Salmos 90:1 Midrash: Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Midrash Tehillim, Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition) & Aggadat Bereshit

(Gen. 37:1:) NOW JACOB DWELT IN THE LAND WHERE HIS FATHER HAD SOJOURNED, < IN THE LAND OF CANAAN >. This text is related (to Deut. 33:27): THE ETERNAL GOD IS A DWELLING PLACE. R. Jeremiah said: We do not know (from the Hebrew text of Scripture) whether a DWELLING PLACE is GOD or whether GOD is a DWELLING PLACE. ¹Gen. R. 68:9 states the problem more clearly: “We do not know whether the Holy One is the place for his world or whether the world is his place.” Similarly, M. Pss. 90:10. When it says (in Ps. 90:1): A PRAYER OF MOSES, THE MAN OF GOD: O LORD, YOU HAVE BEEN OUR DWELLING PLACE, [here the Holy One is the dwelling place for his world and the world is not his place]. Although the Holy One created his world, he did not dwell in the land but a righteous one;²Cf. MS 1240 from the De Rossi library in Parma: “He did not dwell in the land with < the > righteous.” Perhaps the text should read: “He did not dwell in the land but with the righteous. So Y. Elman in a private communication. and by their merit < such righteous > ones sustain the world, as stated (in Deut. 33:27, cont.): AND UNDERNEATH ARE THE ARMS OF THE WORLD.³English translations generally render ARMS OF THE WORLD as “everlasting arms,” but here the midrash views the merits of the righteous as supporting the world like the arms of the mythological Atlas. Come and see how, during all the time the wicked are in the world, the righteous never appear. And so you find that, during all the time Esau was in the land of Israel, Jacob was unable to appear. Esau passed on, as stated (in Gen. 36:6): THEN ESAU TOOK HIS WIVES, < AND WENT INTO A LAND AWAY FROM HIS BROTHER JACOB >. Immediately (one reads in Gen. 37:1): NOW JACOB DWELT < IN THE LAND >. Therefore, (according to Deut. 33:27, cont.): SO HE DROVE OUT THE ENEMY FROM BEFORE YOU. At that time (according to vs. 28): THUS ISRAEL DWELT SAFELY ALONE.

Another interpretation of “Blessed is the person” (Psalms 1:1) – This [relates to] that which is said in the verse: “Then King David came and sat before God [and he said, “What am I, Oh Sovereign God, and what is my family, that You have brought me thus far?” (2 Samuel 7:18). And so, Rabbi Chiya taught: “There is no sitting in the Temple courtyard except for the kings of the Davidic dynasty.” And Rabbi Ami said, in the name of Reish Lakish: “There is no sitting in the Temple courtyard except in the place designated for the kings of the Davidic dynasty.” And that’s why it says that, “David sat” (2 Samuel 7:18). Rav Huna said, in the name of Rabbi Yishmael, “Not so! There is no sitting above [in heaven], as it is stated, “I approached one of the [heavenly] attendants” (Daniel 7:16) [and the Aramaic word for “attendant” suggests that he was standing,] since [angels] do not have knees. As it is said, “Their legs were straight legs” (Ezekiel 1:7). And it is written, “Seraphs stood above him” (Isaiah 6:2). And it is written, “I will grant you walking among those who stand here” (Zechariah 3:7). Above there is no sitting, but David sits?!” Rabbi Ami said, “Even the kings of the house of David have no sitting. And what [does the verse mean when it says that] “he sat”? It means that he leaned himself.” And for whom was there sitting? You might suggest [that there was sitting for] the high priest. As it is said, “And Eli the priest sat upon a seat” (1 Samuel 1:9). If so [if there was only sitting for the high priest in the Tabernacle], what [does it mean when it says of David that] “he sat before the Lord” (2 Samuel 7:18)? It means that he placed himself in prayer [i.e., with such devotion that he could be described as dwelling/sitting within his prayer]. There [in 2 Samuel 7:18] we learn that the prohibition upon male Ammonite and Moabite [converts] is an eternal prohibition, but that their women are permitted [to convert] immediately: “Who am I, and who is my household, that you have brought me this far?” (2 Samuel 7:18). What is “this far”? Is it not enough that I [even managed] to come into the congregation [given my Moabite background], but that I became king? And “this far” [i.e., the Hebrew word הלום] refers only to a king, as it is said, “Behold the king comes” (1 Samuel 10:22) [and the word used for “king,” in that verse, is הלום איש]. “And this was yet small in Your eyes” (2 Samuel 7:19) — like a person who says to his fellow: “This is but a small thing in your presence.” “And You have spoken also of Your servant’s house for a great while to come” (2 Samuel 7:19) — [the fact that the future is described in terms of its being far away is an allusion to David’s feeling that] “I was far away [as a descendent of Moab], yet I have been brought near.” “And this is the Torah for mankind” (2 Samuel 7:19) — This is what you wrote in your Torah, “An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord” (Deuteronomy 23:4). You wrote only about the men, but their women are permitted immediately. And [in 2 Samuel 7:19] the Torah is not described as the Torah of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, but the Torah of mankind. And who is the most praiseworthy of the prophets, and who is the most praiseworthy of the kings? The most praiseworthy of the prophets is Moses. The most praiseworthy of the kings is David. Moses took the Israelites out of Egypt. And David took Israel [out from under] the subjugation of [various] kingdoms. Moses made war with Sihon and Og. And David fought the wars of the Holy One, blessed be He, as it is said “for the wars of God, my master has fought” (1 Samuel 25:28). Moses was king over Israel and Judah as it is said, “And he was king in Yeshurun” (Deuteronomy 23:5). And David ruled over Israel and Judah. Moses split the sea for [the Israelites]. And David split the rivers for them, as it says, “He fought against Aram Naharayim” [which can be creatively translated, given the etymology of the various words, to mean, “He split mighty rivers”] (Psalms 60:2). Moses built an altar. And David built an altar. This one brought sacrifices, and that one brought sacrifices. Moses gave them five books of the Torah, and to correspond to them, David gave them the book of Psalms which contains five books: [the one which starts with] “Blessed is the person” (Psalms 1:1); [the one which starts with] “For the leader” (Psalms 42:1); [the one which starts with] “A psalm of Asaph” (Psalms 73:1); [the one that starts with] “A prayer of Moses” (Psalms 90:1); [and the one that begins] “Let those who have been redeemed say” (Psalms 107:2). Moses blessed the Israelites with the word “אשריך - you are blessed” (Deuteronomy 33:29), and David blessed [them] with [the word] אשרי [which begins the book of Psalms in Psalms 1:1]. “All my words are just. None of them are perverse or crooked” (Proverbs 8:8). There is neither pedantry nor deviation within them. We find that Scripture deviates two or three letters rather than to utter an ugly thing. As it is said, “from the pure animal, and from the animal which isn’t pure” (Genesis 7:8). Rabbi Yudan ben Rabbi Menasia said, “even when [it describes the properties of unkosher animals, the Torah prefers] to start with the pure [attributes that it might have. For example, the Torah] doesn’t say, “the Camel [is unkosher], because it doesn’t have split hooves;” instead [it opens by telling us that despite the fact that it] “chews the cud” [it isn’t kosher, because it doesn’t have split hooves] (Leviticus 11:4). [Likewise, the Torah] doesn’t say, “And the pig [isn't kosher], because it doesn’t chew the cud;” instead [it opens by telling us that despite the fact that it] “has split hooves” [it isn’t kosher, because it doesn’t chew the cud] (Leviticus 11:7). David said, even the Holy One, blessed be He, has testified about me, and said: “God will search for a more like-hearted person” (1 Samuel 13:14). He likened his name to his creator. Just as his creator doesn’t utter anything unsightly, the same could be said of David. He could have said, “Cursed is the person who walks in the company of the wicked,” or “Blessed is the person that walks in the company of the righteous.” But he said, “[blessed is the person] who doesn’t walk..." (Psalms 1:1). You could say a similar thing, [given the following verse:] “[Even if] Moses and Samuel [were to] intercede [with me...]” (Jeremiah 15:1). You find that everything that is written about one [i.e. Moses] is written about the other [i.e. Samuel]. This one was a Levi, and that one was a Levi. This one built an altar and that one built an altar. This one brought sacrifices, and that one brought sacrifices. This one was king, and that one was king. And so, it is said, “a prophet from among your brethren will arise like me” (Deuteronomy 18:15). And thus, you find [what we’ve just seen in the book of] Jeremiah [that Moses and Samuel are compared]. That which is written about this one [i.e. Moses] is written about that one [i.e. Samuel]. And a similar thing could be said about David and Solomon. That which is written about this one is written about that one. Rabbi Yuden says that this Psalm [i.e., the first one] is more praiseworthy than all of the others.

