신명기 2:31의 탈무드

Rebbi Isaac bar Naḥman: Did not Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish ask Rebbi Ḥaninah: What is the status of one who buys in Ammon and Moab⁷⁵What is the status for Sabbatical and tithes? From the discussion in the paragraph after the next it will be clear that “Ammon and Moab” does not refer to the Biblical states but to the domain of the former tribes Reuben and Gad in Transjordan.? Rebbi Zeïra said, I asked this question before Rebbi Assi: Are not Ammon and Moab from Moses? Rebbi Mana asked this question before Rebbi Ḥaggai: Are not Ammon and Moab from Moses? Ammon and Moab are not from Rebbi Eleazar ben Azariah⁸⁴In Mishnah Yadayim 4 there is a list of decrees enacted on the day R. Eleazar ben Azariah was made head of the Synhedrion. On the authority of R. Joshua it was decreed that “Ammon and Moab” (i. e., the domains of the former tribes Reuben and Gad) must give tithe of the poor in the Sabbatical. This implies that the land there is cultivated during the Sabbatical. Therefore, Transjordan cannot be part of the Holy Land where work is forbidden.! Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun said, it is written (Num. 22:26): “For Ḥešbon is the city of Siḥon, the king of the Amorites.” Rebbi Simeon was not sure whether it was purified from the hand of Siḥon and Og or not. If you say it was purified it is obligated, if you say it was not purified it is free. Rebbi Tanḥuma said (Deut. 2:31): “Make profane for inheritance, to inherit his land.” I made his land profane before you⁸⁵Even in the times of Moses and Joshua, Transjordan did not have the status of a Holy Land. The opposite conclusion is drawn from the same verses in Babli Ḥulin 60b..