민수기 30:17 해설: Rabbeinu Bahya, Rav Hirsch & Ibn Ezra

בין איש לאשתו, בין אב לבתו, “between man and his wife, between father and his daughter.” Our sages in Sifri Mattot 156 drew a comparison between husband and father. Just as the husband is only permitted to revoke those vows of his wife which either directly affect their marital relations or which represent an affliction upon his wife threatening to make her repulsive to her husband’s eyes, so the father also may only cancel vows of his daughter if they are either an affliction for his daughter undermining her health, or otherwise disturb the normal relationship between father and daughter. If, for instance, the daughter had vowed not to provide the services for her father which a daughter is expected to perform for him, the father is entitled to declare such a vow as null and void. This is also spelled out specifically in the Jerusalem Talmud Nedarim 11,1. Nachmanides, in his volume on the laws of vows, agrees with the Jerusalem Talmud.

בין איש לאשתו (siehe zu Verse 14 u. 6).,בנעריה בית אביה solange sie alsנערה dem Hause des Vaters angehört, also bis sie durchנשואין in das Haus des Mannes übergegangen.

Regarding a man and his wife. And she is a bogeres (at least the age of twelve and a half).