(Ezek. 11, 16) Yet will I be to them as a minor sanctuary. R. Samuel b. Isaac said: "This refers to the houses of study that are in Babylon." R. Elazar said: "This refers to the house of our master who is in Babylon; i.e., Rab]." Raba lectured: What is the meaning of the passage (Ps. 90, 1) Lord, a place of refuge hast thou been unto us. That refers to the prayer- and learning-houses." Abayi said: "Formerly I used to learn at home, and pray at the house of Prayer; but since I heard what David said (Ps. 16, 6) Lord, I love the site of thy house, I began to study in the prayer-house also." In a Baraitha it was taught, R. Elazar ha-Kapar said: "The prayer - and learning - houses outside of the land of Israel will in the future be established in the land of Israel, as it is said (Jer. 46, 18) As Thabor is among the mountains, and as Carmel is by the sea, so shall He come, etc. Can this not be inferred through a fortiori conclusion? If Thabor and Carmel, at which only occasionally the Law was studied, are deemed within the land of Israel, how much more so will the prayer-houses and schools, at which the Law is studied, be established in the land of Israel?" Bar Kapara lectured: "What does this passage mean (Ps. 68, 17) Why watch ye enviously, ye many-peaked mountains? This means: A heavenly voice went forth and said to the mountains: 'Why should ye be jealous of Mount Sinai? Ye, all great mountains, are blemished in comparison with Sinai; for it is written Gabnunim in connection with mountains, and the same analogy of expression is used (Lev. 21, 20) A Giben (crook-backed) ." .From this," said Abaye, "we may infer that a man who is haughty is to be considered as blemished." (Fol. 31) R. Jochanan said: "Whenever you find in the Scripture a description of the greatness of the Holy One, praised be He! you find also a description of His modesty. This is written in the Pentateuch, repeated in the Prophets, and mentioned a third time in the Hagiographa. In the Pentateuch it is written (Deut. 10, 17) For the Lord your God is the God of gods, and the Lord of Lords; and immediately follows. Who executeth justice for the fatherless and the widow. It is repeated in the Prophets (Is. 57, 15) Thus hath said the High and Lofty One, who inhabiteth Eternity, whose name it Holy; and after this it is written: Yet also with the contrite and humble in spirit. The third time in Hagiographa (Ps. 68, 5) Extol him who rideth upon the heavens. The Everlasting is His name; and after this it is written: A father of the fatherless and the judge of the widows."