וֶֽהֱבִיאָ֗הּ אֶל־בְּנֵ֣י אַהֲרֹן֮ הַכֹּהֲנִים֒ וְקָמַ֨ץ מִשָּׁ֜ם מְלֹ֣א קֻמְצ֗וֹ מִסָּלְתָּהּ֙ וּמִשַּׁמְנָ֔הּ עַ֖ל כָּל־לְבֹנָתָ֑הּ וְהִקְטִ֨יר הַכֹּהֵ֜ן אֶת־אַזְכָּרָתָהּ֙ הַמִּזְבֵּ֔חָה אִשֵּׁ֛ה רֵ֥יחַ נִיחֹ֖חַ לַיהוָֽה׃
아론의 자손 제사장들에게로 가져 올 것이요 제사장은 그 고운 기름 가루 한 줌과 그 모든 유향을 취하여 기념물로 단 위에 불사를지니 이는 화제라 여호와께 향기로운 냄새니라
Jerusalem Talmud Shevuot
MISHNAH: The kinds of awareness of impurity are two1Either centered on sancta or the Sanctuary, as detailed in the Mishnah. All violations of the Sanctuary and sancta in a state of oblivion require a sacrifice depending on the wealth of the perpetrator (Lev. 2:2–13). which are four. If one became impure, realized it, then the impurity was forgotten but he was aware of sancta; or sancta were forgotten by him but he remembered impurity; or he forgot both, ate sanctum and realized it after he had eaten: he is obligated for a variable sacrifice.
If one became impure, realized it, the impurity was forgotten but he was aware of the Sanctuary; or the Sanctuary was forgotten by him but he remembered impurity; or he forgot both, entered the Sanctuary and realized it after he had left: he is obligated for a variable sacrifice.
If one became impure, realized it, the impurity was forgotten but he was aware of the Sanctuary; or the Sanctuary was forgotten by him but he remembered impurity; or he forgot both, entered the Sanctuary and realized it after he had left: he is obligated for a variable sacrifice.
Jerusalem Talmud Yoma
31Babli 47a, Menaḥot11a, Sifra Wayyiqra I Parshata 9(6).“His full handful32Lev. 2:2.. I could assume an overstuffed handful, the verse says, with his handful33Lev. 6:8.. If with his handful, I could assume that he picks it up with his finger tips, the verse says, his full handful. How is this? He sinks his hand into the baking pan34Lev. 2:5. or frying pan35Lev. 2:7. and wipes clean with his finger from top to bottom.”
Jerusalem Talmud Taanit
Rebbi Levi91In the Tosephta (Berakhot3:25) this is a tannaitic text together with the later quote about composite benedictions; in the Babli (loc. cit.) it is attributed to the school of R. Samuel bar Naḥman, and by implication to the latter’s teacher, the first generation Amora R. Jonathan. said, corresponding to the eighteen Divine Names92In biblical language, אזכרה is the part of a cereal sacrifice burned on the altar (Lev. 2:2). It is best explained from Accadic zekrun“pronounced name”, since the part to be burned is taken ceremoniously in God’s Name. The same explanation applies here; the word is used exclusively to refer to the Name YHWH. written in Give to the Eternal, sons of the mighty93Ps. 29.. Rebbi Ḥuna said: If it were said that they are seventeen, tell him the one against sectarians the Sages fixed already at Jabneh94Rebbi Ḥuna’s question is an attack against all who try to find a reason for the eighteen benedictions by pointing out that in the 500 years between the institution of formalized prayer by the Men of the Great Assembly and the Synhedrion of Rabban Gamliel, the Amidah prayer consisted of only 17 benedictions. Rebbi Ḥuna’s answer is that the eighteenth benediction also is an institution of the Synhedrion, the legal successor of the Great Assembly, and, therefore, all eighteen benedictions have the same status.. Rebbi Eleazar ben Rebbi Yose objected before Rebbi Yose, but is it not written the God of Glory thundered95Ps. 29:3. This Divine name is not an askara.? He said to him: Has it not been stated: “He takes together the one against sectarians and sinners in ‘He Who subdues offenders’, the one for elders and proselytes in ‘Assurance to the righteous’, and the one for David in ‘He Who builds Jerusalem.’96This implies that the benediction containing the curse upon apostates and sectarians (i. e., Christians) was not newly introduced at Jabneh but that it was a modification of an old benediction directed at those who wantonly transgress the commandments of the Torah. Hence, the original number of benedictions instituted by the Great Assembly was 18. The Palestinian version had no separate benediction asking for the return of the Davidic rulers. The Babylonian version has no mention of the Davidic dynasty in the prayer for the rebuilding of Jerusalem; it is retained in today’s Yemenite prayerbook. Current Ashkenazic and Sephardic versions combine the Palestinian prayer for Jerusalem and the Davidic dynasty in benediction 14, with the Babylonian one for the Davidic dynasty alone in benediction 15. Hence, Psalm 29 accommodates both the Galilean 18 benedictions based on the number of mentions of the Tetragrammaton, and the 19 of the Babylonian version, based on all invocations of the Deity in the Psalm.” Then you have enough to have ˂a Divine Name˃97Added from G and ב. for each one of them.