민수기 35:31 관련 구절

Witnesses found guilty of plotting. Rebbi Joḥanan said, falsehood, falsehood¹⁹Deut. 21:18: Behold, a witness of falsehood is the witness, falsehood he spoke about his brother. The repetition of the term indicates that every single falsehood in testimony subjects the witness to a separate penalty.. Witnesses found guilty of plotting and then found guilty of lying²⁰In the same testimony, the witnesses were found guilty of “plotting”, of rendering impossible testimony, and then of false (but possible) testimony. If this is a civil case, where the witnesses have to pay for “plotting”, can they still be flogged for false testimony? R. Johanan says yes, R. Eleazar and R. Simeon ben Laqish say no, as discussed at length in Terumot 7:1 Notes 7–29, in particular Note 19 (Ketubot 3:1 Note 29).. Rebbi Joḥanan said, falsehood, falsehood. Rebbi Eleazar said, evildoer, evildoer. ²¹The text is from Terumot 7:1 Notes 21–23. The murderer is called evildoer in Num. 35:31, the person subject to flogging in Deut. 25. It is said evildoer for death penalty cases, and it is said evildoer for cases of whipping. Since for the evildoer subject to the death penalty there is no fine accompanying the death penalty, so for the evildoer subject to whipping there is no fine accompanying whipping.

Rebbi Immi the Babylonian in the name of the rabbis from there: The reason of Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish is “criminal, criminal.” “Criminal” is mentioned in capital cases, “criminal” is mentioned in cases of flogging. Just as for the criminal in capital cases there is no monetary fine, so for the criminal mentioned in flogging cases there is no monetary fine.