פנימיות, inner essence, of any phenomenon, is a reflection of this “love.” In order to serve the Lord properly, the worshipper must get hold of this “love” and use it as the vehicle with which he relates to his Creator. He considers that other מדות, attributes, virtues, must be used in a similar manner. He claims that there are a total of seven such מדות, virtues, and that the seven arms of the lampstand, or candlestick in the Tabernacle, symbolized these seven virtues. He considers Numbers 8,2 as the key phrase in the Torah referring to this concept, when the Torah writes: בהעלותך את הנרות אל מול פני המנורה יאירו שבעת הנרות, “when you elevate the lights of the lampstand they shall be focused on the center shaft so that all seven lamps will be providing light.” The “centre shaft” symbolizes the Sh’chinah, presence of G’d.
At that point the Torah continues with the words: וזה מעשה המנורה מקשה, “and this is the essential ingredient of this lampstand, it is hammered out of a single piece (of gold)”. This verse teaches that true Judaism when it is practiced with all the required virtues, will result in a completely unified, harmonious personality of the worshipper. It is our task in this multifaceted material universe, to reflect the unity of the Creator by emulating His virtues to the best of our knowledge and ability.
The Torah underlines this by adding: עד ירכה, “to its physical foundation;” this is an allusion to physically permitted love when it serves duly married couples to engage in marital intercourse for the purpose of “uniting” their input through bringing into this universe a child that combines the parents’ best qualities in a single body. [Some of these words are mine, but I trust they reflect the author’s meaning. Ed.]
When the Torah relates how G’d set about creating the first human being, (Genesis 1,26) נעשה אדם בצלמנו, “let Us make man in our image, etc.” the words בצלמנו כדמותנו, “in our image, similar to Our likeness,” are parallel to the description of the candlestick being out of one chunk of gold, עד ירכה עד פרחה, colloquially speaking “from head to toe,” i.e. all of it. Although the human being contains parts difficult to associate with sanctity and holiness, as their function is to turn excess food into excrement, for instance, in the final analysis even dung is connected and remains connected to its Creator in heaven. We are asked to relate with love to that aspect of the phenomenon even if its exterior disgusts us. The word פרחה in Numbers 8,4 whose numerical value is 288, clearly is a hidden reference to the 288 sparks of which we wrote on pages 21-23. The words מקשה היא are an allusion to the ultimate unity of the Sh’chinah, when all of these sparks have returned to its holy origin.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
A great and powerful king once invited one of his loyal servants to accompany him to his treasure chamber where he displayed a store of jewels and other valuable artifacts. The servant was overjoyed at the king having taken him into his confidence by showing him all his valuable treasures. He became proud to be a servant to such a powerful king. Upon reflecting on this however, he suddenly was overcome with trembling when thinking about what a great wrong it would be to disregard even a minor paragraph in the law books the king had issued to his subjects to live by. The psalmist’s words reflect a similar dilemma. How can one at one and the same time be in awe and full of joy? The Talmud B’rachot 30, tries to answer this apparent contradiction by understanding the latter half of the verse as: “when in a place where merriment is the rule, do not forget that it behooves you to be trembling, seeing that you are always in the presence of the Lord.” Abbaye, who, when in an extraordinarily happy frame of mind, was reminded of this by a colleague, responded that as long he was wearing the phylacteries on his head, this served him as a reminder not to forget this injunction.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Hakhsharat HaAvrekhim
It is important to bear in mind that the body is not the main point, it is just that we don’t see the soul, but we see and feel the entire body, and for this reason our question is not yet answered. We are not only trying to identify the true nature of that which is hidden from our eyes and our other senses, but we are looking at the very body, that we sense and feel, wanting to know the true nature of its essence, and we find ourselves unable to identify it. How is it that it changes from substance to substance? How is it that the lump that was yesterday a plant, in form, taste, and nature, that was so diligent in drawing the elements from its surroundings and turning them into plant matter, has now changed into a piece of the animal’s stomach, and tomorrow will be the stomach or hand of a man, continuing to work with such diligence in maintaining the current form just as it did the previous form? The Eyts Chaiim,215Of Rav Yitchak Luria (1534-1572), Eytz Chaiim, Sha’ar 42, ch. 1. quotes the Ramban’s comment on Bereshit, (1:2), “and the earth was chaos (tohu) and void,” which identifies the substance of the chaos as hiyuli, or a nebulous energy that is ready to assume different possible forms. The Ari z”l tells us that the hiyuli is on the level of Keter (the Crown). In other words, the essential energy that takes form in the world is the aspect of Divinity called Keter (Crown) which has no form on its own, but rather assumes the form of the root elements and their composites in the world.216(The original text adds:) The Ramban does not understand the hiyuli as did his predecessors. They understood the substance of the hiyuli simply, where God created a physical substance in the world which happens to be lacking in form. Something like this can only be imagined but cannot exist in the same way outside of our minds. This is because a physical substance cannot exist without a form. This is because form is a variable which identifies the matter as well as its nature. For example, the form of snow defines its own characteristics (its whiteness – meaning its form, its softness and coldness, meaning its nature) and separates it from everything else in the world. And the form of fire is its redness, its heat, etc. The form of a house is its shape and structure, and its material is bricks. But the bricks, when they were on their own before they had been built into a house, or after they were taken from it, also have a form by which they are identified as bricks and which distinguishes them from everything else, such as their dimensions and their material, which is clay. The clay also has its own form before it is made into bricks, the form of clay. Even the seed when it is planted in the soil, appears at the time it disintegrates to be formless material, but then too it also has a form, which is its own particular description and nature. It is distinguished from any other disintegrated matter in that it is ready to sprout into a plant. Even while disintegrated, it is distinguished from any other disintegrated seed in the particular kind of plant that it will become, and none other. This is all in order to illustrate that a pure substance without form is something that cannot exist outside of the mind. The idea of hiyuli without any form whatsoever is possible in Divinity but not in the material world. That is why the Eyts Chaiim mentioned above calls it the aspect of Keter – Crown, which is a Godly illumination that God drew into the world before He dressed it in any form. It is the root essence of everything in the world and changes only in the garments that dress it. The idea of dressing form needs to be explained more, but not in the current book.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Our author, instead of using the phylacteries, which are not always worn, as a symbol of our duty never to forget our purpose on earth, uses the words of our verse describing the utter chaos that prevailed prior to G’d having embarked on His gigantic project of creating a universe inhabited by man equipped with a free will, as such a reminder.
