이사야 5:14의 미드라쉬
לָכֵ֗ן הִרְחִ֤יבָה שְּׁאוֹל֙ נַפְשָׁ֔הּ וּפָעֲרָ֥ה פִ֖יהָ לִבְלִי־חֹ֑ק וְיָרַ֨ד הֲדָרָ֧הּ וַהֲמוֹנָ֛הּ וּשְׁאוֹנָ֖הּ וְעָלֵ֥ז בָּֽהּ׃
음부가 그 욕망을 크게 내어 한량 없이 그 입을 벌린즉 그들의 호화로움과 그들의 많은 무리와 그들의 떠드는 것과 그 중에서 연락하는 자가 거기 빠질 것이라
Kohelet Rabbah
“Dead flies spoil and froth a perfumer’s oil; a little folly is weightier than wisdom, than honor” (Ecclesiastes 10:1).
“Dead flies spoil and froth a perfumer’s oil” – ben Azai and Rabbi Akiva: ben Azai said: One fly that dies does not spoil and froth a perfumer’s oil; but a single sin that one performs will cause him to lose much good.
Rabbi Akiva expounded: “Therefore, the netherworld has expanded itself, and opened its mouth without limit [ḥok]” (Isaiah 5:14). It is not written ḥukim, but rather “without ḥok,” one who does not have mitzvot to tip the scales in favor of his virtues.1The word ḥok (plural, ḥukim) can mean limit or statute. Rabbi Akiva interprets the verse according to the second meaning, such that the verse means that the netherworld takes a person who is missing just one mitzva that would have tipped the scales in his favor.
Those who engage in allegorical interpretations of the Torah say: A person is judged on the basis of the majority of his [deeds]. A person should always assess himself as though he is half virtuous and half guilty; if he performs one mitzva, happy is he, as he tipped his scales in favor of virtue, if he performs one transgression, woe is he, as he tipped his scales in favor of guilt. Rabbi Shimon ben Elazar said: Because the individual is judged on the basis of the majority of his [deeds], and the world is judged on the basis of its majority, with the single transgression that this one [individual] performs, he causes himself and the world to lose much good.
“Dead flies spoil and froth a perfumer’s oil” – ben Azai and Rabbi Akiva: ben Azai said: One fly that dies does not spoil and froth a perfumer’s oil; but a single sin that one performs will cause him to lose much good.
Rabbi Akiva expounded: “Therefore, the netherworld has expanded itself, and opened its mouth without limit [ḥok]” (Isaiah 5:14). It is not written ḥukim, but rather “without ḥok,” one who does not have mitzvot to tip the scales in favor of his virtues.1The word ḥok (plural, ḥukim) can mean limit or statute. Rabbi Akiva interprets the verse according to the second meaning, such that the verse means that the netherworld takes a person who is missing just one mitzva that would have tipped the scales in his favor.
Those who engage in allegorical interpretations of the Torah say: A person is judged on the basis of the majority of his [deeds]. A person should always assess himself as though he is half virtuous and half guilty; if he performs one mitzva, happy is he, as he tipped his scales in favor of virtue, if he performs one transgression, woe is he, as he tipped his scales in favor of guilt. Rabbi Shimon ben Elazar said: Because the individual is judged on the basis of the majority of his [deeds], and the world is judged on the basis of its majority, with the single transgression that this one [individual] performs, he causes himself and the world to lose much good.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Midrash Tanchuma
(Lev. 12:3:) “And on the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised.” It is not written here that one lays out expenses over circumcision. See how much Israel loves the commandments, how many expenses they lay out in order to observe them! The Holy One, blessed be He, said, “You make the commandments joyful; I am increasing your joy, as stated (in Is. 29:19), ‘Then the humble shall increase their joy in the Lord.’” Beloved is circumcision, such that the Holy One, blessed be He, swore to Avraham that anyone who is circumcised will not descend to Geihinnom, as stated (Genesis 15:18), “On that day, the Lord made a covenant with Avram, saying.” And who does descend there? See what is written below (Gen. 15:19), “The Kenite, the Kenizzite ….” And so did Ezekiel see, as stated (Ezekiel 32:18-30), “Son of man, wail upon the masses of Egypt and make it descend, and the daughters of mighty nations, to the lowest lands and those that fall in the pit. Who do you surpass in pleasantness, go down and lay with the uncircumcised…. Assyria is there with all of her congregation, its graves are around it…. Meshech and Tubal and all their masses are there, its graves are surrounding it, they are all uncircumcised…. The princes of the North are there….” And so does Isaiah says (Isaiah 5:14), “And so does the pit widen itself and opened wide its mouth without measure (chok),” to he that doesn't have a statute [the words — "without measure" — can also be rendered "to he that doesn't have a statute"]. And where [do we see that] it (the commandment to circumcise) is called a statue? As it says (Ps. 105:10) "And He established it unto Jacob for a statute, to Israel for an everlasting covenant," because the Holy One, blessed be He, placed His name with Israel. And what is the name and the seal that He placed in them? It is Shaddai, the shin is placed on the nose, the dalet on the hand, and the yud on the circumcision. Therefore when he goes to his eternal home, there is an angel appointed in the Garden of Eden who takes him and brings him into the Garden of Eden. And regarding the heretics and sinners, The Holy One, “blessed be He, commands the angel to pull his foreskin (i.e. reverse his circumcision), as it says (Ps. 55:21) "He hath put forth his hands against them that were at peace with him; he has profaned his covenant." It happened that Tyrannus Rufus the wicked asked R. Aqiva, “Which works are the more beautiful? Those of the Holy One, blessed be He, or those of flesh and blood?” He said to him, “Those of flesh and blood are the more beautiful.” Tyrannus Rufus the wicked said to him, “Look at the heavens and the earth. Are you able to make anything like them?” R. Aqiva said to him, “Do not talk to me about something which is high above mortals, things over which they have no control, but about things which are usual among people.” He said to him, “Why do you circumcise?” He said to him, “I also knew that you were going to say this to me. I therefore anticipated [your question] when I said to you, ‘A work of flesh and blood is more beautiful than one of the Holy One, blessed be He.’ Bring me wheat spikes and white bread.”16Qeluska’ot, from the Gk.: kollikes (“long rolls of coarse bread”) or kollikia (the diminutive of kollikes). He said to him, “The former is the work of the Holy One, blessed be He, and the latter is the work of flesh and blood. Is not the latter more beautiful?” Tyrannus Rufus said to him, “Inasmuch as He finds pleasure in circumcision, why does no one emerge from his mother's belly circumcised?” R. Aqiva said to him, “And why does his umbilical cord come out on him? Does not his mother cut his umbilical cord? So why does he not come out circumcised? Because the Holy One, blessed be He, only gave Israel the commandments in order to purify them. Therefore, David said (in II Sam. 22:31 = Ps. 18:31), ‘the word of the Lord is pure.’”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Midrash Tanchuma Buber
He said to him (in Gen. 24:2): PLEASE PUT YOUR HAND < UNDER MY THIGH >. See how they loved circumcision! And Jacob also, when he had Joseph swear, said to him (in Gen. 47:29): [PLEASE] PUT [YOUR HAND UNDER MY THIGH]. For what reason did they love circumcision? Because they knew that it was going to save their children from Gehinnom in the world to come.26See Gen. R. 48:8; Exod. R. 19:4; Tanh., 5:6; cf. M. Ps. 1:20; 6:1; cf. also Gen. R. 21:9. Thus it is stated (in Is. 5:14): THEREFORE SHEOL HAS OPENED WIDE ITS GULLET [AND PARTED ITS MOUTH < FOR ONE > WITHOUT A STATUTE].27A more traditional translation would read: PARTED ITS MOUTH BEYOND MEASURE. What is the meaning of WITHOUT A STATUTE? There is no statute but circumcision. Thus it is stated (in Ps. 105:9f.): < THE COVENANT > WHICH HE CUT WITH ABRAHAM…. AND WHICH HE ESTABLISHED FOR JACOB AS A STATUTE. But the Israelites, because they are circumcised, are saved from it. Thus it is stated (in Is. 43:2): WHEN YOU PASS THROUGH THE WATERS, < I WILL BE WITH YOU >.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition)
(Is. 5, 14) Therefore hath the deep enlarged her desire, and opened her mouth without measure (chok). Resh Lakish said: "This refers to him who failed to perform even one law of the Torah." R. Jochanan said to him: "Your explanation is not satisfactory to their Master. Say the reverse, even he who has studied but one law does not belong to Gehenna." (Zech. 13, 8) And it shall come to pass that in all the land, saith the Lord, two parts (of those) therein shall perish, but the third part shall be left therein. Resh Lakish said: "This refers to a third of Shem's descendants." And R. Jochanan said to him: "Your explanation is not satisfactory for their Master, but it refers to one-third of Noah's children." (Jer. 3, 14) I will take one of a city and two of a family, and bring you to Zion. Resh Lakish said: "It is to be taken literally." And R. Jochanan said again to him: "Their Master is not pleased with such an interpretation, but it means one righteous in a city saves the whole city, and two from a family save the whole family." R. Cahana was sitting before Rab interpreting the just-recited verse literally, and he said to him the very same thing. Rab saw R. Cahana combing his head and thereafter came and occupied his seat in Rab's college. He read to him (Job 28, 3) And she is not found in the land of the living. R. Cahana asked him: "Do you caution me?" He replied: "I only tell you the interpretation of this passage. The Torah cannot be found with him who supports himself by studying." It was taught in a Baraitha: R. Simai said: "The passage says (Ex. 6, 7) I will take you to me as a people, and (Ib. 8) I will bring you in unto the land. The Scripture compares their exodus from Egypt to the entrance in their land. Just as at the entering of the land, it was only two from six hundred thousand who made their exodus from Egypt (Joshua and Caleb), so also was their exodus from Egypt only two from six hundred thousand." Raba said: "And so also will it be in the time of the Messiah, as it is said (Hos. 2, 17) And she shall respond there, as in the days of her youth, and as in the day when she came up out of the land of Egypt."
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Midrash Tanchuma
Similarly, Isaiah declared: Therefore, the netherworld has enlarged her desire, and opened her mouth for those without law (hoq) (Isa. 5:14); that is, for those who have not observed the law of circumcision. Whence do we know that circumcision is called a law (hoq)? We know it from the verse And He established it unto Jacob for a statute (hoq), and to Israel for an everlasting covenant (Ps. 105:10). The Holy One, blessed be He, pulls down the foreskins of infidels and sinners in Israel who deny God and imitate the practices (huqim) of the nations, and even though they may be circumcised they descend to Gehenna, as is said: He hath put forth his hands against them that were at peace with him; he hath profaned his covenant (Ps. 55:21).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Midrash Tanchuma Buber
(Gen. 17:3:) THEN ABRAHAM FELL ON HIS FACE. Before he performed circumcision, he would fall < on his face before the Holy One >.115Tanh., Gen. 3:20. After he performed circumcision he did not fall < on his face >. Moreover, the wicked go down into Gehinnom only because of foreskin, as stated (in Is. 5:14): THEREFORE SHEOL HAS ENLARGED ITS DESIRE < AND OPENED ITS MOUTH FOR THOSE WITHOUT A STATUTE > (i.e., without circumcision). In the world to come, however, the Holy One will save Israel from Gehinnom by virtue of circumcision, as stated (in Prov. 31:21): SHE (i.e., Israel) HAS NO FEAR FOR HER HOUSEHOLD ON ACCOUNT OF (Gehinnom's) SNOW BECAUSE ALL HER HOUSEHOLD ARE DRESSED IN SCARLET.116Scarlet is the color of the blood from circumcision. Buber suggests reading SCARLET as TWICE in accordance with PRK 10:4, according to which the household of Israel wears the two parts of circumcision, the cutting off of the foreskin and the rolling back of the inner lining of the prepuce.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy