출애굽기 13:7의 탈무드

MISHNAH: A Non-Jew’s leavened matter which existed during Passover is permitted for usufruct but a Jew’s is forbidden for usufruct since it is said⁹²Ex. 13:7., it should not be seen in your possession. If a Non-Jew gave a loan to a Jew secured by leavened matter, after Passover it is permitted for usufruct⁹³If the leavened matter is mortgaged, the Jew may not sell or destroy it; therefore it is considered the creditor’s property. The Babli disagrees and restricts the Mishnah to the case that the Non-Jew has custody of the material. but if a Jew gave a loan to a Non-Jew secured by leavened matter, after Passover it is forbidden for usufruct. Leavened matter on which debris fell⁹⁴When a wall or a house collapsed. is as if eliminated; Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel says, only one which cannot be dug out by a dog.

It should not be seen in your possession⁹²Ex. 13:7.. There are Tannaim who state, it should not be seen in your possession, yours you may not see, [but]¹³⁰Corrector’s addition. As the sentence after the next shows, the addition is unnecessary. you may see Heaven’s. There are Tannaim who state, not even Heaven’s. He who said, yours you may not see, you may see Heaven’s, if its dedication precedes its elimination¹³¹Everybody agrees that Temple property is exempt from elimination. A person may dedicate his leavened matter to the Temple, to be sold and the proceeds used for the service. If he did this before noon-time on the 14^th, the dedication is valid. But if it was done on or after noontime, the matter already is (rabbinically) forbidden for usufruct, it is worthless, and nothing worthless can be dedicated to the Temple. The dedication is invalid and he is guilty of disregarding the obligation to eliminate leavened matter in a timely fashion.. He who said, not even Heaven’s, if its dedication is after its elimination. Rebbi Abun bar Ḥiyya said before Rebbi Zeˋira: Explain it about sancta for which he is responsible in case of alienation following Rebbi Simeon¹³²It seems that here also one refers to matters dedicated to the Temple, which are sancta as long as they are not redeemed for the benefit of the Temple. It is assumed that the dedication was not “this is given to the Temple” but “I will give a certain value to the Temple”. In the latter case only actual delivery fulfills the vow and according to R. Simeon [Mishnah Bava qamma 7:5 (Note 56)] even after dedication it remains the votary’s personal property until delivered..

⁷⁶The following is a much shortened version, mostly by the corrector, of a text in Eruvin 10, Notes 165–175. Rebbi Joshua said to him, are you not like one who burns sancta on a holiday? Rebbi Eliezer told him, it is burned automatically. Rebbi Joshua said to him, are you not transgressing it should not be seen, and it should notbe found⁷⁷Ex. 13:7.? He told him, it is better to violate a prohibition that was not caused by you than a prohibition which will come before you.