Chasidut sobre Gênesis 29:32
וַתַּ֤הַר לֵאָה֙ וַתֵּ֣לֶד בֵּ֔ן וַתִּקְרָ֥א שְׁמ֖וֹ רְאוּבֵ֑ן כִּ֣י אָֽמְרָ֗ה כִּֽי־רָאָ֤ה יְהוָה֙ בְּעָנְיִ֔י כִּ֥י עַתָּ֖ה יֶאֱהָבַ֥נִי אִישִֽׁי׃
E Léia <span class="x" onmousemove="Show('perush','É algo inefavelmente importante para as mulheres semitas a fecundidade, em oposto ao modo de pensar ocidental. Mulher sem filhos entre judeus e árabes sentem-se inúteis e desoladas. A preocupação de cuidar da beleza física é menos importante entre as semitas, do que de dar filhos a seu esposo. Isto explica a reação de Raquel no cap. seguinte.');" onmouseout="Hide('perush');">concebeu</span> e deu à luz um filho, a quem chamou <span class="x" onmousemove="Show('perush','“Vêde: um filho!”, como que dizendo: “Vêde: [Deus me compensou, e concedeu-me] um filho!');" onmouseout="Hide('perush');">Rúben</span>; pois disse: Porque o SENHOR atendeu à minha aflição; agora me amará meu marido.
Kedushat Levi
Exodus 1,1. “And these are the names of the tribes of Israel; Reuven, etc.”; the reason why the names of the holy tribes are enumerated once more is because their qualifications as being part of the twelve holy tribes is already alluded to in their names, as we shall see. Reuven was called by that name as his mother had proclaimed at his birth (Genesis 29,32) “G’d has seen my distress; now my husband will love me.” When Leah bore Shimon (verse 13 ibid), she gave thanks to G’d to listening to her prayer. When Levi was born (verse 34) she expressed her conviction to G’d that from then on her husband would devote more of his time to her. Both Shimon’s name from the word שמע “to hear,” and Levi’s name from the word ללוות, “to keep company with,” reflect the connection to G’d that Leah saw in these sons as accompanying them already from birth. When the reader will once more peruse the relevant chapter in Parshat Vayetze he will see that all the names bore testimony to the mothers seeing in these sons being born a gift of G’d, so that it was no more than natural that the sons when growing up would excel in their service to G’d, i.e. they would qualify for the title: קדוש, “holy.”
It would be quite inconceivable that the matriarchs would have named their children in commemorating a physical craving of theirs as having been fulfilled. The fact that the Torah refers to these tribes, i.e. שבטים, not by their secular name, but calls them מטות, a word reminding us of someone, i.e. G’d leaning out of a window to see what goes on beneath him. According to our author it is used to describe physical cravings which have been sublimated to become spiritual cravings.
It would be quite inconceivable that the matriarchs would have named their children in commemorating a physical craving of theirs as having been fulfilled. The fact that the Torah refers to these tribes, i.e. שבטים, not by their secular name, but calls them מטות, a word reminding us of someone, i.e. G’d leaning out of a window to see what goes on beneath him. According to our author it is used to describe physical cravings which have been sublimated to become spiritual cravings.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
We need to address the reason why the twelve sons of Yaakov are sometimes referred to as שבטים, “tribes,” and on other occasions as מטות, in our classical literature, as well as why both Yehudah and Joseph are referred to as “king” in our sources, and why our matriarchs named their children as representing symbols of our physical world rather than as symbols of the celestial spheres, when it is clear that they themselves were far from viewing our existence on this terrestrial part of the world as our real “life,” the very names the matriarchs gave their children reflect that their entire orientation was focused on spiritual values accompanied by prophetic insights. [If any of you have my translation of the commentary Tzror Hamor by Rabbi Avraham Saba, you will be able to read up on all this in his commentary on Vayetze. Ed.]
By naming their children, the matriarchs provide us with a model lesson on how to serve the Lord. Our matriarchs taught us how G’d, the Creator of the universe, in spite of the thousands of concerns that keep Him occupied around the clock, never neglects the problems of an individual creature of His on earth. Leah testifies that this Creator took time out to notice that she was relatively hated by her husband as a result of which He granted her children, in spite of her being barren by nature. (Genesis 29,32) The phrase: ויפתח רחמה in that verse makes it clear that she was barren, why else would G’d have had to “open her womb,” seeing that pregnancy is one of the most natural results of marital intercourse?
