민수기 32:29의 탈무드

MISHNAH: “On condition¹⁰⁶He gives the woman a peruṭah as marriage gift and specifies that he preliminarily marries her as owner of a bet kor, 30 bet se‘ah or 75’000 square cubits of agricultural land. If he actually is the owner of the land, she is married immediately; he can show her the title to his land later. that I possess a bet kor of arable land,” she is preliminarily married if he owns it. “On condition that I possess it at place X”, she is preliminarily married if he owns it at place X, otherwise she is not preliminarily married. “On condition that I shall show you a bet kor of arable land,” she is preliminarily married and he has to show her¹⁰⁷Since he said “to show”, it means that she has to see it with her own eyes; it is not enough for him to prove his ownership to her., but if he showed it in the valley¹⁰⁸בִּקְעָא everywhere means open agricultural land not easily accessible. In all these conditions, a claim of ownership is understood. she is not preliminarily married. ¹⁰⁹In the independent Mishnah mss. and later in the Halakhah here starts a new Mishnah 4. Rebbi Meïr says, any condition which is not formulated in the manner of the condition imposed on the tribes of Gad and Reuben is invalid¹⁰⁹In the independent Mishnah mss. and later in the Halakhah here starts a new Mishnah 4., as it is said¹¹¹Num. 32:29–30.: “Moses said to them, if the tribes of Gad and Reuben cross over … but if they will not in arms cross over with you, etc.” Rebbi Ḥananiah ben Gamliel said, that formulation was necessary¹¹²The involved formulation of the deed of Transjordan to the tribes of Gad and Reuben was necessary under the circumstances. A simple condition is valid; it is not necessary for a man to say: “Be preliminarily married to me on condition that I possess a bet kor of arable land, but be not preliminarily married to me if I do not possess a bet kor of arable land.” for otherwise one would have understood that even in the Land of Canaan they should not inherit.