레위기 10:18 해설: Rashi, Ibn Ezra, Rashbam & Siftei Chakhamim

הֵ֚ן לֹא־הוּבָ֣א אֶת־דָּמָ֔הּ אֶל־הַקֹּ֖דֶשׁ פְּנִ֑ימָה אָכ֨וֹל תֹּאכְל֥וּ אֹתָ֛הּ בַּקֹּ֖דֶשׁ כַּאֲשֶׁ֥ר צִוֵּֽיתִי׃

그 피를 성소에 들여오지 아니하였으니 그 제육은 너희가 나의 명한 대로 거룩한 곳에서 먹었어야 할 것이니라

Rashi

'הן לא הובא וגו‎ BEHOLD [THE BLOOD OF IT] WAS NOT BROUGHT [IN WITHIN THE HOLY PLACE] — for if it had been brought,then indeed was it your duty to burn it, as it is said (Leviticus 6:23) “Any sin-offering whereof any of the blood is brought [into the appointed tent, … shall not be eaten; it shall be burnt in the fire]” (Zevachim 101a; Pesachim 82a);
랍비에게 질문하기BookmarkShareCopy

Ibn Ezra

Its blood was not brought into the inner court of the Sanctuary unlike the bull that atones for all of the commandments, and which can be brought by the High Priest [4:4] or by the entire congregation [4:14]. One might point out that there is one sin-offering of a bull that is entirely burned, but whose blood is not brought into the inner court (i.e., the golden altar, in front of the Partition) [Exodus 29:14]. Understand, though, that that bull was a sin-offering for the Altar. This goat, on the other hand, was a sin-offering for the people; therefore, its meat belongs to the kohen.
랍비에게 질문하기BookmarkShareCopy

Rashbam

הן לא הובא את דמה אל הקדש פנימה, into the sanctuary; all sin offers whose blood is destined for the golden altar or dividing curtain must be burned as has been made clear in Leviticus 6,23. None of it must be eaten by the priests. However, the sin offering under discussion is one whose blood was sprinkled on the copper altar in the courtyard of the Tabernacle.
랍비에게 질문하기BookmarkShareCopy

Rashi

אכל תאכלו אתה YE SHOULD INDEED HAVE EATEN IT although you were Onanim,
랍비에게 질문하기BookmarkShareCopy

Rashi

כאשר צויתי AS I COMMANDED you in the case of the meal-offering (vv. 12, 13).
랍비에게 질문하기BookmarkShareCopy