Our author sees in the word והארץ in our verse a veiled hint at the various temptations that human beings are constantly exposed to by living in a physical world, temptations that are apt to interfere with his desire to serve G’d as a loyal servant.
Our author sees in the word והארץ in our verse a veiled hint at the various temptations that human beings are constantly exposed to by living in a physical world, temptations that are apt to interfere with his desire to serve G’d as a loyal servant.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Mareh Yechezkel on Torah
Sermon on Parashat Bereshit
In Midrash Tehillim, it says, “’The beginning of Your words gives light’ (Psalms 119:130) – the beginning of Your words in the Creation was (Genesis 1:3), ‘Let there be light’; From there, ‘You make the fools understand,’ and they will begin with words of Torah” – and Rashi on Psalms cites this midrash. And it appears that his words can be elucidated according to the Mishnah (Avot 5:1), “With ten utterances the world was created, etc.” And see the book, Orchot Tzaddikim, as he explains that the teacher [of this mishnah] had two questions: One is, what was the benefit of having informed us that the world was created with ten utterances? And also, why was it created with ten utterances? And he answered about the first question, that an evildoer should know to be careful not to sin – for his punishment will be great, since he is destroying the world that was created with ten utterances. And about the second question, he answered that it is to give a goodly reward to the righteous. But that itself is difficult – why should the evildoer be punished with a severe punishment? As what does it matter that it was created with ten utterances, was He not able to have created it with one utterance? For if a craftsman makes a utensil in ten days that he could have made in a day, is his payment any greater as a result; and does one who breaks it have to pay any more? Likewise is it difficult – why should the righteous receive any more reward [as a result of this]? And see what he writes.
In Midrash Tehillim, it says, “’The beginning of Your words gives light’ (Psalms 119:130) – the beginning of Your words in the Creation was (Genesis 1:3), ‘Let there be light’; From there, ‘You make the fools understand,’ and they will begin with words of Torah” – and Rashi on Psalms cites this midrash. And it appears that his words can be elucidated according to the Mishnah (Avot 5:1), “With ten utterances the world was created, etc.” And see the book, Orchot Tzaddikim, as he explains that the teacher [of this mishnah] had two questions: One is, what was the benefit of having informed us that the world was created with ten utterances? And also, why was it created with ten utterances? And he answered about the first question, that an evildoer should know to be careful not to sin – for his punishment will be great, since he is destroying the world that was created with ten utterances. And about the second question, he answered that it is to give a goodly reward to the righteous. But that itself is difficult – why should the evildoer be punished with a severe punishment? As what does it matter that it was created with ten utterances, was He not able to have created it with one utterance? For if a craftsman makes a utensil in ten days that he could have made in a day, is his payment any greater as a result; and does one who breaks it have to pay any more? Likewise is it difficult – why should the righteous receive any more reward [as a result of this]? And see what he writes.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
G’d called the light: ‘day;’" Bereshit Rabbah 3,8 comments that this phrase refers to the deeds of the righteous, whereas the line ולחושך קרא לילה, is understood as referring to the deeds of the wicked. In order to make it plain that the Creator preferred the deeds of the righteous, the Torah added the adjective כי טוב, “that it was good,” when defining the word אור in verse 4.
The average reader of this Midrash surely is puzzled by the fact that there was any doubt as to whose deeds the Creator would prefer so that the Torah had to indicate that G’d preferred the deeds of the righteous! Rabbeinu Yonah, in his commentary on the last Mishnah in B’rachot chapter 9, explains that the Mishnah, when referring to the need to serve the Lord with both parts of our hearts, the urge to do good as well as the urge to do evil, speaks of people who do serve the Lord. The Midrash quoted, was careful to refer to the deeds of the wicked as opposed to the wicked themselves, also does so. We may therefore understand the Midrash as also referring to good deeds, the origin of which, however, differs. The difference between the two “urges” is that the urge to do evil is by definition the result of anger and hatred, whereas the deeds that are prompted by the urge to do good, are by definition prompted by feelings of goodwill and love. No wonder that G’d prefers the positive deeds that are also the result of constructive attitudes, to the good deeds that are the result of the urge to do evil, even when both deeds may be identical. This idea has been portrayed by Proverbs 3,17 where Solomon has described the ways of Torah as being דרכיה דרכי נועם, “her ways are ways of pleasantness;” in other words, it is not only what you do that counts but how you go about doing it.”