Another lesson we learn from the matriarchs is that the word, i.e. request, by a tzaddik, makes an impression in the celestial spheres and that he or she can draw down additional largesse from the Creator to these “lower” regions of the universe. We have explained that this is the reason that the אותיות, letters in the Hebrew alphabet, [when used as the Holy Tongue, Ed.] are called אבנים, “stones,” in the sense of “building blocks,” as the words formulated by the tzaddik in prayer enhance and improve the structure known as the תחתונים, “the lower regions” of the universe. These prayers, as we have demonstrated at the beginning of the last portion, are the real תולדות, enduring achievements by the righteous on earth. [Compare pages 139 and 140 on how a true תולדה is a son in his father’s image, i.e. Yitzchok being a continuation of the spiritual values represented by his father. Ed.]
The names given by their mothers to the founding tribes of the Jewish people retained their significance throughout our history, and this is why both Yaakov and Moses at the respective end of their lives confirmed this in their blessings.
When Leah explained why she called her firstborn son Reuven, she said: ראה ה' בעניי, “for the Lord has seen my affliction,” adding a prayer כי עתה יאהבני אישי, “for from now on my husband will love me.” This was an appeal for G’d’s largesse to be drawn down to her for her benefit. When the letters, words of a tzaddik are translated into “building blocks,” אבנים, they become transformed into אבנים, which translated into Aramaic is equivalent to אבהן, “fathers, founding fathers,” as in רועה אבן ישראל, (Genesis 49,24) When these letters ascend heavenwards, -mature- they become not only corner stones, but, as is customary with sons, eventually they themselves become “fathers,” אבהן. [The concept of letters being “stones” dates back to the Sefer Yetzirah chapter 6. Ed.] In Hebrew, the Holy Tongue, the word אבנים is a combination of אב, “father,” and בנים, “sons.” The progression in Leah’s insights is demonstrated when at the birth of her fourth son, יהודה, she no longer prays for her husband’s love, but is full of gratitude, הפעם אודה את ה', “this time I thank the Lord, etc.” (Genesis 29,35). [The author continues to demonstrate that Rachel also was on the same wavelength as her older sister when naming her children. I have omitted the details. Ed.]
By naming their children, the matriarchs provide us with a model lesson on how to serve the Lord. Our matriarchs taught us how G’d, the Creator of the universe, in spite of the thousands of concerns that keep Him occupied around the clock, never neglects the problems of an individual creature of His on earth. Leah testifies that this Creator took time out to notice that she was relatively hated by her husband as a result of which He granted her children, in spite of her being barren by nature. (Genesis 29,32) The phrase: ויפתח רחמה in that verse makes it clear that she was barren, why else would G’d have had to “open her womb,” seeing that pregnancy is one of the most natural results of marital intercourse?
Another lesson we learn from the matriarchs is that the word, i.e. request, by a tzaddik, makes an impression in the celestial spheres and that he or she can draw down additional largesse from the Creator to these “lower” regions of the universe. We have explained that this is the reason that the אותיות, letters in the Hebrew alphabet, [when used as the Holy Tongue, Ed.] are called אבנים, “stones,” in the sense of “building blocks,” as the words formulated by the tzaddik in prayer enhance and improve the structure known as the תחתונים, “the lower regions” of the universe. These prayers, as we have demonstrated at the beginning of the last portion, are the real תולדות, enduring achievements by the righteous on earth. [Compare pages 139 and 140 on how a true תולדה is a son in his father’s image, i.e. Yitzchok being a continuation of the spiritual values represented by his father. Ed.]
The names given by their mothers to the founding tribes of the Jewish people retained their significance throughout our history, and this is why both Yaakov and Moses at the respective end of their lives confirmed this in their blessings.
When Leah explained why she called her firstborn son Reuven, she said: ראה ה' בעניי, “for the Lord has seen my affliction,” adding a prayer כי עתה יאהבני אישי, “for from now on my husband will love me.” This was an appeal for G’d’s largesse to be drawn down to her for her benefit. When the letters, words of a tzaddik are translated into “building blocks,” אבנים, they become transformed into אבנים, which translated into Aramaic is equivalent to אבהן, “fathers, founding fathers,” as in רועה אבן ישראל, (Genesis 49,24) When these letters ascend heavenwards, -mature- they become not only corner stones, but, as is customary with sons, eventually they themselves become “fathers,” אבהן. [The concept of letters being “stones” dates back to the Sefer Yetzirah chapter 6. Ed.] In Hebrew, the Holy Tongue, the word אבנים is a combination of אב, “father,” and בנים, “sons.” The progression in Leah’s insights is demonstrated when at the birth of her fourth son, יהודה, she no longer prays for her husband’s love, but is full of gratitude, הפעם אודה את ה', “this time I thank the Lord, etc.” (Genesis 29,35). [The author continues to demonstrate that Rachel also was on the same wavelength as her older sister when naming her children. I have omitted the details. Ed.]
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy