אַ֣ךְ בְּֽכוֹר־שׁ֡וֹר אֽוֹ־בְכ֨וֹר כֶּ֜שֶׂב אֽוֹ־בְכ֥וֹר עֵ֛ז לֹ֥א תִפְדֶּ֖ה קֹ֣דֶשׁ הֵ֑ם אֶת־דָּמָ֞ם תִּזְרֹ֤ק עַל־הַמִּזְבֵּ֙חַ֙ וְאֶת־חֶלְבָּ֣ם תַּקְטִ֔יר אִשֶּׁ֛ה לְרֵ֥יחַ נִיחֹ֖חַ לַֽיהוָֽה׃
오직 소의 처음 난 것이나 양의 처음 난 것이나 염소의 처음 난 것은 속하지 말지니 그것들은 거룩한즉 그 피는 단에 뿌리고 그 기름은 불살라 여호와께 향기로운 화제로 드릴 것이며
Bartenura
שנאמר חמש צאן עשויות – that they order their husbands say to him: “Arise and perform a new Commandment that was not commanded upon him that is less than this. And this corresponding per force, the first shearing, as it is written [in the Torah] regarding (Deuteronomy 18:4): “[the first shearing of] your sheep,” which implies many, whereas regarding the ox it is written (Numbers 18:17): “But the firstlings of cattle–בכור שור, [sheep or goats ]” (singular construction in the Hebrew) which implies even one. And similar gifts (Deuteronomy 18:3): “whether an ox or a sheep–אם שור אם שה .”
Bartenura
הבכור מוכרים אותו תמים חי – because concerning a first-born, it is written (Numbers 18:17): “[But the firstlings of cattle, sheep, or goats] may not be redeemed; [they are consecrated. You shall dash their blood against the altar, and turn their fat into smoke as a gift for a pleasing owner to the LORD],” but they can be sold.
German Commentary
so ist es frei von der Erstgeburtspflicht. obgleich sowohl Schaf wie Ziege beide erstgeburtspflichtig sind. Es wird dieses daraus geschlossen, weil es heisst (Num. 18, 17): אך בכור שור או בכור כשב או בכור עז und nicht: אך בכור שור או כשב או עז, das solle darauf hinweisen, dass es nicht genügt, wenn z. B. das erstgeborene Schaf das Erstgeborene von einem Schaf oder von einer Ziege ist, sondern es muss das Erstgeborene eines Schafes, oder wenn es eine Ziege ist, das Erstgeborene von einer Ziege sein.