The average reader of this Midrash surely is puzzled by the fact that there was any doubt as to whose deeds the Creator would prefer so that the Torah had to indicate that G’d preferred the deeds of the righteous! Rabbeinu Yonah, in his commentary on the last Mishnah in B’rachot chapter 9, explains that the Mishnah, when referring to the need to serve the Lord with both parts of our hearts, the urge to do good as well as the urge to do evil, speaks of people who do serve the Lord. The Midrash quoted, was careful to refer to the deeds of the wicked as opposed to the wicked themselves, also does so. We may therefore understand the Midrash as also referring to good deeds, the origin of which, however, differs. The difference between the two “urges” is that the urge to do evil is by definition the result of anger and hatred, whereas the deeds that are prompted by the urge to do good, are by definition prompted by feelings of goodwill and love. No wonder that G’d prefers the positive deeds that are also the result of constructive attitudes, to the good deeds that are the result of the urge to do evil, even when both deeds may be identical. This idea has been portrayed by Proverbs 3,17 where Solomon has described the ways of Torah as being דרכיה דרכי נועם, “her ways are ways of pleasantness;” in other words, it is not only what you do that counts but how you go about doing it.”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Sha'ar HaEmunah VeYesod HaChasidut
“Anan orcha d’oraita naktinan - We are following the way of the Torah.” This is exactly how Rabbi Shimon Bar Yochai said it. Rabbi Shimon revealed how all mysteries are within the Torah. God enlightened him to the knowledge that the Torah contains all Divine names and chambers. The Torah contains the order of the concatenation of the spiritual worlds. All Sefirot, holy names, and names of angels are derived from its verses. It is clearly stated in the Tikunei Zohar (Tikkun 57, page 91b), “every angel has a verse in the Torah.” The mysteries of the pre-Sianitic teachings are not based on the verses of the Torah, for the Torah had not yet been given.80However, all pre-Sinaitic teachings are hinted at in the Torah, as the Torah includes everything, as will soon be explained. From the days of Rabbi Shimon, the Holy One, blessed be He, revealed the knowledge that it is all in the Torah. Therefore it is said in the Zohar (Aharai, 61a), “All who aspire to ascend levels into the realm of mysteries, do so only in order to complete themselves in the knowledge of Rabbi Shimon.” Even that which was taught in the book of Adam HaRishon was again reviewed and taught to Moshe in the Torah. Concerning this, it is written in the Zohar (Yitro, 70a), “Rabbi Shimon said, I raise my hand in prayer81Referring to what Avraham said to the king of Sodom in Bereshit 14:22. to the One who created the world. Even though our forbears revealed great mysteries in this verse, it is well for us to delve deeply into the secrets of the book of Adam HaRishon, for this knowledge found itself in the hidden book of Shlomo HaMelech. This book reveals the secrets of man’s generations. It is a tree which reveals the generations of man and bears the fruits which bring them into the world. This is the book of the knowledge of hidden and profound wisdom, which was delivered to the physical Adam HaRishon. This same wisdom was given to Shlomo HaMelech, who recorded it in a book. We have learned that Moshe has great difficulty learning these matters, until the Shekhina came and taught it to him … Then Moshe learned this wisdom, and internalized it.” From here we see that Adam HaRishon had the book of the knowledge of mysteries, and God later imparted this knowledge to Moshe. This is hinted at in Parshat Tetsave (Shemot, 27:20). It is also hinted at in the realms of Ma’aseh Bereshit (The mystery of Creation) and Ma’aseh Merkava (The mystery of the Chariot). “And God created man in His image, in the image of Elo-him,” These are two good points – which are male and female. (Zohar, Nasso, 122b) Just as there is a good spiritual form on the Tsaddik, which leads him in the proper behavior whereby he merits the world-to-come, so too is there an evil form on the head of the wicked, which leads him in his evil behavior, whereby he inherits hell.82This “form” (heb. tselem) is the medium through which the good or wicked individual receives his power to act. Come and see! The actions of man are a testament to that individual’s spiritual form, and is revealed on his face, as it is written (Yeshayahu, 3:9), ‘the form of their faces witnesses against them.’ The form of a man’s face reveals the nature of the angel which accompanies him; whether it is the lion, or the ox, or the eagle, or the man of the chariot of the Holy One, blessed be He, and His Shekhina. … Or perhaps it is from the chariot of the four elements of the earth … This is the secret of (Bereshit, 1), ‘Let the earth bring forth particular species of living creatures.83The word for living creature, חיה, is the same as the word for angel. ‘ … Come and see! Each of the six days of creation had a specific spiritual countenance84Or “Face” – Partsuf, in Aramaic. which would lead it. (Zohar, Nasso, 123a)85Evidently, Rav Gershon Henokh is quoting this passage in the Zohar as an example of the Rabbi Shimon’s reception and revelation of the wisdom of the Book of Adam. The Zohar refined the knowledge of the book of Adam in a way that could be accessed by later generations.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Numbers 23,9. “as I see them from the mountain tops, etc.;” according to Rashi,, Bileam, viewing Israel’s origin, understands that the creation of hills and mountains, etc., was all due to G’d wanting a people such as Israel. If He had not foreseen this in the future He would not have bothered with creating our part of the universe. This reminds us of Tanna de bey Eliyahu 14 where the opening line in the Torah reading בראשית ברא אלוקים, is understood to mean that on account of Israel, also known as ראשית, G’d began the creation of the universe. Had G’d foreseen only gentile nations in the future He would not have bothered creating hills and mountains.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Another approach to the last paragraph. it is the duty of every Jew to serve his Creator at all times from feelings of awe and fear and to look at fellow Jews with a benevolent attitude, interpreting actions that appear inappropriate in a favourable light, and not to harm any fellow Jew; the first step in serving G’d is always based on fear, awe. Man’s awe when serving G’d results in a mixture of awe and satisfaction, pleasure. Moses had attained this level of possessing wisdom while at the same time remaining in awe of the Creator, as we know from psalms 111,10 ראשית חכמה יראת ה', “all wisdom has its beginning in a feeling of awe and respect of G’d,” and is therefore symbolic of יראה, while Aaron’s name contains the letters נהר א, i.e. the letter אלף of the word יראה, and the letters spelling “water” in the sense of a blissful stream, providing irrigation, the first such water that we find in Genesis 2,10 i.e. ונהר יוצא מעדן, “and a river originated from Eden, and irrigated, etc.” Awe and fear lead to satisfaction תענוג. Seeing that the term יראה, awe, cannot be an attribute of the Creator, and תענוג, the feeling of pleasurable satisfaction preceded the dispensation by G’d of His largesse to Israel, (the process being comparable to what our sages meant when they said that “the cow is more intent of nursing the calf than the calf is consciously looking for its mother’s milk,”) when it comes to the results of Moses and Aaron intervening in the process of preparing Pharaoh to release the Israelites, Moses is mentioned first when the Torah writes: הם המדברים אל פרעה מלך מצרים להוציא את בני ישראל ממצרים, “they were the ones speaking to Pharaoh to permit the Children of Israel to leave Egypt.”[By mentioning Aaron last, the Torah associated him with the execution directly; he was mentioned immediately before the word להוציא, “to release,” i.e. the type of largesse about to be dispensed by G’d to the Jewish people. Ed.].
I have heard in the name of my revered teacher Rabbi Dov Baer from Mezerich that he explained Proverbs 10,1 בן חכם משמח אב, “a wise son brings joy to his father,” as Solomon paraphrasing the relationship between Jews loyal to Torah and their Father in heaven. When a Jew serves his Father in heaven he causes Him satisfaction and joy. Similarly, when someone makes complimentary remarks about fellow Jews, G’d also derives pleasure from such compliments. We are not to serve G’d for selfish reasons at all, such as the reward we have been promised for doing this. We must strive to provide G’d with satisfaction from our service to Him. This is so although there are a few benedictions in the 19 benedictions of the amidah, the central prayer, in which we ask for something for ourselves, such as intelligence to serve G’d properly, the ability to repent our sins, and a cure for our diseases. Seeing that G’d derives pleasure from our prayers, even these benedictions in which we turn to Him for help, also give Him pleasure. G’d derives pleasure from the very fact that we, His people, enjoy our existence on earth. This is what the sages had in mind when they responded to the question (Bereshit Rabbah 3,4) ,מהיכן נבראת האורה “from where did the light in which G’d garbed Himself originate?” The word for “light” in that Midrash is אורה as opposed to אור, the light G’d had created on the first day (Genesis 1,3) [There the word for “light” was in the masculine mode, whereas in the Midrash it is in the feminine mode, reminding us that it was something passive, received. Ed.] The answer given by Rabbi Shmuel ben Nachman in that Midrash is that it originates from the site on which the Holy Temple was built. The Talmud, pursuing this subject also asked whence the light originated from.
[I have not been able to authenticate what follows, supposedly in the Talmud. Ed.]
The Talmud wonders whence the light in which G’d drapes Himself originates. Seeing that the word אורה used for “light,” is in the feminine mode it must have been created at some time, having been the recipient of input from another source. Seeing that man needs to serve the Lord for the sake of providing Him with pleasurable satisfaction, תענוג, as opposed to our receiving blessings and material benefits in the earthly part of the universe, the question is logical. The answer given in the Talmud to the question posed is that G’d derives pleasure from man’s service which enables Him to dispense His largesse to man. He even enjoys prayer when it is offered as a means to secure this largesse. The reason He does so is because the very fact that He has reason to dispense this largesse is a source of satisfaction for Him.
I have heard in the name of my revered teacher Rabbi Dov Baer from Mezerich that he explained Proverbs 10,1 בן חכם משמח אב, “a wise son brings joy to his father,” as Solomon paraphrasing the relationship between Jews loyal to Torah and their Father in heaven. When a Jew serves his Father in heaven he causes Him satisfaction and joy. Similarly, when someone makes complimentary remarks about fellow Jews, G’d also derives pleasure from such compliments. We are not to serve G’d for selfish reasons at all, such as the reward we have been promised for doing this. We must strive to provide G’d with satisfaction from our service to Him. This is so although there are a few benedictions in the 19 benedictions of the amidah, the central prayer, in which we ask for something for ourselves, such as intelligence to serve G’d properly, the ability to repent our sins, and a cure for our diseases. Seeing that G’d derives pleasure from our prayers, even these benedictions in which we turn to Him for help, also give Him pleasure. G’d derives pleasure from the very fact that we, His people, enjoy our existence on earth. This is what the sages had in mind when they responded to the question (Bereshit Rabbah 3,4) ,מהיכן נבראת האורה “from where did the light in which G’d garbed Himself originate?” The word for “light” in that Midrash is אורה as opposed to אור, the light G’d had created on the first day (Genesis 1,3) [There the word for “light” was in the masculine mode, whereas in the Midrash it is in the feminine mode, reminding us that it was something passive, received. Ed.] The answer given by Rabbi Shmuel ben Nachman in that Midrash is that it originates from the site on which the Holy Temple was built. The Talmud, pursuing this subject also asked whence the light originated from.
[I have not been able to authenticate what follows, supposedly in the Talmud. Ed.]
The Talmud wonders whence the light in which G’d drapes Himself originates. Seeing that the word אורה used for “light,” is in the feminine mode it must have been created at some time, having been the recipient of input from another source. Seeing that man needs to serve the Lord for the sake of providing Him with pleasurable satisfaction, תענוג, as opposed to our receiving blessings and material benefits in the earthly part of the universe, the question is logical. The answer given in the Talmud to the question posed is that G’d derives pleasure from man’s service which enables Him to dispense His largesse to man. He even enjoys prayer when it is offered as a means to secure this largesse. The reason He does so is because the very fact that He has reason to dispense this largesse is a source of satisfaction for Him.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Sha'ar HaEmunah VeYesod HaChasidut
From the moment Rabbi Shimon bar Yohai passed on, the wellsprings of wisdom were closed. As it says in the Zohar (Vayehi, 217a), “From the death of Rabbi Shimon bar Yohai, wisdom departed from the land.” It was even known during the Rashb”i’s93RaShBI is the common acronym for Rabbi Shimon Bar Yokhai. life that the wellsprings of wisdom would close from the time of his passing. As it says (Terumah, 149a), “In the generation in which Rabbi Shimon lived, God’s desired to reveal the hidden knowledge of the Torah through him … Woe to the generation in which he departs! The wise will be few, and wisdom will be forgotten from the land.” Elsewhere in the Zohar it is stated (Vayakhel, 201a): “Woe is the generation when the lower light departs and joins the upper light!” This is said in several places in the Zohar. So too do we find several statements in the Gemara telling us that the mysteries are hidden among the select few of the generation. Granted that all of the sages of the Gemara possessed knowledge of the mysteries of the Torah, yet each one knew according to his own level. It is said in the Gemara (Hagiga, 13a), “Rabbi Ami said, the secrets of the Torah are only imparted to an individual who possesses five qualities, ‘The captain of the fifty, the honorable man, the counselor, the cunning artificer, and the eloquent orator.’ (Yeshayahu, 3:3)” We find that the masters of the Talmud would teach the Torah’s mysteries only with great trepidation. On this same page of Gemara it the following story is related: “Rabbi Yohanan said to Rabbi Elazar, ‘come and I will teach you the mysteries of the Divine chariot.’ Rabbi Elazar replied, ‘I am not yet old enough’94To learn the mysteries of the Torah one’s mind must be settled, fully matured. When he felt he was ready, Rabbi Yohanan had already passed away. Later, Rabbi Assi said to Rabbi Elazar, ‘come and I will teach you the mysteries of the Divine chariot.’ He replied, ‘If I had been worthy, I would have learned this from your master Rabbi Yohanan!’ “ Truly, it was said of Rabbi Elazar that he was love-sick for the knowledge of the Torah! For one the Gemara (Eruvin, 54b) honors with the title, “Mara D’Ara D’Yisrael – the master of the land of Israel,” it is inconceivable that he did not know the secrets of the Torah. Yet there are different levels in the knowledge of the mysteries. As it is said in the Zohar (Bo, 34b): Rabbi Shimon said, “there are many in our fellowship who know Ma’aseh Bereshit, the mysteries of creation. Yet there are very few who understand the hints of the mystery of the Tanin HaGadol – the great Sea Creature.”95See Bereshit, 1:21. Variously classified as whales, dragons, or the Leviathan and its mate. It is mentioned in the Pri Etz Hayyim (Sha’ar Kriyat Shema) that the Arizal wanted to explain to his students the mystery of the recitation of the Shema according to the mystery of the Kav HaMidda (the measuring line),96See Zohar, Parshat Pekudei, 233a. The “measuring line” refers to the way God measures His infinite effluence into the finite vessels of creation. yet they were not worthy to receive this knowledge from him. The Zohar Hadash (Parshat Va’etchanan) lays down the fundamental that there are various “faces” of interpretation in the mysteries of the Torah. With the passage of time until the end of the Talmudic era, the knowledge of the mysteries declined, until at the end it was reserved for the select few of the generation and sealed with an iron seal.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
This point is made even more clearly in Genesis 13,14 where we read: וה' אמר אל אברם אחרי הפרד לוט מעמו שא נא עיניך וראה מן המקום אשר אתה שם צפונה ונגבה וקדמה וימה, "and the Lord had said to Avram after Lot had separated from him ‘raise your eyes and look northward, southward, eastward and westward;’” this was a promise first and foremost that he would see in his lifetime three of the patriarchs of the Jewish people, i.e. himself, Yitzchok, and Yaakov. The first three directions mentioned here symbolize the attributes חסד , גבורה, and תפארת, referring to Avraham, Yitzchok and Yaakov in that order.
When telling Avraham that he would see את כל הארץ, “the whole of the land” (future Eretz Yisrael), this refers to David, whose attribute is מלכות, Royalty, David representing this symbol on earth, the Jewish people. David is directly linked to the patriarch Avraham, was shown “the whole land,” so that he would be aware that the glory of the Kingdom of David would be directly traceable to him. This is the reason why north and south, east and west are listed here in this order. According to Ari za’l, ימה, “west,” refers to the emanation יסוד, the emanation directly above the emanation מלכות, the one symbolized by the kingdom of David.
[Malchut, as the “lowest” of the emanations, is the one closest to the physical universe. Rabbi Elie Munk (Ascent to Harmony) has described the emanation Malchut as “History” (of man), thus seeing it as the bridge between the actual physical universe and the celestial domains, since when something becomes “history,” it has either receded or ascended (depending on whether the persons making history made constructive or destructive contributions) to a domain beyond the physical but robbing it of the “substance” common to phenomena in the earthly domain of the universe. Ed.]
According to the Zohar, tzaddik and tzedek, the righteous person and the performance of righteous deeds, are indivisible, i.e. the emanations מלכות and יסוד always go hand in hand. We find this concept first alluded to in the Torah when Malki Tzedek, King of Shalem, (Jerusalem) in Genesis 14,18 congratulates Avram on his victory, blesses him in the name of the Lord, and presents him with bread and wine. The word לחם, commonly understood as “bread,” is used to describe חכמה, “wisdom,” whereas the word יין, commonly understood as “wine” means בינה, “insight,” in this context. Malki Tzedek presented these items as symbols of the two highest emanations man can usually attain, both of which Avraham employed in his service of the Lord.
[As on previous occasions, the author sees in such apparently irrelevant details as a King bringing bread and wine from hundreds of kilometers from Jerusalem. According to Genesis 14,15, Avraham had pursued the armies of Kedorleomer all the way to Damascus) an allusion to something far more profound. Ed.]
The Zohar I,199 traces the fact that a tzaddik serves the Lord with חכמה and בינה to Job 28,28 יראת ה' היא חכמה וסור מרע בינה, “Reverence for the Lord is wisdom, to shun evil is understanding, insight.” The two blessings that Malki Tzedek, who was viewed as G’d’s High Priest in those days, most likely Shem, Noach’s oldest son, bestowed on Avram, represent the two emanations that Avram had been able to use in his service of the Lord, and are reflected in Targum Yonathan’s translation of the Torah, in the first verses of the Torah in which they appear. [In our verses, instead of commending Avraham to G’d, as we would translate the words ברוך אברם ל.., Yonathan ben Uzziel translates: ברוך אברם מ..., “Avram has been blessed by the supreme G’d, etc.” Ed.] Targum Yerushalmi translates already the first words of the Torah, i.e. בראשית ברא אלוקים את השמים ואת הארץ, as “in the beginning G’d used the emanation of חכמה to create heaven and earth.”
When telling Avraham that he would see את כל הארץ, “the whole of the land” (future Eretz Yisrael), this refers to David, whose attribute is מלכות, Royalty, David representing this symbol on earth, the Jewish people. David is directly linked to the patriarch Avraham, was shown “the whole land,” so that he would be aware that the glory of the Kingdom of David would be directly traceable to him. This is the reason why north and south, east and west are listed here in this order. According to Ari za’l, ימה, “west,” refers to the emanation יסוד, the emanation directly above the emanation מלכות, the one symbolized by the kingdom of David.
[Malchut, as the “lowest” of the emanations, is the one closest to the physical universe. Rabbi Elie Munk (Ascent to Harmony) has described the emanation Malchut as “History” (of man), thus seeing it as the bridge between the actual physical universe and the celestial domains, since when something becomes “history,” it has either receded or ascended (depending on whether the persons making history made constructive or destructive contributions) to a domain beyond the physical but robbing it of the “substance” common to phenomena in the earthly domain of the universe. Ed.]
According to the Zohar, tzaddik and tzedek, the righteous person and the performance of righteous deeds, are indivisible, i.e. the emanations מלכות and יסוד always go hand in hand. We find this concept first alluded to in the Torah when Malki Tzedek, King of Shalem, (Jerusalem) in Genesis 14,18 congratulates Avram on his victory, blesses him in the name of the Lord, and presents him with bread and wine. The word לחם, commonly understood as “bread,” is used to describe חכמה, “wisdom,” whereas the word יין, commonly understood as “wine” means בינה, “insight,” in this context. Malki Tzedek presented these items as symbols of the two highest emanations man can usually attain, both of which Avraham employed in his service of the Lord.
[As on previous occasions, the author sees in such apparently irrelevant details as a King bringing bread and wine from hundreds of kilometers from Jerusalem. According to Genesis 14,15, Avraham had pursued the armies of Kedorleomer all the way to Damascus) an allusion to something far more profound. Ed.]
The Zohar I,199 traces the fact that a tzaddik serves the Lord with חכמה and בינה to Job 28,28 יראת ה' היא חכמה וסור מרע בינה, “Reverence for the Lord is wisdom, to shun evil is understanding, insight.” The two blessings that Malki Tzedek, who was viewed as G’d’s High Priest in those days, most likely Shem, Noach’s oldest son, bestowed on Avram, represent the two emanations that Avram had been able to use in his service of the Lord, and are reflected in Targum Yonathan’s translation of the Torah, in the first verses of the Torah in which they appear. [In our verses, instead of commending Avraham to G’d, as we would translate the words ברוך אברם ל.., Yonathan ben Uzziel translates: ברוך אברם מ..., “Avram has been blessed by the supreme G’d, etc.” Ed.] Targum Yerushalmi translates already the first words of the Torah, i.e. בראשית ברא אלוקים את השמים ואת הארץ, as “in the beginning G’d used the emanation of חכמה to create heaven and earth.”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Flames of Faith
In the book of Genesis, after every day of God’s creation, He examined His handiwork and declared that it was good. On the sixth day He reviewed all and declared, Ve-hinneh tov me’od, “And behold it is very good” (Gen. 1:31). The Midrash287Bereishis Rabbah, Chapter 9. explains the phrase “very good” as referring to Gehinnom, death, and the evil inclination. How can the Midrash call these disasters “very good”? The answer is that deep down even the worst evils are good. A kelippah (a shell) fulfills an important function, it preserves the fruit. Kelippos in the moral sense, such as evil desires, help maintain the pleasure that is slated for man.288Innerspace pg. 71.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Mareh Yechezkel on Torah
And with this we can understand [the Gemara’s statement] (Rosh Hashanah 32a), “’In the beginning’ is also considered an utterance, as it is stated (Psalms 33:6), ‘By the word of the Lord the heavens were made’” – and see Rashi’s commentary. For the holy Torah also caused and assisted the Creation, that it be able to exist – and as it is written (Kiddushin 30b), “I created the evil impulse, [and] I created the Torah as a remedy.” And this is the intent of the midrash at the beginning: That because the Holy One, blessed be He, only started using the expression, “And He said,” with, “Let there be light” (Genesis 1:3); but, “And He said” is not said regarding the creation of the heavens and the earth – therefore [we derive that] the heavens and the earth exist on account of the Torah, and did not need an utterance [other than the Torah itself]. And that is why the Torah weakens the strength of the evil impulse. Hence the fools will understand the Torah’s uniqueness, “and they will they will begin with words of Torah.” And this is the meaning of that which is written (Jeremiah 33:20), “Were it not for My covenant […], I would not have made the laws of heaven and earth.” For the heavens and the earth were created by way of the Torah.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Exodus 8,5.Moses said to Pharaoh: ‘you may brag concerning me, ‘for when shall I pray on your behalf, etc;?” ויאמר למחר, ויאמר כדבריך למען תדע כי אין כה' אלוקינו “He said: ‘for tomorrow!” He replied: ‘just as you have said, so that you will know that there is no-one comparable to the Lord our G’d.’” It is worth noting that after the fourth plague, (the third not having been announced beforehand) in announcing the forthcoming plague, (Exodus 8,18) G’d uses the expression: והפלאתי when announcing beforehand that the wild beasts will not invade the land of Goshen, the home of most of the Children of Israel. At that point, Moses adds to his warning: “in order that you will know that there is no-one comparable to Me on the whole Earth.” A similar statement appears before the onset of the plague of hail, (9,14) and prior to Moses leaving the boundaries of the land of Egypt in order to pray to G’d to bring the plague of hail to a conclusion. (Exodus 9,29) Moses adds that his objective is to demonstrate to Pharaoh that the globe is G’d’s property, למען תדע כי לה' הארץ. We need to examine why G’d chose to use different reasons for the onset or removal of the various plagues we quoted.
With G’d’s help we hope to clarify the reasons behind these various nuances that appear so significant that the Torah bothers to list them individually.
The Zohar, in commenting on the verse: אני ראשון ואני אחרון ומבלעדי אין אלוקים, “I am the first and I am the last and apart from Me there is no Divine power,”(Isaiah 44,6) sees in that verse a synopsis of the functions of certain vowels (all three are dots but placed on top, in the middle, or beneath the consonants) If the dot is on top of the letter, as in the חולם, it refers to the ability of the Tzaddikim to cause decrees by the attribute of Justice to be converted to decrees dominated by the attribute of Mercy, the reason being that the concept of the Jewish nation had preceded the concept of creating a physical universe in G’d’s mind. The same dot appearing in the middle of the letter, known as שורוק, alludes to G’d’s intervention in the affairs of man in a covert manner, as He did during the period of Mordechai and Esther. Finally, the dot appearing beneath the letter, known as חיריק, alludes to the period of the wars preceding the arrival of the messiah when G’d will become manifest by His literally “turning the world upside down”, pouring out the wicked, who at that time will finally recognize His might in all its glory. The author derives all of this from the concise comments of the Zohar on the verse we quoted from Isaiah 44,6.
With G’d’s help we hope to clarify the reasons behind these various nuances that appear so significant that the Torah bothers to list them individually.
The Zohar, in commenting on the verse: אני ראשון ואני אחרון ומבלעדי אין אלוקים, “I am the first and I am the last and apart from Me there is no Divine power,”(Isaiah 44,6) sees in that verse a synopsis of the functions of certain vowels (all three are dots but placed on top, in the middle, or beneath the consonants) If the dot is on top of the letter, as in the חולם, it refers to the ability of the Tzaddikim to cause decrees by the attribute of Justice to be converted to decrees dominated by the attribute of Mercy, the reason being that the concept of the Jewish nation had preceded the concept of creating a physical universe in G’d’s mind. The same dot appearing in the middle of the letter, known as שורוק, alludes to G’d’s intervention in the affairs of man in a covert manner, as He did during the period of Mordechai and Esther. Finally, the dot appearing beneath the letter, known as חיריק, alludes to the period of the wars preceding the arrival of the messiah when G’d will become manifest by His literally “turning the world upside down”, pouring out the wicked, who at that time will finally recognize His might in all its glory. The author derives all of this from the concise comments of the Zohar on the verse we quoted from Isaiah 44,6.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
[If I understand the author correctly, Rabbi Levi Yitzchok proceeds at this stage at quite some length and quoting many verses from Scripture, to explain why Malki Tzedek’s definition of G’d as (separately) owning heaven and earth may be misunderstood and has not been adopted by the sages in our daily prayers who opted instead for “owning everything.”
Malki Tzedek’s definition contributed to man believing that there were forces on earth, which though subordinate to G’d, the “Supreme G’d”, nonetheless deserved a measure of man’s fearful or grateful recognition, as the case may be. If G’d tolerated this prior to Avram’s becoming a factor on earth, He did so out of the goodness of His heart, realizing that these visible phenomena, as opposed to His invisibility, contributed to man’s errors in his perception of Who is Who in the universal hierarchy. Ed.]
Malki Tzedek’s definition contributed to man believing that there were forces on earth, which though subordinate to G’d, the “Supreme G’d”, nonetheless deserved a measure of man’s fearful or grateful recognition, as the case may be. If G’d tolerated this prior to Avram’s becoming a factor on earth, He did so out of the goodness of His heart, realizing that these visible phenomena, as opposed to His invisibility, contributed to man’s errors in his perception of Who is Who in the universal hierarchy. Ed.]
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Moses’ song was inspired by the immensity of the miracle that he and the people had witnessed at the time. They had witnessed the “death” and “resurrection” of the universe, albeit in miniature. If the letter ז is symbolic of the עולם העשיה, the universe after its completion on the seventh day, the letter א is symbolic of the very beginning of creation, so that Moses alluded to the process of a reversal in the creative process as having occurred as part of the miracle they had witnessed at that time. It is not accidental that in the Torah scroll instead of writing the שירה, “song” in the normal fashion, the lines are broken, interrupted so as to convey the manner in which bricks are laid, not one exactly above the other, but in a pattern that enables the wall to survive sudden impacts. This is true even of stone walls that are not joined by cement.
At this point the author allegorically describes חיות, the essence of “life” as the word of G’d which was the cement that holds together the different parts of the universe, all of which came into existence by His ten oral directives enumerated in the first chapter of Genesis. The empty spaces between the letters (words) are an allusion to the part of the world where this miracle occurred having retreated toward its origin before the definite contours of that universe had been finalized.
At this point the author allegorically describes חיות, the essence of “life” as the word of G’d which was the cement that holds together the different parts of the universe, all of which came into existence by His ten oral directives enumerated in the first chapter of Genesis. The empty spaces between the letters (words) are an allusion to the part of the world where this miracle occurred having retreated toward its origin before the definite contours of that universe had been finalized.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Moses’ song was inspired by the immensity of the miracle that he and the people had witnessed at the time. They had witnessed the “death” and “resurrection” of the universe, albeit in miniature. If the letter ז is symbolic of the עולם העשיה, the universe after its completion on the seventh day, the letter א is symbolic of the very beginning of creation, so that Moses alluded to the process of a reversal in the creative process as having occurred as part of the miracle they had witnessed at that time. It is not accidental that in the Torah scroll instead of writing the שירה, “song” in the normal fashion, the lines are broken, interrupted so as to convey the manner in which bricks are laid, not one exactly above the other, but in a pattern that enables the wall to survive sudden impacts. This is true even of stone walls that are not joined by cement.
At this point the author allegorically describes חיות, the essence of “life” as the word of G’d which was the cement that holds together the different parts of the universe, all of which came into existence by His ten oral directives enumerated in the first chapter of Genesis. The empty spaces between the letters (words) are an allusion to the part of the world where this miracle occurred having retreated toward its origin before the definite contours of that universe had been finalized.
At this point the author allegorically describes חיות, the essence of “life” as the word of G’d which was the cement that holds together the different parts of the universe, all of which came into existence by His ten oral directives enumerated in the first chapter of Genesis. The empty spaces between the letters (words) are an allusion to the part of the world where this miracle occurred having retreated toward its origin before the definite contours of that universe had been finalized.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Sefat Emet
They established [reading of] Ruth on Shavu'ot, to say that, by means of B'nai Yisrael being chosen through the Giving of the Torah, they are instruments to draw near the converts, because B'nai Yisrael are called the First of His Crop which is the fruit for which everything was created. This is as it says (Gen. R.), "B'reishit -- for the sake of Israel which is called 'reishit.'" The meaning is that "reishit" is the beginning and the inner essence, as it says (Prov.), "The 'reishit' of wisdom is the awe of God." Therefore it is called the Day of Bikkurim, when the fruit is ripe. But B'nai Yisrael "are excepted from the generality in order to teach to the entire generality" (Sifra, principles of R' Yishma'el), as it will be in the future (Zeph. 3:9), "For then I will make the peoples pure of speech, etc. [so that they all invoke Adonai by name and serve Him with one accord]." And then (Eccl. 7:8) "The end of a matter is better than the beginning of it" [see Ruth 3:10]. And in truth, according as B'nai Yisrael elevate from the nations, they are themselves exalted even more. And this itself is the meaning of putting "na'aseh" before "nishma," for B'nai Yisrael understood this, that they were chosen in order to draw everyone near, and they said (Ex. 24:7), "Everything that Adonai has spoken we will do." It is written here "na'aseh" and it is written there (Gen. 1:26), "Na'aseh adam," as it says (Gen. 12:5) "the souls that they had made," which Onkelos translated "that they had subjugated to the Torah", and it is through this that "we will hear." As it is with the particular -- as the improvement [tikkun] of the deeds, in order to draw each physical deed close to the spirit so that the soul shines in the person -- so it is in general -- as the improvement [tikkun] of K'lal Yisrael to draw near from the nations, so that the Torah shines in them. It is written (Micah 7:20), "You will give truth to Ya'akov, hesed to Avraham," for B'nai Yisrael are in truth God's portion and His Torah, but it is also part of the aspect of Truth to do hesed, to bring near those who are far off and who come for the sake of Heaven: "truth to Ya'akov" is the Torah, "hesed to Avraham" is that we should draw close also from the descendants of Lot -- Ruth the Moabite....
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Mareh Yechezkel on Torah
From the Pesach Haggadah: “And God saw all that He had made and behold, it was very good” (Genesis 1:31): As on each day, it is stated, “And God saw that it was good” – that from God, may He blessed, seeing it, it was good. But afterwards (on the sixty day), God saw again (a second time) – and that was very good.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Genesis 22,12. “He (the angel) said to him: ‘do not touch the lad, and do not harm him in any way;’….for now I know …and you have not withheld your only son from Me.” We need to examine why in this verse the word ממני has been added, as well as why this word is omitted when G’d speaks about the oath He has sworn to Himself in verse 16. Before answering these questions, let us look at Shabbat 63 where the Talmud states that כל העושה מצוה כמאמרה אין מבשרין לו דבר רע, “when someone performs one of G’d’s commandments in accordance with its halachot, one (heaven) does not sadden him by informing him of bad news. The Talmud bases this on Kohelet 8,5 שומר מצוה לא ידע רע, “he who will obey the commandments will know no evil.” The word כמאמרה in the Talmud poses a problem. The Talmud means that both study of Torah and performance of the commandments must be based on one’s desire to carry out G’d’s wishes. If one studies Torah to pass an exam, this is not accounted true Torah study. If one blows the shofar on New Year’s day in the synagogue, however expertly, but in order to earn the fee one has been promised, the promise that such people will be spared bad news is not applicable.
Furthermore, even having performed the mitzvah according to the halachah and exclusively in order to fulfill G’d’s wish, one must not congratulate oneself for having carried out one’s Creator’s wishes and have pleased him. If one thinks along these lines, one’s performance of the commandment will not please the Lord.
It is related in Chagigah 15 that it happened once that Rabbi Yoshua ben Chananyah (one of the leading scholars in his time) was standing on one of the steps leading up to the Temple Mount, [the Temple had already been destroyed, but the Mount had not yet been levelled by the Romans, Ed.] when he saw ben Zoma in front of him, and the latter did not rise in acknowledgment of the presence of his teacher. Rabbi Yoshua asked ben Zoma what subject he was so deeply immersed in that he had not noticed the presence of his teacher. The latter replied: “I was contemplating the significance of the difference between the “upper waters,” and the “lower waters,” (Genesis 1,7) and he had discovered that the distance between them was only three fingers’ breadth.” He claimed that the proof was founding Genesis 1,2 where the spirit of the Lord is described as hovering above the surface of the waters.” He considered the word מרחפת, used by the Torah there as describing the act of “hovering” as a reference to a pigeon hovering above its young without touching them. Upon hearing this, Rabbi Yoshua commented to his other students: “ben Zoma is still on the outside.” He meant that ben Zoma had not yet become privy to hidden aspects of the Torah. [The reader will note that ben Zoma, in spite of sayings of his being quoted in the tractate Avot, is never referred to as “Rabbi.” Ed.]
We learn from this passage that even if a person performs the commandments in a manner which affords G’d satisfaction as the worshipper had reduced himself to negating earthly concerns, this does not automatically mean that he has attained the level of awe of the Creator that would overcome him when he enters the palace of a King. He may have attained the awe that a visitor to the King’s palace experienced when entering the vestibule of the palace, but not the awe that overcomes people who enter the inner sanctum of the palace. The closer the visitor approaches the presence of the king, the more profoundly will he be impressed with the aura of glory and power surrounding his majesty. Recognition of this obligates him to prostrate himself, this act being an expression of his being aware how totally inadequate anything that he had done to honour his king really was.
Furthermore, even having performed the mitzvah according to the halachah and exclusively in order to fulfill G’d’s wish, one must not congratulate oneself for having carried out one’s Creator’s wishes and have pleased him. If one thinks along these lines, one’s performance of the commandment will not please the Lord.
It is related in Chagigah 15 that it happened once that Rabbi Yoshua ben Chananyah (one of the leading scholars in his time) was standing on one of the steps leading up to the Temple Mount, [the Temple had already been destroyed, but the Mount had not yet been levelled by the Romans, Ed.] when he saw ben Zoma in front of him, and the latter did not rise in acknowledgment of the presence of his teacher. Rabbi Yoshua asked ben Zoma what subject he was so deeply immersed in that he had not noticed the presence of his teacher. The latter replied: “I was contemplating the significance of the difference between the “upper waters,” and the “lower waters,” (Genesis 1,7) and he had discovered that the distance between them was only three fingers’ breadth.” He claimed that the proof was founding Genesis 1,2 where the spirit of the Lord is described as hovering above the surface of the waters.” He considered the word מרחפת, used by the Torah there as describing the act of “hovering” as a reference to a pigeon hovering above its young without touching them. Upon hearing this, Rabbi Yoshua commented to his other students: “ben Zoma is still on the outside.” He meant that ben Zoma had not yet become privy to hidden aspects of the Torah. [The reader will note that ben Zoma, in spite of sayings of his being quoted in the tractate Avot, is never referred to as “Rabbi.” Ed.]
We learn from this passage that even if a person performs the commandments in a manner which affords G’d satisfaction as the worshipper had reduced himself to negating earthly concerns, this does not automatically mean that he has attained the level of awe of the Creator that would overcome him when he enters the palace of a King. He may have attained the awe that a visitor to the King’s palace experienced when entering the vestibule of the palace, but not the awe that overcomes people who enter the inner sanctum of the palace. The closer the visitor approaches the presence of the king, the more profoundly will he be impressed with the aura of glory and power surrounding his majesty. Recognition of this obligates him to prostrate himself, this act being an expression of his being aware how totally inadequate anything that he had done to honour his king really was.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Genesis 17,13., “to be circumcised, etc.:” [what follows is not documented although the author quotes Bereshit Rabbah, 49. It is not found there, nor in Bereshit Rabbah 47, where it ought to be, if at all. The author himself appears to have had his doubts, and this is why he attributes the so-called “quote” די לעבד להיות כרבו, “it is appropriate for a servant to emulate his master,” to a statement in the Levush. The authenticity of the statement has been questioned as it implies that just as G’d is “circumcised,” so His favourite creatures must be. I will content myself with paraphrasing the thoughts of the author. We know that in order to create a physical world, G’d had to “reduce” the impact of His emanations, or to be מצמצם, “to understate the extent of His brilliance.” In order for G’d to conclude a covenant with Avraham in his capacity as the founder of the Jewish people, G’d’s “junior” partner on earth, he and the people under his authority had to perform a symbolic act on their body, i.e. the removal of their foreskin. By doing this they emulated an attribute used by their Creator. This explanation may answer the question that if G’d created everything in His universe in a perfect state, (compare Genesis 1,31) why would it be necessary at this stage for Avraham to remove a G’d given part of his body? Ed.]
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Flames of Faith
Tzelem Elokim: The image of God, used in Gen. 1:27.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy