신명기 17:12의 탈무드

HALAKHAH: “They came and told her, your son died,” etc. ¹¹⁶The same text Giṭṭin, Halakhah 8:6. In both places, the problem discussed is not the one stated in the Mishnah. The parallel discussion in the Babli is 92a/b where there is no mention of the position of R. Jeremiah. If she should not have married but entered levirate, this is the case of a sister-in-law who married without ḥalîṣah. Rebbi Jeremiah said, this man performs ḥalīṣah, the other one keeps her. Rebbi Jehudah ben Pazi in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: She must leave¹¹⁷This is a rabbinic decree since the outside marriage of a woman under obligation of levirate is invalid (Chapter 1, Notes 93, 94); therefore, the widow was not legally married during the levir’s lifetime and how can you leave a nonexisting marriage?. Rebbi Yose in the name of Rebbi Hila: She must leave. Rebbi Yose asked Rebbi Phineas, how does the rabbi hold? He said, with Rebbi Jeremiah. He said to him, change your mind, for otherwise I shall publicly call you a rebellious Elder¹¹⁸Deut. 17:12.. Rebbi Zevidah said, a baraita¹¹⁹Cf. Tosephta 11:8, Giṭṭin 8:6. supports Rebbi Joḥanan: “She must leave both of them and the thirteen items¹²⁰Enumerated in Mishnah 1. apply to her, following Rebbi Meïr who said it in the name of his teacher Rebbi Aqibah. But the Sages say, there is no bastard from a sister-in-law¹²¹Cf. Halakhah 4:15..” They only said, “there is no bastard from a sister-in-law,” therefore she must leave. And we have stated, “she must leave”. And Rebbi Joḥanan said, she must leave.